IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
#1
IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Hello all,
I have owned a number of new and used 3rd gen camaros start ing with brand new 1984 Z-28 5.0 H.O. then ordered a 1987 Iroc-z 5.7 waited what seemed for ever for it to be delivered to the Chevy dealership back in 1987 (Preston Hood Chevy). Looked at a few brand new Trans Am's on the dealerships floors but there were just not that many to look at or test drive campared to the Camaros. Looking back does anyone think that GM may have been playing with Pontiac to purposely limit the sales of Trans Am? A couple of things that may do it. First, no T-Tops with the 5.7 except for 1989. Next when Chevy/ASC came out in 1987 with the convertible it went to the IROC not both. Why not both? These items were a deal breaker with me, as mine must have T-Tops but would have thought about a Trans Am convertible with the LB9 and 5 speed in 1987 or 1988. Now I realise that Pontiac did have the very limitied run of the 1989 TTA but that's small potatoes in the overall numbers. Next question is why would GM shoot themselfs in the foot and limit any sales? Where they worried about GTA getting into Corvette sales?
What do you think?
I have owned a number of new and used 3rd gen camaros start ing with brand new 1984 Z-28 5.0 H.O. then ordered a 1987 Iroc-z 5.7 waited what seemed for ever for it to be delivered to the Chevy dealership back in 1987 (Preston Hood Chevy). Looked at a few brand new Trans Am's on the dealerships floors but there were just not that many to look at or test drive campared to the Camaros. Looking back does anyone think that GM may have been playing with Pontiac to purposely limit the sales of Trans Am? A couple of things that may do it. First, no T-Tops with the 5.7 except for 1989. Next when Chevy/ASC came out in 1987 with the convertible it went to the IROC not both. Why not both? These items were a deal breaker with me, as mine must have T-Tops but would have thought about a Trans Am convertible with the LB9 and 5 speed in 1987 or 1988. Now I realise that Pontiac did have the very limitied run of the 1989 TTA but that's small potatoes in the overall numbers. Next question is why would GM shoot themselfs in the foot and limit any sales? Where they worried about GTA getting into Corvette sales?
What do you think?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Lots of ground to cover with this one.
Did GM limit Firebird production Vs. Camaro? I don't think so.
Did the federal govt. via the tool of CAFE cause GM to limit F-body performance? Quite likely.
Did GM limit F-body performance to protect the Vette? Almost certainly.
Why would GM shoot itself in the foot? Auto industry watchers have been asking that question for 50+ years. GM went out of it's way to screw Pontiac over countless times. That the brand did as well as it did, for as long as it did, is a credit to those who worked for the brand with great passion, not due to any corporate guidance or help.
Did GM limit Firebird production Vs. Camaro? I don't think so.
Did the federal govt. via the tool of CAFE cause GM to limit F-body performance? Quite likely.
Did GM limit F-body performance to protect the Vette? Almost certainly.
Why would GM shoot itself in the foot? Auto industry watchers have been asking that question for 50+ years. GM went out of it's way to screw Pontiac over countless times. That the brand did as well as it did, for as long as it did, is a credit to those who worked for the brand with great passion, not due to any corporate guidance or help.
#3
Junior Member
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Part of it may be due to the Pontiac selling dealers too in what they ordered as back then they seemed more luxury orientated since they were also selling Buicks and GMC from the same lots where many of the Chevy dealers were more performance orientated.
I worked at a Chevy dealer in the mid to late 80's and we were twice the size of our local GMC, Pontiac and Buick dealer combined.
I worked at a Chevy dealer in the mid to late 80's and we were twice the size of our local GMC, Pontiac and Buick dealer combined.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S. UTAH
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 163 Likes
on
135 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z 305 LB9 AT Convertible
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: AT
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
In the late 70's the Trans Am outsold all the other Pontiac models. I read that GM management ,while happy with TA sales, was concerned because their "Pony" car was not supposed to outsell sedans and intermediate cars.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 242 Likes
on
182 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
My feeling is that the GTA was purely a marketing gimmick, created just because the Z28 had is upscaled IROC, thereby minimizing the once-legendary status of the Trans Am name, when the Trans Am should've simply been marketed as having upgraded performance.
Trans Am is the name people knew and remember. Whenever anyone sees a GTA (or TTA, TA, Formula or Firebird), what do they ask? "Is that a Trans Am?" 'No, it's a GTA.' "A what?"
Trans Am is the name people knew and remember. Whenever anyone sees a GTA (or TTA, TA, Formula or Firebird), what do they ask? "Is that a Trans Am?" 'No, it's a GTA.' "A what?"
#6
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
I somewhat disagree. There is a reason why so many put GTA badges on Trans Ams and attempted to sell them as GTAs. GTA became a buzzword, like 1LE, when it came to listings. There's also a reason why there are some articles that help readers to verify a GTA based on the differences.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Trending Topics
#8
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
The Firebird vs. Camaro doesn't quite add up when you consider that the 1991 and 1992 Formula was the only F-Body you could get in 1991 and 1992 with the L98 and CC1 from the factory, which required the PW7 wheels. The last item gives some suggestion that weight was a factor. The PW7 wheels were the lightweight wheels, plus the Formula was less weight than the Trans Am/GTA. You couldn't get a L98 in the base Firebird, so that was out of the picture.
Hello all,
I have owned a number of new and used 3rd gen camaros start ing with brand new 1984 Z-28 5.0 H.O. then ordered a 1987 Iroc-z 5.7 waited what seemed for ever for it to be delivered to the Chevy dealership back in 1987 (Preston Hood Chevy). Looked at a few brand new Trans Am's on the dealerships floors but there were just not that many to look at or test drive campared to the Camaros. Looking back does anyone think that GM may have been playing with Pontiac to purposely limit the sales of Trans Am? A couple of things that may do it. First, no T-Tops with the 5.7 except for 1989. Next when Chevy/ASC came out in 1987 with the convertible it went to the IROC not both. Why not both? These items were a deal breaker with me, as mine must have T-Tops but would have thought about a Trans Am convertible with the LB9 and 5 speed in 1987 or 1988. Now I realise that Pontiac did have the very limitied run of the 1989 TTA but that's small potatoes in the overall numbers. Next question is why would GM shoot themselfs in the foot and limit any sales? Where they worried about GTA getting into Corvette sales?
What do you think?
I have owned a number of new and used 3rd gen camaros start ing with brand new 1984 Z-28 5.0 H.O. then ordered a 1987 Iroc-z 5.7 waited what seemed for ever for it to be delivered to the Chevy dealership back in 1987 (Preston Hood Chevy). Looked at a few brand new Trans Am's on the dealerships floors but there were just not that many to look at or test drive campared to the Camaros. Looking back does anyone think that GM may have been playing with Pontiac to purposely limit the sales of Trans Am? A couple of things that may do it. First, no T-Tops with the 5.7 except for 1989. Next when Chevy/ASC came out in 1987 with the convertible it went to the IROC not both. Why not both? These items were a deal breaker with me, as mine must have T-Tops but would have thought about a Trans Am convertible with the LB9 and 5 speed in 1987 or 1988. Now I realise that Pontiac did have the very limitied run of the 1989 TTA but that's small potatoes in the overall numbers. Next question is why would GM shoot themselfs in the foot and limit any sales? Where they worried about GTA getting into Corvette sales?
What do you think?
#9
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Ive collected, restored and researched Pontiacs most of my life. We’ve built a pretty extensive collection over the past 30 years or so. You are absolutely right that there has been some ‘protection’ for Chevrolet and their flagship cars.
In the late 50’s Bunkie Knudsen took over and took Pontiac from being an old man’s car to an aggressive young man’s ride. Fuel injection, Tri-powers, dual quads, aluminum body panels and bumpers…. Even Swiss cheese frames. Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday- and they won a lot. He brought John Delorean with him who took Pontiac even further. Hell, in 1965 the entire Pontiac line won car of the year. The GTO and possibly even more so the marketing of the GTO changed the industry.
By 1968 Pontiac was one of the big three- meaning the third biggest manufacturer. That was huge news- for a division of GM to outsell all other National brands. Pontiac pushed the envelope and did it without involving the other brands. This was a threat to Chevrolet. Pontiac was going to play a support role and that was that.
it wasn’t until Bob Lutz brought over the Holden as the GTO (and ultimately the G8) and they developed the Solstice/Sky that Pontiac was really able to be their own brand. Unfortunately that was short lived….
In the late 50’s Bunkie Knudsen took over and took Pontiac from being an old man’s car to an aggressive young man’s ride. Fuel injection, Tri-powers, dual quads, aluminum body panels and bumpers…. Even Swiss cheese frames. Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday- and they won a lot. He brought John Delorean with him who took Pontiac even further. Hell, in 1965 the entire Pontiac line won car of the year. The GTO and possibly even more so the marketing of the GTO changed the industry.
By 1968 Pontiac was one of the big three- meaning the third biggest manufacturer. That was huge news- for a division of GM to outsell all other National brands. Pontiac pushed the envelope and did it without involving the other brands. This was a threat to Chevrolet. Pontiac was going to play a support role and that was that.
it wasn’t until Bob Lutz brought over the Holden as the GTO (and ultimately the G8) and they developed the Solstice/Sky that Pontiac was really able to be their own brand. Unfortunately that was short lived….
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 727
Received 221 Likes
on
158 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 liter V-8
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Pontiac was sometimes held back by Chevrolet to protect the Corvette. No doubt about that (so was the Camaro).
I don't think there were any limits on Firebird 3rd gen production. In the 1982-92 timeframe, Pontiac was still a very strong brand. It was still dwarfed by Chevy, but it was strong enough by itself that GM wouldn't have constrained production. Prices being generally lower, you might have seen more inventory of Camaros, which always outsold Firebirds by good margins.
It can also depend on what dealership you went to. I had to shop around to find one when I bought my first in 1990. And I helped a friend out when he was buying his new '86 Trans Am. I don't know how it works, but dealers have certain allocations of models, and if they exceed that, you might not see any more inventory there and may face a long delay even if you ordered it. It always seemed like an odd system to me and I still don't really understand it. I had the same issue with allocation when i ordered my 4th gen T/A in 1998. My dealer had sold its allocation and I had a significant wait to get mine. This despite the fact that 4th gen sales were already tending hard downward. At that point, considering falling sales, I really wonder if GM wasn't trying to eliminate f-bodies and the plant in Ontario that was then building them (you'll find Canadian auto workers who will agree with this). Why else would my dealer have had trouble stocking a model that, supposedly, few people wanted?
GTA, like a lot of names, was a marketing thing. It just represented a somewhat higher level of standard equipment.
I don't think there were any limits on Firebird 3rd gen production. In the 1982-92 timeframe, Pontiac was still a very strong brand. It was still dwarfed by Chevy, but it was strong enough by itself that GM wouldn't have constrained production. Prices being generally lower, you might have seen more inventory of Camaros, which always outsold Firebirds by good margins.
It can also depend on what dealership you went to. I had to shop around to find one when I bought my first in 1990. And I helped a friend out when he was buying his new '86 Trans Am. I don't know how it works, but dealers have certain allocations of models, and if they exceed that, you might not see any more inventory there and may face a long delay even if you ordered it. It always seemed like an odd system to me and I still don't really understand it. I had the same issue with allocation when i ordered my 4th gen T/A in 1998. My dealer had sold its allocation and I had a significant wait to get mine. This despite the fact that 4th gen sales were already tending hard downward. At that point, considering falling sales, I really wonder if GM wasn't trying to eliminate f-bodies and the plant in Ontario that was then building them (you'll find Canadian auto workers who will agree with this). Why else would my dealer have had trouble stocking a model that, supposedly, few people wanted?
GTA, like a lot of names, was a marketing thing. It just represented a somewhat higher level of standard equipment.
Last edited by ksr; 11-17-2022 at 07:55 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Pontiac was sometimes held back by Chevrolet to protect the Corvette. No doubt about that (so was the Camaro).
I don't think there were any limits on Firebird 3rd gen production. In the 1982-92 timeframe, Pontiac was still a very strong brand. It was still dwarfed by Chevy, but it was strong enough by itself that GM wouldn't have constrained production. Prices being generally lower, you might have seen more inventory of Camaros, which always outsold Firebirds by good margins.
It can also depend on what dealership you went to. I had to shop around to find one when I bought my first in 1990. And I helped a friend out when he was buying his new '86 Trans Am. I don't know how it works, but dealers have certain allocations of models, and if they exceed that, you might not see any more inventory there and may face a long delay even if you ordered it. It always seemed like an odd system to me and I still don't really understand it. I had the same issue with allocation when i ordered my 4th gen T/A in 1998. My dealer had sold its allocation and I had a significant wait to get mine. This despite the fact that 4th gen sales were already tending hard downward. At that point, considering falling sales, I really wonder if GM wasn't trying to eliminate f-bodies and the plant in Ontario that was then building them (you'll find Canadian auto workers who will agree with this). Why else would my dealer have had trouble stocking a model that, supposedly, few people wanted?
GTA, like a lot of names, was a marketing thing. It just represented a somewhat higher level of standard equipment.
I don't think there were any limits on Firebird 3rd gen production. In the 1982-92 timeframe, Pontiac was still a very strong brand. It was still dwarfed by Chevy, but it was strong enough by itself that GM wouldn't have constrained production. Prices being generally lower, you might have seen more inventory of Camaros, which always outsold Firebirds by good margins.
It can also depend on what dealership you went to. I had to shop around to find one when I bought my first in 1990. And I helped a friend out when he was buying his new '86 Trans Am. I don't know how it works, but dealers have certain allocations of models, and if they exceed that, you might not see any more inventory there and may face a long delay even if you ordered it. It always seemed like an odd system to me and I still don't really understand it. I had the same issue with allocation when i ordered my 4th gen T/A in 1998. My dealer had sold its allocation and I had a significant wait to get mine. This despite the fact that 4th gen sales were already tending hard downward. At that point, considering falling sales, I really wonder if GM wasn't trying to eliminate f-bodies and the plant in Ontario that was then building them (you'll find Canadian auto workers who will agree with this). Why else would my dealer have had trouble stocking a model that, supposedly, few people wanted?
GTA, like a lot of names, was a marketing thing. It just represented a somewhat higher level of standard equipment.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 727
Received 221 Likes
on
158 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 liter V-8
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Ah, my bad. Thanks.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
#13
Senior Member
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Ah, my bad. Thanks.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
My feeling is that the GTA was purely a marketing gimmick, created just because the Z28 had is upscaled IROC, thereby minimizing the once-legendary status of the Trans Am name, when the Trans Am should've simply been marketed as having upgraded performance.
Trans Am is the name people knew and remember. Whenever anyone sees a GTA (or TTA, TA, Formula or Firebird), what do they ask? "Is that a Trans Am?" 'No, it's a GTA.' "A what?"
Trans Am is the name people knew and remember. Whenever anyone sees a GTA (or TTA, TA, Formula or Firebird), what do they ask? "Is that a Trans Am?" 'No, it's a GTA.' "A what?"
While I have no badging on my 88 ( or ground FX right now for that matter ),......... I STILL get this all the time !! People give a head-nod & say " Cool Trans Am ! " I reply, "Ya' - Kinda' -----> It's actually a GTA." They reply "A GTA,.......?? Looks like a Trans AM". It happens ALL THE TIME !!
#15
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Thank you for the replies. I find it interesting that when someone in 1987 ordered the IROC opition for the Z-28 you would receive the upgraded suspension, 16 inch wheels,wonderbar,Bilstien rear shocks all things you could not have separately and you could only get the 5.7 TPI in the IROC. With the Trans Am ,IF i'm correct you could order all the suspension upgrades (WS6) and the 5.7 TPI and in some cases even ordering the lower ground effects in body color with the Trans Am while not going the GTA route. The GTA gave you emblems inside and out, no side vent behind the front wheel, different inner door panels and a solid body color. Am I missing something with the GTA opition? I'm straying from my orignal question sorry.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
While I have no badging on my 88 ( or ground FX right now for that matter ),......... I STILL get this all the time !! People give a head-nod & say " Cool Trans Am ! " I reply, "Ya' - Kinda' -----> It's actually a GTA." They reply "A GTA,.......?? Looks like a Trans AM". It happens ALL THE TIME !!
The following users liked this post:
modracer (11-22-2022)
#17
Member
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
That has driven me up a wall for 30+ years. I had a set of black PW7 on my black/silver 84 MSE for a while (the original N24s were gone), and MANY people called the car a GTA 🙄
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 727
Received 221 Likes
on
158 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 liter V-8
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
While I have no badging on my 88 ( or ground FX right now for that matter ),......... I STILL get this all the time !! People give a head-nod & say " Cool Trans Am ! " I reply, "Ya' - Kinda' -----> It's actually a GTA." They reply "A GTA,.......?? Looks like a Trans AM". It happens ALL THE TIME !!
On this forum, I refer to my car as a GTA, since this audience knows what that is. In conversation, I'll typically call it a Firebird or a Trans Am. I probably say "Firebird" more than anything else, just because I've always liked that name.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,437
Received 725 Likes
on
494 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Even my car gets called a GTA all the time I guess because of the wheels ...even though Gta,s had the gold ones.. .Its actually a Formula but since it looks nothing like a Formula at this point I refer to it as a Firebird.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Jefferson, OH
Posts: 1,280
Received 38 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: IROC-Z vs Trans am GTA
Ah, my bad. Thanks.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
When they closed that plant, I remember hearing CAW workers saying that GM didn't support the Camaro and Firebird because they really wanted to shut down that plant. Low sales justified the shutdown. My experience ordering my 4th gen Trans Am makes me wonder. Even in 1998 with the refresh, sales numbers weren't good. Yet it took close to 3 months to get my "low-demand" car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post