Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Cam/valve question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2014, 07:57 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
krackle82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waynesboro, TN
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cam/valve question

I've been told if you take the diameter of your intake valve, divide it by 4, that number will be close to the valve lift that you should use for max air flow past the valve and that opening it any further will do no good unless you go with forced induction. Im inclined to believe it, but does this theory work on the exhaust valve as well? I scanned off the shelf cams at Lunati and Comp, and both tend to use a higher lift on the exhaust side. Is this neccessary or are they just trying to sell the rumpity-rump sound? No opinions, please, Im looking for facts.

Thanks guys.
Old 04-11-2014, 08:09 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,749
Received 368 Likes on 297 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Cam/valve question

No thats not always true. Depends entirely on the application. Some heads flow to 1" of lift and that rule may say .500-.600" would be all thats necessary.head port size may still gain in flow and hp.

The diameter / 4 rule is where curtain area by camshaft lift equals valve head area. The head port cross sectional area then becomes important to know.

The role of the valve is critical at all lift values, but a key proportion is the LD ratio — or the lift-to-diameter ratio — where the lift value equals one-quarter of the valve’s diameter. Regardless of valve diameter, at this point the valve curtain area is exactly equal to the valve head area.

“Everything below this strongly influences low-lift flow,” says Urrutia, “which is an important function of overcoming fuel-mixture inertia.”


The accompanying chart indicates standard valve lengths for popular performance engines. Important dimensions include overall valve length, head diameter, margin height and tip length.
Above this point, the engine builder needs to compare the minimum port cross-sectional area (typically the throat area above the valve) to the valve curtain area. Somewhere around the mid-lift point, the valve curtain area becomes larger than the port area and the port itself becomes the restriction. This is called the saturation lift point. At every point in this equation we are stuck with the same fixed valve shape, seat angles and valve margin dimensions that influence air movement. Above the saturation point, the seat angles are still crucial to maintaining smooth transitional flow and providing a shear edge to help maintain good fuel atomization. The particulars of this are very specific to any given combustion chamber, according to its size, shape, depth, valve position, port texture approaching the valve and, to some degree, the influence of the rising piston crown.
Exhaust lobe sizing depends on the head port and exhaust system design. Efficient heads that flow well on both intake and exhaust in high e/i ratios above 75% typically use same duration or smaller splits in duration and wont need as much lift on exhaust side. Alot of race motors have higher intake lift than exhaust. If intake port is big and slower, a faster cam with more lift to have fast valve motion will help keep velocity up but exhaust side may be good so cam doesnt need alot of lift. Also keep in mind exhaust side is under alot more pressure so more mass flows past valve for given opening. Too much opening to fast will loose energy in the system, possibly over scavenging intake side on induction process

Last edited by Orr89RocZ; 04-11-2014 at 08:16 AM.
Old 04-11-2014, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
86LG4Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: Cam/valve question

And even beyond what Orr quoted and stated, there other factors at play in both stock and race engines that make that D/4 guideline pretty much meaningless for picking lift.

A couple of examples:
1. port velocity profile (ie. how the velocity/massflow is biased toward one side of the port), and therefore how the flow will be unequally distributed around the curtain area.
2. valve shrouding by the combustion chamber and by the cylinder wall - more reasons why the curtain area will not equally share the flow and why more or less lift will be desired.

These factors affect both intake and exhaust, but intake is most sensitive.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
10-29-2022 09:20 PM
fasteddi
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
15
09-10-2015 09:32 AM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
08-31-2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
08-19-2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
08-16-2015 11:40 PM



Quick Reply: Cam/valve question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.