Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2012, 10:30 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

I've been searching for the last hour trying to find the specific difference between the 1982 and 1983 Crossfire / LU5 engines. The 1982 LU5 engine was rated at 165 HP with 8.6:1 compression and the 1983 version is listed as 175 HP and 9.5:1 compression.

So -- what were the differences? Were the heads, cam or pistons different in from '82 to '83 to get the higher compression and slightly higher hp number?
Old 07-23-2012, 11:04 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
8t2 z-chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: belle fourche,s.d.
Posts: 2,156
Received 62 Likes on 55 Posts
Car: '82 z28
Engine: L83 5.7
Transmission: 700r4-1985
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

actually,'82 LU5 also had 9.5 C/R-i have heard '83s had a better catalytic
(better flowing)than '82. '83 crossfire manifolds have little crossover ports
in the manifold that '82 manifolds lack.'83s also have a different ESC
module and different ECM(more compact but about equal performing.
I have ran both '82 and '83 style ECMs in mine and no difference in running
or performance was noticed.
Old 07-25-2012, 09:25 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,121
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

The 10HP difference between the '82 and '83 LU5 engines is nothing more than a slight retune of the PROM to match the '83 Ford Mustang's new 5.0 HO engine 175HP rating.

The basic long block between '82 and '83 engines is the same. 416 heads, flat top pistons yielding 9.5:1 compression, and the L83 Corvette camshaft.

Besides the way the air injection tube attaches to the catalytic converter versus '82 and '83 both years are otherwise the same as is the rest of the exhaust. The '82 LG4 engine used a lesser flowing pellet type catalytic converter but that doesn't apply to LU5 cars.
Old 07-25-2012, 09:39 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Enschede, Netherlands
Posts: 5,357
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

The manifold may be different too, early without the balance holes, later with
Old 07-25-2012, 10:12 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Jeffs82TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo
The manifold may be different too, early without the balance holes, later with
think 82 had o2 sensor in Y-pipe and 83 had it in the exhaust manifold. But could be wrong and I generally am.
Old 07-25-2012, 02:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

Originally Posted by Dens71TA
The 10HP difference between the '82 and '83 LU5 engines is nothing more than a slight retune of the PROM to match the '83 Ford Mustang's new 5.0 HO engine 175HP rating.

The basic long block between '82 and '83 engines is the same. 416 heads, flat top pistons yielding 9.5:1 compression, and the L83 Corvette camshaft.

Besides the way the air injection tube attaches to the catalytic converter versus '82 and '83 both years are otherwise the same as is the rest of the exhaust. The '82 LG4 engine used a lesser flowing pellet type catalytic converter but that doesn't apply to LU5 cars.
Now that's what I'm talking about! Thanks for this info.

It's strange to me that GM could actually get 10 more HP out the CFI set up through nothing more than PROM tuning given the limited processing power of the ECU back then.
Old 07-25-2012, 02:01 PM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

Originally Posted by Jeffs82TA
think 82 had o2 sensor in Y-pipe and 83 had it in the exhaust manifold. But could be wrong and I generally am.
Pretty sure my old '84 L69 had the O2 sensor in the Y-pipe, but that was a long time ago. My '82 has it in the Y-pipe.
Old 07-25-2012, 02:10 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,672
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

My '83's O2 is in the manifold.
Old 07-25-2012, 02:50 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,121
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Re: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences

Originally Posted by FormerL69

It's strange to me that GM could actually get 10 more HP out the CFI set up through nothing more than PROM tuning given the limited processing power of the ECU back then.
Manufacture's engine tuning during the smog era of the the 1970's and early 80's was extremely conservative. It doesn't take much to get 10 more HP than a little change of the distributor advance and fuel curves when V8 engines are putting out only around 160HP.

BTW, the L69 engine had the O2 sensor in the manifold. The '82 LU5 is the only V8 3rd-gen I know of that had the O2 sensor in the Y-pipe. At idle it will sometimes cool off enough to set the computer into open-loop mode which is probably why they went back to the exhaust manifold in '83.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
09-08-2015 06:22 PM
3tas4me
Camaros for Sale
2
09-04-2015 01:45 PM
jtwoods4
Transmissions and Drivetrain
7
09-03-2015 05:39 PM
greenyone
TPI
3
09-02-2015 03:39 PM
ChaseDale3and8
TPI
10
09-01-2015 01:49 PM



Quick Reply: 1982 vs 1983 Crossfire Specs / Differences



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.