TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2021, 05:07 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
wcook174's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 12
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

so I have the car running, it runs alright I bought a 5.7 out of a 92 or 91 truck with 130,000 miles, and swapped in a 214 224 @.50 444 int 446 ex lift camshaft and new lifters, timing chain and gaskets, everything else is bone stock it did have a 305 before also the cam has a range from 1600-5200 rpm I know 5 grand is probably a little much for a stock bottom end truck 350

My issue is it will only rev to 4,000 ish before it sputters and will not rev any higher. it is a manual t5 and these cars I read do not have rev limiters, I tested that myself with the old 305 and hit 6500 rpm I've tried advancing and retarding the timing for not much of a change. I do not have a timing let yet but will buy one if I need
Any suggestions on what the issue is? could it be not enough fuel pressure or something else?

Last edited by wcook174; 10-28-2021 at 05:10 PM.
Old 10-28-2021, 06:39 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,523
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Verify fuel pressure under heavy load. You'll want to be on the high-side of spec; perhaps even above spec since the engine is modified.

Connect a scan tool, make sure that all the sensors are reporting reasonable info. Make sure the knock sensor isn't showing excess activity.

Are the valve springs tired?

Are you getting full throttle? Lots of times the gas pedal bends, the pedal hits the floor before the throttle plates are fully open.

Did you use the 350 fuel injectors or the 305 injectors?

Did you degree the cam? What is the cranking compression?

If you don't have a timing light, you likely have no idea what the base or total timing is. Does the timing advance work?

The swirl-port heads are not known for high-rpm performance.
The following users liked this post:
wcook174 (10-28-2021)
Old 10-28-2021, 07:11 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
wcook174's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 12
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by Schurkey
Verify fuel pressure under heavy load. You'll want to be on the high-side of spec; perhaps even above spec since the engine is modified.
I'll try this for sure
Connect a scan tool, make sure that all the sensors are reporting reasonable info. Make sure the knock sensor isn't showing excess activity.
I'll bust out the old obd 1 scanner of my dads and try this
Are the valve springs tired?
I have a set I was going to put on if needed I have a set of comp springs, but it doesn't quite seem like valve float
Are you getting full throttle? Lots of times the gas pedal bends, the pedal hits the floor before the throttle plates are fully open.
I'll have to double check this
Did you use the 350 fuel injectors or the 305 injectors?
it may be the original throttle body with the tbi injectors I can't remember which one I used
Did you degree the cam? What is the cranking compression?
I did not, I just installed it dot to dot, I can put a compression tester on to see
If you don't have a timing light, you likely have no idea what the base or total timing is. Does the timing advance work?
I'm not sure how the timing advance works on these tbi system
The swirl-port heads are not known for high-rpm performance.
if the bottom end is good I eventually was planning some nice aluminum cylinder heads, no particular brand just some good priced ones
Thanks for the help this is great info and I'll get to verifying all of the different things
I'm also new to this forum thing sorry if it's formatted weirdly
Old 10-28-2021, 10:29 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,523
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by wcook174
it may be the original throttle body with the tbi injectors I can't remember which one I used
That'll make a big difference, if you used the wrong injectors.

Originally Posted by wcook174
I just installed it dot to dot, I can put a compression tester on to see
Again, that could explain a lot. Harder to diagnose and correct, though.

Originally Posted by wcook174
I'm not sure how the timing advance works on these tbi system
Electronic--shared between ECM and the ignition module. If either one is defective, or the wire harness connecting them, you could have no spark advance. Poor power, poor fuel economy, increased emissions, and poor driveability.

Originally Posted by wcook174
I eventually was planning some nice aluminum cylinder heads, no particular brand just some good priced ones
If you want to keep the TBI intake manifold, your only practical choice is the TBI heads from Summit. I don't know of any other aftermarket aluminum heads that have the correct angles on the intake manifold bolts.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-162108
Old 10-30-2021, 08:41 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
DynoDave43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,645
Received 757 Likes on 582 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by Schurkey
If you want to keep the TBI intake manifold, your only practical choice is the TBI heads from Summit. I don't know of any other aftermarket aluminum heads that have the correct angles on the intake manifold bolts.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-162108
Well, there ARE TBI intakes set up for the Vortec bolt pattern. But they are so damned expensive you could probably buy cheap heads in a more common pattern, get a used intake and adapter, and go that route.

I'm not a fan of offshore heads, so I'm going with Vortecs, and using a used 4bbl. Vortec bolt pattern intake with an adapter for the TBI, if I keep the TBI.

I'd start by checking those injectors, and seeing what you have. The first post in this thread has a little table of injector paint marks (assuming the user provided good info). The info is probably here on this forum too, but a search turned this up first. http://www.gearhead-efi.com/Fuel-Inj...d-part-numbers

Here's an example of what those paint marks look like, from an old thread here on TGO.



So you are probably focusing on these two.

5235279 - White / Green - 54pph - 5.0L / 305 Cars/Trucks

5235206 - Orange / Black - 61pph - 5.7L / 350 Cars/Trucks

If you have white and green stripes, you need some new injectors.
Old 10-30-2021, 02:35 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,523
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
Well, there ARE TBI intakes set up for the Vortec bolt pattern. But they are so damned expensive you could probably buy cheap heads in a more common pattern, get a used intake and adapter, and go that route.
The Genuine GM Vortec heads-to-TBI-throttle body manifold was always outrageously expensive...but Pandemic Pricing is now officially insane.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/nal-12496821

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
I'm not a fan of offshore heads, so I'm going with Vortecs, and using a used 4bbl. Vortec bolt pattern intake with an adapter for the TBI, if I keep the TBI.
The heads I listed are made in the USA by Trick Flow, but branded as "Summit". Summit owns Trick Flow.

Using a non-TBI intake manifold will require substantial fabrication to get the throttle/cruise control/TV cable bracket to fit, retain the EGR, and retain various accessory braces.

I used a GM "ZZ4" intake manifold on my K1500 with (different, older) Trick Flow heads. It was a mess getting everything to bolt up properly, particularly the EGR which required two entirely different adapters, one of which is not available commercially--I had to make it--and the A/C brace is still not connected to anything on the manifold.
Old 10-30-2021, 03:24 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
aliceempire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,003
Received 145 Likes on 119 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird, 77 Trans Am SE, 86 Z28
Engine: 5.7 HSR, T/A 6.6, empty
Transmission: T-5, TH350, T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi, 3.23 posi, 3.23
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

I think I'd rather spend the money on the fitting manifold than all the dinking around to make a retrofitted manifold work. Sure it's expensive compared to carbed manifolds but still beats hsr, sr, miniram prices by a wide margin, and we pay for those all the time. But it's all opinion I guess.
Old 10-31-2021, 02:54 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
DynoDave43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,645
Received 757 Likes on 582 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by Schurkey
The Genuine GM Vortec heads-to-TBI-throttle body manifold was always outrageously expensive...but Pandemic Pricing is now officially insane.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/nal-12496821
I know. It's madness. I overpaid for a used one with the conventional head pattern years ago, when I thought I'd be running some World Products heads. But what I paid for it is nothing by today's standards. I guess with the value of stuff right now, I should sell that manifold (and a lot of other parts I've accumulated and won't need).

Originally Posted by Schurkey
The heads I listed are made in the USA by Trick Flow, but branded as "Summit". Summit owns Trick Flow.
Nice! Those look like good heads.

The real problem here is that I CAN'T READ, or didn't do it carefully in this case anyway. I thought the OP had said he was contemplating a CHEAP set of heads, and that more often than not means chinese. And I'm not a fan. But to each his own. My apologizes for confusing the matter.

Originally Posted by Schurkey
Using a non-TBI intake manifold will require substantial fabrication to get the throttle/cruise control/TV cable bracket to fit, retain the EGR, and retain various accessory braces.
I'm not aware of what I would consider to be a "good" answer to this problem. The TBI intakes are not known (stock or aftermarket) for their great flow. And even the Eddy TBI is slightly taller than stock...something my hood line just doesn't need.

Using a carb intake with an adapter creates it's own issues. You need an adapter (cost, and thickness that aggravates the hood clearance issues, plus double gaskets for more leak potential). It also can create linkage issues as you mentioned, but I think that's mostly if the throttle body ends up mounted higher, no? And yes, keeping EGR in some form takes more work.

Originally Posted by Schurkey
I used a GM "ZZ4" intake manifold on my K1500 with (different, older) Trick Flow heads. It was a mess getting everything to bolt up properly, particularly the EGR which required two entirely different adapters, one of which is not available commercially--I had to make it--and the A/C brace is still not connected to anything on the manifold.
Hmmm...is that the 12496820 intake? That's the one I was hoping to run! I liked it for it's A) Vortec head intake bolt pattern, B) very low height...just slightly less than an Eddy Performer, and C) you can retain EGR using a Vortec-like feed setup.

I was not aware of the missing compressor brace bolt location, although with the EGR provision changing the front of the intake around, I guess that makes sense.

But again, I'm not aware of a drop-in solution that meets all these needs.

Sorry to take the conversation slightly off topic OP.
Old 10-31-2021, 05:53 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,523
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
Hmmm...is that the 12496820 intake? That's the one I was hoping to run! I liked it for it's A) Vortec head intake bolt pattern, B) very low height...just slightly less than an Eddy Performer, and C) you can retain EGR using a Vortec-like feed setup.

I was not aware of the missing compressor brace bolt location, although with the EGR provision changing the front of the intake around, I guess that makes sense.
.
No. This has the older, six-bolts-per-head bolt pattern, not the four-bolts-per-head Vortec pattern.
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/nal-10185063

It's almost exactly the same height as the TBI manifold, but the adapter plate raises the throttle body a little bit.

EGR is similar to stock, but uses a different EGR gasket that isn't compatible with the TBI EGR valve. And the whole valve has to be moved rearward to clear the IAC motor on the throttle body.
Old 10-31-2021, 09:11 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (11)
 
DynoDave43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,645
Received 757 Likes on 582 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

I gotcha.

This is the one I have. With some fiddling, I hope to make it work.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/nal-12496820
Old 11-02-2021, 07:41 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,440
Received 731 Likes on 497 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350

These fitment/clearance issues is why I ran 083 heads and a stock intake bored out. Kept it simple. Seems to pull pretty good RPMS too .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigLou907
Tech / General Engine
4
07-12-2012 10:55 AM
bigj350
Tech / General Engine
12
02-02-2012 11:31 PM
racersedge1821
Tech / General Engine
3
02-19-2010 10:36 AM
hdj89
TBI
2
01-17-2010 10:16 PM
naterman35
Tech / General Engine
1
09-16-2007 09:42 PM



Quick Reply: 89 camaro swapped from a TBI 305 to a 1992 truck 350



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.