New fastest ET
#51
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Re: New fastest ET
My immediate thought was your tach is off, because I had the same combo with the same tires and gears and was not breaking 6,000 rpm crossing the traps at 112, I think I was at like 5700 or 5800.
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Yeah, maybe i should get a new tach! I usually shift by ear anyway, but i was thinking those rpms were pretty high.
#53
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Ok just a few updates on my car! First of all i was telling you guys about the traction issues i was having with the 26" tall tire. So i purchased the lca and panhard rod kit and then some relocation brackets from founders performance. They are a very nice and solid product and no complaints there at all!
I went to the track last night and i ran 12.67 at 107.4x every run but once when i hooked a little better and got a 12.60. But my 60' was 1.78 every single time no matter how big the burnout. I also have a linelock now to help with the burnout. With the 28" tire i was getting 1.66 to 1.68 60' with no suspension mods and an lca angle that was messed up.
Overall the car is very consistent now just was wondering why my 60' is dropping off.
I went to the track last night and i ran 12.67 at 107.4x every run but once when i hooked a little better and got a 12.60. But my 60' was 1.78 every single time no matter how big the burnout. I also have a linelock now to help with the burnout. With the 28" tire i was getting 1.66 to 1.68 60' with no suspension mods and an lca angle that was messed up.
Overall the car is very consistent now just was wondering why my 60' is dropping off.
#55
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
The DA was a little higher than last time, but yeah its been hot here as well! It was 2450 instead of 1800 when i ran the best time. My mph was suffering some as well, but i didnt know that the DA would effect 60' that much?
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Would i see any performance gains from a super victor single plane intake? I'm launching from 2800 and flashing higher than that, so i was wondering if that intake would help me more at the top end, and they say it doesnt lose low end?
#58
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Ah okk thanks! I think i'm peaking out power wise for these heads,haha. I'll just have to wait till an exceptional DA to try for an 11.99.
#62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
I was wondering if that was hurting me actually. I have the q-jet on there which is what made the car actually run in the first place. But it's on there with an adapter plate, and i didnt know if that adapter plate is a major restriction or what? Im a little leery on going back to a holley after the last time.
#64
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Yeah, i was thinking i shouldnt let that sway me. I'll have to get a new carb then and try it out. Is there alot of tuning to be had after purchasing a new quickfuel? Or do they come with pretty good tunes out of the box?
#66
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Right, jetting's fine for me, i just didnt know if you needed anymore extensive type of tuning, im not the greatest in that area.
So my next upgrades im going to be doing to the car are, Quickfuel 750 carb with annular boosters, an rpm airgap intake, and longtube headers with dual exhaust exiting before the axle(Right now i just have hooker shorties and a hooker y-pipe and i cut the exhaust right after the y-pipe and put a downpipe, so open headers basically).
Which one of those upgrades will give me the biggest gain in et first and is the biggest restriction as of now?
So my next upgrades im going to be doing to the car are, Quickfuel 750 carb with annular boosters, an rpm airgap intake, and longtube headers with dual exhaust exiting before the axle(Right now i just have hooker shorties and a hooker y-pipe and i cut the exhaust right after the y-pipe and put a downpipe, so open headers basically).
Which one of those upgrades will give me the biggest gain in et first and is the biggest restriction as of now?
Last edited by GreggymacZ28; 07-13-2012 at 06:20 PM.
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Ah okay i had read annular was best for fuel, but im sure thats for alot more radical builds than mine. That'll save me 20 bucks! So do you think the carb is going to be my biggest performance gain then?
#69
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: New fastest ET
i believe it will help. hooker super comps longtubes and a proper exhaust system will be worth a ton too. you are going about this a bit backwards, trying to get exotic on the intake side when the exhaust side is still basically stock type exhaust system, lol.
always make it breath out correctly first before it can breath in more. even then, the cam/heads aren't going to want to go more than about 6500ish even once you get a proper exhaust system on it.
super victors and annular booster carbs are for 14:1 engines that go to 8k, not for street motors with vortec heads
fyi, even with 550+hp on tap, i'm using a downleg booster carb on my lsx engine, and only shifting at 6800 rpm
always make it breath out correctly first before it can breath in more. even then, the cam/heads aren't going to want to go more than about 6500ish even once you get a proper exhaust system on it.
super victors and annular booster carbs are for 14:1 engines that go to 8k, not for street motors with vortec heads
fyi, even with 550+hp on tap, i'm using a downleg booster carb on my lsx engine, and only shifting at 6800 rpm
#70
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
i believe it will help. hooker super comps longtubes and a proper exhaust system will be worth a ton too. you are going about this a bit backwards, trying to get exotic on the intake side when the exhaust side is still basically stock type exhaust system, lol.
always make it breath out correctly first before it can breath in more. even then, the cam/heads aren't going to want to go more than about 6500ish even once you get a proper exhaust system on it.
super victors and annular booster carbs are for 14:1 engines that go to 8k, not for street motors with vortec heads
fyi, even with 550+hp on tap, i'm using a downleg booster carb on my lsx engine, and only shifting at 6800 rpm
always make it breath out correctly first before it can breath in more. even then, the cam/heads aren't going to want to go more than about 6500ish even once you get a proper exhaust system on it.
super victors and annular booster carbs are for 14:1 engines that go to 8k, not for street motors with vortec heads
fyi, even with 550+hp on tap, i'm using a downleg booster carb on my lsx engine, and only shifting at 6800 rpm
#72
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
The exhaust you mentioned was exactly what i had in mind. i wanted longtubes with an x-pipe to magnaflows dumped before the axle. I know i wanted magnaflows because they are a better performance muffler and now i just want the thing to be a little quieter so im hoping the magnaflows will be the best of both worlds.
#74
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
I installed some longtubes a couple days ago( hedman longtubes). Only 1 5/8 primaries, but i figured they would do. I went to the track tonight and i just put some down turns off the headers. Well, i have a new best time. I'm having a very hard time figuring out if im happy with this time or upset,lol. Here's how the slip looks.
60 ft: 1.6721
330 ft: 4.8859
1/8 ET: 7.6119
1/8 MPH: 89.82
1000' ET: 9.9840
1000' MPH: 102.51
1/4 ET: 12.0050
1/4 MPH: 111.38
I couldnt believe that i missed it by .005....I went back and ran again, but spun like crazy with a 1.82 60 foot and then the track closed. The carb was cutting out on take off and then the car would take off, so im sure with a tuned carb it woud run alot better. Oh well, i guess i'm just that much closer now to my 11 second pass!
60 ft: 1.6721
330 ft: 4.8859
1/8 ET: 7.6119
1/8 MPH: 89.82
1000' ET: 9.9840
1000' MPH: 102.51
1/4 ET: 12.0050
1/4 MPH: 111.38
I couldnt believe that i missed it by .005....I went back and ran again, but spun like crazy with a 1.82 60 foot and then the track closed. The carb was cutting out on take off and then the car would take off, so im sure with a tuned carb it woud run alot better. Oh well, i guess i'm just that much closer now to my 11 second pass!
#75
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belleville,IL
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Formula
Engine: 383 248/256 cam
Transmission: 700r4 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.89 gears detroit locker
Re: New fastest ET
well judging by the et and mph id say the car picked up some power to say the least just gotta do some supsension tuning
#77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Yeah, it was bike night at our track, so they decided they wouldnt prep the track. It took the 3 cars there spinning out and ready to hit the wall for them to decide they should prep it a little better. When i go for the points race im sure itll hook up alot better.
#79
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: findlay,oh
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro rs
Engine: twin turbo 406
Transmission: th400 w/brake 4400 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: New fastest ET
Thats awesome, im going to the track august 3rd so hopefully i will be right there with you!!!
#85
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Thanks guys again for your help!
Orr- yeah i know i was hoping the exhaust would help it out, maybe the x-pipe will help it some more.
Bluegrassz- yeah i see that! I couldnt believe i got that close without getting there,lol. But you have a good mph im sure youll get there no problem at all!
mw66nova- Yeah that's what i am hoping for, it seems like my car must have some good torque because my mph's and 60's arent as good as others yet my 1/8 mile et is just as good if not better. I'm thinking that the q-jet i have now is makin me run a little lean, so with a full exhaust itd help that out as well along with all of the other benefits.
Orr- yeah i know i was hoping the exhaust would help it out, maybe the x-pipe will help it some more.
Bluegrassz- yeah i see that! I couldnt believe i got that close without getting there,lol. But you have a good mph im sure youll get there no problem at all!
mw66nova- Yeah that's what i am hoping for, it seems like my car must have some good torque because my mph's and 60's arent as good as others yet my 1/8 mile et is just as good if not better. I'm thinking that the q-jet i have now is makin me run a little lean, so with a full exhaust itd help that out as well along with all of the other benefits.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Central PA
Posts: 706
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: Rebuilt L98 with H/C/I/Carb
Transmission: TH350 with ATI Treemaster
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 4.10's
Re: New fastest ET
I tried turn-downs on my car once and it did not like it at all. I lost a ton in the first 330'. My Mufflex Y into a single 3" exhaust works a lot better. Hopefully you find something similar with a true exhaust with a cross over.
Excellent times by the way. I've read a lot on here lately about Gen 1 small blocks not being able to run with heads, cam and intake...
Excellent times by the way. I've read a lot on here lately about Gen 1 small blocks not being able to run with heads, cam and intake...
#87
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Yeah, that's one thing i like about my build, is that it is one usually people do not want to run if they are talking anything about low 12's. Everyone at my track always asks me where my nitrous is.... I painted my linelock black for that very reason, some random people would see it and think it was a nitrous solenoid....even though it clearly has a brake line,haha.
But on the exhaust, i did the turn down's basically to just show me the difference between shorty headers to longtubes. I wanted to see that gain first, then what i get with the full exhaust. I'm hoping with what you guys said the full exhaust will help me out, i just dont want it to hurt my mph.
But on the exhaust, i did the turn down's basically to just show me the difference between shorty headers to longtubes. I wanted to see that gain first, then what i get with the full exhaust. I'm hoping with what you guys said the full exhaust will help me out, i just dont want it to hurt my mph.
#88
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
I was thinking about getting a 4.10 gear for my car, what do you guys think? Will it help me et wise at all?
#89
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Brooklyn, MI
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: New fastest ET
Most likely if you run the 4:10's you'll want those 28" tires back. I run 4:10's with 26's and run out of gear at the big end. Still looking for some 28's before I get back to the track. Milan as well.
#91
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
DNSTA - yeah that was also one of my worries. I do still have 28's though but after spending what i did on 26's i wouldnt want them to go to waste. And really? Maybe ill see you out there sometime!
mw66nova - Like i said earlier my tach probably is off, but im sure the shiftpoints should tell you alot anyway. I shift from 2-3 at 7000 on my tach, and i go through the traps at 64-6500. It seems like i have a little more gear to go?
mw66nova - Like i said earlier my tach probably is off, but im sure the shiftpoints should tell you alot anyway. I shift from 2-3 at 7000 on my tach, and i go through the traps at 64-6500. It seems like i have a little more gear to go?
#92
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: New fastest ET
DNSTA - yeah that was also one of my worries. I do still have 28's though but after spending what i did on 26's i wouldnt want them to go to waste. And really? Maybe ill see you out there sometime!
mw66nova - Like i said earlier my tach probably is off, but im sure the shiftpoints should tell you alot anyway. I shift from 2-3 at 7000 on my tach, and i go through the traps at 64-6500. It seems like i have a little more gear to go?
mw66nova - Like i said earlier my tach probably is off, but im sure the shiftpoints should tell you alot anyway. I shift from 2-3 at 7000 on my tach, and i go through the traps at 64-6500. It seems like i have a little more gear to go?
Same one here.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ATM-233905/
Last edited by bluegrassz; 07-25-2012 at 02:01 PM.
#93
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: New fastest ET
4.10s would raise you up about 300 rpm going through the traps, but can make 60' harder to be consistent with the 26" tall tires. i'd put a known good tach/shiftlight in there and see where you're actually at. shifting "blind" put me close to half a second slow in my 6.0 combo when i first started working out the kinks.
#94
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 357, Canfield heads, solid roller,
Transmission: Upgraded 03 Cobra T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.50 gears and Detroit Locker
Re: New fastest ET
4.10s would raise you up about 300 rpm going through the traps, but can make 60' harder to be consistent with the 26" tall tires. i'd put a known good tach/shiftlight in there and see where you're actually at. shifting "blind" put me close to half a second slow in my 6.0 combo when i first started working out the kinks.
#95
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
A buddy of mine did some math for me last night, and by the looks of it it appears my tach is actually correct...which has me really confused. Here is the math though....
My tach says i am passing through the traps at 6400. so...
6400 rpm * pi * 26" tire / (3.73 gear * 1056 constant) = 132.7 mph if i had a convertor clutch engaged. So divide that by 1.19 (He has the same convertor as me and decided he'd calculate his convertor loss as well, and noticed it was also 19%) convertor loss = 111.52.
My mph was 111.38. So apparently my 7000 rpm shift would be correct then? The only reason why i ever have said my tach is off, was because almost every other person ive read with a similar engine combo to mine isnt at the rpm's I'm at...
Also i get what you guys mean about shift points, but the numbers on the tach werent really effecting where i shift, ive expiremented basically every rpm on the tach, and 7000 is where it makes its best, if i go to 71-7200 the mph drops off after the 1000'. I shift at anywhere from 65-6800 and it also drops 2-3 mph. And if i shift at around 6000 i tried once, the car fell flat on its face and lost 5-7 mph on three different runs.
My tach says i am passing through the traps at 6400. so...
6400 rpm * pi * 26" tire / (3.73 gear * 1056 constant) = 132.7 mph if i had a convertor clutch engaged. So divide that by 1.19 (He has the same convertor as me and decided he'd calculate his convertor loss as well, and noticed it was also 19%) convertor loss = 111.52.
My mph was 111.38. So apparently my 7000 rpm shift would be correct then? The only reason why i ever have said my tach is off, was because almost every other person ive read with a similar engine combo to mine isnt at the rpm's I'm at...
Also i get what you guys mean about shift points, but the numbers on the tach werent really effecting where i shift, ive expiremented basically every rpm on the tach, and 7000 is where it makes its best, if i go to 71-7200 the mph drops off after the 1000'. I shift at anywhere from 65-6800 and it also drops 2-3 mph. And if i shift at around 6000 i tried once, the car fell flat on its face and lost 5-7 mph on three different runs.
#97
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Okay that's something i was trying to know, i wasnt sure what the average convertor slippage was which made me wonder about his 19% slippage number.
I have a 3500 ******* convertor. I'm pretty sure the company is closed now, my dad ran their convertors for years and said they were the best he'd ever owned, so we put one we had in my car.
I have a 3500 ******* convertor. I'm pretty sure the company is closed now, my dad ran their convertors for years and said they were the best he'd ever owned, so we put one we had in my car.
#98
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Aww crap... i forgot about the weird word blockages on this cite, it was a R..e...d..n..e.c.k convertor.
#99
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro z28
Engine: sbc 383
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11 gear
Re: New fastest ET
Well... my goal has been met! An 11.91 @ 112.56 mph.
I noticed the other day that my car was running hot with the new headers, so i bought some thermal tape and put it on my fuel lines, and took my catalytic convertor's heat shield since i dont need it anymore and formed it as a shield to my fuel lines where they were closest to the headers. I also changed out my antifreeze for water with water wetter. So the car ran nice and cool.
So today was the sunday point series and i went up for my first time trial, and i pulled off an 11.94 @ 112.36 mph. So of course i was happy and that was finally my 11 second i wanted. Then i pulled up for my second one, and i got my new fastest time of 11.91 @ 112.56. I ran 11's almost all day, but to avoid losing some races i let off to run some 12.00's.
Anyway just thought i'd let you guys know i hit my goal! I'll post up a pic of the timeslip sometime to show everything. Thanks again to everyone who has helped me get to where im at!
I noticed the other day that my car was running hot with the new headers, so i bought some thermal tape and put it on my fuel lines, and took my catalytic convertor's heat shield since i dont need it anymore and formed it as a shield to my fuel lines where they were closest to the headers. I also changed out my antifreeze for water with water wetter. So the car ran nice and cool.
So today was the sunday point series and i went up for my first time trial, and i pulled off an 11.94 @ 112.36 mph. So of course i was happy and that was finally my 11 second i wanted. Then i pulled up for my second one, and i got my new fastest time of 11.91 @ 112.56. I ran 11's almost all day, but to avoid losing some races i let off to run some 12.00's.
Anyway just thought i'd let you guys know i hit my goal! I'll post up a pic of the timeslip sometime to show everything. Thanks again to everyone who has helped me get to where im at!
Last edited by GreggymacZ28; 07-29-2012 at 07:09 PM.