Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Bit off more than i could chew...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2008, 05:19 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
GraveDigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: san jose
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 iroc
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Bit off more than i could chew...

Was cruising down santa teresa around 11 at night, saw this black 2k lt1 firebird. So i thought to myself what the hell, the funny part was we were going 40 and nietherof us dropped it into second but gunned it from third, anyway as you would think he pulled away from me decently by 70 he was about 1car and a half ahead. owell at least i tried haha.
Old 01-15-2008, 07:32 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
Frozer!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago(DP)
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 non posi
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

2000 LT1? must've downgraded lol
Old 01-15-2008, 07:59 PM
  #3  
Junior Member

 
TLS_Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 67
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Car: 1999 Camaro SS
Engine: 440ci LS
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 w/3.73 gears
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

His LS1 not LT1 would rip you a new one. If your both stock.

The last STOCK IROC 5.7 I ran with my GTO wasnt even close. From 35-75 I was 3 cars ahead.
Old 01-16-2008, 03:38 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by TLS_Addict
His LS1 not LT1 would rip you a new one. If your both stock.

The last STOCK IROC 5.7 I ran with my GTO wasnt even close. From 35-75 I was 3 cars ahead.
Run a top shape 89 formula 350 and see what happens.


I have a 383 in my 89, if i ran from 40 in third i would not move verry fast due to 2.73 rear gear, but at 80 or so running thru the gears, i tear them up badly. Now a 305 is simply screwed in stock or even mildly modded by the LSx.
Old 01-16-2008, 11:02 PM
  #5  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
BCdawg57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '91 Z28, '13 Civic EX-L
Engine: 355 LT1, 1.8 I4
Transmission: T56, 5spd auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42(as long as no breaky)
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

The tpi will compete or beat lt's or ls's down low. especially in light to light type races. but after that they are toast.
Old 01-17-2008, 10:43 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by BCdawg57
The tpi will compete or beat lt's or ls's down low. especially in light to light type races. but after that they are toast.
yep, it's all about where you race them. from a roll the ls1 has it, from a dig the tpi car would crush both of them light to light.
Old 01-18-2008, 11:06 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
flaming-ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio, near columbus
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
yep, it's all about where you race them. from a roll the ls1 has it, from a dig the tpi car would crush both of them light to light.
it is truly fun stop light racing ls/lt cars with bad drivers makes me and my 220 hp motor feel good lol.
Old 01-19-2008, 12:46 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
rik89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Run a top shape 89 formula 350 and see what happens.


.
Lol! I raced my buddies 2004 GTO at the track and I would pull on him until the 1/8th. After that He'd come flying by me near the end of the track. He was pulling 13.5's at 105 compared to my 14.10's.... Definitely fun races!
Old 01-19-2008, 07:54 AM
  #9  
On Probation
 
rideon1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
Old 01-19-2008, 10:30 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by rideon1200
Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
you're saying a stock ls1 puts 340 to the tires?
Old 01-19-2008, 11:04 AM
  #11  
Member
 
Ed Z28 350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
you're saying a stock ls1 puts 340 to the tires?
Seems too high. My 01 LS1 with a lid put 329.9 to the wheels.
Old 01-19-2008, 12:20 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by rideon1200
Must REALLY be a bad driver if you can beat them with 220hp. Stock on a LS1 is 340 add some minor bolt on mods and ?. Whats hell if you are really tear it up and a women in a caravan passes you!LOL Point is, maybe you are the only one racing light to light. Because there is no way with 220HP you will keep up with a LS1 Firebird or Formula unless it is on the back of a tow truck.
Read what he said again. He said stop light to stop light.
Old 01-19-2008, 01:24 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by Ed Z28 350
Seems too high. My 01 LS1 with a lid put 329.9 to the wheels.
that # is definitely too high. i've seen tons of ls1 cars dyno'd at our local shop. the highest i've seen out of a stock ls1 is 320 or so from the 02 6 speed cars. the normal for an auto is right around 305-310 and for a stick is right around 312-315. ofcourse it's very rare to see one that doesn't atleast have a lid.
Old 01-20-2008, 09:33 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
Cali Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
you're saying a stock ls1 puts 340 to the tires?
no, he is saying flywheel. Why would you automatically think he meant rear wheel?
Old 01-21-2008, 12:52 AM
  #15  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by Cali Z
no, he is saying flywheel. Why would you automatically think he meant rear wheel?
why would you automatically assume he meant flywheel? he never answered the question. either way the # is wrong. it's too high for rwhp, and too low for flywheel hp. :shrug:

Last edited by CashMunson; 01-21-2008 at 12:58 AM.
Old 01-21-2008, 09:40 AM
  #16  
Member
 
19redbird89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Garland, texas
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 9 bolt
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

I lov ethese LS1 threads. From a a stop light they are saying that a nice well kept 350 can pull them for about 1/8th of a mile and I agree. If you have some goodies on the motor you have a good chance of hangin in til the end but it all depends on your top end power. I have to say Third gens are a beast out of the hole. (if you can hook)
Old 01-21-2008, 11:23 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Run a top shape 89 formula 350 and see what happens.


I have a 383 in my 89, if i ran from 40 in third i would not move verry fast due to 2.73 rear gear, but at 80 or so running thru the gears, i tear them up badly. Now a 305 is simply screwed in stock or even mildly modded by the LSx.
Well from a roll even a top running L98 will get walked handily by an LS1. From a dig, sure but it appears your talking roll races here and the LS1 wouldn't be worried about even the best running stock L98. Not sure what your stroker motor has to do with the comparison either, but 2.73s will kill any car really.

From a dig torque and more important traction play huge rolls. Roll races with TPI isn't the smartest, especially when talking about LS1 cars in the other lane, but from a dig there's a chance! Now a good driver in the LS1 who can walk it out of the hole, you might be done from the get go!
Old 01-21-2008, 10:20 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
Cali Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
why would you automatically assume he meant flywheel? he never answered the question. either way the # is wrong. it's too high for rwhp, and too low for flywheel hp. :shrug:
because 340 is fairly close to 345, which is the average flywheel horsepower for an ls1 without any slp options. I can see where your going though, alot of the 6spd's and slp lid/catback cars are what we usually hear about, and are the 320-330 rwhp cars that are 370-380 flywheel. My car was just a run of the mill 98 ls1 an auto at that and made 300 to the ground, which is 350 flywheel. Sorry about the misunderstanding, it's just these cars vary so much 30-40 hp difference from car to car, being factory.
Old 01-21-2008, 10:52 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

I always find it funny that TPI owners think they own LS1 or even LT1 owners to the 1/8. How is it that a car that went 0-60 in about 6 seconds is faster than a car that does it under 6 seconds? Both the LT1 and LS1 did 0-60 under 6 seconds, yet TPI guys always claim their slower cars are so much faster. I don't get it.

Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
Old 01-21-2008, 11:56 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by Cali Z
because 340 is fairly close to 345, which is the average flywheel horsepower for an ls1 without any slp options. I can see where your going though, alot of the 6spd's and slp lid/catback cars are what we usually hear about, and are the 320-330 rwhp cars that are 370-380 flywheel. My car was just a run of the mill 98 ls1 an auto at that and made 300 to the ground, which is 350 flywheel. Sorry about the misunderstanding, it's just these cars vary so much 30-40 hp difference from car to car, being factory.
yeah i know what you mean. i just wanted to know why he threw 340 out there, and what he actually meant by it. i've seen many ls1 auto cars bone stock put 305 or so to the tires. it really depends on the year of the car and the tranny.
Old 01-22-2008, 12:01 AM
  #21  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by TTA 1387
I always find it funny that TPI owners think they own LS1 or even LT1 owners to the 1/8. How is it that a car that went 0-60 in about 6 seconds is faster than a car that does it under 6 seconds? Both the LT1 and LS1 did 0-60 under 6 seconds, yet TPI guys always claim their slower cars are so much faster. I don't get it.

Even my heavy pig of a GTO goes under 6 seconds to 60mph when it was stock. Defies logic....
maybe for you. all it takes is a decent driver to get a tpi car out of the hole very quickly with all the torque it makes. and your average ls1 owner will rip into it and sit there spinning while the tpi car is driving away...
Old 01-22-2008, 09:04 AM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
maybe for you. all it takes is a decent driver to get a tpi car out of the hole very quickly with all the torque it makes. and your average ls1 owner will rip into it and sit there spinning while the tpi car is driving away...
That's the thing. Everybody here that TPI's will out torque an LT1 or LS1. That's just wrong. Its easier to launch an LT1 or LS1 than a TPI. The TPI has more torque at idle and off idle but then dies off fairly quickly.

Its rather easy to get either an LT1 or LS1 in sub 2.0 short times bone stock. Not saying a TPI can't do it either but its a lot easier for the others. Hence the better 0-60 times for them also.
Old 01-22-2008, 01:06 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
PHAT89TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Newark, Ca, USA
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 02 ws-6
Engine: 5.7 liter
Transmission: t56
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

guys let put up dyno readings on l98 and ls1 motors. here my dyno numbers on my 02 ws6 m6. all stock except for slp lid, k&n filter through clogged cats.
Old 01-23-2008, 05:45 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
maybe for you. all it takes is a decent driver to get a tpi car out of the hole very quickly with all the torque it makes. and your average ls1 owner will rip into it and sit there spinning while the tpi car is driving away...
So your comparing a bad driver in an LS1 to a good driver in a TPI? The more torque and peakier (yeah I know it's not a word) it is, the harder it will be to launch.

Coming from someone who can launch a car decently (consistent mid 1.9s with a 1.91 best on a lowered car on 18" street radials), the LS1 and LT1 with a good driver should beat an L98 or TPI car out of the hole when traction is had.
Old 01-24-2008, 10:13 AM
  #25  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CashMunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ravenna, Ohio
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
So your comparing a bad driver in an LS1 to a good driver in a TPI? The more torque and peakier (yeah I know it's not a word) it is, the harder it will be to launch.

Coming from someone who can launch a car decently (consistent mid 1.9s with a 1.91 best on a lowered car on 18" street radials), the LS1 and LT1 with a good driver should beat an L98 or TPI car out of the hole when traction is had.
maybe you have good ls1 drivers where you live. we have few here. i've sat in the tower at our local track, and watched hundreds of ls1 drivers launch like crap. everytime a ws6 ta lines up, i watch a 5k dump on street tires that leads to spinning through 1st and 2nd, and a 2.4 60 ft time. notice you're saying... when traction is had.
Old 01-24-2008, 07:53 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
DIGGLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

the main thing about the tpi cars is torque.... so thats what the tpi owners brag about. lol
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
Old 01-24-2008, 09:14 PM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
Cali Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rocklin, Ca
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by DIGGLER
the main thing about the tpi cars is torque.... so thats what the tpi owners brag about. lol
huge torque down low doesnt mean it pulls faster than an LT1/LS1 i wouldnt think, since both of those cars are mostly traction limited down low from the get-go. i'd say that makes the torque arguement kinda moot. its all about hooking up.
my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
ya I feel this argument also has little backbone to it also. Most bolt-on tpi cars are in the low 14's/high 13s at sacramento raceway and even if they drove me out of the hole I was ahead of them by the middle of 2nd gear on the 12.9 passes, which is well before the 1/8 mile.
Old 01-25-2008, 06:01 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by CashMunson
maybe you have good ls1 drivers where you live. we have few here. i've sat in the tower at our local track, and watched hundreds of ls1 drivers launch like crap. everytime a ws6 ta lines up, i watch a 5k dump on street tires that leads to spinning through 1st and 2nd, and a 2.4 60 ft time. notice you're saying... when traction is had.
I don't see how you can generalize and compare a bad LS1 driver vs a good TPI driver.

Take your guy running 2.4 60's in his LS1. When you stick him in a TPI car with more grunt down low what do you think he is going to do? NOW take a guy who can nab a 1.9 in a TPI car and stick him in an LS1. Same 60' from a car that will haul the mail up top vs a car that gets to 60-70 and starts huffing.

Launching ANY street tired V8 at 5000 RPM is going to yield those results. But to say TPI's will stop light to stop light beat an LS1 because the LS1 driver is going to suck and the TPI driver wont is just a terrible way to make a claim.

To compare two cars with two unknown drivers (which is where the LS1 vs TPI debate has to be taken from) you CANNOT figure the TPI driver to be better than the LS1 driver, and if so what is your basis other than a generalization of people in your area???
Old 01-27-2008, 12:19 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

my stock (with cai and exhaust) '93 Z28 6 speed went 8.90's@81 with a 2.0x 60'.
my stock '99 SS 6 speed went 8.59@84 with a 1.9x 60'.
how about you tpi guys?
8.7@79 1.9 60' with stock tpi.Not up to par with your SS but with better gears,sticky tires and stall I may get close.However thats not stock and you`d still own me top end,TPI is tough to launch well.Took me forever to get low 2.x 60'or better.
Old 01-27-2008, 05:16 AM
  #30  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Here's the best the goat did when it was stock. Took 4 trips to the track to figure out how to launch it. The very first pass down the track was a wheel hopping 13.6 on a 2.1. That was with about 600 miles on it. The 4th trip had about 1000 miles on it.

8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.

I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.

3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
Old 01-27-2008, 11:18 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Good lord.

LSx > LTx > L98 (assuming bone stock)

There, I said it. Now you can all stop arguing
Old 01-28-2008, 05:18 AM
  #32  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by Shadygrady
8.7@79 1.9 60' with stock tpi.Not up to par with your SS but with better gears,sticky tires and stall I may get close.However thats not stock and you`d still own me top end,TPI is tough to launch well.Took me forever to get low 2.x 60'or better.
Not sure if I am missing something but your car is not stock. An LT1 or LS1 with the bolt ons and a cam like you have would be deep 12s cars?
Old 01-29-2008, 05:14 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
DIGGLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Originally Posted by Shadygrady
8.7@79 1.9 60' with stock tpi.Not up to par with your SS but with better gears,sticky tires and stall I may get close.However thats not stock and you`d still own me top end,TPI is tough to launch well.Took me forever to get low 2.x 60'or better.
that doesnt sound anything near stock to me, with all that stuff in your sig.

here's another one for thought.... a buddies car, '97 t/a full weight with nothing done other than a th350/3200 converter, catback, and drag radials went 8.0's at 85ish. thats with stock manifolds even. lol
----------
Originally Posted by TTA 1387
Here's the best the goat did when it was stock. Took 4 trips to the track to figure out how to launch it. The very first pass down the track was a wheel hopping 13.6 on a 2.1. That was with about 600 miles on it. The 4th trip had about 1000 miles on it.

8.568@83.23 on a 1.956 short time. Ended up running 13.252. Definitely not the quickest stock '04 but it was the best I could do before the mods started happening.

I have only tried an LS1 F-Body once. Took a brand new 98 WS6 down the track and it ran 13.3 back in 98. It was a completely different feel to my LT1 WS6. If I would have had a couple more tries at it, I'm sure I could have gotten at least a 13.1 out of it.

3rd gens are a good 500lbs less, if not more, than the goat. So it takes some power to get that thing out of the hole. An LT1/LS1 F-Body is easier to launch and should run quicker all things being equal.
buddy of mine just ran a 12.7x@109 with a 1.9x 60' this past weekend. '04 gto with 19" rims on it and street tires. full weight. headers/exhaust, cai, fast intake, and a little tuning i think.

Last edited by DIGGLER; 01-29-2008 at 05:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-29-2008, 06:11 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Well the tpi is stock and engine mods are mostly gm production parts,but I get your point.Stock l98 cant really compete with the newer series engines.I was really just replying to the how bout you tpi guys comment cause there are some respectable tpi powered cars out there.
Old 01-30-2008, 05:08 AM
  #35  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Bit off more than i could chew...

Were they production parts off yor car? If not, the point is mute.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulaEngland
European Region
38
07-17-2016 07:33 AM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
10-06-2015 11:56 AM
paul_huryk
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
1
10-01-2015 04:27 PM
Zell1luk
TPI
0
09-29-2015 10:36 AM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-28-2015 08:00 AM



Quick Reply: Bit off more than i could chew...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.