True Dual question
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
True Dual question
does anyone know what year 3rd gen came with "true duals"? I know that one of them did, but I can't remember which one, it was one of the V8's and it was only a single model. Also, where was the O2 sensor? Was it in the H-pipe? Just curious if anyone knows.
#2
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Nevermind the year that it was available. I found that it was an option on 89's with the G92 option. It's RPO was N10. Now the question of finding out where the O2 sensor is...
The option was true duals with 2 cats, so there has to be an O2 sensor somewhere. If you know, please hook me up with the info.
The option was true duals with 2 cats, so there has to be an O2 sensor somewhere. If you know, please hook me up with the info.
#3
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Shelby Twp., MI
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28 / 91 Trans Am
Engine: LS1 / 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.09 / 2.73
third gens never came with true duals. late model tuned port performance package cars had dual cats but single exhaust after. 1982 cars had single exhaust but split to dual mufflers
#5
The 5.0L stangs came with true dual. The left & right exhaust manifolds had their own pipes, cat., & mufflers.
The 4.6L stangs exhaust setup was similar to Camaros.
Akshay
The 4.6L stangs exhaust setup was similar to Camaros.
Akshay
#6
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Shelby Twp., MI
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28 / 91 Trans Am
Engine: LS1 / 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.09 / 2.73
4.6 mustangs have the same style setup as their 5.0 l mustangs it is not like a camaro at all.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
A camaro and a mustang both have 4 wheels and oddly enough in a similar configuration pointing all the same way. Round too.
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
How in the Fu(k could an fbody have true duals.
there is no space for that.
there is no space for that.
#10
By saying a 4.6L Mustang exhaust having similar setup as a Camaro's exhaust, I meant both used a Y-pipe. But I guess I was wrong.
I know the 5.0L stang uses an H-pipe. But I didn't know the 4.6L used it too.
Back to 2_point8_boy questions. Depending on smog regulations, you can have the dual cat. setup installed on your car and fabricate a place for the o2 sensor on the Y-pipe. GM claims a 15-25hp gain (iroc/z28 model).
And get this, GM says that a dual exhaust setup for the Trailblazer is good for 30 extra horses.
Akshay
I know the 5.0L stang uses an H-pipe. But I didn't know the 4.6L used it too.
Back to 2_point8_boy questions. Depending on smog regulations, you can have the dual cat. setup installed on your car and fabricate a place for the o2 sensor on the Y-pipe. GM claims a 15-25hp gain (iroc/z28 model).
And get this, GM says that a dual exhaust setup for the Trailblazer is good for 30 extra horses.
Akshay
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by Akshay
And get this, GM says that a dual exhaust setup for the Trailblazer is good for 30 extra horses.
Akshay
And get this, GM says that a dual exhaust setup for the Trailblazer is good for 30 extra horses.
Akshay
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
My old car was a 98 mustang gt, it had dual exhaust all the way back with 4 resonators , two cats and two mufflers. NOTHING like a camaro or firebird And btw WHO CARES? this is a 3rd gen camaro and firebird site........
Last edited by br()bert; 02-13-2004 at 09:50 PM.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by br()bert
My old car was a 98 mustang gt, it had dual exhaust all the way back with 4 resonators , two cats and two mufflers. NOTHING like a camaro or firebird And btw WHO CARES? this is a 3rd gen camaro and firebird site........
My old car was a 98 mustang gt, it had dual exhaust all the way back with 4 resonators , two cats and two mufflers. NOTHING like a camaro or firebird And btw WHO CARES? this is a 3rd gen camaro and firebird site........
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally posted by bes217
They called the RPO N10 dual exhaust, but really what it was was dual catalytic converters that went into a single pipe after the cat.
They called the RPO N10 dual exhaust, but really what it was was dual catalytic converters that went into a single pipe after the cat.
What I am actually looking into is an X-Pipe before the cats, with the O2 mounted in the X, then it splits again into the duals. I have heard really good things about this "X" design.
Last edited by 2_point8_boy; 02-14-2004 at 10:29 PM.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Originally posted by Kj Rockz
How in the Fu(k could an fbody have true duals.
there is no space for that.
How in the Fu(k could an fbody have true duals.
there is no space for that.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
ok... the only thing "dual" was the cat converters.
On the 60's EARLY 70's yes... since? forget it from the factory.
There is room to run true duals, believe it or not. You just run oval pipes. Seen it done many times.
is there a gain? not really, unless you are a big V8, and I mean bigger than 383, or running a S/C.
For the V6? forget it. Not enough exhaust flow. Your Trq will fall through the floor pan to next to nothing. A High flow cat alone costs you Trq, but you do gain minimal Hp.
As far as I know, all but the I4, V6 mustangs from the 70's on were all true dual. But the exhaust for the most part was designed by Flowmaster since the mid 80's. They know their shiznit.
On the 60's EARLY 70's yes... since? forget it from the factory.
There is room to run true duals, believe it or not. You just run oval pipes. Seen it done many times.
is there a gain? not really, unless you are a big V8, and I mean bigger than 383, or running a S/C.
For the V6? forget it. Not enough exhaust flow. Your Trq will fall through the floor pan to next to nothing. A High flow cat alone costs you Trq, but you do gain minimal Hp.
As far as I know, all but the I4, V6 mustangs from the 70's on were all true dual. But the exhaust for the most part was designed by Flowmaster since the mid 80's. They know their shiznit.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by 88IROC350TPI
wrong
wrong
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by Kj Rockz
well hw is it done then?
well hw is it done then?
I'm not that stupid
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally posted by Kj Rockz
see no asnswer, well if you speak of sumptin i expect you to be able to poove it. I mean i'm not going to just take your word for it.
I'm not that stupid
see no asnswer, well if you speak of sumptin i expect you to be able to poove it. I mean i'm not going to just take your word for it.
I'm not that stupid
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
http://home.earthlink.net/~chris255/
Tuh Duh.
Unfortunately, I just noticed that link doesn't work anymore, had about 6 thirdgens with true dual exhaust setup. here is one:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/att...postid=1611784
Tuh Duh.
Unfortunately, I just noticed that link doesn't work anymore, had about 6 thirdgens with true dual exhaust setup. here is one:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/att...postid=1611784
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
tuh duh!!!! page not found lol, didnt dead bird do a dual set up?
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
here's a pic i found somewhere a while back...this setup is for a 3rd gen, it ran UNDER the rear axle. i have some more pics somewhere, i think they're on my other computer. i know i have found a bunch though.
#24
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York State
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6 2BBL (yeah I know...)
Transmission: 700R4 automatic
I've got a buddy with an '84 Camaro (Sport Coupe) that did a V8 conversion from his blown V6. He made his own true dual exhaust using two factory-style extension pipes, though I can't remember what he did for the H-pipe. I do know that though the pipes sound good, they hang too close to the ground and scape every time him and I went for a joy ride in it. They're mounted as close to the floorpans as he was willing to go with them. I think it's his H-pipe setup that's making his system too low; the rear portion of it goes over the axle rather than under it.
According to the exhaust catalogues where I work, there was never a factory dual exhaust for a third-gen. When I asked around about why that was, I was told that a single extension (intermediate) pipe was better for torque.
I agree with V6sucker on the comment about full duals w/ a 6-cyl....
According to the exhaust catalogues where I work, there was never a factory dual exhaust for a third-gen. When I asked around about why that was, I was told that a single extension (intermediate) pipe was better for torque.
I agree with V6sucker on the comment about full duals w/ a 6-cyl....
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
The duals I have seen were run side by side down the stock location. Lots of cars need to be done like that cause of clearance.My Buick "needs" a new cross member to run duals or run them side by side.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i know, this isn't 3rd gen, but i put true duals on my buddy's 01 stang with the 3.8 v6. it picked up torque! stock, it would just barely chirp the tires...we put full length headers on it which had 2.5" collectors but we ran 2.25" piping, through dual flowmasters and into some stock GT tailpipes, it'll spin the tire(s) a whole lot more now!
#27
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
basically, here's what I am looking at. If at some point in the future, I decide to do a motor swap, I might want to have true duals. Since the N10 option was a dual cat setup, and here in California you can do whatever you want after the cat, I was doing research on how I might go about getting it "legal" for California. If it was an option for the car, then you can go on ahead and do it without having to have an E.O. number or a B.A.R. label, but since it was only an option in '89, I would have to "do a swap" of '89 motor and crap, which in theory is exactly the same as the motor and trans. options of the previous year.
I know that it would probably be a little pointless on my 2.8, but if I start planning the future now, then by the time it actually happens, I will have some up with an answer for 99% of my roadblocks.
I know that it would probably be a little pointless on my 2.8, but if I start planning the future now, then by the time it actually happens, I will have some up with an answer for 99% of my roadblocks.
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
i'd still like to see it. seeing is believing
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
i know, this isn't 3rd gen, but i put true duals on my buddy's 01 stang with the 3.8 v6. it picked up torque! stock, it would just barely chirp the tires...we put full length headers on it which had 2.5" collectors but we ran 2.25" piping, through dual flowmasters and into some stock GT tailpipes, it'll spin the tire(s) a whole lot more now!
i know, this isn't 3rd gen, but i put true duals on my buddy's 01 stang with the 3.8 v6. it picked up torque! stock, it would just barely chirp the tires...we put full length headers on it which had 2.5" collectors but we ran 2.25" piping, through dual flowmasters and into some stock GT tailpipes, it'll spin the tire(s) a whole lot more now!
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Kj Rockz
well we know they can do it on mustangs
well we know they can do it on mustangs
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
being able to do it wasn't my point... it GAINED TORQUE. being able to do it wasn't the hard part.
being able to do it wasn't my point... it GAINED TORQUE. being able to do it wasn't the hard part.
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Kj Rockz
and your point is...
and your point is...
thanks for posting the link to that thread, mw66nova! i have seen that one before and it shows some nice dual exhaust setups on 3rd gens.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
one thing you have to remember is that the 60* v6 has alot of other limiting factors that exhaust alone won't help. the heads need tons of help and a bigger cam wouldn't hurt. the big bends in the intake manifold design don't help the deal either. it's pretty hard to get these thing to perform well with just bolt on parts.
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by mw66nova
one thing you have to remember is that the 60* v6 has alot of other limiting factors that exhaust alone won't help. the heads need tons of help and a bigger cam wouldn't hurt. the big bends in the intake manifold design don't help the deal either. it's pretty hard to get these thing to perform well with just bolt on parts.
one thing you have to remember is that the 60* v6 has alot of other limiting factors that exhaust alone won't help. the heads need tons of help and a bigger cam wouldn't hurt. the big bends in the intake manifold design don't help the deal either. it's pretty hard to get these thing to perform well with just bolt on parts.
#36
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I have read many times that until you get above 500hp you do not "need" dual exhaust. A proper single that lets the engine breath is enough but the problem comes when most stock single exhaust do not flow well and then dual seam to make it run better. When a proper single would of done the same thing.
But of course dual are just nice to have, just to have them.
I will do dual on my Buick this summer but wont be doing it to my 6.
But of course dual are just nice to have, just to have them.
I will do dual on my Buick this summer but wont be doing it to my 6.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Originally posted by pasky
http://home.earthlink.net/~chris255/
Tuh Duh.
Unfortunately, I just noticed that link doesn't work anymore, had about 6 thirdgens with true dual exhaust setup. here is one:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/att...postid=1611784
http://home.earthlink.net/~chris255/
Tuh Duh.
Unfortunately, I just noticed that link doesn't work anymore, had about 6 thirdgens with true dual exhaust setup. here is one:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/att...postid=1611784
Heres the new link to the 3rd Gen Dual Exhaust page http://mysite.verizon.net/vze84hud/duals
TONS of pictures of duals on third gens
#38
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 88IROC350TPI
Heres the new link to the 3rd Gen Dual Exhaust page http://mysite.verizon.net/vze84hud/duals
TONS of pictures of duals on third gens
Heres the new link to the 3rd Gen Dual Exhaust page http://mysite.verizon.net/vze84hud/duals
TONS of pictures of duals on third gens
anything that has been thought of for running duals on one of these cars is probably on this site! (something close anyways)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post