Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

UMI Vs. Spohn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2023, 06:58 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
upstateRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 24
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
UMI Vs. Spohn

I am looking at going with one company for items for a LS Engine swap like frame connectors, K-member, transmission cross member for 4L70E and lower A-arms.
is this a good idea going with one company, i am thinking that this option could possible help with ease of installation ?
Also would UMI or Spohn be the better option
Thanks Rich
Old 08-02-2023, 07:33 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
punkmaster98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Jackson NJ
Posts: 1,178
Received 156 Likes on 100 Posts
Car: 1984 T/A
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8 4.10 gears
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I personally do not like the spohn A-arm design. They newer design created a hell of a time installing the spring. The older design which they went away from for some reason was a lot better but harder to come by. I would go with the UMI a arm. As for the trans crossmember you should look into the holley/hooker as it has the torque arm mount integrated into it. Makes room for great exhaust clearance.
The following users liked this post:
upstateRich (08-02-2023)
Old 08-02-2023, 08:34 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
battmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,108
Received 415 Likes on 265 Posts
Car: 1984 TA (1 stock / 1 custom)
Engine: LG4 / turbo LQ4
Transmission: 700R4 / 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Stock / 4:11 Moser 9"
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I had issues with the Spohn LS engine mounts. They made my engine sit crooked.
I switched to UMI LS mounts and those worked much better.
The following users liked this post:
upstateRich (08-02-2023)
Old 08-02-2023, 08:45 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
upstateRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 24
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

Thank you i will check out the holly/hooker crossmember
most of the posts that i find are from 5 plus years ago and i would think that there have been some good upgrades. Every time that i look at the UMI pictures i think that the parts look very nicely made
Old 08-02-2023, 09:02 PM
  #5  
Member
 
Firechicken82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: CT
Posts: 385
Received 110 Likes on 85 Posts
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I have a bunch of UMI and spohn parts. They're both well made. I feel like UMI has more stuff at this point. I haven't had any issues with either. I also have some founders parts. To be honest, I've been happy w all of them. There really isn't a wrong way to go. My spohn crossmember needed a little grinding to fit. My UMI weight jacks needed some grinding to fit. That's how it goes sometimes.
The following users liked this post:
upstateRich (08-02-2023)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oxrabidus
Suspension and Chassis
27
11-03-2009 01:17 AM
Gecz28
Suspension and Chassis
3
07-30-2004 12:30 PM
CamaroEFI
Suspension and Chassis
3
04-20-2004 01:55 AM
Nixon1
Suspension and Chassis
6
12-24-2002 10:55 AM
My90Iroc
Suspension and Chassis
19
06-01-2002 12:44 PM



Quick Reply: UMI Vs. Spohn



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.