Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Cam Q-extreme energy vs. powermax vs.energizer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2002, 09:54 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Black 84 Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 164
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 350ci
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 12 bolt
Cam Q-extreme energy vs. powermax vs.energizer

I'm looking into buying components for future mods to my street driven 350. I already have a holley 650 dp, accel dist, edelbrock performer manifold (may evetually be replaced by RPM), full 3" exhaust, and SLP 1 5/8" headers are on the way (thanx spohn). Now on to the fun parts, cam and heads. I've decided on the trick flow 23* heads, but the cam is driving me nuts trying to decide. I've heard great things about both Comp and Crane cams, and have narrowed it down to either Comp XE 268, Crane powermax 272, or Crane energizer 272. I'm leaning toward the Comp for the extra int. lift, but the 110* LSA concerns me and my power brakes, will i have a problem there? Next in line is the powermax, it has a bit wider LSA (i believe) but would i lose much HP or torque? I don't know much about the Energizer, so any info would help. I'm not sure about the single pattern cam on a car with full exhaust.
Sorry for all the questions, but i really don't want to make a bad choice. I appreciate any opinions or experience you may have with these cams. Thanx.
Old 01-13-2002, 10:32 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chander, Arizona USA
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E
my choice would be the comp cam. you shouldn't have any problems with your power brakes.
Old 01-14-2002, 11:41 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Neither of these cams will cause problems with power
brakes. Don't let the tini tiny variences in lift sway ya.
Anything .450" and over, will more than do the job.
The duration and timing points are much more important. My choice would be the Crane Powermax H278-2 for your
build up. specs are 278/290 222/234@.050 .467/.494" lift
on 114 deg centers. Jump up to the performer RPM, its worth it.
Attached Thumbnails Cam Q-extreme energy vs. powermax vs.energizer-fb2a.jpg  
Old 01-14-2002, 02:08 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Corry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt SLP Torsen, 3.73 ratio
I have seen adds for "vacume storage" canisters, not sure how well if at all, the work, but they advertise being able to run more "radical" cams without worries of stalling, even with power brakes in traffic. Sounds great, I doubt they could sell for much more then $20. Judging by what people in here are saying though, this shouldn't even be an issue, but if you are really worried I suppose this could help put worries at ease
Corry
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prodigious
Theoretical and Street Racing
35
04-13-2021 02:37 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
10-08-2015 01:57 AM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
09-02-2015 07:28 PM
masonta
Power Adders
0
09-01-2015 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: Cam Q-extreme energy vs. powermax vs.energizer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.