Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
#51
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
weee im building another one in about a week. ill get digital video of this one, this time, instead of just pics.
#52
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You said your cowl is removable right? Got any pics of your car with the hood closed and the cowl off? I'm just curious to see how much of the blower comes through.
Thanks,
Tony
Thanks,
Tony
#53
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
The old cowl was fiberglass, its sold to danF82 from this board...
the new cowl is in the works. it will be done about the same time as the motor, it will also be on my site. as of now the car has no hood...
the new cowl is in the works. it will be done about the same time as the motor, it will also be on my site. as of now the car has no hood...
#54
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ocean State, lil Rhody, the biggest littlest state in the union, Rhode Island
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA Black/Gray
Engine: Blown 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by tyty49
Thanks for your wounderful article. I allready saved this puppy .
I'm considering doing this type of swap however I would like to get a centrifugal (SP???) S/C with some type of EFI. Do you have any suggestions??
Thanks for your wounderful article. I allready saved this puppy .
I'm considering doing this type of swap however I would like to get a centrifugal (SP???) S/C with some type of EFI. Do you have any suggestions??
#55
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by 88GTAinRI
Check out my sig. I just installed the F.A.S.T. engine management system and am hoping to be heading for the dyno on May 3. I am hoping for similiar numbers as KingtalOn. I have a very similiar build with the exception of stock bottom end and a centrifugal supercharger.
Check out my sig. I just installed the F.A.S.T. engine management system and am hoping to be heading for the dyno on May 3. I am hoping for similiar numbers as KingtalOn. I have a very similiar build with the exception of stock bottom end and a centrifugal supercharger.
Jeezsh.... a 730 or a 749 with $58 code would do the job for a hell of a lot less than the F.A.S.T. stuff..
But thats me...
#56
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Kingtal0n
The old cowl was fiberglass, its sold to danF82 from this board...
the new cowl is in the works. it will be done about the same time as the motor, it will also be on my site. as of now the car has no hood...
The old cowl was fiberglass, its sold to danF82 from this board...
the new cowl is in the works. it will be done about the same time as the motor, it will also be on my site. as of now the car has no hood...
Thanks,
Tony
#57
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
oh that little blower & even the carb sits below the stock hood, its the aircleaner that sticks up about 3", and maybe a teeny bit of the carb. i had a 2" cowl, and i was using a drop base aircleaner (2" drop base) to clear it, so figure 1" of carb, and 1" of aircleaner stuck up into the top of the cowl. it barelly touched....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
#58
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by SATURN5
Jeezsh.... a 730 or a 749 with $58 code would do the job for a hell of a lot less than the F.A.S.T. stuff..
But thats me...
Jeezsh.... a 730 or a 749 with $58 code would do the job for a hell of a lot less than the F.A.S.T. stuff..
But thats me...
#59
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ocean State, lil Rhody, the biggest littlest state in the union, Rhode Island
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA Black/Gray
Engine: Blown 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by SATURN5
Jeezsh.... a 730 or a 749 with $58 code would do the job for a hell of a lot less than the F.A.S.T. stuff..
But thats me...
Jeezsh.... a 730 or a 749 with $58 code would do the job for a hell of a lot less than the F.A.S.T. stuff..
But thats me...
#60
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
the whole FAST thing has me wondering too. if monty's using it, then hey...
I know the commander can control a sequential setup, and i know the FAST can too.
Tom do you know anything about the "speed" of the commander VS say Accel DFI or FAST...
Some people were saying the commander is a "Slow" ECM and does not respond as quickly as other aftermarket EFI's... is that true? seems pretty quick to me...
I know the commander can control a sequential setup, and i know the FAST can too.
Tom do you know anything about the "speed" of the commander VS say Accel DFI or FAST...
Some people were saying the commander is a "Slow" ECM and does not respond as quickly as other aftermarket EFI's... is that true? seems pretty quick to me...
#61
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I never look at a processor speed when it comes to a engine. even the slowest ECM can handle processes for a deviceas slow operating as an internal combustion engine froma ***** 4 to a top fuel 8. It sounds like a marketing jackass's dream. I might remind you that japan has followed way behind the american vehicles for years in ECM processor speed and they have a few of the most complicated operating engines I have ever seen. so in a word "no"
#62
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Kingtal0n
oh that little blower & even the carb sits below the stock hood, its the aircleaner that sticks up about 3", and maybe a teeny bit of the carb. i had a 2" cowl, and i was using a drop base aircleaner (2" drop base) to clear it, so figure 1" of carb, and 1" of aircleaner stuck up into the top of the cowl. it barelly touched....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
oh that little blower & even the carb sits below the stock hood, its the aircleaner that sticks up about 3", and maybe a teeny bit of the carb. i had a 2" cowl, and i was using a drop base aircleaner (2" drop base) to clear it, so figure 1" of carb, and 1" of aircleaner stuck up into the top of the cowl. it barelly touched....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
Anybody make a drop center hood?
Tony
#63
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
<b>A prerequisit of a blower install for me is that the blower must sit high enough above the hood for at least half of the pulley to show. </b>
get a 10-71 i guarantee it will make your car stand out like nothing you have ever seen before....
get a 10-71 i guarantee it will make your car stand out like nothing you have ever seen before....
#64
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Kingtal0n
get a 10-71 i guarantee it will make your car stand out like nothing you have ever seen before....
get a 10-71 i guarantee it will make your car stand out like nothing you have ever seen before....
As for the hood clearance thing, since I was a kid, I've always wanted a car with a polished blower and a Mr. Gasket scoop (the one with the butterflys) sticking out of the hood. That's probably something I'm going to have to get over unless I'm willing to go way overkill (and over budget) with the blower.
Thanks,
Tony
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sharonville OH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
You could put a spacer between the blower and the manifold. Might kill the power but it wold look cool.
#66
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
tell me more about this $58 code look at the sig for my 91 Z drag car
tell me more about this $58 code look at the sig for my 91 Z drag car
Simply put... for cheap you can ditch the FMU and have the ECM do the job.
Not knocking the F.A.S.T. stuff, just the price, considering the few "real" improvements they offer. About the only thing a aftermarket ECM has that might help some is the ability to run 8 P/H injectors out of the box.. but even that can be acheived with a 7749 if you don't mind changing out some components in the ECM.
Last edited by SATURN5; 04-19-2003 at 10:13 AM.
#67
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Cronic3rd
You could put a spacer between the blower and the manifold. Might kill the power but it wold look cool.
You could put a spacer between the blower and the manifold. Might kill the power but it wold look cool.
Seriously, I guess my best two options would be to either just bite the bullet and cover the blower up with a cowl or save alot longer than I'd like to and buy a 671.
Tony
#68
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Elizabeth, WV
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Kingtal0n
oh that little blower & even the carb sits below the stock hood, its the aircleaner that sticks up about 3", and maybe a teeny bit of the carb. i had a 2" cowl, and i was using a drop base aircleaner (2" drop base) to clear it, so figure 1" of carb, and 1" of aircleaner stuck up into the top of the cowl. it barelly touched....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
oh that little blower & even the carb sits below the stock hood, its the aircleaner that sticks up about 3", and maybe a teeny bit of the carb. i had a 2" cowl, and i was using a drop base aircleaner (2" drop base) to clear it, so figure 1" of carb, and 1" of aircleaner stuck up into the top of the cowl. it barelly touched....
the weiand 142 is supposed to be a bit taller than the B&M 144 blower was, so we will see what i have to fabricate.
check my site....
Thanks,
Tony
#69
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
SOld the 144 for $1150 on ebay about 4 months ago!
I have a weiand 142 brand new but thats going on my 383 soon.
you can get a nice roots 142 now on ebay for less than $1000. keep searching they appear every now and then. just make sure you get a "later model" like cars the newer ones last longer and work better, hehe.
I have a weiand 142 brand new but thats going on my 383 soon.
you can get a nice roots 142 now on ebay for less than $1000. keep searching they appear every now and then. just make sure you get a "later model" like cars the newer ones last longer and work better, hehe.
#71
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Tom have you been browsing the TPI board? hehe I just picked up a TPI setup im busy porting polishing and siamesing it for my 355.
im hoping with my TPI setup, 700R4, and 3.73 gears I will break my record of 18 MPG- im hoping for 25 with the right tune. Eventually, I will do a "tom"- that is a stealthram / procharger combo to net me 500-600 RWHP on pump gas
im hoping with my TPI setup, 700R4, and 3.73 gears I will break my record of 18 MPG- im hoping for 25 with the right tune. Eventually, I will do a "tom"- that is a stealthram / procharger combo to net me 500-600 RWHP on pump gas
#74
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Kingtal0n,
did you ever descide if you were going to go with a serpentine belt and the 142? if you do that, let me know what kind of spacing issues you have with the pulleys.
did you ever descide if you were going to go with a serpentine belt and the 142? if you do that, let me know what kind of spacing issues you have with the pulleys.
#75
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by Kingtal0n
of couse i do. thats why i want a D1-SC.
of couse i do. thats why i want a D1-SC.
#76
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
<b>did you ever descide if you were going to go with a serpentine belt and the 142? if you do that, let me know what kind of spacing issues you have with the pulleys.</b>
actually i am going to use serpentine on this 383 im building, with the 142 blower. weiand sells a "special" blower for serpentine setups. Im not using the single serpentine though, im getting a blower serpentine setup from march pullies. that should cure it. heh.
actually i am going to use serpentine on this 383 im building, with the 142 blower. weiand sells a "special" blower for serpentine setups. Im not using the single serpentine though, im getting a blower serpentine setup from march pullies. that should cure it. heh.
#77
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: '85 TA
Engine: 350 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 posi 9bolt
One of the most in-depth threads I've read on this board. Long, but a lot of good engine building and tuning information. Kingtal0n, any updates?
#78
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Red Lion, PA
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro RS, 99 Camaro Z28
Engine: L03, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, T56
Axle/Gears: bunch of 10 bolts how scary is that
I have the recipe for 500 hp and 25mpg.... ready its real short....LS7 hehehehe I had to do it ... but still thats gotta be sweet.
#79
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
This is one of my oldest threads. Here is your update:
I built a twin-turbo camaro : geocities.com/kingtaling/turbo.html
Then, I switched my entire career / life / business around to JDM cars:
Here you will find our current list of JDM CARS for sale</title>
</head>
<body>
<!-- following code added by server. PLEASE REMOVE -->
<!-- preceding code added by server. PLEASE REMOVE -->
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<title>Welcome to IMPORT JAPAN Here you will find our current list of JDM
CARS for sale
I am now one of the largest suppliers in Florida for Japanese cars/motors, possibly in the lower states. I actually got out of the American scene simply because it was a waste of money for me, not because its bad or worse or for any particular reason case/effect of it.
But I will say that its a LOT easier to make a faster, lighter, more reliable car using Japanese cars/parts for cheap simply by virtue- In my opinion- the majority come OEM like this in Japan, for cheap, where the only "fast" oem american cars we can get here are usually heavy-tank/boats or simply out of the price range of the average person.
An example:
On my site you will see an orange 650RWHP 240sx. No- this isnt pump gas, it makes a mere 520RWHP on pump gas. But it has a 6-speed, a fully built 2.6Liter motor (yes 2.6L) and a stand-alone, among the other things you can clearly see. And it weighs... 2850Lbs without driver. Imagine, for a moment, your 500RWHP camaro losing 1000Lbs. Now move the redline to 8500RPMS (factory for that motor) and the transmission to a six speed. Now your having fun....
and it still gets the fuel economy of a 2.6L powered 2800Lb car.
Dont get me wrong, mad <3 to american power, its just not how I get my kicks anymore... But I AM building a small block to stick into one of these light JDM cars, something a little special to stir up the locals that frown on american V8 power. :-)
I built a twin-turbo camaro : geocities.com/kingtaling/turbo.html
Then, I switched my entire career / life / business around to JDM cars:
Here you will find our current list of JDM CARS for sale</title>
</head>
<body>
<!-- following code added by server. PLEASE REMOVE -->
<!-- preceding code added by server. PLEASE REMOVE -->
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<title>Welcome to IMPORT JAPAN Here you will find our current list of JDM
CARS for sale
I am now one of the largest suppliers in Florida for Japanese cars/motors, possibly in the lower states. I actually got out of the American scene simply because it was a waste of money for me, not because its bad or worse or for any particular reason case/effect of it.
But I will say that its a LOT easier to make a faster, lighter, more reliable car using Japanese cars/parts for cheap simply by virtue- In my opinion- the majority come OEM like this in Japan, for cheap, where the only "fast" oem american cars we can get here are usually heavy-tank/boats or simply out of the price range of the average person.
An example:
On my site you will see an orange 650RWHP 240sx. No- this isnt pump gas, it makes a mere 520RWHP on pump gas. But it has a 6-speed, a fully built 2.6Liter motor (yes 2.6L) and a stand-alone, among the other things you can clearly see. And it weighs... 2850Lbs without driver. Imagine, for a moment, your 500RWHP camaro losing 1000Lbs. Now move the redline to 8500RPMS (factory for that motor) and the transmission to a six speed. Now your having fun....
and it still gets the fuel economy of a 2.6L powered 2800Lb car.
Dont get me wrong, mad <3 to american power, its just not how I get my kicks anymore... But I AM building a small block to stick into one of these light JDM cars, something a little special to stir up the locals that frown on american V8 power. :-)
#80
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Kingtal0n
But I will say that its a LOT easier to make a faster, lighter, more reliable car using Japanese cars/parts for cheap simply by virtue- In my opinion- the majority come OEM like this in Japan, for cheap, where the only "fast" oem american cars we can get here are usually heavy-tank/boats or simply out of the price range of the average person.
Originally Posted by Kingtal0n
An example:
On my site you will see an orange 650RWHP 240sx. No- this isnt pump gas, it makes a mere 520RWHP on pump gas. But it has a 6-speed, a fully built 2.6Liter motor (yes 2.6L) and a stand-alone, among the other things you can clearly see. And it weighs... 2850Lbs without driver. Imagine, for a moment, your 500RWHP camaro losing 1000Lbs. Now move the redline to 8500RPMS (factory for that motor) and the transmission to a six speed. Now your having fun....
and it still gets the fuel economy of a 2.6L powered 2800Lb car.
On my site you will see an orange 650RWHP 240sx. No- this isnt pump gas, it makes a mere 520RWHP on pump gas. But it has a 6-speed, a fully built 2.6Liter motor (yes 2.6L) and a stand-alone, among the other things you can clearly see. And it weighs... 2850Lbs without driver. Imagine, for a moment, your 500RWHP camaro losing 1000Lbs. Now move the redline to 8500RPMS (factory for that motor) and the transmission to a six speed. Now your having fun....
and it still gets the fuel economy of a 2.6L powered 2800Lb car.
Originally Posted by Kingtal0n
Dont get me wrong, mad <3 to american power, its just not how I get my kicks anymore... But I AM building a small block to stick into one of these light JDM cars, something a little special to stir up the locals that frown on american V8 power. :-)
#81
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
I checked out your website and you have some nice stuff on there. I have always been curious if imports are cheaper to build. I see some of them at the track but only one or two of them are fast. Since you have built American stuff and import stuff, what is the average price ratio? I guess I am not the average Joe because there is no way I could afford the cheap cars on that site.
Well, the cars on that site are mostly ACTUAL imports, not "imports" sold in america...
In other words, if you bought a 240sx here from 1992 you would pay $800~. Thats a crappy 2.4L N/A motor that makes 140WHP if your lucky. now they are RWD so thats a plus...
But go to Japan and you wont see 240's. You will see Silvias / 180SX cars. These cars cost less american $ there, and they have Turbocharged 2.0L 250RWHP+ motors. The tricky part is bringing that (@*# back to the USA. It doesnt pay to just bring 1, you have to bring 50 or more. I Bring the motors, AND the cars back.
Thats why the cars on my site are so much money, most of them are ACTUAL Japanese cars, right hand drive, factory turbocharged, etc... Nothing important is aftermarket. They are more rare in the USA than ferrari's or lamborghini's, thus the high prices.
now, to simply put one of the JDM (japanese domestic market) engines into an american car is much cheaper. You can get one of the "redtop" 2.0L 250RWHP motors for your american 240SX for under $2000. Installation and wiring can be done yourself, the intercooler and exhaust can be anywhere from $350-$1500 depends how cheap you go. Search "SR20DET" on ebay and see the support these motors have now..
And in a car like this $800 240sx (nissan btw) a 250RWHP will put you into the low 12's. And yes, it gets 26-28MPG. So your price range is $3000-$5000 for a 12 second reliable daily driver... that was my first project in the import world. it only ended when I Upgraded to a bigger and better project, all I ever did to it was change the oil.
and thats just for starters. A turbo upgrade, injectors, maf and ECU tune ($1500 more) and pick 300-400RWHP on the stock motor, your choice. 350RWHP~ is just flat out scary in one of these cars. this is my idea of cheap and reliable so far on a budget.
as you go up in the years of these cars and the motors, and as they get more rare and hard to find (I have the only 98 240sx for sale in florida under $10,000 unmodified) the prices go up. I just sold the moss-green one on my site for $17000 saturday afternoon. I have a guy in japan right now bringing back more cars/motors for me because I sell this stuff amazingly fast.
We do lexus(toyota) nissan mazda mostly, You would not BELEIVE the kind of crap the japanese can get OEM for cheap.
there are a few "favorites" of swaps/cars from japan:
toyota "soarer" (aka SC300 Lexus here in the USA)
US version: 6-cylinder 3.0L N/A 180~horsepower automatic
JDM version: 6-cylinder 2.5L Turbo 320Horsepower 5-speed or auto
Nissan "Silvia" (aka 240sx)
US version: 2.4L N/A 140Horsepower
JDM version: 2.0L Turbo 250-320Horsepower, year dependant
Nissan "Skyline" (us version: NONE)
Cheap version "GT-T" 2.5L Turbo 320+Horsepower ($2500~ motor)
more pricey motor "GT-R" 2.6L Twin Turbo 8200RPM Redline 380+Horsepower ($4500~)
People put these into 240's usually... As seen on my site.
A few more
Toyota "aristo" (Lexus GS here)
Mazda "savannah" (RX-7 here)
Get this... Acura RSX Type-S here in the USA: 200(?) horsepower,
Acura Type-R (the RSX badge is USA only) in Japan is 230~WHP, N/A 2.0L motor. This doesnt sound like much... but in that car... it goes 11's... Comes FACTORY with RECARO seats, BREMBO brakes, SIX speed, big-juice equipment.
Then there are the same name cars, like the STI or EVO, Yes in japan the engines have bigger better turbo equipment, bigger brakes, better seats, etc... and the cars are cheaper.
----------
That is impressive. I would never have imagined a stock 2.6 engine or 6-speed could handle that much HP. Kind of comparing apples to oranges using that car as an example. I am guessing it is in the 20+ PSI boost range. Is that the stock weight for that car? The axles will handle that much HP?
First off, the stock RB26 (2.6L GT-R motor) will easilly handle 700-800 Horsepower from the factory. this particular one was built to ensure reliability for years over years at this power level. it didnt have to be. It runs 15PSI regularly, with 27PSI being the peak that we could hit with the current boost controller. it would do more than 650 to the wheels but the wastegates were getting peaky with the kind of duty cycle I was running on the BC selenoid...
stock weight is 2660Lbs, you lose some weight when you shave the factory motor but gain it back and THEN some with the skyline motor. we shaved some more weight off the car with different seats, removed A/C, nothing in the back, a fuel cell, and a few more aluminum replacment parts like wheels and hubs and brakes... etc... it would be about 2900 without saving any weight from all the things we did. You can go all the way down to 2000lbs with these cars, but you HAVE to use the all aluminum 2.0L turbo motor to hit that number or be crazy with a plasma cutter and a sawzaw.
Well, the cars on that site are mostly ACTUAL imports, not "imports" sold in america...
In other words, if you bought a 240sx here from 1992 you would pay $800~. Thats a crappy 2.4L N/A motor that makes 140WHP if your lucky. now they are RWD so thats a plus...
But go to Japan and you wont see 240's. You will see Silvias / 180SX cars. These cars cost less american $ there, and they have Turbocharged 2.0L 250RWHP+ motors. The tricky part is bringing that (@*# back to the USA. It doesnt pay to just bring 1, you have to bring 50 or more. I Bring the motors, AND the cars back.
Thats why the cars on my site are so much money, most of them are ACTUAL Japanese cars, right hand drive, factory turbocharged, etc... Nothing important is aftermarket. They are more rare in the USA than ferrari's or lamborghini's, thus the high prices.
now, to simply put one of the JDM (japanese domestic market) engines into an american car is much cheaper. You can get one of the "redtop" 2.0L 250RWHP motors for your american 240SX for under $2000. Installation and wiring can be done yourself, the intercooler and exhaust can be anywhere from $350-$1500 depends how cheap you go. Search "SR20DET" on ebay and see the support these motors have now..
And in a car like this $800 240sx (nissan btw) a 250RWHP will put you into the low 12's. And yes, it gets 26-28MPG. So your price range is $3000-$5000 for a 12 second reliable daily driver... that was my first project in the import world. it only ended when I Upgraded to a bigger and better project, all I ever did to it was change the oil.
and thats just for starters. A turbo upgrade, injectors, maf and ECU tune ($1500 more) and pick 300-400RWHP on the stock motor, your choice. 350RWHP~ is just flat out scary in one of these cars. this is my idea of cheap and reliable so far on a budget.
as you go up in the years of these cars and the motors, and as they get more rare and hard to find (I have the only 98 240sx for sale in florida under $10,000 unmodified) the prices go up. I just sold the moss-green one on my site for $17000 saturday afternoon. I have a guy in japan right now bringing back more cars/motors for me because I sell this stuff amazingly fast.
We do lexus(toyota) nissan mazda mostly, You would not BELEIVE the kind of crap the japanese can get OEM for cheap.
there are a few "favorites" of swaps/cars from japan:
toyota "soarer" (aka SC300 Lexus here in the USA)
US version: 6-cylinder 3.0L N/A 180~horsepower automatic
JDM version: 6-cylinder 2.5L Turbo 320Horsepower 5-speed or auto
Nissan "Silvia" (aka 240sx)
US version: 2.4L N/A 140Horsepower
JDM version: 2.0L Turbo 250-320Horsepower, year dependant
Nissan "Skyline" (us version: NONE)
Cheap version "GT-T" 2.5L Turbo 320+Horsepower ($2500~ motor)
more pricey motor "GT-R" 2.6L Twin Turbo 8200RPM Redline 380+Horsepower ($4500~)
People put these into 240's usually... As seen on my site.
A few more
Toyota "aristo" (Lexus GS here)
Mazda "savannah" (RX-7 here)
Get this... Acura RSX Type-S here in the USA: 200(?) horsepower,
Acura Type-R (the RSX badge is USA only) in Japan is 230~WHP, N/A 2.0L motor. This doesnt sound like much... but in that car... it goes 11's... Comes FACTORY with RECARO seats, BREMBO brakes, SIX speed, big-juice equipment.
Then there are the same name cars, like the STI or EVO, Yes in japan the engines have bigger better turbo equipment, bigger brakes, better seats, etc... and the cars are cheaper.
----------
That is impressive. I would never have imagined a stock 2.6 engine or 6-speed could handle that much HP. Kind of comparing apples to oranges using that car as an example. I am guessing it is in the 20+ PSI boost range. Is that the stock weight for that car? The axles will handle that much HP?
First off, the stock RB26 (2.6L GT-R motor) will easilly handle 700-800 Horsepower from the factory. this particular one was built to ensure reliability for years over years at this power level. it didnt have to be. It runs 15PSI regularly, with 27PSI being the peak that we could hit with the current boost controller. it would do more than 650 to the wheels but the wastegates were getting peaky with the kind of duty cycle I was running on the BC selenoid...
stock weight is 2660Lbs, you lose some weight when you shave the factory motor but gain it back and THEN some with the skyline motor. we shaved some more weight off the car with different seats, removed A/C, nothing in the back, a fuel cell, and a few more aluminum replacment parts like wheels and hubs and brakes... etc... it would be about 2900 without saving any weight from all the things we did. You can go all the way down to 2000lbs with these cars, but you HAVE to use the all aluminum 2.0L turbo motor to hit that number or be crazy with a plasma cutter and a sawzaw.
Last edited by Kingtal0n; 05-09-2006 at 12:57 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#83
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: santa barbara,ca
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 iroc z
Engine: LSX 376 F1A
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.42
i dont have that much power on my zz 383 superrammed engine but i do get 28mpg. tested it many times.
#84
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Garage
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: SBC
Transmission: Manual Th-350
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.89's Spool.
KingtaLon, congrats on the amazing projects you did with your thirdgen and the buisness u have built with the JDM stuff.
Im really wanting to build a 355 with a Weiand 177, my AFR 195's 750 carb and about 9:0-1 compression. I was wondering what u felt the was best Hyd Flat tappet cam for a setup like that. NX262H? XE262H?
Im really wanting to build a 355 with a Weiand 177, my AFR 195's 750 carb and about 9:0-1 compression. I was wondering what u felt the was best Hyd Flat tappet cam for a setup like that. NX262H? XE262H?
#86
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: on the street
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92 Formula 350
Engine: L98 with a T-76
Transmission: ArtCarr 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Bone stock 10bolt and 3.23's
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
Very Nice. Should have thought about a turbo setup though.
#87
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
I look back on this and I cant BELIEVE how far I've gone, what I've been through since then. I still get emails from thirdgen'ers a few a week asking me questions, what are you doing, what ever happened, help me with this, etc... its awsome.
I am not retired just on break
I am not retired just on break
#89
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
I think this should get sticky status. Extremely well presented. Only thing I can think to add would be the option to swap the blower for a 100-150 shot of NOS, so you have even more economy, and as an added benefit, you get to make all the fart-can-muffler hoda drivers drop a load in their pants.
#90
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
and to be honest now that its 08' I dont even think 22MPG is worth a crap. I drive something with 682 RWHP and it gets 28+mpg so... this thread should be buried IMHO.
#91
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...sts/index.html
Stock
204/211 @ .050 .525 lift (116 lobe separation angle) = 402.1 hp at 5,300 rpm and 437 lb-ft of torque at 4,300 rpm
90 MORE HORSEPOWER WITH JUST A FREAKING CAM CHANGE!
218/220 @ .050 .570 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 494.4 hp at 6,400 rpm and 450 lb-ft of torque at 5,200 rpm
Looks like we are pretty close to the limits of the heads
232/236 @ .050 .600 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 500.2 hp at 6,400 rpm and 449.8 lb-ft at 5,000 rpm
If you want to see the the parts 2 and 3 of this article, they add some ported heads and then L92 heads. There are several pages and pictures for each article:
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ads/index.html
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...dyno_test.html
This thread was made a long time ago, and everything in it is just as valid, but because of the LS series motors, the bar is definitely raised. I remember when the LS first came out, and I heard that they would be putting iron variants in millions of trucks. I told my friends that it was a lot like the 1950's when the flathead was the king and this new technology called the small block chevy came on the scene and turned the world of hotrodders on their heads.
Now we have Hot Rod magazine articles with Ford Fairmonts running 5.3 GMC truck motors with a LS6 cam and a Brazilian Masterpower MP-70 through an eBay intercooler making 625hp at the rears and running low 9's.
Anyone who has been building their projects for a while are probably thinking about these motors (I have been). If you are just getting started on a project I recommend you GET thinking about them. They may just be CHEAPER to get your hands on in the long run!!!
#92
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
LS2, better cam, better exhaust, stock heads, no blower, no nitrous, no turbo. There are 3 pages of just this article:
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...sts/index.html
Stock
204/211 @ .050 .525 lift (116 lobe separation angle) = 402.1 hp at 5,300 rpm and 437 lb-ft of torque at 4,300 rpm
90 MORE HORSEPOWER WITH JUST A FREAKING CAM CHANGE!
218/220 @ .050 .570 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 494.4 hp at 6,400 rpm and 450 lb-ft of torque at 5,200 rpm
Looks like we are pretty close to the limits of the heads
232/236 @ .050 .600 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 500.2 hp at 6,400 rpm and 449.8 lb-ft at 5,000 rpm
If you want to see the the parts 2 and 3 of this article, they add some ported heads and then L92 heads. There are several pages and pictures for each article:
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ads/index.html
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...dyno_test.html
This thread was made a long time ago, and everything in it is just as valid, but because of the LS series motors, the bar is definitely raised. I remember when the LS first came out, and I heard that they would be putting iron variants in millions of trucks. I told my friends that it was a lot like the 1950's when the flathead was the king and this new technology called the small block chevy came on the scene and turned the world of hotrodders on their heads.
Now we have Hot Rod magazine articles with Ford Fairmonts running 5.3 GMC truck motors with a LS6 cam and a Brazilian Masterpower MP-70 through an eBay intercooler making 625hp at the rears and running low 9's.
Anyone who has been building their projects for a while are probably thinking about these motors (I have been). If you are just getting started on a project I recommend you GET thinking about them. They may just be CHEAPER to get your hands on in the long run!!!
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...sts/index.html
Stock
204/211 @ .050 .525 lift (116 lobe separation angle) = 402.1 hp at 5,300 rpm and 437 lb-ft of torque at 4,300 rpm
90 MORE HORSEPOWER WITH JUST A FREAKING CAM CHANGE!
218/220 @ .050 .570 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 494.4 hp at 6,400 rpm and 450 lb-ft of torque at 5,200 rpm
Looks like we are pretty close to the limits of the heads
232/236 @ .050 .600 lift (114 lobe separation angle) = 500.2 hp at 6,400 rpm and 449.8 lb-ft at 5,000 rpm
If you want to see the the parts 2 and 3 of this article, they add some ported heads and then L92 heads. There are several pages and pictures for each article:
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ads/index.html
http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...dyno_test.html
This thread was made a long time ago, and everything in it is just as valid, but because of the LS series motors, the bar is definitely raised. I remember when the LS first came out, and I heard that they would be putting iron variants in millions of trucks. I told my friends that it was a lot like the 1950's when the flathead was the king and this new technology called the small block chevy came on the scene and turned the world of hotrodders on their heads.
Now we have Hot Rod magazine articles with Ford Fairmonts running 5.3 GMC truck motors with a LS6 cam and a Brazilian Masterpower MP-70 through an eBay intercooler making 625hp at the rears and running low 9's.
Anyone who has been building their projects for a while are probably thinking about these motors (I have been). If you are just getting started on a project I recommend you GET thinking about them. They may just be CHEAPER to get your hands on in the long run!!!
Hi Tom!!! Long time!!!
#96
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Trans Am..
Engine: Hmm... 350? The guy told me
Transmission: 5 speed
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
This recipe sounds good.. great thread!!! As soon as I finish my 400 swap TA I want to try this one on a 85 camaro Also I feel you on the import scene.. it was epic the summer evening when I chose between my Firebird and a S14 with a turbo KA24.. my heart is divided
#97
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
This recipe sounds good.. great thread!!! As soon as I finish my 400 swap TA I want to try this one on a 85 camaro Also I feel you on the import scene.. it was epic the summer evening when I chose between my Firebird and a S14 with a turbo KA24.. my heart is divided
#98
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Trans Am..
Engine: Hmm... 350? The guy told me
Transmission: 5 speed
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
Could you give me some examples of products with better technology than the one behind the build? Also I think they even might be cheaper
#99
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Re: Recipe for 500 Horsepower, 22 MPG. Long.
It would also pass the sniffer in most states inspection.