Quest for a better flowing TPI

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-02-2018, 01:09 PM

#351

Tuned Performance

Sponsor

iTrader: (92)

Join Date: Dec 2004

Location: Mile High Country !!!

Posts: 15,392

Likes: 7

Received 644 Likes on 569 Posts

Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28

Engine: Lb9

Transmission: M20

Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt

Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI

Don are you referring to extending the ve tables ?

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ve-tables.html

Reply Like

07-02-2018, 01:45 PM

#352

Dyno Don

Supreme Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (7)

Join Date: Mar 2000

Location: Orange, CA

Posts: 5,674

Likes: 0

Received 106 Likes on 65 Posts

Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71

Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ

Transmission: Tremec T-56

Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73

Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI

No, Just using a different bin file.

AXCN for SD starting a new project or combination.

APYP for MAF starting a new project or combination.

We were using AXXD where the problem occurred.

Reply Like

09-03-2018, 04:55 PM

#353

VincentZ28

Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Mar 2002

Location: San Antonio TX

Posts: 2,516

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram

Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters

Transmission: G-Force T5

Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears

Re: Quest for a better flowing TPI

Quote:

Originally Posted by no new tires

Where's the new chart, time to pony up.

This is what he talking about. The first video is with the 305manual program. This was used because GM didn’t make an F-Body 350 manual program and only program up to 5600. But they made it in the Corvette manual program in which can be programmed to 6400.