Bit off more than i could chew...
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: san jose
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 iroc
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Bit off more than i could chew...
Was cruising down santa teresa around 11 at night, saw this black 2k lt1 firebird. So i thought to myself what the hell, the funny part was we were going 40 and nietherof us dropped it into second but gunned it from third, anyway as you would think he pulled away from me decently by 70 he was about 1car and a half ahead. owell at least i tried haha.
#3
Junior Member
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
His LS1 not LT1 would rip you a new one. If your both stock.
The last STOCK IROC 5.7 I ran with my GTO wasnt even close. From 35-75 I was 3 cars ahead.
The last STOCK IROC 5.7 I ran with my GTO wasnt even close. From 35-75 I was 3 cars ahead.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
I have a 383 in my 89, if i ran from 40 in third i would not move verry fast due to 2.73 rear gear, but at 80 or so running thru the gears, i tear them up badly. Now a 305 is simply screwed in stock or even mildly modded by the LSx.
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 Z28, '13 Civic EX-L
Engine: 355 LT1, 1.8 I4
Transmission: T56, 5spd auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42(as long as no breaky)
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
The tpi will compete or beat lt's or ls's down low. especially in light to light type races. but after that they are toast.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Lol! I raced my buddies 2004 GTO at the track and I would pull on him until the 1/8th. After that He'd come flying by me near the end of the track. He was pulling 13.5's at 105 compared to my 14.10's.... Definitely fun races!
#9
On Probation
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2002 Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
#10
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
#11
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
#13
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
that # is definitely too high. i've seen tons of ls1 cars dyno'd at our local shop. the highest i've seen out of a stock ls1 is 320 or so from the 02 6 speed cars. the normal for an auto is right around 305-310 and for a stick is right around 312-315. ofcourse it's very rare to see one that doesn't atleast have a lid.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
why would you automatically assume he meant flywheel? he never answered the question. either way the # is wrong. it's too high for rwhp, and too low for flywheel hp. :shrug:
Last edited by CashMunson; 01-21-2008 at 12:58 AM.
#16
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Garland, texas
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 9 bolt
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
I lov ethese LS1 threads. From a a stop light they are saying that a nice well kept 350 can pull them for about 1/8th of a mile and I agree. If you have some goodies on the motor you have a good chance of hangin in til the end but it all depends on your top end power. I have to say Third gens are a beast out of the hole. (if you can hook)
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Run a top shape 89 formula 350 and see what happens.
I have a 383 in my 89, if i ran from 40 in third i would not move verry fast due to 2.73 rear gear, but at 80 or so running thru the gears, i tear them up badly. Now a 305 is simply screwed in stock or even mildly modded by the LSx.
I have a 383 in my 89, if i ran from 40 in third i would not move verry fast due to 2.73 rear gear, but at 80 or so running thru the gears, i tear them up badly. Now a 305 is simply screwed in stock or even mildly modded by the LSx.
From a dig torque and more important traction play huge rolls. Roll races with TPI isn't the smartest, especially when talking about LS1 cars in the other lane, but from a dig there's a chance! Now a good driver in the LS1 who can walk it out of the hole, you might be done from the get go!
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
because 340 is fairly close to 345, which is the average flywheel horsepower for an ls1 without any slp options. I can see where your going though, alot of the 6spd's and slp lid/catback cars are what we usually hear about, and are the 320-330 rwhp cars that are 370-380 flywheel. My car was just a run of the mill 98 ls1 an auto at that and made 300 to the ground, which is 350 flywheel. Sorry about the misunderstanding, it's just these cars vary so much 30-40 hp difference from car to car, being factory.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
I always find it funny that TPI owners think they own LS1 or even LT1 owners to the 1/8. How is it that a car that went 0-60 in about 6 seconds is faster than a car that does it under 6 seconds? Both the LT1 and LS1 did 0-60 under 6 seconds, yet TPI guys always claim their slower cars are so much faster. I don't get it.
Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
#20
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
because 340 is fairly close to 345, which is the average flywheel horsepower for an ls1 without any slp options. I can see where your going though, alot of the 6spd's and slp lid/catback cars are what we usually hear about, and are the 320-330 rwhp cars that are 370-380 flywheel. My car was just a run of the mill 98 ls1 an auto at that and made 300 to the ground, which is 350 flywheel. Sorry about the misunderstanding, it's just these cars vary so much 30-40 hp difference from car to car, being factory.
#21
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
I always find it funny that TPI owners think they own LS1 or even LT1 owners to the 1/8. How is it that a car that went 0-60 in about 6 seconds is faster than a car that does it under 6 seconds? Both the LT1 and LS1 did 0-60 under 6 seconds, yet TPI guys always claim their slower cars are so much faster. I don't get it.
Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Its rather easy to get either an LT1 or LS1 in sub 2.0 short times bone stock. Not saying a TPI can't do it either but its a lot easier for the others. Hence the better 0-60 times for them also.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Newark, Ca, USA
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 02 ws-6
Engine: 5.7 liter
Transmission: t56
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
guys let put up dyno readings on l98 and ls1 motors. here my dyno numbers on my 02 ws6 m6. all stock except for slp lid, k&n filter through clogged cats.
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Coming from someone who can launch a car decently (consistent mid 1.9s with a 1.91 best on a lowered car on 18" street radials), the LS1 and LT1 with a good driver should beat an L98 or TPI car out of the hole when traction is had.
#25
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
So your comparing a bad driver in an LS1 to a good driver in a TPI? The more torque and peakier (yeah I know it's not a word) it is, the harder it will be to launch.
Coming from someone who can launch a car decently (consistent mid 1.9s with a 1.91 best on a lowered car on 18" street radials), the LS1 and LT1 with a good driver should beat an L98 or TPI car out of the hole when traction is had.
Coming from someone who can launch a car decently (consistent mid 1.9s with a 1.91 best on a lowered car on 18" street radials), the LS1 and LT1 with a good driver should beat an L98 or TPI car out of the hole when traction is had.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
the main thing about the tpi cars is torque.... so thats what the tpi owners brag about. lol
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
the main thing about the tpi cars is torque.... so thats what the tpi owners brag about. lol
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
maybe you have good ls1 drivers where you live. we have few here. i've sat in the tower at our local track, and watched hundreds of ls1 drivers launch like crap. everytime a ws6 ta lines up, i watch a 5k dump on street tires that leads to spinning through 1st and 2nd, and a 2.4 60 ft time. notice you're saying... when traction is had.
Take your guy running 2.4 60's in his LS1. When you stick him in a TPI car with more grunt down low what do you think he is going to do? NOW take a guy who can nab a 1.9 in a TPI car and stick him in an LS1. Same 60' from a car that will haul the mail up top vs a car that gets to 60-70 and starts huffing.
Launching ANY street tired V8 at 5000 RPM is going to yield those results. But to say TPI's will stop light to stop light beat an LS1 because the LS1 driver is going to suck and the TPI driver wont is just a terrible way to make a claim.
To compare two cars with two unknown drivers (which is where the LS1 vs TPI debate has to be taken from) you CANNOT figure the TPI driver to be better than the LS1 driver, and if so what is your basis other than a generalization of people in your area???
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Here's the best the goat did when it was stock. Took 4 trips to the track to figure out how to launch it. The very first pass down the track was a wheel hopping 13.6 on a 2.1. That was with about 600 miles on it. The 4th trip had about 1000 miles on it.
8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.
I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.
3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.
I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.
3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Good lord.
LSx > LTx > L98 (assuming bone stock)
There, I said it. Now you can all stop arguing
LSx > LTx > L98 (assuming bone stock)
There, I said it. Now you can all stop arguing
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Not sure if I am missing something but your car is not stock. An LT1 or LS1 with the bolt ons and a cam like you have would be deep 12s cars?
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
here's another one for thought.... a buddies car, '97 t/a full weight with nothing done other than a th350/3200 converter, catback, and drag radials went 8.0's at 85ish. thats with stock manifolds even. lol
----------
Here's the best the goat did when it was stock. Took 4 trips to the track to figure out how to launch it. The very first pass down the track was a wheel hopping 13.6 on a 2.1. That was with about 600 miles on it. The 4th trip had about 1000 miles on it.
8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.
I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.
3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.
I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.
3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
Last edited by DIGGLER; 01-29-2008 at 05:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Well the tpi is stock and engine mods are mostly gm production parts,but I get your point.Stock l98 cant really compete with the newer series engines.I was really just replying to the how bout you tpi guys comment cause there are some respectable tpi powered cars out there.
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...
Were they production parts off yor car? If not, the point is mute.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post