RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
I keep telling my friend that we need to go to the track, but he keeps insisting on running on the streets...
I think he might be afraid
I took him around the block in my RS and since then he hasnt said to much about wanting to race anymore...
I think he might be afraid
I took him around the block in my RS and since then he hasnt said to much about wanting to race anymore...
#52
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinatti OH
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
The tremendously brutal torque of the TPI is enough to scare anyone who's unprepared for it. Put some 3.42's and a posi in it then take him for a ride again, guarantee he won't want to race then.
#53
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
yea, if nothing else, tpi is damn fun to drive around the city.
#55
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middleburg Hts. OH
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 T/A, 92 Rs
Engine: L98:D,L03:<
Transmission: 700r4x2
Axle/Gears: 3.23 bw, 2.73 10 bolt.
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
my 92 rs isn't much different from your 91, i was there too. but for an l03 mine was fast, 15.65 wit a cat back and open element. compared to the l98 though, it's crap.
to the l03 guys, don't take it personally that the l03 is the low man on the totem pole, but don.t think twice about buying an l98 car or upgrading to a 350. then again we don't even speak of, or see much of the v6 cars either which somehow get left aalone. prbably cause those guys KNOW they aren't the fast ones unless it's a certain BOP v6 or another turbo/super charged option.
to the l03 guys, don't take it personally that the l03 is the low man on the totem pole, but don.t think twice about buying an l98 car or upgrading to a 350. then again we don't even speak of, or see much of the v6 cars either which somehow get left aalone. prbably cause those guys KNOW they aren't the fast ones unless it's a certain BOP v6 or another turbo/super charged option.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
My stock longblock L98 (gears exhaustand corvette converter) destroyed NPI cars
and holeshot then slowly walked PI mustangs.
#57
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinatti OH
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
*Sigh* in 1997 the 4.6's had an oval shaped intake port, in 1998 they changed it to a teardrop shaped port but it IS smaller than the 1999 PI style ports. The 98's also got better PCM tuning and a few other small changes that put the power up to 225. I've done a PI intake swap to a 98 and seen the intakes off of a few 4.6's. We had a HECK of a time getting stuff to work right until we found that the 1998 was basically a 1 off year. Similar to the 1997 LT1 engine, it was just one of those odd years. Oh and btw, stock 4.6 liter Mustangs are dogs. They feel fast when they're equipped with the 5 speed but they aren't in a hurry to get anywhere.
#58
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
That is one thing that I have noticed about his GT.... It feels like it kicks pretty hard, but it doesnt actually seem to be going anywhere...
I just thought that I was going crazy or something
I just thought that I was going crazy or something
#59
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: RS vs Mustang GT vs WRX
Those year GTs weren't extremely fast cars, higher 14s most likely. Heavy, motors weren't torquey and a weak N/A aftermarket. The best bet for those years is a PI swap with some freshening up, cams, and a power adder .
One of the easiest Mustangs to beat out there.
One of the easiest Mustangs to beat out there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mongoose462ci
North East Region
0
09-16-2015 11:46 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
8
09-12-2015 08:39 PM