Hanging with an LS1
#52
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
One thing being missed is trap speed. You can have that quick e/t all you want, but what happens when you run into a LS1 on the highway and you're only trapping 108 while going deep 12 second e/t's? Well, you'll probably get walked by anything that has a few bolt ons. Just last weekend my 2000 went 13.1 @ 110 with just a lid, catback and 4.10's. That's it.
It's not impossible to build a good running L98/SBC to battle a LS1, even one making a true 400hp at the wheels, you just have to have the right combination of parts and finances to buy stuff that isn't junk.
I'm thinking I'm going to be selling my SS to buy another 3rd gen, so I've been trying gather up the info I'll need to be able to run with my SS and cars running 400rwhp cams.
FWIW, my buddy has a 99 Formula. Cam, ported tb, longtubes, true duals, 4.10's - that's about it for engine stuff. He went a best of 12.2 @ 117. Still needs a retune, LS6 intake and pulley. It'll go 11's at should hit 120 in the ¼. With that setup, he was "only" making 380rwhp.
I just don't understand where people come off underestimating LS1 cars. I saw someone say they run high 13's/low 14's stock just a few replies up. What are you smoking?
It's not impossible to build a good running L98/SBC to battle a LS1, even one making a true 400hp at the wheels, you just have to have the right combination of parts and finances to buy stuff that isn't junk.
I'm thinking I'm going to be selling my SS to buy another 3rd gen, so I've been trying gather up the info I'll need to be able to run with my SS and cars running 400rwhp cams.
FWIW, my buddy has a 99 Formula. Cam, ported tb, longtubes, true duals, 4.10's - that's about it for engine stuff. He went a best of 12.2 @ 117. Still needs a retune, LS6 intake and pulley. It'll go 11's at should hit 120 in the ¼. With that setup, he was "only" making 380rwhp.
I just don't understand where people come off underestimating LS1 cars. I saw someone say they run high 13's/low 14's stock just a few replies up. What are you smoking?
#53
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Originally posted by H0TR0Dn
You didnt say that to CC89Formula He just made a statment and you went off like an idiot calling his friend names etc, grow up. You could have handled yourself with a little more respect of others. If you cant explain(teach) others with a little professionalism maybe you should just keep your knowledge to yourself
You didnt say that to CC89Formula He just made a statment and you went off like an idiot calling his friend names etc, grow up. You could have handled yourself with a little more respect of others. If you cant explain(teach) others with a little professionalism maybe you should just keep your knowledge to yourself
Note to self: Never argue Red Devil OR Mr_Dude.
#54
All 350 sbc pretty much have the same potential when you get down to it.... just build the right combo.there are 23 degree heads out there that flow as well as the current 15 degree LS1...they just have bigger ports and streatability is a concern....the LS1/ even LS6 intakes are restrictions after awhile....the fastest cars end up with custom intakes anyway. Isn't there LT1's out there running 9's n/a?
What happens when your in an LS1 on the highway and you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118?
e.t.'s win races.
I never was much for the whole corrected e.t. thing.
just because you run a certain number at a certain altitude does not mean you are going to run a certain number at sealevel..you go to sealevel and you make more power and it may effect your traction ect...which may effect e.t.
If your best run is 13.6 or whatever at 5000ft then all you have is a 13.6 car untill proven otherwise.
What happens when your in an LS1 on the highway and you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118?
e.t.'s win races.
I never was much for the whole corrected e.t. thing.
just because you run a certain number at a certain altitude does not mean you are going to run a certain number at sealevel..you go to sealevel and you make more power and it may effect your traction ect...which may effect e.t.
If your best run is 13.6 or whatever at 5000ft then all you have is a 13.6 car untill proven otherwise.
#55
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by demonspeed
One thing being missed is trap speed. You can have that quick e/t all you want, but what happens when you run into a LS1 on the highway and you're only trapping 108 while going deep 12 second e/t's? Well, you'll probably get walked by anything that has a few bolt ons. Just last weekend my 2000 went 13.1 @ 110 with just a lid, catback and 4.10's. That's it.
It's not impossible to build a good running L98/SBC to battle a LS1, even one making a true 400hp at the wheels, you just have to have the right combination of parts and finances to buy stuff that isn't junk.
I'm thinking I'm going to be selling my SS to buy another 3rd gen, so I've been trying gather up the info I'll need to be able to run with my SS and cars running 400rwhp cams.
FWIW, my buddy has a 99 Formula. Cam, ported tb, longtubes, true duals, 4.10's - that's about it for engine stuff. He went a best of 12.2 @ 117. Still needs a retune, LS6 intake and pulley. It'll go 11's at should hit 120 in the ¼. With that setup, he was "only" making 380rwhp.
I just don't understand where people come off underestimating LS1 cars. I saw someone say they run high 13's/low 14's stock just a few replies up. What are you smoking?
One thing being missed is trap speed. You can have that quick e/t all you want, but what happens when you run into a LS1 on the highway and you're only trapping 108 while going deep 12 second e/t's? Well, you'll probably get walked by anything that has a few bolt ons. Just last weekend my 2000 went 13.1 @ 110 with just a lid, catback and 4.10's. That's it.
It's not impossible to build a good running L98/SBC to battle a LS1, even one making a true 400hp at the wheels, you just have to have the right combination of parts and finances to buy stuff that isn't junk.
I'm thinking I'm going to be selling my SS to buy another 3rd gen, so I've been trying gather up the info I'll need to be able to run with my SS and cars running 400rwhp cams.
FWIW, my buddy has a 99 Formula. Cam, ported tb, longtubes, true duals, 4.10's - that's about it for engine stuff. He went a best of 12.2 @ 117. Still needs a retune, LS6 intake and pulley. It'll go 11's at should hit 120 in the ¼. With that setup, he was "only" making 380rwhp.
I just don't understand where people come off underestimating LS1 cars. I saw someone say they run high 13's/low 14's stock just a few replies up. What are you smoking?
I run low 12's and trap 111 mph, and I have raced a LS1 from a roll on the highway, 98 LS1/M6 with lid, K&N and exhaust. I put some serious distance on it by 80 mph, still pulling. I have seen two bone stock LS1 cars go to my track and run 13.9's, both auto 2.73 cars. I have driven a friend's LS1 car, then gotten in my car and gave him a ride directly after. I don't think it gets much better for comparisons sake than that.
My car pulls hard through every gear up to redline. I have ran a Z06 vette at the track, with similar 60' times I had him all the way through the 1/4 mile. On the highway he would probably get me, my car runs out of steam around 110 mph.
Nobody is underestimating LS1 cars, I think people overestimate them. People think they are automatically low 13/high 12 second cars. In reality for most people they are not, especially the A4/2.73 cars. I have had the pleasure of driving one of these and the bottom end in them is lacking, most 13 second cars could make them look like a fool up to the 330 foot. Pull nice up top, not down low.
#56
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by unknown_host
So your gears/lid/exhaust LS1 runs low 13's, and you think it is ridiculous that a stock LS1 would run high 13's?
So your gears/lid/exhaust LS1 runs low 13's, and you think it is ridiculous that a stock LS1 would run high 13's?
I see you said the 13.9 car is an auto with the standard 2.73 gear. You can't get a much more worse setup than that. Still, he should be getting a better e/t.
And who races to 330' mark?
EDIT: I'll also agree people sometimes overestimate them. It's so rare (ie: unheard of) that a bone stock LS1 goes 12's. Just doesn't happen in the real world.
Last edited by demonspeed; 03-28-2005 at 08:04 AM.
#57
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
Isn't there LT1's out there running 9's n/a?
What happens when your in an LS1 on the highway and you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118?
e.t.'s win races.
Isn't there LT1's out there running 9's n/a?
What happens when your in an LS1 on the highway and you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118?
e.t.'s win races.
I don't get your analogy either. 118 trap would give many 11 second cars a run for their money.
#58
Member
Originally posted by demonspeedFastest LS1 is in the 7's.
Seriously though, you guys shouldn't waste you're time arguing about this... any engine can be built to run extremely fast, no? $$$$
#59
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by TPI-454
Fastest Big Blocks are in the 4's, and on and on and on...
Seriously though, you guys shouldn't waste you're time arguing about this... any engine can be built to run extremely fast, no? $$$$
Fastest Big Blocks are in the 4's, and on and on and on...
Seriously though, you guys shouldn't waste you're time arguing about this... any engine can be built to run extremely fast, no? $$$$
But to play devil's advocate... are those 4 second BB cars licensed and "inspected"?
#60
Member
Originally posted by demonspeed
Agree...
But to play devil's advocate... are those 4 second BB cars licensed and "inspected"?
Agree...
But to play devil's advocate... are those 4 second BB cars licensed and "inspected"?
Although the following (see below) doesn't necessarily prove anything, I'm just linking it to show exactly what can happen when a little time (and money) is involved in any project, employing any engine...
This is nothing new for my fellow track-heads, of course;
Enjoy...
LT1 vs Dodge MiniVan
#61
My anology is that you run a13.1 @ 110...
What if you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118..who has the faster car? Your e.t. of 13.1 is still faster than the 13.2 of the Supra..who cares who can pull who on the highway...people relate mph to an automatic e.t. ... that does not work...the supra may trap a mph to run 11's but can't because of its poor launch.
If racing on the highway at high speeds is your thing so be it..like I said there are plenty of Supra's that are glad to hear it.
I want a good e.t. on a timeslip ..not a poor e.t. with a high MPH,thats all I'm saying...I hear alot of talk of rwhp and such...but e.t. is what wins the races. Like you said..who races to 330ft? well racing from 60- 110mph isn't a complete race either,its nice to brag on an internet forum..but what do you really want... the better timeslip or trying to impress people you don't even know .
I'm talking about an LT1 that runs 9's n/a with the stock factory block/cubic inches... That LT1 with a power adder would run much faster...question is the strength of the block...it has a forged /balanced bottom end/and some filler in the jackets to make it stronger..was in a magazine write up a while back....
So there is an LS1 with the stock factory block/cubic inches running 7's....n/a? I know I've read of one that was running 8's with a lot of boost ...if your dealing with the same amount of cubic inches/can deliver the same amout of fuel and air you have pretty much the same potential regardless of what your block casting says. I do think a big port 15 degree head will have a high end advantage on a 23 degree head...And I just saw that AFR has a 225cc LS1 head...so maybe things are not so good afterall..
What if you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118..who has the faster car? Your e.t. of 13.1 is still faster than the 13.2 of the Supra..who cares who can pull who on the highway...people relate mph to an automatic e.t. ... that does not work...the supra may trap a mph to run 11's but can't because of its poor launch.
If racing on the highway at high speeds is your thing so be it..like I said there are plenty of Supra's that are glad to hear it.
I want a good e.t. on a timeslip ..not a poor e.t. with a high MPH,thats all I'm saying...I hear alot of talk of rwhp and such...but e.t. is what wins the races. Like you said..who races to 330ft? well racing from 60- 110mph isn't a complete race either,its nice to brag on an internet forum..but what do you really want... the better timeslip or trying to impress people you don't even know .
I'm talking about an LT1 that runs 9's n/a with the stock factory block/cubic inches... That LT1 with a power adder would run much faster...question is the strength of the block...it has a forged /balanced bottom end/and some filler in the jackets to make it stronger..was in a magazine write up a while back....
So there is an LS1 with the stock factory block/cubic inches running 7's....n/a? I know I've read of one that was running 8's with a lot of boost ...if your dealing with the same amount of cubic inches/can deliver the same amout of fuel and air you have pretty much the same potential regardless of what your block casting says. I do think a big port 15 degree head will have a high end advantage on a 23 degree head...And I just saw that AFR has a 225cc LS1 head...so maybe things are not so good afterall..
Last edited by DON 88T/A; 03-29-2005 at 12:02 AM.
#62
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
My anology is that you run a13.1 @ 110...
What if you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118..who has the faster car? Your e.t. of 13.1 is still faster than the 13.2 of the Supra..who cares who can pull who on the highway...people relate mph to an automatic e.t. ... that does not work...the supra may trap a mph to run 11's but can't because of its poor launch.
If racing on the highway at high speeds is your thing so be it..like I said there are plenty of Supra's that are glad to hear it.
My anology is that you run a13.1 @ 110...
What if you run into a Supra that runs 13.2 and traps 118..who has the faster car? Your e.t. of 13.1 is still faster than the 13.2 of the Supra..who cares who can pull who on the highway...people relate mph to an automatic e.t. ... that does not work...the supra may trap a mph to run 11's but can't because of its poor launch.
If racing on the highway at high speeds is your thing so be it..like I said there are plenty of Supra's that are glad to hear it.
If you race a car that traps 118 mph and you're only 110, then you will absolutely get walked on the street. I don't want to build a car that's only fun 1320 feet. If I wanted to do that, I'd have a strict drag car only. My car gets driven everyday and runs into people from a roll. I like to bruise ego's, so my mph will let me do that - I just hope I don't bruise my head when I'm lying in a ditch because I lost control
Here's a link about the 7 second cars... I didn't notice the big blower the first time I read the thread though. So http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=290774
You say 60-110 isn't a complete race compared to 330'. Well, if you race 60-110 and get walked, you're not catching up. If someone pulls you out of the hole, you will catch them if you have the better trap. It's a fact.
Last edited by demonspeed; 04-04-2005 at 03:01 PM.
#63
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
I've raced and beat a Z06 and several modded LS-1 F-bodies.
A heads and cam LS-1 Camaro pulled on me by a few cars though.
What you looking to do isn't hard to accomplish.
However, you need a good set of heads (my ported vortecs flowed better than AFR 195's on the bench). Also, the Hot-cam is weak.
Go with a XR276HR-12 (the one I run), or a little bigger.
I've raced and beat a Z06 and several modded LS-1 F-bodies.
A heads and cam LS-1 Camaro pulled on me by a few cars though.
What you looking to do isn't hard to accomplish.
However, you need a good set of heads (my ported vortecs flowed better than AFR 195's on the bench). Also, the Hot-cam is weak.
Go with a XR276HR-12 (the one I run), or a little bigger.
#64
I have to admit I'd like something that can kick *** on the street too...
I was just saying with Supra's they have a great trap but poor e.t.
At least at the track you can beat people out of the hole and they may not always catch you....on the streat is another story...and the way the streats are getting these days,its tough to race anywhere anymore.I don't think racing to 330/or from a roll is a complete race...but like you said its fun to bruise ego's
I was just saying with Supra's they have a great trap but poor e.t.
At least at the track you can beat people out of the hole and they may not always catch you....on the streat is another story...and the way the streats are getting these days,its tough to race anywhere anymore.I don't think racing to 330/or from a roll is a complete race...but like you said its fun to bruise ego's
Last edited by DON 88T/A; 03-29-2005 at 10:02 PM.
#65
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
I have to admit I'd like something that can kick *** on the street too...
I was just saying with Supra's they have a great trap but poor e.t.
At least at the track you can beat people out of the hole and they may not always catch you....on the streat is another story...and the way the streats are getting these days,its tough to race anywhere anymore.I don't think racing to 330/or from a roll is a complete race...but like you said its fun to bruise ego's
I have to admit I'd like something that can kick *** on the street too...
I was just saying with Supra's they have a great trap but poor e.t.
At least at the track you can beat people out of the hole and they may not always catch you....on the streat is another story...and the way the streats are getting these days,its tough to race anywhere anymore.I don't think racing to 330/or from a roll is a complete race...but like you said its fun to bruise ego's
What does a 700hp Supra have in common with a 400hp Camaro?
-They both run 11's.
#66
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Formula 350
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by demonspeed
I've heard people say:
What does a 700hp Supra have in common with a 400hp Camaro?
-They both run 11's.
I've heard people say:
What does a 700hp Supra have in common with a 400hp Camaro?
-They both run 11's.
#67
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Changing Tires
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: too many ...
I think its because of the type of powerband the Supras have. That super high HP number is just the peak HP, and if you look at the dyno sheets, you can see how steep the power curve is. I agree its kind of misleading too. My friend here in Hawaii regularly runs at the fastest streetcar shootout at Hawaii Raceway Park, and I think he does have the fastest Supra on the island. He's running the 2JZ, SP67 turbo (unknown turbine trim), Built auto tranny w/ 3800 stall, and C16 and water/meth injection (boosting 2.17 bar holy crap!) and his best so far was 10.93 at 131 mph and he's running 315 drag radials. His last dyno on 92 pump gas and water/meth spray, 28psi, he made 592 rwhp and 490 rwtq. He believes the car has potential to put down over 650rwhp on C16 and full boost, but every time hes tried for that dyno sheet, something goes wrong ....
Tell you one thing though, those Supras are crazy on the freeway. I have not seen a faster freeway car ever. He can pull Busas and GSX1000's, and R1's. No joke. I raced him for giggles and he decided to leave it in 5th. So i actually pulled. But around 135mph he downed it to 4th and blew by me while I had my speedo pegged. Must have been going at least 10 mph faster than me .... Crazyness ...
Tell you one thing though, those Supras are crazy on the freeway. I have not seen a faster freeway car ever. He can pull Busas and GSX1000's, and R1's. No joke. I raced him for giggles and he decided to leave it in 5th. So i actually pulled. But around 135mph he downed it to 4th and blew by me while I had my speedo pegged. Must have been going at least 10 mph faster than me .... Crazyness ...
#70
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
if you look around long enough, you will find tons of vids of supras running all kind of cars
they are deadly from a roll but the stock suspension setup doesnt allow for great launchin so thats why they never run real quick et's but trap at unimaginable speeds LOL
the proper HSR/Miniram car or LT1's and a good gear mated to a T56 should be fine with a supra. miniram can match the topend and superior torque curve can hang
turbo supra's are mean, but so are GN's, turbo/boosted LS1's/Lt1's and cobra's....etc......
they are deadly from a roll but the stock suspension setup doesnt allow for great launchin so thats why they never run real quick et's but trap at unimaginable speeds LOL
the proper HSR/Miniram car or LT1's and a good gear mated to a T56 should be fine with a supra. miniram can match the topend and superior torque curve can hang
turbo supra's are mean, but so are GN's, turbo/boosted LS1's/Lt1's and cobra's....etc......
#71
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
Having an '87 L98 IROCZ and a '99 LS1 SS, I feel like I can give my 2 cents worth here and bring this thread back to the first question.
My stock '99 SS (if I can remember correctly) ran 13.7s at 107mph, top speed about 160mph, and got 27 mpg on the xway.
That was with a dynoed 289RWHp.
With a lid, 4.10 gears, cat back, and an K&N filter, and some tuning, the car had 319RWHp, and turned 13.2s & 13.3s.
With heads, cam, headers, intake and more tuning, the car now has 400RWHp, goes 12.2s with bad starts (60' @ 2.0sec) at 117 mph, and probably is good for 175 mph top speed. The car is very fast. Bring on those turbo Supras!!!!!!!!!!! Since then I have added a nitrous kit.
My exploits with my L98 car seems like a major struggle compared to my LS1 car. With ram air effect, headers, cat back, cam, gears, intake, heads, tuning; this car would dyno only about 275RWHp and has turned a 12.97sec ET at Norwalk which is about 0.3 sec faster than Dragway 42 where I set the LS1 times above. So by comparison, it is a 13.3 car to me.
So, my LS1 with a lid, 4.10 gears, K&N, and a catback is about equal in ET time slips to my highly modded L98 car. However, my LS1 will turn higher trap speeds.
Now, dont get me wrong here, I love my '87 IROCZ. I recently put a 395 cu in motor into it. This car dynoed at 340RWHp and 370 Ft-Lbf. My goal is high 11 sec ETs.
Soooo, basically, a highly modded L98 3rd gen car (thats quicker than mine) can only beat a simple bolt on LS1 car.
My stock '99 SS (if I can remember correctly) ran 13.7s at 107mph, top speed about 160mph, and got 27 mpg on the xway.
That was with a dynoed 289RWHp.
With a lid, 4.10 gears, cat back, and an K&N filter, and some tuning, the car had 319RWHp, and turned 13.2s & 13.3s.
With heads, cam, headers, intake and more tuning, the car now has 400RWHp, goes 12.2s with bad starts (60' @ 2.0sec) at 117 mph, and probably is good for 175 mph top speed. The car is very fast. Bring on those turbo Supras!!!!!!!!!!! Since then I have added a nitrous kit.
My exploits with my L98 car seems like a major struggle compared to my LS1 car. With ram air effect, headers, cat back, cam, gears, intake, heads, tuning; this car would dyno only about 275RWHp and has turned a 12.97sec ET at Norwalk which is about 0.3 sec faster than Dragway 42 where I set the LS1 times above. So by comparison, it is a 13.3 car to me.
So, my LS1 with a lid, 4.10 gears, K&N, and a catback is about equal in ET time slips to my highly modded L98 car. However, my LS1 will turn higher trap speeds.
Now, dont get me wrong here, I love my '87 IROCZ. I recently put a 395 cu in motor into it. This car dynoed at 340RWHp and 370 Ft-Lbf. My goal is high 11 sec ETs.
Soooo, basically, a highly modded L98 3rd gen car (thats quicker than mine) can only beat a simple bolt on LS1 car.
#72
Member
Originally posted by doc.Soooo, basically, a highly modded L98 3rd gen car (thats quicker than mine) can only beat a simple bolt on LS1 car.
It also depends on what you consider "Highly Modded". Stock for stock, Ls1's come from the factory with a superior valvetrain to that of the L98... so of course the L98 will need mucho mods to even catch up with it in terms of it's (the Ls1's) stock performance.
#73
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
LS1's are not the end all of factory motors, they are just the best as it stands when you talk about an engine straight from the factory......... period(will through in for a v8 engine architecture)
I could swap this topic to turbo buicks like the engine in my 89 Turbo Trans AM. Just a little 6 and it still pulls fear and respect cred on the street.
I rememeber when 18 degree small block heads were crazy.
Then someone came along with 15 degree. Whooooooooooooaaaa dogiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Slowly idiot engineers and automobile manufacturers rubbed their eyes and saw that band-aiding everything wasnt the answer(swirl port heads, egr, etc) but using all the technology gained in the prior years to put on to a clean sheet of paper and start fresh.
Suddenly we had 6 bolt mains(crossbolted) and 15 degree heads form the factory and now even 12 degree heads on the LS7(new ZO6)...
Funniest things about this whole rant? It all came down to the heads :-) Guess out of all the above cars, the fastest one down the track has the latest technology and the newest and greatest head design.(as far as from the factory is concerned)
Anyone of them can be called superior to the others, it just depends how deep your pockets are and how much you are willing to spend to get there.
Get some trick 180-190 AFR heads with the competition CNC'ing done on them strap them onto a conventional smallblock with a decent cam and go LS1 bashing lol.
Same token build a 3.8 turbo and push enough boost and you have your LS1 slayer.(I have one that should be more than adequate:-) )
If your looking for cubes, stroker LS1 setups are not cheap(yes I know with the LS2 the prices have dropped considerably but its still only 366 cubes) Everythign else costs alot more as well, from cams to springs to rockers.
They all cost money, which one do u like the best and which one will get your money is the question.
Its all about 2 things. Dollars and cents.
How much do u have?
This is like Ford vs. Chevy , there never will be a clear winner as long as each side has millions of supporters.
If u ignore the possibilities of the LS1 and its derivitives, you are an idiot. If u think the LS1 family is unbeatable, your an idiot.
Its evolution, out with the old and in with the new and the bitter fight between the old school and the new.
Myself, I'm taking a liking to thirdgen with a LS engine :-)(more than likely my next project)
later
Jeremy
I could swap this topic to turbo buicks like the engine in my 89 Turbo Trans AM. Just a little 6 and it still pulls fear and respect cred on the street.
I rememeber when 18 degree small block heads were crazy.
Then someone came along with 15 degree. Whooooooooooooaaaa dogiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Slowly idiot engineers and automobile manufacturers rubbed their eyes and saw that band-aiding everything wasnt the answer(swirl port heads, egr, etc) but using all the technology gained in the prior years to put on to a clean sheet of paper and start fresh.
Suddenly we had 6 bolt mains(crossbolted) and 15 degree heads form the factory and now even 12 degree heads on the LS7(new ZO6)...
Funniest things about this whole rant? It all came down to the heads :-) Guess out of all the above cars, the fastest one down the track has the latest technology and the newest and greatest head design.(as far as from the factory is concerned)
Anyone of them can be called superior to the others, it just depends how deep your pockets are and how much you are willing to spend to get there.
Get some trick 180-190 AFR heads with the competition CNC'ing done on them strap them onto a conventional smallblock with a decent cam and go LS1 bashing lol.
Same token build a 3.8 turbo and push enough boost and you have your LS1 slayer.(I have one that should be more than adequate:-) )
If your looking for cubes, stroker LS1 setups are not cheap(yes I know with the LS2 the prices have dropped considerably but its still only 366 cubes) Everythign else costs alot more as well, from cams to springs to rockers.
They all cost money, which one do u like the best and which one will get your money is the question.
Its all about 2 things. Dollars and cents.
How much do u have?
This is like Ford vs. Chevy , there never will be a clear winner as long as each side has millions of supporters.
If u ignore the possibilities of the LS1 and its derivitives, you are an idiot. If u think the LS1 family is unbeatable, your an idiot.
Its evolution, out with the old and in with the new and the bitter fight between the old school and the new.
Myself, I'm taking a liking to thirdgen with a LS engine :-)(more than likely my next project)
later
Jeremy
#74
Member
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM.Funniest things about this whole rant? It all came down to the heads :-) Guess out of all the above cars, the fastest one down the track has the latest technology and the newest and greatest head design.(as far as from the factory is concerned)
#75
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Mims, Florida
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
TPI-454,
Yea, I'm not the best mechanic, but at least I give it a good try. I know there is Hp left on the table, maybe mostly from mismatched parts. For example, now with a 395, I think I would benefit from an HSR in place of my SuperRam. But also, my goal is a good car in the quarter mile and be totally streetable. I can drive either of my Camaros to work everyday if I want to.
All TPI setups are restrictive compared to the LS1 architecture, restrictive in the sense of upper end air flow. I think my peak Hp comes in now at 5700 RPM, but it has alot of grunt.
What I would like to see is an LS1 type intake on an L98 car. That intake works great, in fact, it works so great that Ford copied it for their latest 4.6L 3V motor in the current Mustang GT.
Yea, I'm not the best mechanic, but at least I give it a good try. I know there is Hp left on the table, maybe mostly from mismatched parts. For example, now with a 395, I think I would benefit from an HSR in place of my SuperRam. But also, my goal is a good car in the quarter mile and be totally streetable. I can drive either of my Camaros to work everyday if I want to.
All TPI setups are restrictive compared to the LS1 architecture, restrictive in the sense of upper end air flow. I think my peak Hp comes in now at 5700 RPM, but it has alot of grunt.
What I would like to see is an LS1 type intake on an L98 car. That intake works great, in fact, it works so great that Ford copied it for their latest 4.6L 3V motor in the current Mustang GT.
#76
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Its evolution, out with the old and in with the new and the bitter fight between the old school and the new.
Its evolution, out with the old and in with the new and the bitter fight between the old school and the new.
Just look at the aluminum headed L98 in the Corvette (the top of the line EFI Gen I SBC) and compare that to the LS6 - the top of the line Gen III SBC. Well, it's not even a comparison. Hell, throw in the LT4 if you want some Gen II action. 245hp, 330hp, 405hp... I'll take the Z06 please.
Hmm... what a shoot out that'd be - 91 L98 vs 96 LT4 vs 04 LS6
In the end, give me a 6.0 stroker, LSX intake, some AFR's, and a matched cam...
Quit complaining about trying to beat LS1's and start worrying about how to take out Mustangs.
#77
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by demonspeed
Quit complaining about trying to beat LS1's and start worrying about how to take out Mustangs.
Quit complaining about trying to beat LS1's and start worrying about how to take out Mustangs.
so you're saying..........................aim low?
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Acworth/Marietta, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Pro 5.0 shifted T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Call me crazy but i believe i have read in multiple places where bone stock LS1s, and i do mean BONE STOCK, have been documented into the high 12.90s
i could be wrong though
i could be wrong though
#79
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Originally posted by StreetRoc85 350
Call me crazy but i believe i have read in multiple places where bone stock LS1s, and i do mean BONE STOCK, have been documented into the high 12.90s
i could be wrong though
Call me crazy but i believe i have read in multiple places where bone stock LS1s, and i do mean BONE STOCK, have been documented into the high 12.90s
i could be wrong though
#80
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by MrDude_1
so you're saying..........................aim low?
so you're saying..........................aim low?
Originally posted by StreetRoc85 350
Call me crazy but i believe i have read in multiple places where bone stock LS1s, and i do mean BONE STOCK, have been documented into the high 12.90s
i could be wrong though
Call me crazy but i believe i have read in multiple places where bone stock LS1s, and i do mean BONE STOCK, have been documented into the high 12.90s
i could be wrong though
#82
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
I have seen a stocker go 12.96 and 12.98 at the track.
Was also a 6spd Z.
Best one was a gold 2000 Ram Air.
Less than 300 miles on it and the guy hotlapped it 8 times in a row and ran 13.3 and 13.4 on every run. It was an automatic and not even broken in yet lol
Still had dealer coverings on the seats.
Have friends with them too and have watched them go bottom 13's with ease. like times in 13.00-13.2 range, least the ones who could drive lol
later
Jeremy
Was also a 6spd Z.
Best one was a gold 2000 Ram Air.
Less than 300 miles on it and the guy hotlapped it 8 times in a row and ran 13.3 and 13.4 on every run. It was an automatic and not even broken in yet lol
Still had dealer coverings on the seats.
Have friends with them too and have watched them go bottom 13's with ease. like times in 13.00-13.2 range, least the ones who could drive lol
later
Jeremy
#84
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by vortec77
Whats the HP on the 05's 390?
Whats the HP on the 05's 390?
The 03/04's are only a few bolt ons away from 11's. It's bull crap
#85
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
I have seen a stocker go 12.96 and 12.98 at the track.
Was also a 6spd Z.
Best one was a gold 2000 Ram Air.
Less than 300 miles on it and the guy hotlapped it 8 times in a row and ran 13.3 and 13.4 on every run. It was an automatic and not even broken in yet lol
Still had dealer coverings on the seats.
Have friends with them too and have watched them go bottom 13's with ease. like times in 13.00-13.2 range, least the ones who could drive lol
later
Jeremy
I have seen a stocker go 12.96 and 12.98 at the track.
Was also a 6spd Z.
Best one was a gold 2000 Ram Air.
Less than 300 miles on it and the guy hotlapped it 8 times in a row and ran 13.3 and 13.4 on every run. It was an automatic and not even broken in yet lol
Still had dealer coverings on the seats.
Have friends with them too and have watched them go bottom 13's with ease. like times in 13.00-13.2 range, least the ones who could drive lol
later
Jeremy
Nonetheless, I've never seen an absolutely stock LS1 that was better than 13.3 in real life.
#86
Member
Originally posted by demonspeed.Hmm... what a shoot out that'd be - 91 L98 vs 96 LT4 vs 04 LS6
In the end, give me a 6.0 stroker, LSX intake, some AFR's, and a matched cam...
#88
LT5's are just nasty,just geared poorly from the factory...and that was 15 year old technology
I wonder if there is a trade off to running a smaller degree head..
I guess a smaller dgree head needs a specific block to fit...and GM just didn't want to develop a new block all those years...now it seems like every other day they have a new engine coming out.
I wonder if there is a trade off to running a smaller degree head..
I guess a smaller dgree head needs a specific block to fit...and GM just didn't want to develop a new block all those years...now it seems like every other day they have a new engine coming out.
#89
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
I don't really consider the LT5 in much of the SBC family. It was one of a kind. An exotic in sorts. DOHC, 32V - not something you'd really associate with a small block Chevrolet, not to mention it was a Mercury Marine.
This isn't saying the LT5 is a POS or isn't good enough for a comparison, but it's in another category that isn't very pertinate to this discussion.
This isn't saying the LT5 is a POS or isn't good enough for a comparison, but it's in another category that isn't very pertinate to this discussion.
#90
Member
Originally posted by demonspeed.This isn't saying the LT5 is a POS or isn't good enough for a comparison, but it's in another category that isn't very pertinate to this discussion.
Now, speaking of 4-valve per cylinder heads... didn't Hot Rod, or some other magazine, do a test with the L98 engine employing a set of those 32 valve Dominion (Aero) heads? I know I have that article somewhere, and the engine averaged close to 450 Horsepower.
Just goes to show what the right valvetrain can do to an engine, especially the L98...
#92
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Originally posted by MrDude_1
glad to see SOMEONE caught the joke.... lol.
glad to see SOMEONE caught the joke.... lol.
#93
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by demonspeed
I got the joke, but I was just saying 03/04 Cobra's aren't going to be the easiest.
I got the joke, but I was just saying 03/04 Cobra's aren't going to be the easiest.
unless you're drag racing.
nice modern IRS... perfect for wheel hopping halfshaft snapping action....
oh, and just enough weight to take away from any inital power advantage from the "starter" mods.... (pulley, exhaust, ect)
lol, theres a few of them here, the local fbody club and the local mustang groups get along, we all goto the track together... but ive been less then impressed with the cobras everywhere except the dyno.
making power you're not using is even worse then not making it.
#94
Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 1LE
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MM5
Axle/Gears: GU6
Pulley, intake, x pipe and drag radials - there was a guy with ONLY those mods running 12.1 @ 119 consistently last year.
The first day the track opened this year, there was a guy going 119 (can't remember the e/t) with a pulley, intake, and catback.
How easy is it for a L98 to trap 119? Let's see...
The first day the track opened this year, there was a guy going 119 (can't remember the e/t) with a pulley, intake, and catback.
How easy is it for a L98 to trap 119? Let's see...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post