Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

87 Iroc 305 Tpi vs. 97 Eclipse GS-T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2005, 03:20 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
87 Iroc 305 Tpi vs. 97 Eclipse GS-T

Just curious to see who would of came out on top. Won't be able to do the race now, since the car's out of comission, but he did back down from a challenge when my buddy tried to get him to come out and play.
My mods:
Edelbrock TES
American Thunder Catback with gutted cat
Gutted airbox
4th gen rear w/4.11's
His mods:
BOV
Strut Tower Brace

Thats all he said was done to the car, his moms just bought for him for $9000 and he know's nothing of cars, so more could have been done to it. His is a 5-speed, while i gots the 700r4. Hope he's up for the challenge when my car comes out of surgery.
Old 09-14-2005, 03:23 PM
  #2  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would you list mods that don't make the car faster? Well, because that's all he told you. I don't know, how fast is your car?
Old 09-14-2005, 03:28 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
Inwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2007 Saturn Sky Redline
Engine: 2.0 turbo
Transmission: m5
Axle/Gears: 3.91 LSD
Who knows. It will probably be pretty even though. Similar weight similar HP and most likely very similar times in the 1/4. It's a toss up really. If he has an MBC instead of a different BOV then you'll probably be left pretty quickly depending on whether he can drive/shift/launch. If he's essentially stock and can't drive/shift/launch then you'll win easily.
Old 09-14-2005, 03:45 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
Stu - I'm not sure on how fast it is by times, because i've never been to the track. It a pretty good 305 i say. Can hit 60 pretty quick, thanks to the exhuast and gears. I know i get him from the dig, but from what i'm told those turbos like to be up top, where as the tpi's like to fall apart around 4500rpms, correct?
Old 09-14-2005, 05:19 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
The answer is pretty easy as you both have similar hp.

His car is the GS-T version, the FWD turbo. He doesn't really have traction, and I hear those need a bit ot clutch massaging to get them to launch right.. I see them all the time either bog or spin their asses off at the track. His launch is going to suck.

Your launch however will be awesome unless you blow it. you have a bit of down low TQ and you're RWD.

Once you get up there, 4500RPMs or so, your car will slow down, and his will speed up.

You'll nail the launch, and if you don't race to far I think you'll hold it, but if you get to about 65 mph or if you do a highway roll, he'll get ya.
Old 09-14-2005, 06:45 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
If you don't royally screw up you should take him.

BTW 4.11's are WAAAAAAY too steep for that car, especially with the 700.
Old 09-14-2005, 06:46 PM
  #7  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can gears be too steep?
Old 09-14-2005, 06:49 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
87TPI350KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
Our cars only rev to 5k rpm, so the 4.11 will be a monster to about 30 then it will fall flat on its face all the way to its top speed of about 100.
Old 09-14-2005, 06:51 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by stu
How can gears be too steep?
Easy. 4.11's keep the RPM's up....well as you've probably learned by reading these boards the TPI's aren't exactly high RPM breathers.

Think as 4.11's as someone that forces a 10-pack-a-day smoker to run a 25 miles marathon
Old 09-14-2005, 06:58 PM
  #10  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There used to be a lot of debate about this with the turbo cars.

One side said:

If you have a turbo, you should have longer gears, because longer gears will keep you in the powerband longer. Plus, there will be more load on the motor, and turbos run off of load, so they'll also spool faster.

The other side said:

You dummies, why would you want to spend the same time in one power band with long gears, as two power bands with short gears? The guy who gets through all his gear faster is clearly going faster.

I never took a side. I understand the concept of parts made for certain power ranges being mismatched, but I never really understood how gears could mess that up. I guess I just don't understand why it's a big deal to fly through your powerband, if you can just shift and be in the next one.
Old 09-14-2005, 07:03 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
but when your powerband really ends at say 4500 rpm's flying through it only makes you fly through it in the next gear. They're just too high for a TPI motor. On a LS1 it's better...hell there are guys that run 4.56's on the street with their 6-speed cars.
Old 09-14-2005, 07:23 PM
  #12  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, streetability and being fast are two different things I guess.

My last car had 4.10 gears, and it sucked trying to cruise at even 80mph.
Old 09-14-2005, 08:48 PM
  #13  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,243
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
As stated 4.10's take a TPI out of its sweet spot right away. The motor will run outside of its powerband for the entire time that you "race it". Also, a car doesn't accelerate linearly. Therefore, each numerical gear that you go higher the less the acceleration you have no matter how much power you make. The key to acceleration is to match the power range of your motor with a gear that keeps in that range the longest. The reason why you see LT1 and LS1 cars with 4.10's is because their powerbands are nearly twice as wide as any other previous f-body V8. They can hop from gear to gear because the have the motor that keeps making power at high RPM's. They can accelerate more per gear than a motor with a narower power band.
Old 09-14-2005, 09:52 PM
  #14  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess since I made all my power up top, I never would have noticed the difference.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:10 PM
  #15  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
Imagine how much faster you could have been if you had put that info to good use. BTW, How easy it it for honda guys to play around with their gear ratios? Is there alot of aftermarket choices for that?
Old 09-14-2005, 10:17 PM
  #16  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm, not really. My gears were factory. I don't think I would have been any faster with different gears. If you want different gears, you are pretty much looking at just mix and matching from different transmissions if you don't want to pay an arm and a leg.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:38 PM
  #17  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
I was just wondering if they played around with the final drive ratio to address traction issues or getting more rpms though the traps. I can imagine 4.10 being necessary for the stock engines to multiply the scarce torque they had. But putting turbos into the equation usually ups the torque significantly so traction issues may have been a problem.

Last edited by 79vette; 09-14-2005 at 10:40 PM.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:43 PM
  #18  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha, you have no idea. I had an open differential, so I would get torque steer so bad that I'd have to fight the car just to keep it in my lane sometimes.

Unless you are talking about doing some serious mods for specific track use, it's either the LS transmission (long gears) or GS-R, Civic Si, Type R (short gears) transmission. The only person that I personally know to mess with gears was my friend who has GSR 1-4, then an LS 5th gear (since he doesn't ever use 5th on the road coarse or autocross). His is all custom, but I don't remember what he did.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:48 PM
  #19  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
Well, when you do start your next project, do your self a favor and get a RWD car. I dont care what make it is, but you will not have to worry about torque steer no more. I am not sure if AWD cars suffer from torque steer, they might have eliminated that problem through engineering the driveline right.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:51 PM
  #20  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Next car will be a Miata. I like to be the underdog, it's more fun.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:55 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
lilbowilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina!
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
I race a stock GST when my tpi 305 only had 3 inch exhaust and a cheap performance chip with 2.73 gears. We race 2 times first race I got the jump and beat him by a fender. Second race he got the jump and won by a fender. I also notice he would start to pull away a little after 100mph. Anyway I think you would win with you mods unless you screw up the kick.
Old 09-14-2005, 10:58 PM
  #22  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
Well those look like they would be fun to soup up, I hope your not too tall cause I'm 6'1 and it really hurt to sit inside those things. My knees were jammed hard against the dash with the seat all the way back. Corky Bell Has a company that makes those things very quick with turbo kits. I think its called Flyin Miata or something like that. Shave a few more 100 lbs off that thing and get it to be 300-400 hp and you will have a giant killer.

Edit: here is a Link:Flyn' Miata

They got a pretty cool cars for sale section. All ready to go mini street demons.

Last edited by 79vette; 09-14-2005 at 11:10 PM.
Old 09-14-2005, 11:17 PM
  #23  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flyin Miata is only a four hour drive from me, and they have nothing to do with Corky Bell that I know of. I'm 6'2".
Old 09-14-2005, 11:38 PM
  #24  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
Yea I am wrong about corky bell, He did have a miata tuner shop though. I hope you can fit in it.

Edit: actually Flyin Miada Distributes Corky's Turbo kits for the Miata.

here is Corky's Shop:Bell engineering Group

Last edited by 79vette; 09-14-2005 at 11:48 PM.
Old 09-14-2005, 11:46 PM
  #25  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've driven one before. I have a taller torso than most men I think.
Old 09-14-2005, 11:50 PM
  #26  
Member
 
79vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Corvette
Engine: 355, TFS heads, comp 270H cam, 10.5 comp.
Transmission: 700r4/ 3:55 posi/ 2500 stall
I like Corky cause he is a Texas A&M graduate. In fact I am doing Mechanical/Marine Engineering there right now.
Old 09-15-2005, 02:39 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by stu
There used to be a lot of debate about this with the turbo cars.

One side said:

If you have a turbo, you should have longer gears, because longer gears will keep you in the powerband longer. Plus, there will be more load on the motor, and turbos run off of load, so they'll also spool faster.

The other side said:

You dummies, why would you want to spend the same time in one power band with long gears, as two power bands with short gears? The guy who gets through all his gear faster is clearly going faster.

I never took a side. I understand the concept of parts made for certain power ranges being mismatched, but I never really understood how gears could mess that up. I guess I just don't understand why it's a big deal to fly through your powerband, if you can just shift and be in the next one.
the tpi cars not being heavy breathers at higher rpms are just going to wind through the gears too quick.
as I'm sure you already know having a numericly higher gear gives you more torque at the wheels. but with a low reving car like the stock intake tpi car it just ends up in 3rd gear where the torque to the wheels isn't as high as in first gear


while on a higher revving motor having those steeper gears is kinda nice being you can take advantage of them a little longer. as the motor is able to breathe higher up.

but then again you go too numericly lower of a gear your going to stay in each gear longer but your going to overall put a lot less torque to the ground as well.

gotta find the middle ground
Old 09-15-2005, 02:42 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 79vette
Well, when you do start your next project, do your self a favor and get a RWD car. I dont care what make it is, but you will not have to worry about torque steer no more. I am not sure if AWD cars suffer from torque steer, they might have eliminated that problem through engineering the driveline right.

lol I get torque steer like effect from my mazda.

hit the gas the car veers to the right let off the gas and she veers to the left.


think the bushings for the steering on the back is a little messed up though.
Old 09-15-2005, 08:19 AM
  #29  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
I noticed the 4.11's did drop off the top a little bit compared to the orignal 2.73's the car came with. I bent my rear axle arm on the pass. side, so i pick up an entire rear from a friends 94 trans am. He put 4.11's, and the screamed for his car. I wanted to go with some 3.42 or 3.73, but couldn't afford them at the time (i got the entire rear with calipers, rotors, new posi and gears for $100, he bought a moser 12 bolt, and wanted to get rid of it, so i pick it up. I going to be doing an LT1 swap soon, so i guess i can keep the gears. I know when i cruise to like 65, and then go WOT, damn car barely seems like it's moving.
Old 09-15-2005, 09:31 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
yeah those 4.11s are way too steep for you.. on the other hand my 4.10s just came in yesterday

Even with the LT1 if you're planning on running an auto I'd suggest stepping down to a 3.73. 4.10s are bad on gas mileage in the 4L60E, but you can run them if you can live with it. Be prepared for MAJOR traction issues Cant imagine what your gas mileage is like in the 700R4.. seeing as how you're probably flooring it on the highway to pass someone
Old 09-15-2005, 11:31 AM
  #31  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
I'm doing a T-56 along with the LT1. I guess the 4.11's will be fun, but with the 305, they are way too much, but really fun off the line, they throw you in the seat. BUt once i hit like 60 and above, it was no fun, didn't have anymore ooommmppphh!! I believe i would of got him, for the fact he can't drive, he really cocky, thought was hot **** when he got the car. I'll have to admit though, it's was very clean when i first saw it, very clean. But his modest cockiness as to go, some needs to take it away from him.
Old 09-15-2005, 03:24 PM
  #32  
TGO Supporter

 
nick418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
i wouldnt go any higher then 3.42 gears on a TPI car
Old 09-15-2005, 04:19 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Nitrous Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '90 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
Engine: 5.0L Ford V8
Transmission: AOD
Axle/Gears: 8.8" Ford, 3.08:1
When is your car going to be done? I'd love to see it.
Old 09-15-2005, 09:03 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
goodtimes11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
He is going to spin his tires no matter what. if you keep the race short and all he has is what you mentioned then you will win. but if he can drive and has done some work like mbc, 1stgen bov, uicp, intake and has his suspension dialed in you don't have much of a chance. DON"T RACE HIM FROM A ROLL you will lose. the gst are best eclipse from a roll because they are lighter then the gsx and have less drivetrain loss.
Old 09-16-2005, 01:24 AM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
Mikels86T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Chevy S-10
Engine: LT-1 (94-Z)
Transmission: 2001 4L60E
I have an 86 TPI 350 car with 342 gears and TCI 2100 and my friend has a 97 gs-t (eclipse) we went to the track and with me spinning half through first gear i pulled 2 and a half cars and stayed! I ran 13.70 he ran a 15.23! my motor is stock pickup 350 with 305 tpi heads/intake and the RV cam! with 3 inch catback!
Old 09-16-2005, 08:31 AM
  #36  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
Well, i guess from a dig i have him, with his mods vs. mine, which he barely has any mods, just a BOV. Nitrous Al, the car should be done by spring time i hope, but i'll say the summer. Where in a Mass do you live, i'm in dorchester. When would an LT1 run outta of breath?
Old 09-16-2005, 09:56 AM
  #37  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,243
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by link85x
When would an LT1 run outta of breath?
They really don't. The heads can be ported to flow 280cfm and the intake potential is almost unlimited. They have a flat powerband when modded or stock.
Old 09-16-2005, 10:15 AM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
Mikels86T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Chevy S-10
Engine: LT-1 (94-Z)
Transmission: 2001 4L60E
actually there guys getting 300+ cfm out LT-1's and I have an LT-1 in my S-10 and it pulls hard all the way to 6900 rpm. so depends on cam and heads to when the LT-1 would run out of air.
Old 09-16-2005, 10:54 AM
  #39  
stu
Supreme Member
 
stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A BOV doesn't make a car faster. It shouldn't even be considered a performance mod.
Old 09-16-2005, 11:41 AM
  #40  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
6900rpm!! Damn, thats some good pulling there. Boy, i can't wait.
Old 09-16-2005, 11:52 AM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
goodtimes11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 90 eagle talon tsi awd
Yes however if the 2nd gen eclipse bov were made of plastic and leaks at 13 psi so if you want to use a mbc and up the boost to 15psi (max turbo eclipse can handle without fuel mods) you need to switch bov. the 1st gen bov is metal and can handle more then 20psi. but your right stu bov on its own is not a performance mod. im just saying that when you buy a new bov for a eclipse it is usually so that you can run a boost controller.
Old 09-16-2005, 12:06 PM
  #42  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
link85x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt w/3.08's (dying)
I don't really know much about imports, but it was that way when he bought the car from the dealership. I thought the BOV had some significance(sp) by itself, but you learn something new everyday.
Old 09-16-2005, 05:11 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by stu
A BOV doesn't make a car faster. It shouldn't even be considered a performance mod.
yes it is man
it makes the car louder when shifting
and we all know that louder means faster right?
Old 09-20-2005, 11:01 PM
  #44  
Member

 
DON 88T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who is getting 300+ cfm out of LT1 heads?
Old 09-21-2005, 11:03 AM
  #45  
Member

 
Perry93TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Kingfisher,Ok
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 97 WS6 T/A
Engine: LT1 383
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by DON 88T/A
Who is getting 300+ cfm out of LT1 heads?
LE and AI are getting close to 290 out of stock LT1 castings, move up to LT4s and they get over 300 CFM with them.

Of course the aftermarket heads easily get over 300 cfm when ported.

My 97 T/A with a 383 spins to 7000 rpm with only 270 cfm from my 190cc AFRs.
Old 09-22-2005, 02:24 PM
  #46  
Junior Member
 
cas0484's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stafford, virginia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1994 25th Anniversary Trans Am
Engine: Lt1
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by urbanhunter44
yeah those 4.11s are way too steep for you.. on the other hand my 4.10s just came in yesterday

Even with the LT1 if you're planning on running an auto I'd suggest stepping down to a 3.73. 4.10s are bad on gas mileage in the 4L60E, but you can run them if you can live with it. Be prepared for MAJOR traction issues Cant imagine what your gas mileage is like in the 700R4.. seeing as how you're probably flooring it on the highway to pass someone

4.10's eh? Let me know the results once you get them swapped out. I have a set of 3.73's in my basement waiting for some extra cash. But for now, I don't have any complaints about the factory 3.23's. I'm sure traction will be a huge issue for you. I have a hard time hooking up from a dig with a good set of street tires and what few bolt-ons I have.
Old 09-23-2005, 01:24 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
yes, traction is going to be a huge issue. I have some plans in the works to fix that though

The intake potential of an LT1 is ridiculously high. LE3 heads are routinely ported to 275 with ease. I've seen some reports of 285-290 from some companies, including LE.
Old 09-24-2005, 01:21 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
lilbowilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina!
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
yes, traction is going to be a huge issue
Please don't take any offense to this but you might want to work on your driving skills because I've seen completely stock LT1's run consitant 8.7's in the 1/8. Your 60ft tells it all 60': 2.197 if your doing that with 3.42 gears what do you thinks going to happen with 4.10? You should be able to get a 1.8 or atleast a 1.9 in stock form.

OH shoot I forgot I don't know anything about f-bodies! LOL

Last edited by lilbowilson; 09-24-2005 at 01:24 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueIroc-Z
Camaros for Sale
7
06-09-2019 03:22 AM
gta90
TPI
40
09-15-2015 04:00 PM
drewdock87
South Central
3
08-18-2015 09:02 PM
st.evel07
Engine Swap
5
08-13-2015 06:15 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM



Quick Reply: 87 Iroc 305 Tpi vs. 97 Eclipse GS-T



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.