Turbo versus Supercharger
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Black IROC
Engine: 305 Quadrajet
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 273
Turbo versus Supercharger
I'm sure this has been asked and answered several times on here so don't bash me for not being able to search. But what are the pros and cons of each and versus each and the expense?
Thanks guys
Thanks guys
#2
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan!
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine: Vortec 4200 Inline 6 PT70 Turbo..
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
GOOGLE that!!
Nobody makes a turbo kit for thirdgen camaros so it will have to be custom made.
Nobody makes a turbo kit for thirdgen camaros so it will have to be custom made.
#3
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro Iroc Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Borg Warner/ 2.77 gear
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Spin tires
Go fast
Pop wheelies
Make noise
Cons:
Break parts
Cost money
Good fuel and spark tuning
Install parts
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malvern, Arkansas
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 90 IROC 2-92 Zs blk vert & prpl
Engine: stealth ram brodix track 1 ful port
Transmission: 700r4 4l80e
Axle/Gears: iroc 375 lokr 92 Z 277 pos vert 327
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Maybe it could be broken down like this. Placement of power adder, placement of intercooler, placement of pipes, power vs dollars spent, How much maintanance involved.
The new LS superchargers with the radiator built in the bottom of them really takes advantage of space. Then you just have the intercooler to place and a little tubing. We need orr89 and some other people of that level to chime in here since I am another interested observer as well.
The new LS superchargers with the radiator built in the bottom of them really takes advantage of space. Then you just have the intercooler to place and a little tubing. We need orr89 and some other people of that level to chime in here since I am another interested observer as well.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Turbos are more efficient and make more peak power.
Trending Topics
#10
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
What I don't quite understand is the posts on the other forums that turbo setups cost "$6,000 or more"..
Absolutely everything for my turbo setup cost 1/2 of what I sold my used procharger for...
-- Joe
Absolutely everything for my turbo setup cost 1/2 of what I sold my used procharger for...
-- Joe
#11
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Camaro z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
If you have to ask this then you have no business doing either one. Google pulls many good threads and good articles to read about this.
#14
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
$210 XSpower turbo headers (stainless) and crossover
$56 38mm wastegate, tial knockoff
$100 Greddy bov (DSM style)
$210 cxracing intercooler kit, 3", 27x13x3" core
$100 Misc drain/feed flanges, AN adapters, oil -4 oil hose
$100 4" air cleaner and misc extra bends/silicone I needed
$100 Misc pipes and vbands to make the downpipe
$1226
I had big injectors, and I think they are like $245 for a set of 8 42lbs
Boost control is done by adjustable wastegate, however should I decide to do it electronically my engine management computer (megasquirt) does boost control, so I'd just need a $19 GM boost solenoid.
I can see where someone could spend $8k on a turbo build, but it's not required. I suppose if you want to make 1,200hp it would take twins and some fancy parts, but I don't even think Orr has half that into his and he's faster than most members. For a 500-800hp single build, I think $1500 is about top of the mark. I just literally in the past 30 days sold my supercharger and went turbo.
Oh, I spent $19 on a spool of stainless mig wire to modify the headers.
-- Joe
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Originally Posted by DIGGLER
$8100
#16
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Your right Dig, with top of the line parts, you will spend even more than that. But for a simple build, one that can handle the horsepower limitations of a cast rolling assembly, it can be done for very cheap and last quite some time. Just have to keep detonation in check.
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Originally Posted by anesthes
I vaguely remember his build, but isn't he running banks or sts cast headers with twin .70s or something making over 1k whp ? That's quite a bit of a stretch from "What does it cost to put a turbo on my L98 or foxbody"...
Originally Posted by anesthes
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
-- Joe
#18
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
Yeah I forget too, we really need a turbo database for the members here that gets updated, I've given up on the individual profile signatures. I'm familiar with the builds of Justin's (Orr) and Steve's (ZZ3) because they regularly post vids and updates, but everyone else I have to search for...
Agreed.
Agreed.
When I was researching turbo's it was almost impossible for me to find some real solid data. I found a post you made in someone's thread regarding the xspower headers, a post from project89 about the ebay turbos, and I was somewhat familiar with Orr. Most of the turbo stuff is way out of data on here and hard to find in the search. It's easy to search "procharger" or "P1SC" and get all the threads you need, but most of the "turbo" matches are dead end threads.
-- Joe
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
you can do things on the cheap for sure... but like anything else you get what you pay for. build a whole system using cheap stuff and you will have lots of possibilities for failure, not working right, or intermittent problems. when trying to go fast, you have to be able to trust all your parts so you can narrow down where you can make improvements or to figure out why the car slowed down a tenth to the 330'. its hard to do that with a bunch of chinese parts with questionable tolerances that are getting pushed to their limits.
for comparison, i have been building a car with a vortech ysi supercharger recently. blower itself is around $3k, cog drive setup is around $800 or so, vortech mondo bov was $325.... had to fabricate a motor plate and mount to fit in the car (4th gen camaro). he is reusing his headers, so you can figure its roughly a $6-7k setup with the tubing/injectors and stuff. people have made over 1k hp with these things. (this car wont, though)
for comparison, i have been building a car with a vortech ysi supercharger recently. blower itself is around $3k, cog drive setup is around $800 or so, vortech mondo bov was $325.... had to fabricate a motor plate and mount to fit in the car (4th gen camaro). he is reusing his headers, so you can figure its roughly a $6-7k setup with the tubing/injectors and stuff. people have made over 1k hp with these things. (this car wont, though)
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
I vaguely remember his build, but isn't he running banks or sts cast headers with twin .70s or something making over 1k whp ? That's quite a bit of a stretch from "What does it cost to put a turbo on my L98 or foxbody".
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
I vaguely remember his build, but isn't he running banks or sts cast headers with twin .70s or something making over 1k whp ? That's quite a bit of a stretch from "What does it cost to put a turbo on my L98 or foxbody".
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
I realize that better turbos, better intercoolers, better parts, etc will all have higher power and reliability potential but I'm not certifying the car to run 9 second e/t's.
-- Joe
#22
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,732
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo versus Supercharger
i decided to steer away from the sts manifolds so i could run some better turbos. i still have the manifolds, but will probably be selling them. new turbos are precision 6766's and do not have an on center design like the sts/banks manifolds require. been trying to get going on it for about 3 years now, but the house and baby knocked the wind out of my sails.
I'd probably re-weld the flanges to a normal T4 flange, but the routing for a twin is a bit much for me. I considered twins but then I gotta merge before the IC or get a new IC, deal with two down pipes, two wastegates, blah.
-- Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post