stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: fairmont WV USA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
i wuz wondering what my IROC is SUPPOSE to do in the 1/4 mile, stock, if anybody knows, or has takin there 87-90 IROC to the track what your times were?, my IROC has 350 TPI and single cat and i think 2.77 gears? im not sure but it has rear disc brakes and its not posi, thanks 4 your help!
#3
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: tulsa ,ok , usa
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mid to high 14's.,Its kinda of unrealistic to go by internet times posted,way too many varibles to take into account,track condition,alt ,weather etc.I see a lot of cars that are basically the same mods and there can be .3-.4 diffence in ET's just by where they are from.
------------------
86 z28 zz4 ssm lift bars ,3.73 simesed runners and a traction deficient 13.707@101.02,on a 2.16 60 ft on 295/50/15 junk street rubber ,best MPH run 13.82@102.7,69 AMX,390 4 speed sticky tires and other stuff..12.94@102.3
------------------
86 z28 zz4 ssm lift bars ,3.73 simesed runners and a traction deficient 13.707@101.02,on a 2.16 60 ft on 295/50/15 junk street rubber ,best MPH run 13.82@102.7,69 AMX,390 4 speed sticky tires and other stuff..12.94@102.3
#4
Well, I ran my car when it was stock (K&Ns don't count as a mod IMO) Here was my best run.
60' 2.219
1/8 9.632 @ 74.54
1/4 14.920 @ 92.73
I hate to be one of those guys that give a million excuses for thier crappy times, but you need an honest image. This was my first time and the track (3rd run that night) When I left the track at 10:30pm it was 90*, meaning this run it was about 95* and high humidity. This is in Florida (orlando) so that accounts for the heat, also means it was at sea level basicly.
Car is a '89 Iroc 350 TPI, 700R4, 2.77 posi, single cat. In need of a tune up, plugs/wires/cap/rotor. And it was in full street trim, subs in the back, 3/4 tank of gas. Yadda yadda yadda.
Now I don't think those factors are going to pull a second off the time. But realisticly the car should have been able to pull off a 14.6-14.7.
Hope this helps you.
60' 2.219
1/8 9.632 @ 74.54
1/4 14.920 @ 92.73
I hate to be one of those guys that give a million excuses for thier crappy times, but you need an honest image. This was my first time and the track (3rd run that night) When I left the track at 10:30pm it was 90*, meaning this run it was about 95* and high humidity. This is in Florida (orlando) so that accounts for the heat, also means it was at sea level basicly.
Car is a '89 Iroc 350 TPI, 700R4, 2.77 posi, single cat. In need of a tune up, plugs/wires/cap/rotor. And it was in full street trim, subs in the back, 3/4 tank of gas. Yadda yadda yadda.
Now I don't think those factors are going to pull a second off the time. But realisticly the car should have been able to pull off a 14.6-14.7.
Hope this helps you.
The following users liked this post:
RPOL98 (05-23-2023)
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Well, mine w/ 2.77 gears ran 14.8 @ 96 MPH on a G-Tech w/ stock engine and headers, exhaust, CAI, pulleys, roller rockers, AFPR, ported plenum, and a PR chip. That's with a decent amount of wheel spin on very poor street tires on the street.
------------------
89 IROC-SuperRammed 355 w/ AFR 190's and LPE 219/219 cam-http://www.geocities.com/buckeyeroc
------------------
89 IROC-SuperRammed 355 w/ AFR 190's and LPE 219/219 cam-http://www.geocities.com/buckeyeroc
#6
I have a stock '89 GTA, convertible. I just ran a '97 6-speed formula firebird. First run I got him by a little, second run he took me by a little over a carlength. So figure mid-low 14's.
This is with 119,000 miles, mis-adjusted tranny, and in desparate need of a tuneup and some sensor resetting.
This is with 119,000 miles, mis-adjusted tranny, and in desparate need of a tuneup and some sensor resetting.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
I had several runs in the 14.4's this summer, at 95 mph. My motor, (block, heads, cam, exhaust manifolds) is still stock. I have all the other basic, first mods, though. It was a warm day, and I think I could do better on a cooler day. This was before I had the tranny worked on, so hopefully now I am quicker.
------------------
Best ET 14.413 @95.57 without
pulling valve covers or manifolds.
Also with stock 2.77 rear end!!!
------------------
Best ET 14.413 @95.57 without
pulling valve covers or manifolds.
Also with stock 2.77 rear end!!!
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: fairmont WV USA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man, i wuzzent expecting such low times!! that gives me a little confidence!! i wont get my hopes up to high though, but my friend just got a 94' Z28, its a 6 speed and im not sure what his car is suppose to run in the 1/4 but i read in car&driver, they tested a 96' Z28 and it only did 14.6 in the quarter, that wuz after they put 40,000 miles on it, but it still did better times than when it dident have any miles on the motor yet, i would just like to be able to stay w/ him
#10
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Some of these answers are from la la land. A box stock Irocz like yours with the 350 pulling 2.77s well prepped would run low 15s. One thing I have noticed is that as the cars get older, they get faster.
The following users liked this post:
tom3 (05-10-2023)
#11
Moderator
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
This post is 22 years old, haha. Well I might as well chime in. Bone stock mine went 14.8@93 with the wonderful 2.77 gears on a pretty hot summer day. A healthy L98 with the G92 package should easily go mid 14's.
The following users liked this post:
MaxpowerTA (05-09-2023)
#12
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
man, i wuzzent expecting such low times!! that gives me a little confidence!! i wont get my hopes up to high though, but my friend just got a 94' Z28, its a 6 speed and im not sure what his car is suppose to run in the 1/4 but i read in car&driver, they tested a 96' Z28 and it only did 14.6 in the quarter, that wuz after they put 40,000 miles on it, but it still did better times than when it dident have any miles on the motor yet, i would just like to be able to stay w/ him
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,435
Received 724 Likes
on
493 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
I saw my friends brand new 93 Z28 run a 13.88 absolutely bone stock right after he bought it in 93. We knew and the Mustang guys knew right then and there those 4th genCamaros were ugly but they would run!
#14
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Original owner of my Trans Am took the car to a drag strip after he bought it. He let a friend drive it who knew how to drive and said it turned high 13's. I believe it.
The following users liked this post:
dmccain (05-08-2023)
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 393 Likes
on
336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Last edited by Fast355; 05-10-2023 at 07:12 PM.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,239
Received 152 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
May as well chime in!
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08 on 91 octane
0-60mph, 7.0s
1/4 mile, 15.1s @ 91.0mph
After custom tune
0-60mph, 6.6s
1/4 mile, 14.7s @ 93.0mph
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...89-camaro.html
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08 on 91 octane
After custom tune
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...89-camaro.html
Last edited by SbFormula; 05-11-2023 at 09:20 AM.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
May as well chime in!
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08 on 91 octane
0-60mph, 7.0s
1/4 mile, 15.1s @ 91mph
After custom tune
0-60mph, 6.6s
1/4 mile, 14.7s @ 93mph
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...89-camaro.html
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08 on 91 octane
0-60mph, 7.0s
1/4 mile, 15.1s @ 91mph
After custom tune
0-60mph, 6.6s
1/4 mile, 14.7s @ 93mph
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...89-camaro.html
#18
Supreme Member
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
I don't know what mine would do in the 1/4 but the change from the 2:77 to a 3:23 rear was pretty amazing. A whole different car seems like. If you're looking more performance that would be my suggestion for the first upgrade.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,239
Received 152 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Actually, after reading your comment, I went back to my numbers and decided to retest but this time with more accurate device: Dragy. On the street with street tires and my lack of launching skills.
So they came at:
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08, NOT N10, on 91 octane
0-60mph, 7.0s
1/4 mile, 15.2s @ 90.0mph
After custom tune
0-60mph, 6.7s
1/4 mile, 15.0s @ 91.5mph
Around +10HP at crank. But not more than factory advertised!
In 1989, Road and Track tested the IROC-Z equipped with the 5.0-liter LB9 and manual transmission and garnered a 0 to 60 time of 6.9 seconds and a quarter mile time of 15.0 seconds at 91.5 mph. (don't have more details).
It is what it is lol
So they came at:
Bone stock '89 IROC-Z, MT, 305TPI, 3.08, NOT N10, on 91 octane
0-60mph, 7.0s
1/4 mile, 15.2s @ 90.0mph
After custom tune
0-60mph, 6.7s
1/4 mile, 15.0s @ 91.5mph
Around +10HP at crank. But not more than factory advertised!
In 1989, Road and Track tested the IROC-Z equipped with the 5.0-liter LB9 and manual transmission and garnered a 0 to 60 time of 6.9 seconds and a quarter mile time of 15.0 seconds at 91.5 mph. (don't have more details).
It is what it is lol
Last edited by SbFormula; 05-12-2023 at 07:03 AM.
The following users liked this post:
chazman (05-11-2023)
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Of course, there is always this Motorweek test of an '89, G92, 5 speed, N10 IROC. 13.9 sec 1/4 mile.
The following users liked this post:
SbFormula (05-11-2023)
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,239
Received 152 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Of course, there is always this Motorweek test of an '89, G92, 5 speed, N10 IROC. 13.9 sec 1/4 mile.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCL-odNmuGA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCL-odNmuGA
EDITED:
The more I research and compare, the less I believe Motorweek's claim of 5.9sec/13.9sec. The MPH was not specified. That would mean around 102mph or a bit less if the 1/8 mile was very quick. If you look at the video, it's not like the IROC hooks hard and launches forward. There is no way you can move a 3700lbs car that fast with 230hp. You need at least 270-280hp. I call BS.
Last edited by SbFormula; 05-12-2023 at 09:03 AM.
The following users liked this post:
dmccain (05-12-2023)
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,239
Received 152 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird Formula
Engine: SP383 Deluxe FIRST® TPI Intake
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" Eaton Truetrac Motive 3.89
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
This is actually a good video:
Camaro 91 or 92, Convertible, L03 TBI, Transmission/rear gear not specified, 17.4s @ 74mph
Camaro 91 or 92, LB9 TPI, G92, MT, most likely 3.42, 14.7s @ 95mph
Camaro 91 or 92, L98 TPI, G92, AT, rear gear not specified, 14.6s @ 92mph
Camaro 91 or 92, Convertible, L03 TBI, Transmission/rear gear not specified, 17.4s @ 74mph
Camaro 91 or 92, LB9 TPI, G92, MT, most likely 3.42, 14.7s @ 95mph
Camaro 91 or 92, L98 TPI, G92, AT, rear gear not specified, 14.6s @ 92mph
Last edited by SbFormula; 05-12-2023 at 08:56 AM.
The following users liked this post:
RPOL98 (05-23-2023)
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 393 Likes
on
336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
I don't know how they pulled this one off! 230HP on a 3700lbs car (driver and gas) don't add up to the numbers they get. But again, it is what it is.
EDITED:
The more I research and compare, the less I believe Motorweek's claim of 5.9sec/13.9sec. The MPH was not specified. That would mean around 102mph or a bit less if the 1/8 mile was very quick. If you look at the video, it's not like the IROC hooks hard and launches forward. There is no way you can move a 3700lbs car that fast with 230hp. You need at least 270-280hp. I call BS.
EDITED:
The more I research and compare, the less I believe Motorweek's claim of 5.9sec/13.9sec. The MPH was not specified. That would mean around 102mph or a bit less if the 1/8 mile was very quick. If you look at the video, it's not like the IROC hooks hard and launches forward. There is no way you can move a 3700lbs car that fast with 230hp. You need at least 270-280hp. I call BS.
The GM ZZ conversion package made 308 hp claimed hp at the crankshaft and ran mid 12s in the car I worked on ~20 years ago.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,435
Received 724 Likes
on
493 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
I probably seen a thousand thirdgens go down the track as a kid, I practically grew up at the dragstrip with my Dad. NEVER saw a stock Thirdgen 305 or 350 run better than a 14.2 or so. Now with headers , gears, underdrive pulleys and lil add ons they would easily.
The following users liked this post:
SbFormula (05-15-2023)
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Received 212 Likes
on
178 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
Of course, there is always this Motorweek test of an '89, G92, 5 speed, N10 IROC. 13.9 sec 1/4 mile.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCL-odNmuGA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCL-odNmuGA
I'll add mine:
1989 GTA 350/Auto, 3.27 rear, dual cat. Only mods were air box replaced with K&N conical air filter and Magnaflow cat back. So, not exactly stock, but the mods probably didn't add anything.
14.63 @ 95mph
The following 3 users liked this post by TransamGTA350:
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: stock 1/4 mile times for 89' IROC
I think I've mentioned this before. I had a friend with a '92 B4C, 1LE, 5.7. First time at the track, he put it in drive and mashed the pedal. 13.7 seconds.
The following users liked this post:
RPOL98 (05-31-2023)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NJITIROC
Theoretical and Street Racing
10
04-01-2003 07:22 AM