Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

L69 305 no fuel issue....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2022, 08:18 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Scott's 83' Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Bloomington mn
Posts: 53
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
L69 305 no fuel issue....

Hello all!
I have a 1983 Z28 with the 305 HO and I am stumped on a fuel issue.

I started with a new intake manifold due to an oil leak off the back of the motor. I had a Carter mechanical I purchased previously and thought this would be good time to replace that too.

Now I can only get the car to run on fuel in the carb only.
I used the hack saw blade trick to install the pump the first time. It appeared the push was hitting the very end of the fuel pump arm and therefore was not moving enough fuel.

I took it out and used a bolt through the block to hold the push rod in place and reinstalled the pump. I am still have the same issue. It has a new pump and 3/4 tank of gas (I put almost 5 gallons in the tank before this so it has gas and spark.

Ideas anyone????
Old 10-09-2022, 08:18 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Scott's 83' Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Bloomington mn
Posts: 53
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
L69 305 no fuel issue....

Hello all!
I have a 1983 Z28 with the 305 HO and I am stumped on a fuel issue.

I started with a new intake manifold due to an oil leak off the back of the motor. I had a Carter mechanical I purchased previously and thought this would be good time to replace that too.

Now I can only get the car to run on fuel in the carb only.
I used the hack saw blade trick to install the pump the first time. It appeared the push was hitting the very end of the fuel pump arm and therefore was not moving enough fuel.

I took it out and used a bolt through the block to hold the push rod in place and reinstalled the pump. I am still have the same issue. It has a new pump and 3/4 tank of gas (I put almost 5 gallons in the tank before this so it has gas and spark.

Ideas anyone????
Old 10-09-2022, 09:04 PM
  #3  
Member

 
stew'86MCSS396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: honolulu
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: '86MCSS
Engine: 396 .030"
Transmission: M20
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Well you know what they say about "NEW." Never Ever Worked! Can you disconnect the fuel line between carb and pump, place loose end in a catch can and crank engine to see if any fuel is coming out the line.

Comparing old to new...pump lever identical?

I don't know how hard it is to make this mistake but is the input and output lines connected correctly? I've only heard of this happening with aftermarket style pumps that require npt fittings/barbs to install.
Old 10-10-2022, 05:29 AM
  #4  
Moderator

 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,369
Received 219 Likes on 179 Posts
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Originally Posted by Scott's 83' Z
...I took it out and used a bolt through the block to hold the push rod in place and reinstalled the pump....
Of course, you removed the longer bolt from the front of the block and installed a shorter one when finished, right?

Someone had to ask.

You can also gently blow back through the fuel line to the tank with the filler cap removed to insure the line and filter/sock in the tank are clear. It is also fair game to rig a fuel line to a temporary tank/bottle to the inlet side of the pump and crank the engine to wet down the check valves and diaphragm in the pump, just in case they are stuck to their seats from long storage.

The following users liked this post:
Scott's 83' Z (11-13-2022)
Old 10-14-2022, 11:21 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
84 1LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oyth
Posts: 6,206
Received 322 Likes on 264 Posts
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Dont the H.O engines also use an in tank (electric) fuel pump. Is that working?
Old 10-15-2022, 06:53 AM
  #6  
On Probation

 
sonjaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 1,588
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 84 Z-28
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: r-700
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

My 84 HO had a pump in tank and pump on block.
(That set up changed in later years IIRC)
Old 10-15-2022, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
84 1LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oyth
Posts: 6,206
Received 322 Likes on 264 Posts
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Yep, i think 86 was the last year.
Old 10-15-2022, 02:40 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
LAFireboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 242 Likes on 182 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

My 83 HO didn't have an electric in-tank pump from the factory, and it was built near the end of the production run, so I'd guess none of the 83 HOs had one. The in-tank pump was a service order addition installed by the dealer later on.

I don't remember exactly when it became a thing, but the dealer installed mine sometime in, I'm thinking, 1984, maybe, so Scott's 83 may or may not have one. It would depend upon whether or not that particular car was taken to a dealer for the "fix." If his car was mine, lol, then it has one. Mine never got the little fan "fix" though, whenever that came out.
Old 10-15-2022, 02:55 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
84 1LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oyth
Posts: 6,206
Received 322 Likes on 264 Posts
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

I always thought it was a production line thing.
Old 10-15-2022, 03:40 PM
  #10  
Member

 
stew'86MCSS396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: honolulu
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: '86MCSS
Engine: 396 .030"
Transmission: M20
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Understood that '83s might not have one but... That's an interesting thought on the in tank fuel pump considering the work that was done on the vehicle. IDK, I'm just asking. How's it wired and is it possible that the wiring was accidentally disconnected during the intake swap.

Last edited by stew'86MCSS396; 10-15-2022 at 03:46 PM.
Old 10-15-2022, 10:16 PM
  #11  
Member

 
1983LU5TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1983 LU5 Trans Am, 1967 Chevelle
Engine: LU5, LSx
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.73
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Originally Posted by 84 1LE
Dont the H.O engines also use an in tank (electric) fuel pump. Is that working?
Not all L69s received an in-tank pump. It was installed on some vehicles per a TSB that was issued. They also received a carb heat shield, and an electric fan mounted between the passenger side fenderwell and fender, with a duct that ran up to the inlet of the carb.
Old 10-16-2022, 07:55 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,123
Received 1,688 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

My 83 L69 never had any of that added to it.

Not sure why the factory didn't just use something like this cantonracingproducts.com/canton-85-000-phenolic-insulator-for-small-block-chevy-fuel-pumps/ since The Real Problem is heat getting into the fuel via the pump's intimate metallic connection to the block.




For that matter, just putting in 2 of the super-thin gaskets between the plate and the block, and 2 gaskets between the pump and the plate, makes a YYYYYYUUUUUUUUUJJJJJJJJJJE improvement in the whole fuel-boiling behavior that these cars suffer from. That's what I did for years.

Butt, to Scott's issue though; the stock pump is entirely adequate for at least 400 HP worth of fuel. Makes no sense to mess with it. Best fix for the "pump not working" scenario is to simply put the/a stock one back on it.
Old 10-16-2022, 08:32 AM
  #13  
Member

 
1983LU5TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1983 LU5 Trans Am, 1967 Chevelle
Engine: LU5, LSx
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.73
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
My 83 L69 never had any of that added to it
Im sure it didn’t. The TSB was sent out during the 1984 model year. 👍
Old 10-16-2022, 06:43 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,123
Received 1,688 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

True; but the car was absolutely identical in every way to a 84, in that particular system. After the "fix" came out people would go to the stealership and buy that goofy crap and put it on their 83 cars back then, for why I can't begin to imagine. And their techs would do it as well and charge the customer since 83 wasn't covered by the TSB. Blatant rip-off. Both the pump and the fan were very inelegant attempts at a solution that tried to cover up The Symptom instead of actually fixing The Problem.
The following 2 users liked this post by sofakingdom:
NoEmissions84TA (10-16-2022), T.L. (10-16-2022)
Old 10-16-2022, 09:19 PM
  #15  
Member

 
1983LU5TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1983 LU5 Trans Am, 1967 Chevelle
Engine: LU5, LSx
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.73
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
True; but the car was absolutely identical in every way to a 84, in that particular system. After the "fix" came out people would go to the stealership and buy that goofy crap and put it on their 83 cars back then, for why I can't begin to imagine. And their techs would do it as well and charge the customer since 83 wasn't covered by the TSB. Blatant rip-off. Both the pump and the fan were very inelegant attempts at a solution that tried to cover up The Symptom instead of actually fixing The Problem.
Oh I agree 100%. GM has never been great at actually fixing the problem, especially in that era. Look at the lawsuits from all of the problems with the Citation. I’ve had many 84 L69 cars over the years, and quite a few had the TSB “fixes” don’t, yet they didn’t fix anything.
Old 10-17-2022, 12:14 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
LAFireboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 242 Likes on 182 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Didn't cost me anything. The dealer covered it under warranty. And it never misbehaved again.

Not sure where the car is today. May 9, 1986, 5:30 am, "a day that will live in infamy." Beautiful morning, opened the blinds, looked out the window, GONE. It was like being in The Twilight Zone.
Old 11-16-2022, 10:34 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Scott's 83' Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Bloomington mn
Posts: 53
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: L69 305 no fuel issue....

Originally Posted by Vader
Of course, you removed the longer bolt from the front of the block and installed a shorter one when finished, right?

Someone had to ask.

You can also gently blow back through the fuel line to the tank with the filler cap removed to insure the line and filter/sock in the tank are clear. It is also fair game to rig a fuel line to a temporary tank/bottle to the inlet side of the pump and crank the engine to wet down the check valves and diaphragm in the pump, just in case they are stuck to their seats from long storage.
After getting more than a little pissed I decided to double check everything. I used the original bolt after reinstalling the fuel pump. The easiest thing to screw up is fuel filter. I installed backwards. Runs fine when you have it in correctly!!

No electric fuel pump or that band aid fix for fuel boiling on my car. I have a 180 degree fan switch and a new radiator in my car and I have never had any issues with fuel boiling.

Thanks for the replies everyone!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1stUC
Carburetors
4
10-15-2013 06:05 PM
1986chevycamaro
Tech / General Engine
4
12-31-2010 12:06 PM
SteelTownMadDog
Tech / General Engine
3
06-05-2007 04:17 PM
intex1982
Tech / General Engine
2
05-17-2007 09:21 PM



Quick Reply: L69 305 no fuel issue....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.