History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2023, 04:20 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
noel6653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE


My family owns several 1987 Camaro Iroc Z convertibles. Most of them have the ‘20th anniversary commemorative edition’ noted on the passenger dash but one we just purchased says ‘special edition’ with a number 0115 on the dash (see picture above). Sure enough this one also has a 2 as the sixth digit in the VIN. This forum has been incredibly helpful, you all have so much knowledge and I appreciate reading through your comments in other threads. My question is— with the 2 as the sixth digit in the VIN, even though it looks the exact same as the ‘true’ convertibles with the 3 in the VIN, does this make this vehicle any less valuable? Also, I was able to locate an article ON GM’s WEBSITE that stated ALL 1987 Iroc Z convertibles in 1987 were converted from production ‘t top’ coupes by ASC. If so, how were there ‘original’ convertibles then and what about the difference in the 2 versus 3 in the VIN, special edition vs commemorative edition.
Old 12-21-2023, 05:51 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
topduarte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pflugerville, Texas
Posts: 1,342
Received 434 Likes on 263 Posts
Car: 92 Heritage Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Limited Slip
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE

GM never did the convertible conversion. They were t top cars that were sent to ASC for conversion
Old 12-21-2023, 09:58 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
noel6653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE

Okay, but didn’t GM contract through ASC to have this done? Do you have any idea if these ones that were original T Tops then sent to ASC have a lower appraised value today than the original convertibles? Why does the GM article state all 1987 convertible models were t tops converted?
Old 12-24-2023, 08:32 PM
  #4  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,379
Received 170 Likes on 124 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE

The difference between a factory convertible and and ASC convertible in 1987 was the VIN. GM contracted with ASC to make the convertible, and used ttop cars as a starting point due to the extra body support needed, compared to the hard top cars that already had body strength because of the roof. Every "factory" converted car, with a 3 in the VIN, will have RPO Z08 to designate the convertibe, and also CC1 for the TTops.

Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.

The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
Old 12-26-2023, 11:41 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
noel6653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
The difference between a factory convertible and and ASC convertible in 1987 was the VIN. GM contracted with ASC to make the convertible, and used ttop cars as a starting point due to the extra body support needed, compared to the hard top cars that already had body strength because of the roof. Every "factory" converted car, with a 3 in the VIN, will have RPO Z08 to designate the convertibe, and also CC1 for the TTops.

Regarding an aftermarket VIN 2 car being converted, I don't know what ASC did if the car was a hard top versus a TTop.

The value is still in question as SLP also made the 4th gen SS before it came in house and became a Chevy thing. Does that change the value any? I think the value is usually tied to a VIN designation that also corresponds to limited numbers. Take a 2014 Roush Mustang. It was rated at 670hp and was about $64k. The Mustang GT500 was rated at 662hp and sold for about $64k. The GT500 is much more valuable due to the VIN designation stating it as a Shelby Mustang. The Roush is just a Mustang GT VIN, so resale is much less.
This is great information. Thank you so much!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe_L
History / Originality
30
02-16-2024 07:45 PM
1986FirebirdV6
History / Originality
6
04-01-2017 04:49 PM
slimwhitman
Convertibles
1
05-02-2012 04:26 PM
Sleeper_Z
History / Originality
2
01-02-2006 09:22 PM
Scania
History / Originality
3
01-04-2003 04:10 PM



Quick Reply: Question on 1987 Camaro iroc z CONVERTIBLE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.