Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Hey guys, just wanted to put this out and see if anyone else has had any problems.....
I went to put all my front suspension back together, and the passenger side tie rod is hitting the K-Member so I can't get it far enough towards the spindle to connect.
Also the stock lower A-Frames, seem to rub on the front side on the K-Member as well, dont have any pics of that here....
Has anyone else run into problems like this?
I went to put all my front suspension back together, and the passenger side tie rod is hitting the K-Member so I can't get it far enough towards the spindle to connect.
Also the stock lower A-Frames, seem to rub on the front side on the K-Member as well, dont have any pics of that here....
Has anyone else run into problems like this?
#2
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
mine rubs a little but didnt come in full contact, but those k-members seem to differ from cars to cars. I had to use a bottle jack and a 2x4 to spread it a little so i could get the bolt holes to line up.
Justin
Justin
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
I'm sorry, can you explain that a little better, I dont understand how a jack will help my situation?
I e-mailed bruce the pics, so hopefully he will get time to check email soon and let me know what he thinks.
I e-mailed bruce the pics, so hopefully he will get time to check email soon and let me know what he thinks.
#4
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
oh sorry i was talking about getting the k-member bolted up to the frame. Was just trying to say that the k-member just didnt fit the greatest and there has been different experiences with different people with it. You also wont be able to run a pro-kit with it.
Justin
Justin
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Antelope, CA
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IrocZ/17 LS 1LE
Engine: 383/LGX
Transmission: 400/TR-3160
Axle/Gears: 3.08/3.27
Originally posted by ThirdGenLS1
oh sorry i was talking about getting the k-member bolted up to the frame. Was just trying to say that the k-member just didnt fit the greatest and there has been different experiences with different people with it. You also wont be able to run a pro-kit with it.
Justin
oh sorry i was talking about getting the k-member bolted up to the frame. Was just trying to say that the k-member just didnt fit the greatest and there has been different experiences with different people with it. You also wont be able to run a pro-kit with it.
Justin
im guessing you mean the lowering spings
#6
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
I'm running stock springs with 1 coil cut off to make up for the weight loss.....
So noone has any info on how to deal with this problem.
So noone has any info on how to deal with this problem.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Jade Green---Trans Am Converti
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Please let me know if lowering is an issue. I might have to cancel my order! I've got the GroundControl weight jacks and I'm definately lower then a pro-kit.
Kevin D.
Kevin D.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
I'll let you know how my cut springs work when I get the car on the ground, but until I can sort out this tie-rod issue I'm pretty screwed.
And after looking at it some more, the stock A-Arms are also rubbing, I can see paint from the k-member on the front side of the a-arm and a big *** scratch in the paint above the front of the a-arm when the a-arms are at full drop.
This fitment isnt very good, I sure hope bruce gets back to me soon.
And after looking at it some more, the stock A-Arms are also rubbing, I can see paint from the k-member on the front side of the a-arm and a big *** scratch in the paint above the front of the a-arm when the a-arms are at full drop.
This fitment isnt very good, I sure hope bruce gets back to me soon.
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Jade Green---Trans Am Converti
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
How long ago did you get yours? I wonder if this has anything to do with Spohn now making them?
Kevin D.
Kevin D.
Last edited by shr00m; 11-05-2005 at 07:05 PM.
#11
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: LO3 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 Speed
I talked to spohn recently and they told me in december it would be out.
Originally posted by shr00m
How long ago did you get yours? I wonder if this has anything to do with Spohn now making them?
Kevin D.
How long ago did you get yours? I wonder if this has anything to do with Spohn now making them?
Kevin D.
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fontana, ca & saint clair shores, MI
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 camaro Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
i got mine during the summer, and the pro-kit didnt work because the coils were thicker and wouldn't fit up in the perch, but i'm sure they will fix that when spohn makes them.
Justin
Justin
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Hello, just had a quick question about the tubular K member. what are the benefits of it verses the stock unit? weight savings? thaknks in advance.
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
thanks for the info. Does the Tubular K member give you more clearance for the Hawks LTs or will they not fit at all on the stock K member?
#18
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
They will fit on the stock k-member. The tubular will save you about 25-30 pounds but the room that it gives is almost worth the money makes working underneath the car a lot easier. I was going to go with the stock k-member but after having to pay for the motor mounts and ac relocation bracket it was only like 100 more for the tubular one so figured why not.
Justin
Justin
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Originally posted by camaro05
thanks for the info. Does the Tubular K member give you more clearance for the Hawks LTs or will they not fit at all on the stock K member?
thanks for the info. Does the Tubular K member give you more clearance for the Hawks LTs or will they not fit at all on the stock K member?
#21
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Originally posted by shr00m
Steven,
Did you ever find out what the issue was? Mine's going in in about a week.
Thanks,
Kevin D.
Steven,
Did you ever find out what the issue was? Mine's going in in about a week.
Thanks,
Kevin D.
I'm either going to:
A) Flip over the center (drag) link, so the angle of the tie-rods starts from farther in front, and hopefully clears the steering box and idler arm.
or
B) Notch the holes in the k-member, take a BFH to the underside of the car and 'massage' the body to allow the K-member to sit back farther.
#22
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
man that sucks, mine rubs on that side too but doesnt hit like yours. Bruce is a good guy but i had all sorts of problems with mine, i'm sure once the spohn one is made most of those problems should be fixed.
Justin
Justin
#23
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Jade Green---Trans Am Converti
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
i'm sure once the spohn one is made most of those problems should be fixed.
Justin
Justin
Kevin D.
#25
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Any of you guys ever get your k-members? Anyone installed the "old" one recently? I'm curious how everyone else's "old" k-member is going with regards to the steering.
My update is this....My car is put completely back together, its been inspected, and its ready to drive....
Except the ****ing steering still isn't right. If you look at the pic of my tie rod above, you will see how it hits...so, I flipped the drag link over to get some more room. Problem with that is, steering geometry. I'm not sure exactly how much of a difference it makes, but I'm pretty sure its significant enough. Just visualizing in my head, if you move the drag link up, you are taking some of the travel out, which can make the wheels turn different amounts. At least thats my guess since I now have some serious rubbing and I practically can't turn the car around. Granted, I'm running a wider rim than I should (ZR1, 275s), but they did not rub with the stock k-member, and now I have two nice silver spots on the framerails where the rims are hitting.
So I've been investigating getting a shorter drag link and steering arm...basically that isn't working out so well, I can find shorter ones, but they don't fit the drag link...right now I'm waiting on a machine shop to hopefully make some shims to make up for the larger holes in the pitman/idler arms. Somehow I doubt this is going to turn out how I want though.
So I was looking around on the net and I come across this pic:
Is it me, or is his drag link on backwards?
God I don't want to spend yet even more money to go with the rack and pinion...especially because I have a really bad feeling that there will be issues with that too...seems like nothing I buy actually fits :-(
Anyway, if anyone has some advice about how to proceed, or can post up pictures of their Hawk's k-member with a similar angle to my above pic, I would apriciate it.
My update is this....My car is put completely back together, its been inspected, and its ready to drive....
Except the ****ing steering still isn't right. If you look at the pic of my tie rod above, you will see how it hits...so, I flipped the drag link over to get some more room. Problem with that is, steering geometry. I'm not sure exactly how much of a difference it makes, but I'm pretty sure its significant enough. Just visualizing in my head, if you move the drag link up, you are taking some of the travel out, which can make the wheels turn different amounts. At least thats my guess since I now have some serious rubbing and I practically can't turn the car around. Granted, I'm running a wider rim than I should (ZR1, 275s), but they did not rub with the stock k-member, and now I have two nice silver spots on the framerails where the rims are hitting.
So I've been investigating getting a shorter drag link and steering arm...basically that isn't working out so well, I can find shorter ones, but they don't fit the drag link...right now I'm waiting on a machine shop to hopefully make some shims to make up for the larger holes in the pitman/idler arms. Somehow I doubt this is going to turn out how I want though.
So I was looking around on the net and I come across this pic:
Is it me, or is his drag link on backwards?
God I don't want to spend yet even more money to go with the rack and pinion...especially because I have a really bad feeling that there will be issues with that too...seems like nothing I buy actually fits :-(
Anyway, if anyone has some advice about how to proceed, or can post up pictures of their Hawk's k-member with a similar angle to my above pic, I would apriciate it.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
put it back on correctly, and move the idler arm forward...
problem solved.
----------
btw, this wont apply to you, but to the guys running stock style tie rod connectors:
make sure the bolts on the crimp-clamps are facing away from the Kmember... otherwise they will hit.
problem solved.
----------
btw, this wont apply to you, but to the guys running stock style tie rod connectors:
make sure the bolts on the crimp-clamps are facing away from the Kmember... otherwise they will hit.
Last edited by MrDude_1; 12-22-2006 at 07:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#27
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Dude, how do I "move the idler arm forward"?
Do you mean elongate the holes in the frame forward instead of up/down? If thats what you mean, at what point to I move them forward, right now we have it in the all the way down position. So I guess my idler arm holes would then look like an "L" for both holes?
And that probably does apply to me, I have stock tierods, the pic above is from someone else's car.
Do you mean elongate the holes in the frame forward instead of up/down? If thats what you mean, at what point to I move them forward, right now we have it in the all the way down position. So I guess my idler arm holes would then look like an "L" for both holes?
And that probably does apply to me, I have stock tierods, the pic above is from someone else's car.
#31
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
I talked to him Last week, so my guess is any of the new ones being made as of last week no longer have a notch. Thats my guess.
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Dude, how do I "move the idler arm forward"?
Do you mean elongate the holes in the frame forward instead of up/down? If thats what you mean, at what point to I move them forward, right now we have it in the all the way down position. So I guess my idler arm holes would then look like an "L" for both holes?
And that probably does apply to me, I have stock tierods, the pic above is from someone else's car.
Do you mean elongate the holes in the frame forward instead of up/down? If thats what you mean, at what point to I move them forward, right now we have it in the all the way down position. So I guess my idler arm holes would then look like an "L" for both holes?
And that probably does apply to me, I have stock tierods, the pic above is from someone else's car.
#35
Supreme Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 92 Likes
on
56 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: Supercharged 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.73
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Just band-aids like moving the idler arm forward, flipping the centerlink, swapping in S10 pitman/idler arms etc
Heck, even Spohn's "fix" was a band-aid itself. He simply notched the main hoop which corrects this at ride height, but bumps with the wheels turned contacts just the same, not to mention a blatant weak point
Only real solution is pick a different K-member
Heck, even Spohn's "fix" was a band-aid itself. He simply notched the main hoop which corrects this at ride height, but bumps with the wheels turned contacts just the same, not to mention a blatant weak point
Only real solution is pick a different K-member
#38
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,945
Likes: 0
Received 1,872 Likes
on
1,280 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
I regret buying the Spohn torque arm many years ago. They powder coated on top of rusty metal for gosh sakes! First time I touched it when new a big flake of paint came off exposing the rust underneith.
My Kenny Brown pieces are a work of art. It really displays who is just one step above a backyard outfit, and who has real engineers and production processes. My BMR K-member and A-arms seem like they have some thought behind them too. Man, I wish Kenny Brown still made 3rd gen stuff though. Just outstanding stuff!
My Kenny Brown pieces are a work of art. It really displays who is just one step above a backyard outfit, and who has real engineers and production processes. My BMR K-member and A-arms seem like they have some thought behind them too. Man, I wish Kenny Brown still made 3rd gen stuff though. Just outstanding stuff!
Last edited by QwkTrip; 10-06-2011 at 07:37 AM.
#40
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: new phila, oh
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 9 bolt
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Is this an issue with all tubular K-members or just spohn and PA racing? Have they been updated since 2006 when this thread was originally posted? I have a BMR waiting to be installed and had never heard of this till someone brought this thread back up.
#41
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 1,514
Received 17 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
I have a spohn tubular K-member and it looks like my inner tierod ends are going to hit the k-member, even with the notches. I bought mine in January.
I was thinking of flipping the center link and inner tie rod ends for more clearance... but afraid I'll have geometry issues.....
I was thinking of flipping the center link and inner tie rod ends for more clearance... but afraid I'll have geometry issues.....
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 92 Likes
on
56 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: Supercharged 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 3.73
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
I have a newer spohn K-member with the notch and it rubs like crazy above and below. Pass side isnt as bad with the idler arm at max forward, but drivers side... see for yourself
#43
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Hi,
The K members BMR make for us do not have these geometry issues, but you will have to run there A ARMS as well. Please let me know if I can help you guys at all.
Thanks,Bruce
www.hawksthirdgenparts.com
The K members BMR make for us do not have these geometry issues, but you will have to run there A ARMS as well. Please let me know if I can help you guys at all.
Thanks,Bruce
www.hawksthirdgenparts.com
#44
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Hi,
The K members BMR make for us do not have these geometry issues, but you will have to run there A ARMS as well. Please let me know if I can help you guys at all.
Thanks,Bruce
www.hawksthirdgenparts.com
The K members BMR make for us do not have these geometry issues, but you will have to run there A ARMS as well. Please let me know if I can help you guys at all.
Thanks,Bruce
www.hawksthirdgenparts.com
"Please let me know if I can help you guys at all." Hawks could help by not continuing to sell a part that does not function. They (Hawks) could offer a trade in credit to customers who trade in thier defective Spohn pieces for a BMR piece.
#45
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,945
Likes: 0
Received 1,872 Likes
on
1,280 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Yes, I forgot about the nasty little surprise I got when I put in my BMR K-member before realizing I needed another $700 of A-arms. I consider tubular A-arms to be money down the pooper and entirely worthless. I bought my K-member cheap as "new in box never used" from somebody so I didn't take time to do my research because I jumped on the deal right away before somebody else got it. But it fit, and I'd rather spend more and have it fit then spend less and not be satisfied. It's a good chunk of change either way.
The other I was considering is Racecraft.
The other I was considering is Racecraft.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 10-07-2011 at 05:12 PM.
#47
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
I must be the only person that loves my Spohn k member and doesn't have any issues with it...
#48
Member
#50
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Hawks Tubular K-Member Issues
Yes I've checked it twice now, and have put roughly 2,000-ish miles on it, no rubbing at all.