99 T/A vs 87 IROC
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
99 T/A vs 87 IROC
My car is the iroc, not done yet. I have it in the shop. I'm swapping my 14.9 second stock 305 out for:
SDPC 350 TPI w/ Vortec heads, LT4 hot cam and stuff.
24# injectors, SLP runners, hooker 2055 headers, catco cat and hooker cat back. Holley AFPR. Spohn LCAs w/ relocation brackets, SFCs, and adjustable panhard. 3.42 posi rear. Custom tune. 700r4 with 3000 stall TC and shift kit.
His car will be a bone stock 99 T/A...LS1 M6, beat to **** by him. Hes never run it. Brought it to the track, but watched...go figure.
Our friends talk...they always say "a race between you two would be real close, itd be an awesome race"
In my head I'm gonna have at least a car on him if not more. I think his car will go 13.6 if hes lucky...my tuner agrees that I can go into the 12s with traction. Our race wouldn't be on the strip though. Most likely light to light or something...somehow making me more confident.
Whats your opinions?
SDPC 350 TPI w/ Vortec heads, LT4 hot cam and stuff.
24# injectors, SLP runners, hooker 2055 headers, catco cat and hooker cat back. Holley AFPR. Spohn LCAs w/ relocation brackets, SFCs, and adjustable panhard. 3.42 posi rear. Custom tune. 700r4 with 3000 stall TC and shift kit.
His car will be a bone stock 99 T/A...LS1 M6, beat to **** by him. Hes never run it. Brought it to the track, but watched...go figure.
Our friends talk...they always say "a race between you two would be real close, itd be an awesome race"
In my head I'm gonna have at least a car on him if not more. I think his car will go 13.6 if hes lucky...my tuner agrees that I can go into the 12s with traction. Our race wouldn't be on the strip though. Most likely light to light or something...somehow making me more confident.
Whats your opinions?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Fuel Injection
Transmission: Automatic 4speed /w OVerdrive
Well you just stated that he has never ran his car but can the guy drive? It could just all come down to human error/lack of experience. If he can't drive and just hammers down on the gas off the line then he will sit there for a bit while he re-coats the pavement with rubber while you are screaming down the track.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
He can drive for daily driving. Not race though. No one ever seems to know about power shifting around here. But just the same...if he could drive...I bet the best his car would do was a 13.6...mainly because its a beat LS1...upwards of 60-70k miles and the first couple of weeks he had it he did donuts out the ***.
I think I'd win because i should be putting close to 300 rwhp down and close to 400 rwtq.
I think I'd win because i should be putting close to 300 rwhp down and close to 400 rwtq.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pasadena, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Your power numbers are pretty close. That same motor with a stock intake put down 256 hp and 373 tq with a stock intake, so the runners should give about 15 maybe 20 horses more.
You should definitley take him off the line with your suspension mods and since you say he cant drive you shouldn't have any problems staying ahead.
You should definitley take him off the line with your suspension mods and since you say he cant drive you shouldn't have any problems staying ahead.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by RS Chris
Your power numbers are pretty close. That same motor with a stock intake put down 256 hp and 373 tq with a stock intake, so the runners should give about 15 maybe 20 horses more.
You should definitley take him off the line with your suspension mods and since you say he cant drive you shouldn't have any problems staying ahead.
Your power numbers are pretty close. That same motor with a stock intake put down 256 hp and 373 tq with a stock intake, so the runners should give about 15 maybe 20 horses more.
You should definitley take him off the line with your suspension mods and since you say he cant drive you shouldn't have any problems staying ahead.
#6
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
How good is your tune? Is it perfectly dialed in with many many burns or is a it a mail order stab in the dark? If your car is not properly tuned I would give him the victory. The stock TPI is really holding that motor back. The day you switch it for another intake is the day you never lose to him.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
my tune will be the kind with numerous burns and such, datalogging, all that good stuff. Like I said the car isnt done yet. I will be going to my tuner, we will datalog for 10 minutes or so, and he will begin messing around until I find a tune that works. After break in...we will then proceed to the track to really fine tune it. Then he will burn me a 2nd chip to pass emissions.
I would agree on the top end half of it that he would beat me. But from a stoplight to another stop light, his top end doesnt have a chance to show its ugly head. And the TPI torque would carry me to victory wouldnt you say? Beings he has a 99 LS1...arent the 98-99 ones the poorer of the bunch? Also, his engine is beat to death. He still has his skipshift thing in place as well.
oh, and about the intake, when i get the funding (the engine swap dented me big time)...HSR for vortecs will be put on. nuff said.
I would agree on the top end half of it that he would beat me. But from a stoplight to another stop light, his top end doesnt have a chance to show its ugly head. And the TPI torque would carry me to victory wouldnt you say? Beings he has a 99 LS1...arent the 98-99 ones the poorer of the bunch? Also, his engine is beat to death. He still has his skipshift thing in place as well.
oh, and about the intake, when i get the funding (the engine swap dented me big time)...HSR for vortecs will be put on. nuff said.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Originally posted by IROCZ28dan.oh, and about the intake, when i get the funding (the engine swap dented me big time)...HSR for vortecs will be put on. nuff said.
#9
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
All of the LS1's made about the same power. Remember the LS1 has wicked low end as well. They make 400lb ft and have an equaly impressive power curve. Your low end power curve should be right on par with his. An LS1's top end is just so mean that they appear to lack low end. Even a from a dig and LS1 can spin up in no time and put a hurtin on you if you aren't ready. If he had routine maintenance on his motor there shouldn't be anything wrong with it power wise. Lots of people keep the skip shift because it doesn't effect WOT performance.
Because your tune is not dialed in yet I wouldn't take him too lightly. You have a weight advantage but your set-up is not dialed in and your power curve will be compromised by the stock TPI. Remember, it takes an LT4 hotcam for an LT1 car to run with a stock LS1. You have a great combo started there and with a tune you should really see some serious improvements. That alone could put you easily in front of him. Without it though you just have some parts that your car isn't feeding correctly.
Because your tune is not dialed in yet I wouldn't take him too lightly. You have a weight advantage but your set-up is not dialed in and your power curve will be compromised by the stock TPI. Remember, it takes an LT4 hotcam for an LT1 car to run with a stock LS1. You have a great combo started there and with a tune you should really see some serious improvements. That alone could put you easily in front of him. Without it though you just have some parts that your car isn't feeding correctly.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
yea...the tune will take place directly after the swap though...which is taking place right now. the LS1s ive seen with dyno numbers dont come close to 400 ft/lbs at the wheels...and ive seen similar combos on this board with guys who claim to have walked LS1s...so i guess ill see.
#11
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by IROCZ28dan
yea...the tune will take place directly after the swap though...which is taking place right now. the LS1s ive seen with dyno numbers dont come close to 400 ft/lbs at the wheels...and ive seen similar combos on this board with guys who claim to have walked LS1s...so i guess ill see.
yea...the tune will take place directly after the swap though...which is taking place right now. the LS1s ive seen with dyno numbers dont come close to 400 ft/lbs at the wheels...and ive seen similar combos on this board with guys who claim to have walked LS1s...so i guess ill see.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
My combination puts down 304RWHP and 334RWT. A week ago I ran a 12.73@105.85 with 3/4 tank of gas. This is a fully loaded 1989 GTA with T-Tops and me weighing 250 pounds. TPI by the way.
If you are around 300RWHP this will give you and idea of what your car can do. If I had been smart and ran a 1/8 tank of gas I would have been in the high 12.6's. You should give the LS1 a real run for his money. Allen
If you are around 300RWHP this will give you and idea of what your car can do. If I had been smart and ran a 1/8 tank of gas I would have been in the high 12.6's. You should give the LS1 a real run for his money. Allen
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Mods? do you have emissions...ie do you still have your AIR?
what kinda traction did you have...and were you on slicks or anything?
what kinda traction did you have...and were you on slicks or anything?
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
I think you've got him stop-light to stoplight, but as soon as you go faster than 60 or 70, he's going to walk you HARD. Your TPI dies out real quick, and LS1s only get stronger.
change your induction system, and you have him.
change your induction system, and you have him.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
I still have air and the car is completely smog legal for California. I was running Mickey Thompson ET Street Radials at the track. No traction otherwise.
I drove 65 miles to the track. The only thing I did was change out the tires. I left the airfilter in place. Hopefully with a little tweaking here and there I will be in the 12.5's by the end of the year. Allen
I drove 65 miles to the track. The only thing I did was change out the tires. I left the airfilter in place. Hopefully with a little tweaking here and there I will be in the 12.5's by the end of the year. Allen
Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; 04-18-2005 at 09:58 PM.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 1989GTATransAm
My combination puts down 304RWHP and 334RWT. A week ago I ran a 12.73@105.85 with 3/4 tank of gas. This is a fully loaded 1989 GTA with T-Tops and me weighing 250 pounds. TPI by the way.
If you are around 300RWHP this will give you and idea of what your car can do. If I had been smart and ran a 1/8 tank of gas I would have been in the high 12.6's. You should give the LS1 a real run for his money. Allen
My combination puts down 304RWHP and 334RWT. A week ago I ran a 12.73@105.85 with 3/4 tank of gas. This is a fully loaded 1989 GTA with T-Tops and me weighing 250 pounds. TPI by the way.
If you are around 300RWHP this will give you and idea of what your car can do. If I had been smart and ran a 1/8 tank of gas I would have been in the high 12.6's. You should give the LS1 a real run for his money. Allen
#17
Member
Originally posted by stu.It drives me nuts seeing guys like you run those times with that trap speed. I mean I know I had almost the cheapest tires money could buy, but my best time was a 13.8 @ 106.86.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Wow stu, your tires must have REALLY sucked. I though my Eagles out back on the Stang sucked, consdiering Ill spin in 2nd gear....guess I found out someone has used ****tier tires than me
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
yea torque and street tires dont mix. a ran a 9.17 in the 1/8th which isnt anything to brag about but trapping 81 while doing so tells me i need traction....bad.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by stu
Well, I think it's more that my best 60' EVER was a 2.3.
Well, I think it's more that my best 60' EVER was a 2.3.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
lol@60-70K miles being a tired motor...it's just being broken in
Seriously though, should be a good race. You have a decent setup but your tune is gonna be key(as previously stated).
I'm interested to see the results
Seriously though, should be a good race. You have a decent setup but your tune is gonna be key(as previously stated).
I'm interested to see the results
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Remember, it takes an LT4 hotcam for an LT1 car to run with a stock LS1
my brother in his stock 00' Z28 6speed and i raced from 40 to 110 several times and were ALWAYS door to door. then he added a lid and a catback and would beat me by a car and a half
Last edited by tpivette89; 04-27-2005 at 08:46 PM.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by tpivette89
dont you think that statement is a bit extreme? my 93' Vette 6speed with only a K&N filter and the mufflers cut off trapped over 107mph. thats what a well driven stock LS1 is capable of
my brother in his stock 00' Z28 6speed and i raced from 40 to 110 several times and were ALWAYS door to door. then he added a lid and a catback and would beat me by a car and a half
dont you think that statement is a bit extreme? my 93' Vette 6speed with only a K&N filter and the mufflers cut off trapped over 107mph. thats what a well driven stock LS1 is capable of
my brother in his stock 00' Z28 6speed and i raced from 40 to 110 several times and were ALWAYS door to door. then he added a lid and a catback and would beat me by a car and a half
#26
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by tpivette89
dont you think that statement is a bit extreme? my 93' Vette 6speed with only a K&N filter and the mufflers cut off trapped over 107mph. thats what a well driven stock LS1 is capable of
dont you think that statement is a bit extreme? my 93' Vette 6speed with only a K&N filter and the mufflers cut off trapped over 107mph. thats what a well driven stock LS1 is capable of
I realize that there are bolt on LT1's running better ET's than LS1 cars but from a roll it takes a cam to hang with one in an F-body.
#27
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by urbanhunter44
Yikes. Yeah your ET/trap speed is wayyyy off. You musta had alot of wheel spin.
Yikes. Yeah your ET/trap speed is wayyyy off. You musta had alot of wheel spin.
I think with slicks and like a 2.1 60' I could have done a 13.4 or something.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Most stock LT1 f-bods only trap 100 to 102 as well. It would take a cam to even get close to the MPH of an M6 LS1 car.
Most stock LT1 f-bods only trap 100 to 102 as well. It would take a cam to even get close to the MPH of an M6 LS1 car.
Once the headers, ypipe, ported TB and some PCM tuning get done I'm hoping to be around 109-ish.
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Well my last time out at California Raceway there were maybe 20 4th gens. I only saw one that had a faster trap time than me and one with a 12.74 trap time with me at 12.73.
Now a lot of them had better speed at the 1320 mark but that is not what wins the race. Hehehe. Gotta love the TPI for the quick launch to get the car moving. Now if I could just get to line up with some instead of the ricers which I annihilate.
Now a lot of them had better speed at the 1320 mark but that is not what wins the race. Hehehe. Gotta love the TPI for the quick launch to get the car moving. Now if I could just get to line up with some instead of the ricers which I annihilate.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Wow! You have a freak on your hands You are way above the norm
Wow! You have a freak on your hands You are way above the norm
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
I think he's talking about fbody's
LT1 vettes are tremendously lighter and have a better exhaust than their f-body brother
With just a catback and a lid I trapped at 106.63...not too bad
Wow! You have a freak on your hands You are way above the norm
Last edited by tpivette89; 04-28-2005 at 04:44 PM.
#32
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by tpivette89
really? my brothers 00' Z28 with the same mods + a K&N filter trapped 110.51mph at Cecil last November. he ran a 12.90 with a 2.0X 60ft on that run. maybe your car is an auto? (your trans isnt listed in your sig) that would explain the mph difference
really? my brothers 00' Z28 with the same mods + a K&N filter trapped 110.51mph at Cecil last November. he ran a 12.90 with a 2.0X 60ft on that run. maybe your car is an auto? (your trans isnt listed in your sig) that would explain the mph difference
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
TPIvette...yeah auto car. I don't bother with 6-speeds. Once I get a converter(if I even bother) the car will be more fun, consistent and faster than a 6-speed car
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
I am an idoit. I thought he had an LT1 car until I just read his sig and found out he had an LS1. His trap times are normal for an LS1 car. If he had an LT1 car with that trap speed he would be way above the norm.
I am an idoit. I thought he had an LT1 car until I just read his sig and found out he had an LS1. His trap times are normal for an LS1 car. If he had an LT1 car with that trap speed he would be way above the norm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM