Why did GM do this?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird--02 Grand Prix GTP 2Dr
Engine: Poncho 400--3.8 Supercharged
Transmission: T56 6 Speed--4T65EHD
Axle/Gears: Open 10 bolt 3.42--Internal 2.93
Why did GM do this?
Looking at my factory manual I noticed that all 8 TPI injectors are fired from a single ECM ground. On the MPI 3.1, the fuel injectors are fired from 2 separate ECM grounds. Why would GM do that to the higher performing model and give the base engine the better route as far as injecting the fuel?
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wauconda, IL
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 69 Corvette
Engine: 409 CID SBC
Transmission: SS 700
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: Why did GM do this?
Since all 8 fire at the same time, I don't understand the concern?
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Why did GM do this?
It may sound crazy, but the wiring and injector grounds for the two are identical. Even though the 3.1 MPFI drawing shows what appears to be two injector drivers, there is only one in the ECM.
The drawing for the TPI setup is more accurate.
Note that the '90 - '92 TPI engines and 3.1l MPFI engines used the same ECM. But with different code bases in each.
RBob.
The drawing for the TPI setup is more accurate.
Note that the '90 - '92 TPI engines and 3.1l MPFI engines used the same ECM. But with different code bases in each.
RBob.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird--02 Grand Prix GTP 2Dr
Engine: Poncho 400--3.8 Supercharged
Transmission: T56 6 Speed--4T65EHD
Axle/Gears: Open 10 bolt 3.42--Internal 2.93
Re: Why did GM do this?
Ah, well that was simple! Just something that had had stuck out to me when I was looking through diagrams. Makes more sense that way.