Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE
#1
Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE
My family owns several 1987 Camaro Iroc Z convertibles. Most of them have the ‘20th anniversary commemorative edition’ noted on the passenger dash but one we just purchased says ‘special edition’ with a number 0115 on the dash (see picture above). Sure enough this one also has a 2 as the sixth digit in the VIN. This forum has been incredibly helpful, you all have so much knowledge and I appreciate reading through your comments in other threads. My question is— with the 2 as the sixth digit in the VIN, even though it looks the exact same as the ‘true’ convertibles with the 3 in the VIN, does this make this vehicle any less valuable? Also, I was able to locate an article ON GM’s WEBSITE that stated ALL 1987 Iroc Z convertibles in 1987 were converted from production ‘t top’ coupes by ASC. If so, how were there ‘original’ convertibles then and what about the difference in the 2 versus 3 in the VIN, special edition vs commemorative edition.
#3
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE
Okay, but didn’t GM contract through ASC to have this done? Do you have any idea if these ones that were original T Tops then sent to ASC have a lower appraised value today than the original convertibles? Why does the GM article state all 1987 convertible models were t tops converted?
#4
Moderator
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE
The difference between a factory convertible and and ASC convertible in 1987 was the VIN. GM contracted with ASC to make the convertible, and used ttop cars as a starting point due to the extra body support needed, compared to the hard top cars that already had body strength because of the roof. Every "factory" converted car, with a 3 in the VIN, will have RPO Z08 to designate the convertibe, and also CC1 for the TTops.
Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.
The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.
The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
#5
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE
The difference between a factory convertible and and ASC convertible in 1987 was the VIN. GM contracted with ASC to make the convertible, and used ttop cars as a starting point due to the extra body support needed, compared to the hard top cars that already had body strength because of the roof. Every "factory" converted car, with a 3 in the VIN, will have RPO Z08 to designate the convertibe, and also CC1 for the TTops.
Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.
The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.
The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sleeper_Z
History / Originality
2
01-02-2006 09:22 PM