87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Hi All,
1st off my apologies if this is the incorrect section. I searched and couldn't find info to my questions. Also please excuse my nOOb questions on Camaros.
I have always loved camaros and I'm thinking to take the plunge and finally get my 1st. I have found one that I'm going to look at and wanted opinions and advice from current/past owners.
What's are the pros and cons for the 87 IROC 350?
What issues have you experienced?
How are parts availabillity?
What should I pay the most attention on at the dealer?
Odometer is showing around 75000 miles and there is no VIN listed. I will check as soon as I get it.
Here's a link to the car:
http://www.parade-leasing.com/en/use...spy?id=5639933
Thanks in advance for any info!
- Chris
Montreal, Canada
1st off my apologies if this is the incorrect section. I searched and couldn't find info to my questions. Also please excuse my nOOb questions on Camaros.
I have always loved camaros and I'm thinking to take the plunge and finally get my 1st. I have found one that I'm going to look at and wanted opinions and advice from current/past owners.
What's are the pros and cons for the 87 IROC 350?
What issues have you experienced?
How are parts availabillity?
What should I pay the most attention on at the dealer?
Odometer is showing around 75000 miles and there is no VIN listed. I will check as soon as I get it.
Here's a link to the car:
http://www.parade-leasing.com/en/use...spy?id=5639933
Thanks in advance for any info!
- Chris
Montreal, Canada
#2
Moderator
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
It depends on what you're looking for. Me? They are asking too much for what it is. I like clean original cars and the pricing is increasing, but for a little bit more, you can get one with less issues.
What I see here is that the car was repainted at some point and the decals weren't replaced. The decal delete was available starting in '88, not '87 so that is not correct. It has an aftermarket exhaust which in my opinion looks hideous. I'm not a fan of the exhaust pipes sticking out like that. There is a lot of wear on the buttons that make me think the car was either not taken care of for the miles or the miles are not correct.
1987 was the first year for the 350 and it was a good year. It was the first year for a lot of things and the last year for a lot of things.
Firsts:
350, leather, Bose, all performance options included with 350 as standard
Lasts:
all performance options included with 350 as standard
Norwood factory built cars
decals at the front of the car
the most coveted IROC-Z rim design
Z28 badges on the rocker instead of IROC-Z
What I see here is that the car was repainted at some point and the decals weren't replaced. The decal delete was available starting in '88, not '87 so that is not correct. It has an aftermarket exhaust which in my opinion looks hideous. I'm not a fan of the exhaust pipes sticking out like that. There is a lot of wear on the buttons that make me think the car was either not taken care of for the miles or the miles are not correct.
1987 was the first year for the 350 and it was a good year. It was the first year for a lot of things and the last year for a lot of things.
Firsts:
350, leather, Bose, all performance options included with 350 as standard
Lasts:
all performance options included with 350 as standard
Norwood factory built cars
decals at the front of the car
the most coveted IROC-Z rim design
Z28 badges on the rocker instead of IROC-Z
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Thank you very much for your reply.
I knew there were some things that didn't add up with the info/pictures.
Can I ask what is the decal delete?
I knew there were some things that didn't add up with the info/pictures.
Can I ask what is the decal delete?
Last edited by IROCZ28MTL; 04-15-2014 at 11:56 AM.
#4
Moderator
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
In 1988, you could order the car with RPO code DX3 which was for decal delete. It gave a credit, a very small credit, for getting the car without the stripes along the ground effects and the IROC-Z door decals. It looked very much like a '89 or '90 RS only with the IROC-Z hood and wheels. It was the 80's way of creating a sleeper.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Thanks again Scott.
I just got back from paying it a visit at the dealer. Props to you as you were pretty much bang on with your assesment just by looking at the pics. This is not an IROC as advertized on their site.
By the VIN its a 305 -190 LB9 engine. She told me that the engine was changed by the previous owner. She has no clue what it was changed to.
Are there any visibile parts to distinguish the 305 from the 350 engines? I checked and apparently there pretty much the same lookwise.
The Car Proof report shows no accidents/stolen. But it does show in 1991 the ODO was 70k. In 1995 it had 96k and it dropped down to 31k in 2002. Im guessing thats where the engine was changed.
Sucks as I knew more then she did. Makes me a little hesitant. Definietly not worth the price there asking without knowing. Shes going to clean it up and call me back for a 2nd visit. I'm gong to also contact a buddy who is a mechanic and test it with him.
Thx!
Chris
I just got back from paying it a visit at the dealer. Props to you as you were pretty much bang on with your assesment just by looking at the pics. This is not an IROC as advertized on their site.
By the VIN its a 305 -190 LB9 engine. She told me that the engine was changed by the previous owner. She has no clue what it was changed to.
Are there any visibile parts to distinguish the 305 from the 350 engines? I checked and apparently there pretty much the same lookwise.
The Car Proof report shows no accidents/stolen. But it does show in 1991 the ODO was 70k. In 1995 it had 96k and it dropped down to 31k in 2002. Im guessing thats where the engine was changed.
Sucks as I knew more then she did. Makes me a little hesitant. Definietly not worth the price there asking without knowing. Shes going to clean it up and call me back for a 2nd visit. I'm gong to also contact a buddy who is a mechanic and test it with him.
Thx!
Chris
#6
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
The 5000RPM redline is a clear indicator that the peanut cammed 305 was in it from the factory, and my still be.
The 31k in 2002 is probably 131k, and more than likely has 175k on it presently, based on the 96k reading in 1995. I doubt the last owner rolled back the mileage if, indeed, there was an engine swap.
Second visit at your own risk. It may not be a bad purchase at a fraction of what they're asking (IMHO)
The 31k in 2002 is probably 131k, and more than likely has 175k on it presently, based on the 96k reading in 1995. I doubt the last owner rolled back the mileage if, indeed, there was an engine swap.
Second visit at your own risk. It may not be a bad purchase at a fraction of what they're asking (IMHO)
#7
Member
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
I think the only hard stuff to find for our 87 350 iroc was the y pipe, the catalytic converter and that long pipe. The 350's have a bigger y pipe than the 305's and it has a flange for a bolt on cat instead of a welded on one.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
With all due respect, I think I'm missing the point of your post.
#9
Member
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
I thought he asked about some of the hard stuff to find. And I know the Y-pipes were different since you can't use a 305 one because its too small so you have to find all of the right size stuff. I am also pretty sure about flanged cat and stuff too.
#10
Member
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
So if he ever needs to replace exhaust parts, I think it could be a pain since they dont make the y-pipe any more.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Thanks everyone for the infos. It has really helped me out alot.
Unless they have more info on engine ect... come down in price going to
keep looking.
Have a great day!
-Chris
Unless they have more info on engine ect... come down in price going to
keep looking.
Have a great day!
-Chris
#12
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
As for the y-pipe & flanged cat, what do I know? I've only owned 7 3rd gen F-bodies over the past 29 years (305's & 350's).
He's going to keep shopping, anyway.
#13
Member
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Hey sorry if I got you a little pissed. That was what we found out by actually measuring them. I guess our car isn't all original then. :/
#14
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z28
Engine: L98 - 350 TPI
Transmission: MD8 - 700R4
Axle/Gears: GH3/G80 - 2.77 POSI
Just FYI this is what Scott was talking about, 1989 factory decal delete car.
It was a $65 credit. IIRC, 25 years was a lot of years ago.
It was a $65 credit. IIRC, 25 years was a lot of years ago.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: 87 IROC 350 1st Camaro
Thanks again Scott.
The Car Proof report shows no accidents/stolen. But it does show in 1991 the ODO was 70k. In 1995 it had 96k and it dropped down to 31k in 2002. Im guessing thats where the engine was changed.
Sucks as I knew more then she did. Makes me a little hesitant. Definietly not Thx!
Chris
The Car Proof report shows no accidents/stolen. But it does show in 1991 the ODO was 70k. In 1995 it had 96k and it dropped down to 31k in 2002. Im guessing thats where the engine was changed.
Sucks as I knew more then she did. Makes me a little hesitant. Definietly not Thx!
Chris
#17
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z28
Engine: L98 - 350 TPI
Transmission: MD8 - 700R4
Axle/Gears: GH3/G80 - 2.77 POSI
The cluster could have been changed. In reality we have no idea other than there is more than 96,000 miles on it. I'm guessing 171 but who knows.
I'd avoid this car like the plague or pay like $3,000 for it.
I'd avoid this car like the plague or pay like $3,000 for it.
#18
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z28
Engine: L98 - 350 TPI
Transmission: MD8 - 700R4
Axle/Gears: GH3/G80 - 2.77 POSI
Let me give you a quick example...
In 1989 we bought a 350 iroc. It was sold in 1991. In 2008 I bought it back after stumbling across it.
I paid $5000 for it. Forget any sentimental value, I feel the car was a great deal.
83,000 miles. No way it's 183,000 based on condition.
350 hard top
Zero modifications
Zero rust
Needed paint.
No questions about anything.
Was it perfect? No, but it wasn't altered or showing any sighs of things not adding up.
In 1989 we bought a 350 iroc. It was sold in 1991. In 2008 I bought it back after stumbling across it.
I paid $5000 for it. Forget any sentimental value, I feel the car was a great deal.
83,000 miles. No way it's 183,000 based on condition.
350 hard top
Zero modifications
Zero rust
Needed paint.
No questions about anything.
Was it perfect? No, but it wasn't altered or showing any sighs of things not adding up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM