Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Hello.
I'm a newb.
I have a 1988 Z28 that I want to build for handling, not drag.
Which K Member should I consider?
What front suspension kit should I consider?
I just purchased the RSM long front kit to remove the front end entirely.
I was looking at a BMR K Member which can help with an easy LS swap. What year pinto rack do I need? Are the racks different year pinto racks for different K Members?
What hubs shocks, spindles and springs should I run?
Can I use the BMR adjustable suspension parts (camber/caster)? Or are there better recommended options?
As far as the rear I imagine once I am pointed in the right direction for the front the rear should follow suit.
Tear down begins
I'm a newb.
I have a 1988 Z28 that I want to build for handling, not drag.
Which K Member should I consider?
What front suspension kit should I consider?
I just purchased the RSM long front kit to remove the front end entirely.
I was looking at a BMR K Member which can help with an easy LS swap. What year pinto rack do I need? Are the racks different year pinto racks for different K Members?
What hubs shocks, spindles and springs should I run?
Can I use the BMR adjustable suspension parts (camber/caster)? Or are there better recommended options?
As far as the rear I imagine once I am pointed in the right direction for the front the rear should follow suit.
Tear down begins
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Stock k-meber is best for handling and the pinto racks are for the drag racing guys.
IMO Detroit Speed and UMI are leading the way for parts that improve handling. Koni yellow struts and shocks unless you can afford better then the spring and sway bar game comes into effect and dont forget sub frame connectors.
IMO Detroit Speed and UMI are leading the way for parts that improve handling. Koni yellow struts and shocks unless you can afford better then the spring and sway bar game comes into effect and dont forget sub frame connectors.
Last edited by obeymybird; 03-06-2021 at 10:27 AM.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Jackson NJ
Posts: 1,179
Received 156 Likes
on
100 Posts
Car: 1984 T/A
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8 4.10 gears
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Im a big fan of the Heidts tubular kmember. Pretty stout piece. I have it in my personal vehicle.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I haven't see anyone use the QA1 kit or much of any of their parts for that matter. Like I said factory k-member is best if it wasn't the dse iroc wouldn't still have it in place. Stay away from front coilover setups.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I haven't see anyone use the QA1 kit or much of any of their parts for that matter. Like I said factory k-member is best if it wasn't the dse iroc wouldn't still have it in place. Stay away from front coilover setups.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
#12
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,932
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Everything you talk about is for drag racing, not cornering.
The following users liked this post:
GenZ28 (03-09-2021)
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,345
Received 298 Likes
on
234 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Unless you need the space, there is really no reason to go to an aftermarket crossmember, it is the stiffest with a small trade off for weight, but the weight is in a good place, low. The rest of the suspension is where you will find gains
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I agree. I canceled my order (BMR K Member with Pinto Rack) and have decided to stay with the original steering setup. Thanks for your advice.
Besides the Heidts IRS setup are there any other MFGs that do not break to bank in the rear and handle decent?
Besides the Heidts IRS setup are there any other MFGs that do not break to bank in the rear and handle decent?
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Do you recommend anything for the rear setup handling wise? I see Heidts has an IRS setup but looks pricey. Im sure its great. Any other rear setups I can consider?
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I haven't see anyone use the QA1 kit or much of any of their parts for that matter. Like I said factory k-member is best if it wasn't the dse iroc wouldn't still have it in place. Stay away from front coilover setups.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
If you still feel the need to go aftermarket k-member look at umi's roadrace one.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,345
Received 298 Likes
on
234 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I'll be doing some road racing and I'll be using an essentially stock rear suspension. I am going to try to get an UBE decoupled torque arm, but if not I might try my hand at fabbing my own. Up front I am going to use the DSE lower arms, strut mounts and sway bar.
Alternatively, for the rear, you could go with a DSE Quadralink.
#18
Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 122
Received 39 Likes
on
29 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
As for the rear suspension, if you are not trying to save the last tenth off of lap times, the stock style suspension is hard to beat. a few good upgrades such as: Weight jacks, double adjustable shocks, heim jointed adjustable LCA, heim jointed adjustable panard bar, adjustable torque arm, and slotted brackets at all location points.
With the upgrades listed above, alignment, bar angles, corner weight, and shock tuning become paramount. I would say that 95% of enthusiast don't have the skill or ability to maximize this suspension. There is a reason why CorteX and Maximum Motorsports sell a torque arm suspension upgrade for Mustangs, TCI and BMR sells one for First Gen F-Bodies, and chassisworks fabs several for different makes and models. It's one of the most simple, adjustable, and robust designs.
With the upgrades listed above, alignment, bar angles, corner weight, and shock tuning become paramount. I would say that 95% of enthusiast don't have the skill or ability to maximize this suspension. There is a reason why CorteX and Maximum Motorsports sell a torque arm suspension upgrade for Mustangs, TCI and BMR sells one for First Gen F-Bodies, and chassisworks fabs several for different makes and models. It's one of the most simple, adjustable, and robust designs.
The following users liked this post:
GenZ28 (03-09-2021)
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
What do you want to do with the car?
I'll be doing some road racing and I'll be using an essentially stock rear suspension. I am going to try to get an UBE decoupled torque arm, but if not I might try my hand at fabbing my own. Up front I am going to use the DSE lower arms, strut mounts and sway bar.
Alternatively, for the rear, you could go with a DSE Quadralink.
I'll be doing some road racing and I'll be using an essentially stock rear suspension. I am going to try to get an UBE decoupled torque arm, but if not I might try my hand at fabbing my own. Up front I am going to use the DSE lower arms, strut mounts and sway bar.
Alternatively, for the rear, you could go with a DSE Quadralink.
Thank you all for the tips on keeping it mostly stock.
What rear end do you run??
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
As for the rear suspension, if you are not trying to save the last tenth off of lap times, the stock style suspension is hard to beat. a few good upgrades such as: Weight jacks, double adjustable shocks, heim jointed adjustable LCA, heim jointed adjustable panard bar, adjustable torque arm, and slotted brackets at all location points.
With the upgrades listed above, alignment, bar angles, corner weight, and shock tuning become paramount. I would say that 95% of enthusiast don't have the skill or ability to maximize this suspension. There is a reason why CorteX and Maximum Motorsports sell a torque arm suspension upgrade for Mustangs, TCI and BMR sells one for First Gen F-Bodies, and chassisworks fabs several for different makes and models. It's one of the most simple, adjustable, and robust designs.
With the upgrades listed above, alignment, bar angles, corner weight, and shock tuning become paramount. I would say that 95% of enthusiast don't have the skill or ability to maximize this suspension. There is a reason why CorteX and Maximum Motorsports sell a torque arm suspension upgrade for Mustangs, TCI and BMR sells one for First Gen F-Bodies, and chassisworks fabs several for different makes and models. It's one of the most simple, adjustable, and robust designs.
I presume the slotted brackets you are suggesting strengthen the connections?
#22
Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 122
Received 39 Likes
on
29 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Bar Angle is a racer jargen for the angle of a lateral control arm. The rear Lower Control Arm (A.K.A. LCA's) are the two suspension components that connect the rear end housing to the chassis. In stock form, the attachment points are fixed on both the chassis and the rear housing. several manufacturers make brackets that bolt to the rear housing and allows for different mounting points, thus changing the angle of the LCA relative to a fixed point, such as the frame rail. The angle of the LCA affects the Anti-squat property of the rear end.
All of these changes are done to increase, or sometimes decrease, the grip level and angle of the rear tires. Extreme bar angle can be seen on dirt super late models. the rear end actually steers the car though the corners. Watch a couple videos of the rear suspension on those cars in action, and it might help you visualize what is happening to the rear suspension in a very dramatic fashion. Those cars are wild.
Scooter, the decoupled torque arm appears to be similar to a three link and lift bar setup that circle track dirt modifieds like to run. It would be interesting to try.
All of these changes are done to increase, or sometimes decrease, the grip level and angle of the rear tires. Extreme bar angle can be seen on dirt super late models. the rear end actually steers the car though the corners. Watch a couple videos of the rear suspension on those cars in action, and it might help you visualize what is happening to the rear suspension in a very dramatic fashion. Those cars are wild.
Scooter, the decoupled torque arm appears to be similar to a three link and lift bar setup that circle track dirt modifieds like to run. It would be interesting to try.
The following users liked this post:
GenZ28 (03-09-2021)
#23
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,932
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I'm not a road racer, but I know the smart money goes into shocks, shocks, shocks, shocks, strut tower caster/camber plates, and subframe connectors. Oh, and shocks too. Everything else is pretty much just taking the flex out of the car and freeing up suspension movement with the right kinds of bushings at each location.
Detroit Speed makes some really good subframe connectors but it requires cutting up the car.
Detroit Speed makes some really good subframe connectors but it requires cutting up the car.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I'm not a road racer, but I know the smart money goes into shocks, shocks, shocks, shocks, strut tower caster/camber plates, and subframe connectors. Oh, and shocks too. Everything else is pretty much just taking the flex out of the car and freeing up suspension movement with the right kinds of bushings at each location.
Detroit Speed makes some really good subframe connectors but it requires cutting up the car.
Detroit Speed makes some really good subframe connectors but it requires cutting up the car.
#25
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Our UMI k-member features a strong, twin tube design. The UMI k averages around a 25lb weight loss as compared to stock.
Dragon Lady and 50 Shades runs our kit as does Ryan Harris, Josh Jones and Brian and Tara Johns. All are fast and all are reliable.
Shoot me a message and I can design a Dragon Lady complete package for you or tone it down a bit to fit your budget.
ramey@umiperformance.com
Also for steering. Turn One steering gears are our favorite choice. I don't know of any racks that work properly...
Dragon Lady and 50 Shades runs our kit as does Ryan Harris, Josh Jones and Brian and Tara Johns. All are fast and all are reliable.
Shoot me a message and I can design a Dragon Lady complete package for you or tone it down a bit to fit your budget.
ramey@umiperformance.com
Also for steering. Turn One steering gears are our favorite choice. I don't know of any racks that work properly...
The following users liked this post:
Tidan (03-13-2021)
#26
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Our UMI k-member features a strong, twin tube design. The UMI k averages around a 25lb weight loss as compared to stock.
Dragon Lady and 50 Shades runs our kit as does Ryan Harris, Josh Jones and Brian and Tara Johns. All are fast and all are reliable.
Shoot me a message and I can design a Dragon Lady complete package for you or tone it down a bit to fit your budget.
ramey@umiperformance.com
Also for steering. Turn One steering gears are our favorite choice. I don't know of any racks that work properly...
Dragon Lady and 50 Shades runs our kit as does Ryan Harris, Josh Jones and Brian and Tara Johns. All are fast and all are reliable.
Shoot me a message and I can design a Dragon Lady complete package for you or tone it down a bit to fit your budget.
ramey@umiperformance.com
Also for steering. Turn One steering gears are our favorite choice. I don't know of any racks that work properly...
What is a Dragon Lady?
I'd prefer you list you parts on here so others besides me can see what you are talking about and let them chime in as to their experience with your quality and customer service.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Dude dont give UMI crap for your lack of knowledge their just trying to help and they have a pile of handling parts you just dont seem to have a clue on what your doing also I did recommend the umi roadrace k-member above if you wanted to change it out.
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
You mad bro? LOL
#29
Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Thanks for all the name drops but that does me nothing. I'm not sure why you mentioned all those folks, are they drag racers? To my knowledge you don't sell any handling kits I can see for the 82-92 Camaro as a kit, everything is piecemealed and looks great for the drags. If you actually read the thread above nobody suggest to change the K member from stock EXCEPT for you? Is saving 25 pounds of weight from the K member the answer to setting up the car to handle? Is that your recommendation?
What is a Dragon Lady?
I'd prefer you list you parts on here so others besides me can see what you are talking about and let them chime in as to their experience with your quality and customer service.
What is a Dragon Lady?
I'd prefer you list you parts on here so others besides me can see what you are talking about and let them chime in as to their experience with your quality and customer service.
Last edited by Fullmonte77; 03-12-2021 at 02:33 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Fullmonte77:
1986BANDIT (03-12-2021), Tidan (03-13-2021)
The following 2 users liked this post by Abubaca:
1986BANDIT (03-12-2021), Tidan (03-13-2021)
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: waterloo ontario
Posts: 902
Received 139 Likes
on
110 Posts
Car: 1986 trans am
Engine: 305/350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
no,but you seem to be mad for some reason? this is all about knowing a little something BEFORE talking....sometimes its better to listen,then talk
ill take a wild guess and place you in your early 20s,right? here is a little advice,when you become interested in something spend some time and educate yourself a little before asking a lot of stupid questions,this way the information you get (after grasping the basics of what you are trying to learn about)is good,relevant and usable not just run of the mill common sense info..
ill take a wild guess and place you in your early 20s,right? here is a little advice,when you become interested in something spend some time and educate yourself a little before asking a lot of stupid questions,this way the information you get (after grasping the basics of what you are trying to learn about)is good,relevant and usable not just run of the mill common sense info..
#33
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,932
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I don't see the point in a k-member unless you're trying to free up some space. I have a BMR k-member and it's just flat out flimsy. I'd pretty much have to remove it if I wanted to autocross or road race.
Heidts is rarely ever talked about on this board. They do something different than everybody else by dialing in something like 3 degrees of anti dive into the a-arm mounts. It's very strong, I'm not even sure it's a weight reduction. I never looked at one seriously because it probably won't clear an LS oil pan. But it sounds like somebody posted earlier that they do have experience with it.
Heidts is rarely ever talked about on this board. They do something different than everybody else by dialing in something like 3 degrees of anti dive into the a-arm mounts. It's very strong, I'm not even sure it's a weight reduction. I never looked at one seriously because it probably won't clear an LS oil pan. But it sounds like somebody posted earlier that they do have experience with it.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 03-12-2021 at 03:02 PM.
The following users liked this post:
scooter (03-12-2021)
#34
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I would suggest you do a little more research before you badmouth someone for trying to help you out. If you did said research you would know who UMI is and that their products are geared for both drag and road race/autocross. They are one of the leaders in 3rd gen suspension upgrades. You would also know who some of the people are they mentioned. They are at the top of the class for autocross and road racing. Not trying to be a ahole but you came here looking for help and now your getting all pissed off over someone giving you info you wanted. And as for UMI's quality and customer service it's top notch. I run their weight jacks, front and rear control arms, and panhard bar.
I admitted I'm new and am looking for information. I don't know a thing. I bought this car for $400 and have it torn to the bare bones. It will be what I want. If people agree with what you say then I should tend to agree too, but we arent there yet, at least I am not. My goal is to actually learn and research and upon that I did not find anything the sales rep mentioned about my car on THIER website as a staged kit like they have for MANY other cars.
Wondering why they dont was my question, sorry if that wasn't how I asked it. That's what I meant.
So in conclusion, Thank you...for not taking this as a personal attack on anyone, sorry if anyone feels that way let's just move forward please. I'm here to understand that if I am going to spend 10-15 grand on a setup it better dam be good. Agreed? And do what I want. That my goal here.
Thanks for your reply.
#35
Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 122
Received 39 Likes
on
29 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I would be very careful of bad mouthing one of the top brands of suspension components for our platform. Also, as it's generally not the first suspension part to change, a K-Member that is 25 Lbs lighter will have a significant impact on a car that is already extremely nose heavy. As far as any changes for the suspension geometry, I don't know if the UMI K-Member has any changes. Hopefully someone can inform us on the details.
As far as "kits", there is a reason why you won't find many listed online. If you are at the level (and price bracket) of needing serious suspension components, any suspension company worth their salt will want to know your plans for the car. They will put together a package that works for your need, and give you a decent base line. For example, the spring weights for an autocross car can be very different than a car running, say, Road Atlanta. Also, they want to build a relationship with you. I wouldn't be surprised if they want feedback on their products.
By the way, UMI also runs UMI Motrosports Park, where they run an autocross challange each year in July. Their event is currently sold out with over 125 drivers registered. I would say they have an idea on how to make these cars handle.
As far as "kits", there is a reason why you won't find many listed online. If you are at the level (and price bracket) of needing serious suspension components, any suspension company worth their salt will want to know your plans for the car. They will put together a package that works for your need, and give you a decent base line. For example, the spring weights for an autocross car can be very different than a car running, say, Road Atlanta. Also, they want to build a relationship with you. I wouldn't be surprised if they want feedback on their products.
By the way, UMI also runs UMI Motrosports Park, where they run an autocross challange each year in July. Their event is currently sold out with over 125 drivers registered. I would say they have an idea on how to make these cars handle.
The following users liked this post:
Tidan (03-13-2021)
#36
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
no,but you seem to be mad for some reason? this is all about knowing a little something BEFORE talking....sometimes its better to listen,then talk
ill take a wild guess and place you in your early 20s,right? here is a little advice,when you become interested in something spend some time and educate yourself a little before asking a lot of stupid questions,this way the information you get (after grasping the basics of what you are trying to learn about)is good,relevant and usable not just run of the mill common sense info..
ill take a wild guess and place you in your early 20s,right? here is a little advice,when you become interested in something spend some time and educate yourself a little before asking a lot of stupid questions,this way the information you get (after grasping the basics of what you are trying to learn about)is good,relevant and usable not just run of the mill common sense info..
#37
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I would be very careful of bad mouthing one of the top brands of suspension components for our platform. Also, as it's generally not the first suspension part to change, a K-Member that is 25 Lbs lighter will have a significant impact on a car that is already extremely nose heavy. As far as any changes for the suspension geometry, I don't know if the UMI K-Member has any changes. Hopefully someone can inform us on the details.
As far as "kits", there is a reason why you won't find many listed online. If you are at the level (and price bracket) of needing serious suspension components, any suspension company worth their salt will want to know your plans for the car. They will put together a package that works for your need, and give you a decent base line. For example, the spring weights for an autocross car can be very different than a car running, say, Road Atlanta. Also, they want to build a relationship with you. I wouldn't be surprised if they want feedback on their products.
By the way, UMI also runs UMI Motrosports Park, where they run an autocross challange each year in July. Their event is currently sold out with over 125 drivers registered. I would say they have an idea on how to make these cars handle.
As far as "kits", there is a reason why you won't find many listed online. If you are at the level (and price bracket) of needing serious suspension components, any suspension company worth their salt will want to know your plans for the car. They will put together a package that works for your need, and give you a decent base line. For example, the spring weights for an autocross car can be very different than a car running, say, Road Atlanta. Also, they want to build a relationship with you. I wouldn't be surprised if they want feedback on their products.
By the way, UMI also runs UMI Motrosports Park, where they run an autocross challange each year in July. Their event is currently sold out with over 125 drivers registered. I would say they have an idea on how to make these cars handle.
#38
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I don't see the point in a k-member unless you're trying to free up some space. I have a BMR k-member and it's just flat out flimsy. I'd pretty much have to remove it if I wanted to autocross or road race.
Heidts is rarely ever talked about on this board. They do something different than everybody else by dialing in something like 3 degrees of anti dive into the a-arm mounts. It's very strong, I'm not even sure it's a weight reduction. I never looked at one seriously because it probably won't clear an LS oil pan. But it sounds like somebody posted earlier that they do have experience with it.
Heidts is rarely ever talked about on this board. They do something different than everybody else by dialing in something like 3 degrees of anti dive into the a-arm mounts. It's very strong, I'm not even sure it's a weight reduction. I never looked at one seriously because it probably won't clear an LS oil pan. But it sounds like somebody posted earlier that they do have experience with it.
I'm not overly concerned with weight reduction as I intend to have enough horsepower that that won't make it relevant. I do plan on cutting the front apart and running a full fiberglass front end, using the Rock Solid short kit most likely.
I was researching LS oil pans and the attitude seems to be the F body version clears best, but for which K members im unsure.
#39
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
The thing that's so important to remember is that there are SOOOOO many variables, so what makes one product good for one, won't be good for another. My 2 cents would be to start off with the idea of NOT replacing the K member. -THEN....if you find parts that require an aftermarket K for spring perches or maybe LS pan clearance, etc. etc, you can make the switch.
#40
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
The thing that's so important to remember is that there are SOOOOO many variables, so what makes one product good for one, won't be good for another. My 2 cents would be to start off with the idea of NOT replacing the K member. -THEN....if you find parts that require an aftermarket K for spring perches or maybe LS pan clearance, etc. etc, you can make the switch.
#41
Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
I can handle a response like this, thank you this is actually helpful hence why I asked such direct questions. Your defensiveness is either paid or is genuine, if you thought differently you wouldn't have commented.
I admitted I'm new and am looking for information. I don't know a thing. I bought this car for $400 and have it torn to the bare bones. It will be what I want. If people agree with what you say then I should tend to agree too, but we arent there yet, at least I am not. My goal is to actually learn and research and upon that I did not find anything the sales rep mentioned about my car on THIER website as a staged kit like they have for MANY other cars.
Wondering why they dont was my question, sorry if that wasn't how I asked it. That's what I meant.
So in conclusion, Thank you...for not taking this as a personal attack on anyone, sorry if anyone feels that way let's just move forward please. I'm here to understand that if I am going to spend 10-15 grand on a setup it better dam be good. Agreed? And do what I want. That my goal here.
Thanks for your reply.
I admitted I'm new and am looking for information. I don't know a thing. I bought this car for $400 and have it torn to the bare bones. It will be what I want. If people agree with what you say then I should tend to agree too, but we arent there yet, at least I am not. My goal is to actually learn and research and upon that I did not find anything the sales rep mentioned about my car on THIER website as a staged kit like they have for MANY other cars.
Wondering why they dont was my question, sorry if that wasn't how I asked it. That's what I meant.
So in conclusion, Thank you...for not taking this as a personal attack on anyone, sorry if anyone feels that way let's just move forward please. I'm here to understand that if I am going to spend 10-15 grand on a setup it better dam be good. Agreed? And do what I want. That my goal here.
Thanks for your reply.
#42
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Thank you. I appreciate your honesty.
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Bar Angle is a racer jargen for the angle of a lateral control arm. The rear Lower Control Arm (A.K.A. LCA's) are the two suspension components that connect the rear end housing to the chassis. In stock form, the attachment points are fixed on both the chassis and the rear housing. several manufacturers make brackets that bolt to the rear housing and allows for different mounting points, thus changing the angle of the LCA relative to a fixed point, such as the frame rail. The angle of the LCA affects the Anti-squat property of the rear end.
All of these changes are done to increase, or sometimes decrease, the grip level and angle of the rear tires. Extreme bar angle can be seen on dirt super late models. the rear end actually steers the car though the corners. Watch a couple videos of the rear suspension on those cars in action, and it might help you visualize what is happening to the rear suspension in a very dramatic fashion. Those cars are wild.
Scooter, the decoupled torque arm appears to be similar to a three link and lift bar setup that circle track dirt modifieds like to run. It would be interesting to try.
All of these changes are done to increase, or sometimes decrease, the grip level and angle of the rear tires. Extreme bar angle can be seen on dirt super late models. the rear end actually steers the car though the corners. Watch a couple videos of the rear suspension on those cars in action, and it might help you visualize what is happening to the rear suspension in a very dramatic fashion. Those cars are wild.
Scooter, the decoupled torque arm appears to be similar to a three link and lift bar setup that circle track dirt modifieds like to run. It would be interesting to try.
#44
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
#45
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,932
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
If you want to get some ideas then search for old posts by a guy named vetruck and slicktrackgod. Same guy. Got banned. Really smart but couldn't cope in conversation with people. I think he was a crew chief for a semi-pro circle track team or something like that. Anyway, he gives some advice how to make the car work well while keeping things fairly simple.
#46
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,932
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Or if you want to cut the whole car up then there is SpeedTech. It's pretty expensive and there is no real world feedback on it that I've ever seen.
#47
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Here is an article on his car, there are other posts about it on here too.
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp...aro-third-gen/
But I do remember an actual video of his TQ arm in action.
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp...aro-third-gen/
But I do remember an actual video of his TQ arm in action.
#48
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
#49
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA & NV
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Re: Best Handling K Member and Suspension???
Here is an article on his car, there are other posts about it on here too.
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp...aro-third-gen/
But I do remember an actual video of his TQ arm in action.
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp...aro-third-gen/
But I do remember an actual video of his TQ arm in action.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post