Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

305 LB9 are slow bull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2012, 09:47 PM
  #251  
Junior Member
 
83TransAmDayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 trans am Dayton
Engine: 305 cross fire
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Id like to see that too, but them motors more for racing in A time class then street driving with the Ele water pump here in Arizona you have problems. I,m buliding my 305 too be a fun street car with a little more power then stock,and good on gas. I know it not gonna be like my old 350 motor that I put a lot of money into But I.m gonna be having fun with this motor. to the first poster Id like to see time slips from the track and a dyno sheet.
Old 02-15-2012, 10:08 PM
  #252  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

That one article says if it was an l03 the numbers would be much lower.

Not for nothing I have the cam they're using in that motor, the 292
Old 02-15-2012, 10:15 PM
  #253  
Junior Member
 
83TransAmDayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 trans am Dayton
Engine: 305 cross fire
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

How do you like that cam ? I have the comp cams 268 yet too put it in motor put doing that this weekend
Old 02-15-2012, 10:45 PM
  #254  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Man, this topic has got people fired up!
Old 02-15-2012, 10:53 PM
  #255  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by 83TransAmDayton
How do you like that cam ? I have the comp cams 268 yet too put it in motor put doing that this weekend
Well the car isn't done yet, but it sounds awesome and seems to run strong. Plus the idle is awesome.
Old 02-16-2012, 08:46 AM
  #256  
86Z
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (4)
 
86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: CT
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

i support 305's, mine is built up with a supercharger at 14#'s of boost, i make well over 400 at the motor, i dyno'd 380 to the wheels and 420 ft/lbs of torque...

your not making a n/a 400 hp 305... with the stock bore...

when the 305 is done, it's LSx time ...
Old 02-16-2012, 09:34 AM
  #257  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by sailtexas186548
buff - you EXPLICTLY claimed that 400RWHP is possible, then threw some numbers out of a catalog and are expecting to not get called out? takes you lumps, move on, and stop spreading false info/claims
No catalog, Off the top of my head. Do you get everything out of a catalog cause you've said that like 5 times in like 5 different posts.

And I am EXPLICITLY claiming right now that 400RWHP is possible with a 305 small block chevy.
I'm pretty sure if I had a GM technician tell you this right now(he probably got his info from a catalog too), show you 200 dyno sheets, get it engraved in the side of a boulder, and machine it into the 305 itself; you still would say "NO 305 SLOW LIKE SNAIL". I mean seriously, if you don't think its possible than you should probably pick up a book or something, maybe watch a documentary. I just saw 3 links of 350+ hp 305's. I posted 2, someone else posted a couple 2 or 3 pages ago. If your still hatin' then you're obviously just a player hater. And noone likes a player hater. It's not like I'm saying a 305 is better than a 350, or its faster than your motor. I am simply stating a FACT that 400hp is obtainable. And honda techs should get a job at ferrari BECAUSE 240 Hp is obviously impossible for 122 cubic inches too right? And half the members here with N/A 350's pushing 500+ their motors should be in ferrari's too, cause anything over 1.5hp per cubic inch is impossible.. you guys are really funny. I'm 19 and I have more common sense and mechanical logic than most of you just running your mouth.
your not making a n/a 400 hp 305... with the stock bore...
REALLY!??!?! OHHH NO WUNDER.... Obviously it wouldn't be stock bore, or stock heads ( said this before like 4 times ) and I've said this before too, READ B4 SPEAK <-- i wouldn't have to repeat myself so much if people did this.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 09:43 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:03 AM
  #258  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
And I am EXPLICITLY claiming right now that 400RWHP is possible with a 305 small block chevy. I'm pretty sure if I had a GM technician tell you this right now...
This is getting ridiculous. Listen to me, a 302 Chevy can be taken to well over 500 horsepower, and its already been done. However, a 302 Chevy uses a 4" bore, so it can run much larger intake valves without shrouding the valve. Air and fuel gives us our horsepower, that fact never changes, but like I said above... it was never a question of the 305's cubic inch displacement being the problem, rather, it is how that displacement was obtained by GM. The 305 has a very small bore, smaller than the 3.8 V6 Buick engine found in the Grand National for crying out loud (the 305's bore is only 3.736"). The 305 was a "bored out" 262 engine (4.3) that had a 3.67"/3.10" bore and stroke. The engine, although can in fact perform, was never really designed to because of the very thin casting...
Old 02-16-2012, 10:09 AM
  #259  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I'm pretty sure if I had a GM technician tell you this right now(he probably got his info from a catalog too), show you 200 dyno sheets, get it engraved in the side of a boulder, and machine it into the 305 itself; you still would say "NO 305 SLOW LIKE SNAIL".
See but the difference between the above statement, and what you've been saying throughout this entire thread is that you'd actually have proof with the above. Your still telling us all that it's possible, but you don't even have a pot to **** in. You and this thread are starting to turn into a pretty big and funny joke.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:09 AM
  #260  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

No matter what, buffalo isn't gunna change his mind lol. Even if street lethal spells it out, like he just did.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:20 AM
  #261  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I'm 19 and I have more common sense and mechanical logic than most of you just running your mouth.
That. Is funny. More like your 19 and don't understand that just because a honda motor [or any other small high hp motor] makes x amount of hp per cubic inch, doesn't mean a 305 can with an entirely different layout. In your amateur brain you think, small motor can make big power, so fhe 305 motor must be able to make even more. The people in here with more years of experience then years that you've been alive are giving you facts and you're just not accepting it.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:27 AM
  #262  
Member

iTrader: (7)
 
pound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beautiful Coastal New Jersey
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn posi 3.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Old 02-16-2012, 10:44 AM
  #263  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Slayerx666
That. Is funny. More like your 19 and don't understand that just because a honda motor [or any other small high hp motor] makes x amount of hp per cubic inch, doesn't mean a 305 can with an entirely different layout. In your amateur brain you think, small motor can make big power, so fhe 305 motor must be able to make even more. The people in here with more years of experience then years that you've been alive are giving you facts and you're just not accepting it.
I am stating something that has been done before (305 making 400hp). I showed 3 articles of it, other people have showed a few also. The only reason you're(and the 5 others) coming at me about it is because I'm telling you that you are wrong and noone likes to hear that.

If you don't think that it is possible to make 400hp out of a 305, you are WRONG ( I didn't say it would be worth it )
Its that simple.

I only brought up the honda motor because someone said if you make over 1.5 hp per cubic inch you should be a "ferrari mechanic building f1 motors"
Noone has once stated a fact of why the 305 cant make 400hp, they have only said that the stock bore limits the head choices and that the displacement is not the problem. And I provided a solution, bore the motor and get ported heads or new high flow heads.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 10:48 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 10:55 AM
  #264  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I am stating something that has been done before (305 making 400hp). I showed 3 articles of it, other people have showed a few also. The only reason you're(and the 5 others) coming at me about it is because I'm telling you that you are wrong and noone likes to hear that...
That is not what you said. In another post you said you could get a 305-TBI to make 400-RWHP (rear wheel horsepower), Click Here. Nobody is saying that you can't get 400-FWHP out of a 305 by running a tremendous amount of static compression and race gas, but your claiming 400 rear wheel horsepower naturally aspirated, even using a TBI system no less, and I would pay good money to see that with either TPI, TBI or even carbed. Put a naturally aspirated 305 together and prove the "six" of us wrong, I would love for you to reach 400-RWHP out of a naturally aspirated small bore 305, and that is not sarcasm...
Old 02-16-2012, 10:58 AM
  #265  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Street Lethal
That is not what you said. In another post you said you could get a 305-TBI to make 400-RWHP (rear wheel horsepower), Click Here. Nobody is saying that you can't get 400-FWHP out of a 305 by running a tremendous amount of static compression and race gas, but your claiming 400 rear wheel horsepower naturally aspirated, even using a TBI system no less, and I would pay good money to see that with either TPI, TBI or even carbed. Put a naturally aspirated 305 together and prove the "six" of us wrong, I would love for you to reach 400-RWHP out of a naturally aspirated small bore 305, and that is not sarcasm...
I wouldn't do it because it would be a waste of money. But it is still possible.
And I said I can get 400 out of the crank, and 400RWhp is possible. ("I still say you can get 400+ rwhp out of a 305" click your link for reference.)
And you can even see where I said mine only had 250.

Thanks for proving my point. NOONE READS, they'd rather just start going on about the first thing they can think of that they can say otherwise.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 11:02 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:03 AM
  #266  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
And I provided a solution, bore the motor and get ported heads or new high flow heads.
But those aren't solutions. Boring the motor doesn't significantly change the bore. You can typically add .060" of diameter at most, which is only about a 1.6% increase. The increase in clearance around the valve margin is less than half that as well. Not enough to run larger valves, which is the issue. "High-flow" ported heads still can't flow past a shrouded valve. If you really wanted to address the issue, you could use a 4-valve head.

400 HP 305s are possible. They're not cost-effective or practical.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:05 AM
  #267  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Apeiron
But those aren't solutions. Boring the motor doesn't significantly change the bore. You can typically add .060" of diameter at most, which is only about a 1.6% increase. The increase in clearance around the valve margin is less than half that as well. Not enough to run larger valves, which is the issue. "High-flow" ported heads still can't flow past a shrouded valve. If you really wanted to address the issue, you could use a 4-valve head.

400 HP 305s are possible. They're not cost-effective or practical.
Thank you, I did mention they are not worth it and I don't suggest trying it unless you're made of money. 4 valve heads are pretty common too, I got a pair of aluminum heads from the junk yard that were 4 valves per cylinder(im assuming thats what you mean by 4 valve head).
Old 02-16-2012, 11:11 AM
  #268  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I wouldn't do it because it would be a waste of money. But it is still possible. And I said I can get 400 out of the crank, and 400RWhp is possible. ("I still say you can get 400+ rwhp out of a 305" click your link for reference.)
And you can even see where I said mine only had 250.

Thanks for proving my point. NOONE READS, they'd rather just start going on about the first thing they can think of that they can say otherwise.
Excuse me? I provided a link that was posted by you, in which you wrote that "you" (in general) could get 400 REAR wheel horsepower out of a 305, a 305 using TBI no less, so that is something that you apparently believe. This is something that you said, and that we all read. Tell me buffalo, do you know how much air and fuel is needed to make 400-RWHP out of 305 cubic inches of displacement? Do you know the formula used? I do. Care to ask your sources and get back to me to see if they know...?
Old 02-16-2012, 11:13 AM
  #269  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
4 valve heads are pretty common too
Not if you expect them to fit a SBC.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:18 AM
  #270  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Thank you, I did mention they are not worth it and I don't suggest trying it unless you're made of money. 4 valve heads are pretty common too, I got a pair of aluminum heads from the junk yard that were 4 valves per cylinder(im assuming thats what you mean by 4 valve head).
Again, 400-FWHP is not 400-RWHP, there is approximately a 75 horsepower difference, and we are discussing RWHP are we not? Nobody is saying that 400-FWHP is not possible with the right amount of static compression and corresponding fuel with a 305. As for 4-valve heads, there are none that clear the 305's 3.736" bore, which is what the "six" of us are saying here, the bore is the limitation. I can show you a 274 cubic inch Buick V6 that makes over 500 horsepower naturally aspirated on pump gas, so what you are trying to say here completely defeats the purpose...;



"Good things come in small packages. Compared to a V8, a Buick V6 is rather diminutive, except when it comes to power. Jim Ruggles' Grand National Sportsman engines produce 530+ horsepower from 274 cubic inches. Even without a hand-held calculator, that figures out to 1.94 horsepower per cubic inch, an impressive figure for any engine on one four-barrel carburetor and gasoline"...

http://www.teambuick.com/reference/l.../v6_stage2.php
Old 02-16-2012, 11:23 AM
  #271  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Thank you, I did mention they are not worth it and I don't suggest trying it unless you're made of money. 4 valve heads are pretty common too, I got a pair of aluminum heads from the junk yard that were 4 valves per cylinder(im assuming thats what you mean by 4 valve head).
You have a pair of 4 valve aluminum heads for a small block chevy, that you found in a junkyard? Is it a junk yard full of unattainable racing parts, located directly outside of area 51? You gotta bring me to this place, I bet they have some Arao heads lying around that will really wake my non-performing 350 up.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:32 AM
  #272  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Street Lethal
Excuse me? I provided a link that was posted by you, in which you wrote that "you" (in general) could get 400 REAR wheel horsepower out of a 305, a 305 using TBI no less, so that is something that you apparently believe. This is something that you said, and that we all read. Tell me buffalo, do you know how much air and fuel is needed to make 400-RWHP out of 305 cubic inches of displacement? Do you know the formula used? I do. Care to ask your sources and get back to me to see if they know...?
I did not say that "I" can do it, I said "you" can do it and it's possible. Don't know the formula, and my "sources" are myself and whatever I google.

As for the 4 valve heads, I have 4 valve per cylinder heads that fit on my 350 SBC perfectly, not sure if they have them for 305's but I could see it reasonable that there are some out there. Even so, taking the stock swirl port heads and porting out the intake/exhaust could make those decent heads, far from the best but still reasonable for producing around 400hp. I didn't even get into mentioning the crank options because I know nothing about them but this could even add a good couple hp. All I'm trying to say is that the 305 can be made into a decent street machine pushing around 400-450 out of the crank.
Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
You have a pair of 4 valve aluminum heads for a small block chevy, that you found in a junkyard? Is it a junk yard full of unattainable racing parts, located directly outside of area 51? You gotta bring me to this place, I bet they have some Arao heads lying around that will really wake my non-performing 350 up.
Got them at LKQ in St.Pete, Florida out of a thirdgen actually. I should mention that they were cracked, I didn't find out until I brought them home.
WOW, Arao heads are VERY expensive.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 11:40 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:36 AM
  #273  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
You have a pair of 4 valve aluminum heads for a small block chevy, that you found in a junkyard? Is it a junk yard full of unattainable racing parts, located directly outside of area 51? You gotta bring me to this place, I bet they have some Arao heads lying around that will really wake my non-performing 350 up...
Agreed. Arao heads (formerly Old Dominion) are the only company that made 32-valve heads for the SBC, and they were, and are, over six thousand dollars. I want to see pictures of these heads that were found in the junkyard...
Old 02-16-2012, 11:39 AM
  #274  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
As for the 4 valve heads, I have 4 valve per cylinder heads that fit on my 350 SBC perfectly
Too bad you used them, you could have sold them for enough to buy another car. They're that rare.

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Even so, taking the stock swirl port heads and porting out the intake/exhaust could make those decent heads, far from the best but still reasonable for producing around 400hp.
Doesn't matter how much you port them, you're not going to get that from swirl ports. They're that bad.

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I didn't even get into mentioning the crank options because I know nothing about them but this could even add a good couple hp.
Assuming you're not changing the displacement, cranks don't add HP. They only lose less.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:39 AM
  #275  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Street Lethal
Agreed. Arao heads (formerly Old Dominion) are the only company that made 32-valve heads for the SBC, and they were, and are, over six thousand dollars. I want to see pictures of these heads that were found in the junkyard...
Like he said, pics, or you're lying. Florida must have the best junk yards, or those heads fell off a NASA rocket, and just happened to land on a third gen lmao.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:43 AM
  #276  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Apeiron
Too bad you used them, you could have sold them for enough to buy another car. They're that rare.



Doesn't matter how much you port them, you're not going to get that from swirl ports. They're that bad.



Assuming you're not changing the displacement, cranks don't add HP. They only lose less.
I have never laughed so much on a third gen thread. And the other forums say we're uptight lmao.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:45 AM
  #277  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Apeiron
Too bad you used them, you could have sold them for enough to buy another car. They're that rare.

Doesn't matter how much you port them, you're not going to get that from swirl ports. They're that bad.

Assuming you're not changing the displacement, cranks don't add HP. They only lose less.
Didn't know that about cranks. And I know the swirl port heads are extremely bad, I just didn't think they were so bad you can't even port them out for decent gains.

As for the cracked 32 valve heads I found at a junkyard, they were cracked so unfortunately as quickly as I got them, I got rid of them. Next time I see a pair I'll be sure to snap a photo and throw them on craigslist. Me and the guy at the junkyard obviously made a mistake not knowing what we had was worth so much.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 11:49 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:51 AM
  #278  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Didn't know that about cranks. And I know the swirl port heads are extremely bad, I just didn't think they were so bad you can't even port them out for decent gains.

As for the cracked 32 valve heads I found at a junkyard, they were cracked so unfortunately as quickly as I got them, I got rid of them. Next time I see a pair I'll be sure to snap a photo and throw them on craigslist. Me and the guy at the junkyard obviously made a mistake not knowing what we had was worth so much.
Let me spell it out. Y O U did not F I N D a pair of A R A O heads in a junkyard.
You may have been looking at some Northstar V8 heads, but they don't bolt up to any SBC.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:52 AM
  #279  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Thank you, I did mention they are not worth it and I don't suggest trying it unless you're made of money. 4 valve heads are pretty common too, I got a pair of aluminum heads from the junk yard that were 4 valves per cylinder(im assuming thats what you mean by 4 valve head).
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...i/viewall.html

378hp out of a 305 tbi. I dont think they even touched the block itself. Its all top end of the motor.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:52 AM
  #280  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

You could have had the cracks welded and the heads machined, sold them, and still had enough for that second car.

Don't worry about the photo, you'll never see another pair in your lifetime.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:54 AM
  #281  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Apeiron
You could have had the cracks welded and the heads machined, sold them, and still had enough for that second car.

Don't worry about the photo, you'll never see another pair in your lifetime.
I gave them to a scrapper, I wonder if he was happy. And you don't know that, after looking at Arao's website, I want a pair now.. it will just be far down the road.

Originally Posted by ninetyone
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...i/viewall.html

378hp out of a 305 tbi. I dont think they even touched the block itself. Its all top end of the motor.
Another article of a 305 making good horsepower. Nice find.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-16-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Old 02-16-2012, 11:59 AM
  #282  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by ninetyone
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...i/viewall.html

378hp out of a 305 tbi. I dont think they even touched the block itself. Its all top end of the motor.
I read that whole article, it said 330 corrected horsepower at the crank, factoring in 22% driveline loss.
http://image.chevyhiperformance.com/...ission09_z.jpg
Old 02-16-2012, 12:00 PM
  #283  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Thank you, I did mention they are not worth it and I don't suggest trying it unless you're made of money. 4 valve heads are pretty common too, I got a pair of aluminum heads from the junk yard that were 4 valves per cylinder(im assuming thats what you mean by 4 valve head).
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...i/viewall.html

378hp out of a 305 tbi.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:01 PM
  #284  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Actually i think they meant 378 ft/lbs of torque at the crank, but the hp is still at 330 HP at the crank. I say not bad for a 305.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:02 PM
  #285  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by ninetyone
Actually i think they meant 378 ft/lbs of torque at the crank, but the hp is still at 330 HP at the crank. I say not bad for a 305.
Not bad at all for 9.63:1 compression and using a bunch of parts made by TurboCity ( still N/A motor )
Old 02-16-2012, 12:04 PM
  #286  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by ninetyone
Actually i think they meant 378 ft/lbs of torque at the crank, but the hp is still at 330 HP at the crank. I say not bad for a 305.
I agree, it's definitely not bad. But it's not 330 wheel, out of an N/A L03, which is what I was asking buffalo to show us because he can do it lol.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:05 PM
  #287  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
I agree, it's definitely not bad. But it's not 330 wheel, out of an N/A L03, which is what I was asking buffalo to show us because he can do it lol.
I already posted an article of a 400hp 305 and someone else posted the link to the 500+ hp circle track 305.. So obviously it can be done, I am not going to show you a damn thing, nor waste my money attempting it.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:06 PM
  #288  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I already posted an article of a 400hp 305 and someone else posted the link to the 500+ hp circle track 305.. So obviously it can be done, I am not going to show you a damn thing, nor waste my money attempting it.
I had to look at your public profile after this one, and this is what I found.

"Interests goin fast n smokin grass" Looks like you're doing a whole lot of the latter friend.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:11 PM
  #289  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
I had to look at your public profile after this one, and this is what I found.

"Interests goin fast n smokin grass" Looks like you're doing a whole lot of the latter friend.
Lol, more than 50% of the worlds most successful people do the same things that I do, but were not talking about that are we ?

I have posted articles proving my point and other people have posted ones that go beyond my point.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:15 PM
  #290  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Lol, more than 50% of the worlds most successful people do the same things that I do, but were not talking about that are we ?

I have posted articles proving my point and other people have posted ones that go beyond my point.
Those articles didn't prove anything except that, to get the horsepower your saying can be had, the motor needs to be out of a vehicle, stripped of all accessories, pumped full of race gas, and have a compression ratio that can't be run without said race gas.

Last edited by calamitascamaro; 02-16-2012 at 12:18 PM.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:16 PM
  #291  
Member
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: manitoba.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 ws6, 2011 sierra 6.2L 6 speed
Engine: ls1
Transmission: M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Didn't know that about cranks. And I know the swirl port heads are extremely bad, I just didn't think they were so bad you can't even port them out for decent gains.

As for the cracked 32 valve heads I found at a junkyard, they were cracked so unfortunately as quickly as I got them, I got rid of them. Next time I see a pair I'll be sure to snap a photo and throw them on craigslist. Me and the guy at the junkyard obviously made a mistake not knowing what we had was worth so much.
by 32 valve heads you mean between both heads right?
Old 02-16-2012, 12:19 PM
  #292  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
Those articles didn't prove anything except that, to get the horsepower your saying can be had, the motor needs to be out of a vehicle, stripped of all accessories, pumped full of race gas, and have a compression ratio that can't be run without said race gas.
But did they produce the horsepower that I said they would?
And what about the circle track 305 pushing 500+? Is that outside of the vehicle?
Old 02-16-2012, 12:20 PM
  #293  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
But did they produce the horsepower that I said they would?
And what about the circle track 305 pushing 500+? Is that outside of the vehicle?
Considering none of them were L03's, no they didn't.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:23 PM
  #294  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Ahh yes, the ole he said - she said, and the magazine said, so it must be true. Just like Bruce Lee would have kicked that crap out of every MMA fighter in the world because the magazines said so, yet he didn't actually compete "once" in his life. Let's see what the real dyno has to say about a naturally aspirated 305, one that is actually filmed during the session. You know, the kind that youtube is filled with for every other engine out there in the entire world... "except" with the 305. Anyone have any factual vids?
Old 02-16-2012, 12:28 PM
  #295  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Street Lethal
Ahh yes, the ole he said - she said, and the magazine said, so it must be true. Just like Bruce Lee would have kicked that crap out of every MMA fighter in the world because the magazines said so, yet he didn't actually compete "once" in his life. Let's see what the real dyno has to say about a naturally aspirated 305, one that is actually filmed during the session. You know, the kind that youtube is filled with for every other engine out there in the entire world... "except" with the 305. Anyone have any factual vids?
Probably not going to be a video of this, but the articles I posted did have dyno print-outs which technically is legit proof.


Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
Considering none of them were L03's, no they didn't.
What does that have to do with anything? Theres more 305's than just the l03..
Old 02-16-2012, 12:31 PM
  #296  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Probably not going to be a video of this, but the articles I posted did have dyno print-outs which technically is legit proof.




What does that have to do with anything? Theres more 305's than just the l03..
Umm your whole agruement is with the L03 as your base.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:33 PM
  #297  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
Umm your whole agruement is with the L03 as your base.
I mentioned an L03 because that's what I had. I was stating 305's in general.
Old 02-16-2012, 12:43 PM
  #298  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Probably not going to be a video of this, but the articles I posted did have dyno print-outs which technically is legit proof...
Technically legit proof? Please tell me you are joking...

Let me explain something to you, when it comes to horsepower from a fuel injection standpoint, we confirm what the magazines tell us by using proper formula's. Years ago most magazines could talk out of their butt's because the readers were left in the dark, but not anymore. If you had half a brain, you would realize why the above "378-HP out of a TBI" article left out which injectors they were using. Go back and read it, and tell me what size the injectors they used were. Can't find it? Too bad...

Injector Rating x # of injectors x Duty Cycle / BSFC = Maximum Horsepower...

Asusming that the 305 TBI was running 90-lb injectors....

Injector Rating x # of injectors x Duty Cycle / BSFC = Maximum Horsepower...

90 x 2 x .9 / .6 = 270 Horsepower Maximum...

... and that is assuming they were running that big of an injector.

Show me that link to that 500-HP 305, I'd like to dissect it...
Old 02-16-2012, 12:46 PM
  #299  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Lol jumping ship because youre wrong....
Old 02-16-2012, 12:47 PM
  #300  
Member
 
Slayerx666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

I found an lt5 in a junkyard, got it for 50$, scrapped it tho cause its dirty.


Quick Reply: 305 LB9 are slow bull



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.