Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
#101
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
The Syclone, typhoon, Turbo Sunbird, the Quad 4 (that used $58), did not use A.I.R. Pumps...
#102
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
That is absolutely correct, as I had boost encoded $8D on the brain. Although he is running a piggyback on top of his stock prom, and the AIR code that I was referring to was located in there. Now the question is, being that I never ran $59 myself, is if $59 has no code to override the original AIR code, is the original AIR code still being applied...
IAC could be disabled, but I doubt that is causing any of the idle surge issues.
I tried for a long time to adjust many things I thought were causes of unstable idle, but in the end, it turned out to be injector voltage compensation, that needed to be adjusted. It wasn't up to my "perfect" status, because there was still a small wander every now and then, but it was more than acceptable.
fasteddi, have you bought an emulator yet? If you are trying to tune idle by chip burning, you will spend MONTHS tuning idle. Once i decided to adjust the injector voltage comp table(s), it literally took me about 20 minutes to get it acceptable, then about another 20 to fine tune it over the next few days. If I weer to try to do the same thing with chip burning, I'd still be working on it.
#103
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Yes the IAC is moving when it starts getting out of control.
It doesnt surge till the engine is warmed up.
Ive got about 22* of timing at idle and its ideling at 15 afr right now.
What OL joe?
Yea six im still burning chips though. I know its a slow process but It all im able to do ATM just because of cost.
It doesnt surge till the engine is warmed up.
Ive got about 22* of timing at idle and its ideling at 15 afr right now.
What OL joe?
Yea six im still burning chips though. I know its a slow process but It all im able to do ATM just because of cost.
#104
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
AFAIK, fasteddi is not running a piggy back, he's running just one ECM, which is running $59. No A.I.R. control to speak of...
#105
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by Street Lethal
He is claiming that something is pulling fuel periodically during idle every ten to fifteen seconds or so, and unless it is a mechanical issue which he may be overlooking, what else then AIR will pull fuel, rather, what else in the $59 code will pull fuel periodically in the manner in which he is describing?
#107
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
It feels like those pesky $58 idle problems all over again, chasing our tails trying to get it to idle correctly, blaming quasi, blaming injectors, blaming this, blaming that, etc. I brought up AIR because it is so damn coincidental that everyone running the '730 with $58/$59 has had a similar idle issue at one point or another, yet those who repin their '165 to run $59 seem to avoid those idle issues entirely for some reason. Invest in an EBL-P4 and call it a day...
#108
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
:facepalm:
I've been stating the solution for months, but no one wants to listen to some that is ACTUALLY using $59 and for the most part solved the hunting idle issue on my own car, along with a few other people solving their idle hunting issues the same way.
$59 has ZERO parameters for A.I.R. So I don't know why anyone would even consider that?
$59 seems to rely heavily on correct injector voltage compensation tables, especially at idle. I spent a couple years playing with a lot of other things, mechanical and tune, and finally followed some information I found on the $59 site and decided to adjust this table with great success.
I've been stating the solution for months, but no one wants to listen to some that is ACTUALLY using $59 and for the most part solved the hunting idle issue on my own car, along with a few other people solving their idle hunting issues the same way.
$59 has ZERO parameters for A.I.R. So I don't know why anyone would even consider that?
$59 seems to rely heavily on correct injector voltage compensation tables, especially at idle. I spent a couple years playing with a lot of other things, mechanical and tune, and finally followed some information I found on the $59 site and decided to adjust this table with great success.
#109
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
I've been stating the solution for months, but no one wants to listen to some that is ACTUALLY using $59 and for the most part solved the hunting idle issue on my own car, along with a few other people solving their idle hunting issues the same way...
The kid's been trying to tune this engine for a long time, running LC2 injectors, and now a new set from one of the sponsors, as well as two different turbo chargers. I will admit, I have never run $59, so your understanding of the code should definitely help him sort things out. Hopefully he listens this time, because I honestly thought he exhausted all advice already given, only to realize now that he hasn't yet...
#110
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
does the fan happen to be cycling when it starts to surge ?
fan coming on will cause a voltage drop , if so check voltage on the injector lines with a dvom and adjust injector dead time at that voltage
for the most part high-z injectors will be around 1.1-1.2ms around 13.5 volts , if it is the case jack the dead time around 1.3-1.4ms at 12-13.5 volts and see if it clears up
at 14v+ they should be no higher then 1.1-1.2
if u change the injector offset/dead time dont forget that u will need to retune the ve table
fan coming on will cause a voltage drop , if so check voltage on the injector lines with a dvom and adjust injector dead time at that voltage
for the most part high-z injectors will be around 1.1-1.2ms around 13.5 volts , if it is the case jack the dead time around 1.3-1.4ms at 12-13.5 volts and see if it clears up
at 14v+ they should be no higher then 1.1-1.2
if u change the injector offset/dead time dont forget that u will need to retune the ve table
#111
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by project89
does the fan happen to be cycling when it starts to surge ?
fan coming on will cause a voltage drop , if so check voltage on the injector lines with a dvom and adjust injector dead time at that voltage...
fan coming on will cause a voltage drop , if so check voltage on the injector lines with a dvom and adjust injector dead time at that voltage...
#112
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Another question for him to answer is at what temperature does the surge begin to take place. I am convinced now that I know why it is doing that with his application, but I will wait to see if he gets it resolved through adjusting the injector voltage compensation tables first...
im still thinking the ecm is going bad with the other issues he has intermitantly
personally id have given up on it by now and switched to ms and not deal with certain tables fighting each other , or tables that multiply other tables
i was close to switching to 59$ on my silverado sonce its already got the 7730 and tpi swap done , the mor ei look at the software and issues some ppl have ive decided not to
#113
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
The injector compensation tables need to be adjusted vs battery voltage, they are a 2D table, with more than 1 value, and in my experience, the values vary greatly from one cell to the next, which is based on an injector's response to voltage.
#114
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
11volt 1.6ms
12volt 1.4ms
13volt 1.2ms
etc
between 13-14.5 volt the injectors should be really close to 1.2/1.3ms
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Grand National
Engine: LZ9????
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 3.42
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Mark, OL=open loop, i was referring to the idle.
i datalog of the surging will help, ill be glad to take a look at it as well
i datalog of the surging will help, ill be glad to take a look at it as well
#116
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Here joe. I just tossed everything up here that i may have thought would help. Yea its open look. Always has been.
The (entire) link is every part of datalog avalible
Dave the fan doesnt cycle. I control that.
Last edited by fasteddi; 01-31-2013 at 03:40 PM.
#117
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Offset table from low to high volts. 9.6-16vts is the 1190
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
3295.94
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
F94 table is all set to 0.
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
7782.09
3295.94
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
1190.20
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
457.77
F94 table is all set to 0.
#118
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Im on the verge of just racing the gtp ive got for this spring. Sure is alot easier to tune IMO. Craps just flustrating.
Could I just unplug the IAC to eliminate it and see what happends? Or is that stupid. I also read this a minuet ago. On code59
"My bet is that there's *something* happening in the data when that 16afr+ happens durring the surge every so often- either IAC opens, there's a change in airtemp, or something. If the PW delivered doesn't change when the 16 AFR happens, that would mean that either FP is dropping or it's getting a slug of air someplace.
I do see this sometimes when the mid-kpa in the 400-800 RPM areas isn't right - IAC tries to pull the RPM down, goes a bit too far into the 400 range, gets a big slug of fuel, IAC tries to pull back up, and over corrects, cycle repeats"
My injector pulse width really doesnt change now that i look at the data but the Injec DC does but mabey thats because im running such large injectors.
Last edited by fasteddi; 01-31-2013 at 03:53 PM.
#119
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
The issue with the idle appears to be the spark advance (SA) table values. As the idle speed drops so does the SA, which causes the idle speed to drop further. As this occurs the IAC is opening which ends up making the idle RPM overshoot.
The SA table needs to have the areas of idle worked on. Need more SA at the lower RPM & higher MAP so that as the RPM drops the SA props up the engine speed. I would zero out the idle SA compensation tables.
Then level out and add SA at the lower RPMs. Then if the idle rolls add some back into the idle SA compensation until that stops.
Take a look at line # 534 in the data log. This is where the RPM dropped to 525. Leading up to that point, at line # 520, the RPM is at 925 with the SA at 31* BTDC. For idle that is too high as it makes the idle difficult to control, it wants to float upward.
Then as the ECM has closed the IAC, the idle speed starts to drop. And as it does so does the SA, until at 525 RPM it is at 19*BTDC. At which time the IAC is being rapidly opened to try and maintain the idle speed.
Which causes the RPM to increase along with the SA. A double whammy that causes the idle RPM to go too far upward. And the cycle repeats.
Work on leveling out the SA and even adding some at the lower RPM, higher load areas. Use the data log to see which area the engine is idling in, by both RPM & MAP KPa.
RBob.
The SA table needs to have the areas of idle worked on. Need more SA at the lower RPM & higher MAP so that as the RPM drops the SA props up the engine speed. I would zero out the idle SA compensation tables.
Then level out and add SA at the lower RPMs. Then if the idle rolls add some back into the idle SA compensation until that stops.
Take a look at line # 534 in the data log. This is where the RPM dropped to 525. Leading up to that point, at line # 520, the RPM is at 925 with the SA at 31* BTDC. For idle that is too high as it makes the idle difficult to control, it wants to float upward.
Then as the ECM has closed the IAC, the idle speed starts to drop. And as it does so does the SA, until at 525 RPM it is at 19*BTDC. At which time the IAC is being rapidly opened to try and maintain the idle speed.
Which causes the RPM to increase along with the SA. A double whammy that causes the idle RPM to go too far upward. And the cycle repeats.
Work on leveling out the SA and even adding some at the lower RPM, higher load areas. Use the data log to see which area the engine is idling in, by both RPM & MAP KPa.
RBob.
#120
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Ok Rbob. I worked the tables a tad but no sucess yet. I disabled the spark compinsation and didnt see any effect at all.
Before I saw your post I disconnected the IAC and no difference. So I tossed a different IAC I had(new one) and did the relearn... no difference.
So Ill Keep working those SA tables tommorow after work and see if I can start to fix the issue. Thanks again Rbob.
Heres a video. Gives you a good idea of how long between surges.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQhwv...ature=youtu.be
Before I saw your post I disconnected the IAC and no difference. So I tossed a different IAC I had(new one) and did the relearn... no difference.
So Ill Keep working those SA tables tommorow after work and see if I can start to fix the issue. Thanks again Rbob.
Heres a video. Gives you a good idea of how long between surges.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQhwv...ature=youtu.be
#121
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
The issue with the idle appears to be the spark advance (SA) table values. As the idle speed drops so does the SA, which causes the idle speed to drop further. As this occurs the IAC is opening which ends up making the idle RPM overshoot.
The SA table needs to have the areas of idle worked on. Need more SA at the lower RPM & higher MAP so that as the RPM drops the SA props up the engine speed. I would zero out the idle SA compensation tables.
Then level out and add SA at the lower RPMs. Then if the idle rolls add some back into the idle SA compensation until that stops.
Take a look at line # 534 in the data log. This is where the RPM dropped to 525. Leading up to that point, at line # 520, the RPM is at 925 with the SA at 31* BTDC. For idle that is too high as it makes the idle difficult to control, it wants to float upward.
Then as the ECM has closed the IAC, the idle speed starts to drop. And as it does so does the SA, until at 525 RPM it is at 19*BTDC. At which time the IAC is being rapidly opened to try and maintain the idle speed.
Which causes the RPM to increase along with the SA. A double whammy that causes the idle RPM to go too far upward. And the cycle repeats.
Work on leveling out the SA and even adding some at the lower RPM, higher load areas. Use the data log to see which area the engine is idling in, by both RPM & MAP KPa.
RBob.
The SA table needs to have the areas of idle worked on. Need more SA at the lower RPM & higher MAP so that as the RPM drops the SA props up the engine speed. I would zero out the idle SA compensation tables.
Then level out and add SA at the lower RPMs. Then if the idle rolls add some back into the idle SA compensation until that stops.
Take a look at line # 534 in the data log. This is where the RPM dropped to 525. Leading up to that point, at line # 520, the RPM is at 925 with the SA at 31* BTDC. For idle that is too high as it makes the idle difficult to control, it wants to float upward.
Then as the ECM has closed the IAC, the idle speed starts to drop. And as it does so does the SA, until at 525 RPM it is at 19*BTDC. At which time the IAC is being rapidly opened to try and maintain the idle speed.
Which causes the RPM to increase along with the SA. A double whammy that causes the idle RPM to go too far upward. And the cycle repeats.
Work on leveling out the SA and even adding some at the lower RPM, higher load areas. Use the data log to see which area the engine is idling in, by both RPM & MAP KPa.
RBob.
I had a bin set at one point that would not cause SA to change, other than when it absolutely needed to, meaning throttle opening or while I was actually driving.
I could not get any adjustments to SA to have any effect on the idle hunting.
Just to remind everyone that uses $59, the idle cells are the 400 RPM row in the F1 table, regardless of what actual RPM is, or where the bubble is floating around, the 400 RPM row is what controls idle SA.
Only setting the injector compensation table while it was running using an emulator did the trick for me.
It seemed that the SA only changed because the stall saver was coming in, once I got the idle stable, the SA hardly changes at idle now, with SA settings as they were when I had the idle hunting.
2D table, meaning there is an X and a Y value. In this case X = volts, and Y = mSEC.
Your table is meaningless without having the volts variable to go with them. Yes, I could transpose the numbers into a table on my PC, but it would be better to have them in the post.
Just at a quick glance it looks like you WAY over compensating though, adding a ton of PW, which will cause the engine to drown, stumble, try to save itself (open IAC that will lean out the mixture), at the same time voltage is reducing (via the alternator slowing down), which will want to add even more fuel, making the problem worse, and cyclic.
Just as a comparison, I have max values of 946 mSEC, and min value of 518 mSEC, quite a bit less delta than you have. Your injectors will likely be different, but having a delta of over 7324.32 mSEC is a lot, that's 7.3 seconds of PW difference between min and max cells. Compare that to what I'm running which has a delta of 427.25 mSEC, that's less than half a second delta, so very small changes in PW, in stock calibrations the delta is even less.
The idea is to keep the fuel delivery the same at all supply voltages, not use the table to compensate for something else. Once you can get the fuel delivery the same at all supply voltages, the engine will run smoother.
Southbay told you to set 1.2 what? 1.2 bananas? 1.2 seconds? 1.2 ft/lbs? 1.2 what? What is meant by "running volts"?
Are you running low-Z injectors? If you are that's another issue. the '7730 in stock form does not like to run low-Z injectors and requires internal modifications to run them properly. It's also recommended to use a '7749 instead due to it's dual injector drivers.
#122
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Tthere not low z injectors. Southbay set to 1.2 ms for vts from 12.5-14.6 vts.
#123
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
What they told you doesn't sound very helpful. Since there is a curve of Volts vs opening time that is needed to set the table correctly. this curve is what compensates for different supply voltages, and helps maintain consistent fuel supply at the varying voltages that the injector will see.
#124
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
I have 1190Usec(microsecond) in my table which equals 1.2 Ms(milisecond). How is that 1.2 seconds???
Would the F28 table ever cause this issue? Mines at 98 but my f29x is not even close to being maxed and my f77 is a tad over 1.00 on all cells(.84 on cell for 84kpa and under).
Would the F28 table ever cause this issue? Mines at 98 but my f29x is not even close to being maxed and my f77 is a tad over 1.00 on all cells(.84 on cell for 84kpa and under).
Last edited by fasteddi; 01-31-2013 at 07:06 PM.
#125
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Micro is represented by a lower case U (u), since it's the closest thing to the proper symbol we have, without a Greek lettered keyboard.
If it is supposed to be micro (u), then the documentation has been ****ed up from the start.
Many tables in $59 use the m-prefix, and are milli.
Regardless of the magnitude, you're not using the table correctly and you will continue to experience problems with how you have it set.
Keep doing what you're doing, keep struggling or listen to people who have experience with the code and have solved the issues you are having, it's your choice.
If it is supposed to be micro (u), then the documentation has been ****ed up from the start.
Many tables in $59 use the m-prefix, and are milli.
Regardless of the magnitude, you're not using the table correctly and you will continue to experience problems with how you have it set.
Keep doing what you're doing, keep struggling or listen to people who have experience with the code and have solved the issues you are having, it's your choice.
Last edited by Six_Shooter; 01-31-2013 at 07:20 PM.
#126
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
My offset table has your greek lower case u micro. Not mS like some of the other talbles on $59 have.
I know what mS and uS are in these tables. I will continue to struggle then as your last post is about the dumbest thing Ive heard. I know what the difference between mS and uS is. I just stated that southbay said use 1.2mS since I can do the conversion to uS as from what Ive seen more then some use mS insted of uS.
Ill play with the table more, but as far as im concerned this is why i stayed away from the V6 forum. I know this table isnt perfect but then explain to my why this is now a issue. That table has always been locked to a set value since day one and I didnt have any issues then... enlighten me please.
This question is probly the last ill ask. But how small are the passages for the IAC? Im sure thats a dumb question and ill get bashed on that but if anyone can just give me a idea since ive never seen in there before. The reason I ask is because youd be amazed on how gunked up that IAC was. That alky is like glue in there catching all the crap and turning into thick gooo.
But ill check the post but as far as im concerned im done with this forum. Ive had enough of my threads get locked in the past and ppl aruing because they have a fixed idea on things. I know Ive got some issues that need to be attended to on the car. I just wanted to not chase my tail as I always do. One guy says this the other that and the other that. Then everyone says im a total idiot. Since that may be im no use for this anymore.
.
I know what mS and uS are in these tables. I will continue to struggle then as your last post is about the dumbest thing Ive heard. I know what the difference between mS and uS is. I just stated that southbay said use 1.2mS since I can do the conversion to uS as from what Ive seen more then some use mS insted of uS.
Ill play with the table more, but as far as im concerned this is why i stayed away from the V6 forum. I know this table isnt perfect but then explain to my why this is now a issue. That table has always been locked to a set value since day one and I didnt have any issues then... enlighten me please.
This question is probly the last ill ask. But how small are the passages for the IAC? Im sure thats a dumb question and ill get bashed on that but if anyone can just give me a idea since ive never seen in there before. The reason I ask is because youd be amazed on how gunked up that IAC was. That alky is like glue in there catching all the crap and turning into thick gooo.
But ill check the post but as far as im concerned im done with this forum. Ive had enough of my threads get locked in the past and ppl aruing because they have a fixed idea on things. I know Ive got some issues that need to be attended to on the car. I just wanted to not chase my tail as I always do. One guy says this the other that and the other that. Then everyone says im a total idiot. Since that may be im no use for this anymore.
.
#127
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by fasteddi
But ill check the post but as far as im concerned im done with this forum. Ive had enough of my threads get locked in the past and ppl aruing because they have a fixed idea on things. I know Ive got some issues that need to be attended to on the car. I just wanted to not chase my tail as I always do. One guy says this the other that and the other that. Then everyone says im a total idiot. Since that may be im no use for this anymore...
- Rob
#128
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Ok Rbob. I worked the tables a tad but no sucess yet. I disabled the spark compinsation and didnt see any effect at all.
Before I saw your post I disconnected the IAC and no difference. So I tossed a different IAC I had(new one) and did the relearn... no difference.
So Ill Keep working those SA tables tommorow after work and see if I can start to fix the issue. Thanks again Rbob.
Heres a video. Gives you a good idea of how long between surges.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQhwv...ature=youtu.be
Before I saw your post I disconnected the IAC and no difference. So I tossed a different IAC I had(new one) and did the relearn... no difference.
So Ill Keep working those SA tables tommorow after work and see if I can start to fix the issue. Thanks again Rbob.
Heres a video. Gives you a good idea of how long between surges.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQhwv...ature=youtu.be
I wonder if there is a small vacuum leak, that too can cause a surge. I was going to suggest pressurizing the TB, but need to pull the rockers to do that. Maybe some smoke blown into the TB would work.
As there may be more than one item causing the surge, I studied the data log a bit more. It is going lean as the RPM drops. That can cause the RPM to surge upward.
Work on the closed throttle VE table, it will likely be the area before the WB reports it going lean (transport delay).
I don't see a 700 RPM row in that table (would be nice), so work with the 600 & 800 RPM rows in the areas of 50 through 70 KPa.
RBob.
#129
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by RBob
I wonder if there is a small vacuum leak, that too can cause a surge. I was going to suggest pressurizing the TB, but need to pull the rockers to do that. Maybe some smoke blown into the TB would work...
#130
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Vacuum leaks are a funny thing. As the manifold pressure increases the volume of the leak decreases. On a SD set up a vacuum leak in or before the plenum area rarely causes the engine to go lean. It can lean a cylinder if the leak is down at the lower intake.
One thing I've learned is to not discount anything until it is a proven.
From what I've seen the frustration appears to be mostly with one individual.
Looking at the data log the vehicle voltage is rather steady, at 13.5 to 13.8 volts. And only dips down when the RPM drops down.
There is something else going on here. One other oddity is the reported SA. Look at the data log, lines (Excel line #), 710 through 720, and note the SA, it is jumping all over the place.
It doesn't appear as it would be from idle compensation SA either. I'm beginning to wonder about the $59 code.
RBob.
One thing I've learned is to not discount anything until it is a proven.
From what I've seen the frustration appears to be mostly with one individual.
Looking at the data log the vehicle voltage is rather steady, at 13.5 to 13.8 volts. And only dips down when the RPM drops down.
There is something else going on here. One other oddity is the reported SA. Look at the data log, lines (Excel line #), 710 through 720, and note the SA, it is jumping all over the place.
It doesn't appear as it would be from idle compensation SA either. I'm beginning to wonder about the $59 code.
RBob.
#131
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Vacuum leaks are a funny thing. As the manifold pressure increases the volume of the leak decreases. On a SD set up a vacuum leak in or before the plenum area rarely causes the engine to go lean. It can lean a cylinder if the leak is down at the lower intake.
One thing I've learned is to not discount anything until it is a proven.
From what I've seen the frustration appears to be mostly with one individual.
Looking at the data log the vehicle voltage is rather steady, at 13.5 to 13.8 volts. And only dips down when the RPM drops down.
There is something else going on here. One other oddity is the reported SA. Look at the data log, lines (Excel line #), 710 through 720, and note the SA, it is jumping all over the place.
It doesn't appear as it would be from idle compensation SA either. I'm beginning to wonder about the $59 code.
RBob.
One thing I've learned is to not discount anything until it is a proven.
From what I've seen the frustration appears to be mostly with one individual.
Looking at the data log the vehicle voltage is rather steady, at 13.5 to 13.8 volts. And only dips down when the RPM drops down.
There is something else going on here. One other oddity is the reported SA. Look at the data log, lines (Excel line #), 710 through 720, and note the SA, it is jumping all over the place.
It doesn't appear as it would be from idle compensation SA either. I'm beginning to wonder about the $59 code.
RBob.
but since u owuld know best how well would the ebl work in his application, what advantages would it have or disadvantages over 59$.
what would it cost him to make the switch?
maybe some screen shots of the tunning software
does ebl have launch control/boost control/fan control etc
im a firm believer of it dont matter how good the ecm is when u want to tune it and that the software and layout along with the code running on it makes all the difference
fast if u ever decide u want to get away form the 59$ and go ms let me know if u cant solder i would assemble a kit for u free of charge, and flash it with a base tune just to get u up and running
#132
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
I was fooling around with Megasquirt for the last few months while assembling parts for my next build. I just sold my Bullseye Turbo, PTC converter, and I gave the Megasquirt back to my cousin because it was his to begin with, but I kept the android tablet. It did fine for what it is, but I am making the switch to the EBL-P4 myself, just going over the knock filter issue. I think Mark should go with the EBL, and if he can't at the moment, at least try another code, preferably $8F, just to see if it makes any difference. Spring will be here soon enough, and he needs to be prepping for his launch, not chasing surging issues. We've all been there, and its a pain in the freaking @ss...
#133
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
I was fooling around with Megasquirt for the last few months while assembling parts for my next build. I just sold my Bullseye Turbo, PTC converter, and I gave the Megasquirt back to my cousin because it was his to begin with, but I kept the android tablet. It did fine for what it is, but I am making the switch to the EBL-P4 myself, just going over the knock filter issue. I think Mark should go with the EBL, and if he can't at the moment, at least try another code, preferably $8F, just to see if it makes any difference. Spring will be here soon enough, and he needs to be prepping for his launch, not chasing surging issues. We've all been there, and its a pain in the freaking @ss...
the tables suck the layout sucks its one big cluster****
maybe ive just been spoiled with cleanly labeled tables that do exactly what they say they do all this time
rob rember my first ms install that u helped with.
what did it take us 2-3 hours to wire the car and get it running and driving?alebit it wasnt anywere near perfectly tuned but u could have driven the car anywere after that short period of time
and neither of us had prior ms experiance before that
#134
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by project89
rob rember my first ms install that u helped with.
what did it take us 2-3 hours to wire the car and get it running and driving?
what did it take us 2-3 hours to wire the car and get it running and driving?
#135
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
yeah we did piggy back at first, but full control would have only been an extra 3 wires for connections so maybe another 30 minutes to install ( the 3 wires to the 4 pin connector on the distributor )
#136
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
rbob the ebl is held in pretty high by ppl saying how easy it works and how great it works, since ive never used it myself i cant comment.
but since u owuld know best how well would the ebl work in his application, what advantages would it have or disadvantages over 59$.
what would it cost him to make the switch?
maybe some screen shots of the tunning software
does ebl have launch control/boost control/fan control etc
im a firm believer of it dont matter how good the ecm is when u want to tune it and that the software and layout along with the code running on it makes all the difference
fast if u ever decide u want to get away form the 59$ and go ms let me know if u cant solder i would assemble a kit for u free of charge, and flash it with a base tune just to get u up and running
but since u owuld know best how well would the ebl work in his application, what advantages would it have or disadvantages over 59$.
what would it cost him to make the switch?
maybe some screen shots of the tunning software
does ebl have launch control/boost control/fan control etc
im a firm believer of it dont matter how good the ecm is when u want to tune it and that the software and layout along with the code running on it makes all the difference
fast if u ever decide u want to get away form the 59$ and go ms let me know if u cant solder i would assemble a kit for u free of charge, and flash it with a base tune just to get u up and running
The best way to go would be the EBL SFI-6, which has even more features over the EBL P4, and is specifically designed for high power turbo or supercharged 6-cylinder engines.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/EBL_SFI6_Flash.php
He would need to add a cam sensor and four more injector wires as it is a sequential injection ECM. But it would be well worth it.
> maybe some screen shots of the tuning software
All calibration (BIN) changes are done via Tuner Pro, everything else is done via the What's Up Display (WUD). Although one can use Excel for a more detailed look at things. Web site has a bunch of screen shots and explanations of the WUD.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/EBL_ScreenShots.php
http://www.dynamicefi.com/EBL_P4_ScreenShots.php
> does ebl have launch control/boost control/fan control etc
No launch or boost control. We worked on the boost control but found it difficult to model as live tests showed no real control. So that code is disabled. We use the RJC boost control valve and find that it works darn near perfect. And very few customers wanted boost control via an electrical solenoid.
Fan control is for either low/high fan, or dual fans.
The SFI-6 system also has alky injection control, the P4 system does not. Both are fully emissions complaint if that is required. Both have oil temperature sensor capability.
The EBL P4 uses the '7730 ECM, so that is the easiest way to go. But is batch fire, although it does go single fire for small PW's. None of the quasi-async stuff.
http://www.dynamicefi.com/EBL_P4_Flash.php
Of course all are fully documented with support. And the data logging, also supplied with a USB interface... Flashing in a new tune takes all of but 4 - 5 seconds.
Oh, and can data log up to 8 devices, such as fuel pressure sensors, WB set ups (can also be used for auto VE Learn), g-meters or whatever (0 - 5 devices).
I could go on forever, the EBL SFI-6 system has the ability to reduce spark advance via MPH or by which gear the transmission is in (with 3rd and 4th gear switches).
OK, time to stop... Please check out our web site, there is a bunch of good info there.
RBob.
#137
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Was very close to installing an LC2 in the GTA, in which of course I would have went straight with the SFI-6, but in keeping the turbo 305 I need to go with the EBL-P4. When and if I get my hands on another TTA though it will be SFI-6 all the way. Dave, I'm starting another build thread soon, and I will document the EBL-P4 conversion. The cam I am going with is pretty big one, although overlap is still kept in check, but the EBL will essentially laugh at it...
#138
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Spark tables are high resolution and full size up to 6,400 RPM
what happens when u exced this limit ?
thats off the p4 systems page
the sfi-6 would be a lil hard to implement without a 3.4L engine as those are the only ones with a cam sensor, on a 2.8/3.1 it would require a 3.4 cam core and the 3.4 timing cover and oilpan
does the standard ebl not work with the 7730? i might be interested int hat system for my truck as it would run me roughly the same price for a megasquirt system , well the ms would be a lil cheaper
what happens when u exced this limit ?
thats off the p4 systems page
the sfi-6 would be a lil hard to implement without a 3.4L engine as those are the only ones with a cam sensor, on a 2.8/3.1 it would require a 3.4 cam core and the 3.4 timing cover and oilpan
does the standard ebl not work with the 7730? i might be interested int hat system for my truck as it would run me roughly the same price for a megasquirt system , well the ms would be a lil cheaper
#139
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
There is much more to be gained by having fueling tables that go to 8,000 RPM.
With the 4-injector upgrade can run a 4-bbl TBI set up. Or with that and the Port Mod, a 8-cylinder MPFI set up with low impedance injectors.
Then the EBL P4 system for those using the '7730 or '7749 ECM. This can be used on a single 1-bbl TBI, or a 4, 6, or 8 cylinder batch fire MPFI set up. Even have a guy looking at it to run a 5.5 HP Honda engine (yes, it should work).
The EBL SFI-6 is based on a GM 6-cylinder SFI ECM. So it has 6 injector drivers instead of the one or two that the EBL P4 system handles. In addition has more hardware to handle the individual injector control. Yes, there are individual injector trims in that calibration.
The GM hardware varies to match the capability that is required. So we have the code set up for the various hardware. Which has different amounts of RAM, and different hardware for the various capabilities.
RBob.
#140
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
just wanted to make sure that the timing wouldnt freak out above 6,400 in case of the turbo 60* engine these things are well capable of spinning to 8-8,500 rpms. i have personally spun mine to 8,300 on a few occasions , but try to keep it around 7,600 as power does start to fall off with my current cam (268/272) something more along of the lines of 276/280 would let me spin a lil higher
thats what i figured my silverado was originally tbi but it has a 7730 and tpi swap
soon its getting twin turbos id love to try out the ebl as like i said alot of ppl here hold it in very high regard. the problem is i can get a ms system for less and i know that system inside and out
thats why i asked if the reg ebl flash being much cheaper would run on the 7730 that system is much much closer to the ms system price so i wouldnt hesitate to try it
thats what i figured my silverado was originally tbi but it has a 7730 and tpi swap
soon its getting twin turbos id love to try out the ebl as like i said alot of ppl here hold it in very high regard. the problem is i can get a ms system for less and i know that system inside and out
thats why i asked if the reg ebl flash being much cheaper would run on the 7730 that system is much much closer to the ms system price so i wouldnt hesitate to try it
Last edited by project89; 02-02-2013 at 02:05 AM.
#142
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
lmao i pm'ed fast when i first hijacked it and said i was sorry for the hijack , i think fast is pretty damn near done with this thread anyway
hopefully he reads some of this and maybe just maybe makes a decesion to move away form code 59 wether it me an ebl or ms or another system that works properly
hopefully he reads some of this and maybe just maybe makes a decesion to move away form code 59 wether it me an ebl or ms or another system that works properly
#143
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Originally Posted by project89
lmao i pm'ed fast when i first hijacked it and said i was sorry for the hijack , i think fast is pretty damn near done with this thread anyway
hopefully he reads some of this and maybe just maybe makes a decesion to move away form code 59 wether it me an ebl or ms or another system that works properly
hopefully he reads some of this and maybe just maybe makes a decesion to move away form code 59 wether it me an ebl or ms or another system that works properly
#144
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Im just flustrated. You guys should know who flustrates me on here. Its not this thread that irritates me but the whole v6 forum. Since im not a very smart person when it comes to this stuff, im thinking that im a better assest to this forum to just read what others write rather then open my mouth anymore. I think what flustrates me the most though is how little I know about tuning....
Ill give the 8f a shot on sunday. It only a few files i need to gather and I dont need to repin the wategate ATM. Im keeping the boost low. The wategate is holding me at 10psi quite well right now and thats a good spot for me to be at. Im almost certain that im going to have massive boost spiking at WOT if I let that boost contoler do its work and jack the boost. That 38mm wategate just isnt in the right spot anymore for that turbo. Im having a +2 psi spike now. So untill I weld in the WG in a better spot the boost is staying where its at. Ill read up some more about 8f also. Im not sure if theres a good hack for the WB off hand but ill search for one. Also I do remember repinning something else too. I think it was the VSS but to be honest that was a year ago and I cant remember. Also I "thought" that 8f was for dis systems. I would really just like to load a different mask and see if it idles right. That could help me eliminate some issues and then go from there. 8f to my knowledge doesnt have much support for hacked adx's but the bin file itself seems to resemble the $88 I started with a year and some change ago. I also have a 3bar map which im unsure will work with 8f. But that mask is all new to me and im reading my best to catch up on the basics of that mask.
I know you guys help me and im grateful for that. My appoligies for me coming off the wrong way.
Ill give the 8f a shot on sunday. It only a few files i need to gather and I dont need to repin the wategate ATM. Im keeping the boost low. The wategate is holding me at 10psi quite well right now and thats a good spot for me to be at. Im almost certain that im going to have massive boost spiking at WOT if I let that boost contoler do its work and jack the boost. That 38mm wategate just isnt in the right spot anymore for that turbo. Im having a +2 psi spike now. So untill I weld in the WG in a better spot the boost is staying where its at. Ill read up some more about 8f also. Im not sure if theres a good hack for the WB off hand but ill search for one. Also I do remember repinning something else too. I think it was the VSS but to be honest that was a year ago and I cant remember. Also I "thought" that 8f was for dis systems. I would really just like to load a different mask and see if it idles right. That could help me eliminate some issues and then go from there. 8f to my knowledge doesnt have much support for hacked adx's but the bin file itself seems to resemble the $88 I started with a year and some change ago. I also have a 3bar map which im unsure will work with 8f. But that mask is all new to me and im reading my best to catch up on the basics of that mask.
I know you guys help me and im grateful for that. My appoligies for me coming off the wrong way.
Last edited by fasteddi; 02-02-2013 at 07:41 AM.
#145
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
With $8F need to use a 2-bar MAP. Being DIS, need to change three parameters for it to work with a distributor.
I'm still on my first cup of coffee, but looking at the code, it appears that it is just two parameters. GM changed something from what I'm used to seeing. These two:
Just set them the same as when using a distributor. Can also open the EST/BYPASS so that the spark advance runs same as limp mode.
RBob.
I'm still on my first cup of coffee, but looking at the code, it appears that it is just two parameters. GM changed something from what I'm used to seeing. These two:
Code:
801D FFE4 65508 -10 DEG SPARK MAX ADVANCE REL TO REF (2?S COMPL) 801F FF39 65337 -70 DEG SPARK MAX RETARD REL TO REF (2?S COMPL)
RBob.
#146
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
It was likely the TCC that you had to re-pin. Between $88 & $58/$59 it is on a different pin.
RBob.
RBob.
#147
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Also Mark, don't be deterred with the 2-Bar setting. Dial the engine in with what you have using $8F, and you will see a tremendous difference, as well as why resolution is so very important. By the time you reach 15-psi, you should have your tune perfected, and if you need more than 15-psi it is as simple as adding two code references for a 2-Bar to 3-Bar Flag, keeping your VE where it needs to be, when it needs to be, so there is no need to kludge any numbers. When you understand this, you will then see why SFI-6 is undoubtedly the best ECM out there, because you automatically get that in Flash form, and it would be worth the addition of the 3.4 pan and timing cover if you ever went that route. But I digress. As for the lack of $8F support, remember what I said in the other post, people come to Bob because he is the source for all their support, and he is all the support you will ever need...
#148
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
If I burn off a chip for the correct changes needed, Will the mask/ecm understand the 3 bar map sensor for idle kpas? I would like to see if the idle is affected in a positive way? I also have a 1 bar(stocker) The main reason is because we have about 3inches of fresh snow on the ground today so theres no driving that ill be doing. I just would like to tinker with the idle on a new mask. Thanks again so much.
Last edited by fasteddi; 02-02-2013 at 02:12 PM.
#150
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 6,274
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
19 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: BBC 509 Merlin ii 9.6:1 pump gas
Transmission: ATI pro th350 sfi case. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
re: Fasteddis Turbo 3.1/3100 Hybrid
Is that a must, to change back if I try to start and log the new mask?