History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2014, 04:12 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Okay, no crying!

http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/4386434116.html



Old 03-22-2014, 05:06 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

What a cornucopia of original GM parts!

Mint wheels, original factory muffler/tailpipe assembly, powertrain, etc.
Old 03-22-2014, 05:20 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
mantaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mantua NJ
Posts: 5,827
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

What a shame!!!
Old 03-22-2014, 05:24 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Weird looking damage.... Does a t top fold up that bad if it just rolls over ? I'm thinking it went off a cliff or something ?
Old 03-22-2014, 05:26 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
mantaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mantua NJ
Posts: 5,827
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I'm thinking,he went under a trailer.
Old 03-22-2014, 05:32 PM
  #6  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by mantaguy
I'm thinking,he went under a trailer.
That's a possibility ..... it doesn't look like it slid on it's sides.
Old 03-22-2014, 06:09 PM
  #7  
Member
 
jrhaus76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z28
Engine: L98 - 350 TPI
Transmission: MD8 - 700R4
Axle/Gears: GH3/G80 - 2.77 POSI
Clear title my ***.
Old 03-22-2014, 07:26 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by jrhaus76
Clear title my ***.
Old 03-22-2014, 07:45 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Weird damage. It looks like it slid under something sideways, impacting on the passenger side given how the A and B pillars are collapsed. However, the passenger seat is in tact. Strange. I agree there's no way this car has a clean title.
Old 03-22-2014, 08:26 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
OrangeBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,702
Received 669 Likes on 477 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

.

Last edited by OrangeBird; 02-10-2017 at 08:02 PM.
Old 03-22-2014, 08:33 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by init4fun
The ad says the car was wrecked and bought back from the insurance company in 1992 , and has sat ever since . Did they (the MO. RMV) issue "salvage titles" 22 years ago ? I do know that I once (years ago) bought back a wrecked Cadillac and the title was just a regular title also , with no mention of salvage .

Anyone know what year the different States began issuing salvage titles ?
That's probably why it's a clean title.... pre salvage titles.

I bought my 94 chevy truck back after a guy ran into it parked and totaled it, and it was salvaged titled.... around 2002 in Ca.
Old 03-22-2014, 09:45 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
JC1992rsconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: alabama
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 camaro rs convertible
Engine: 3.1 liter v6
Transmission: automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi trac
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

ive seen some decent wrecks growing up in a tow business nut i have to admit this is new. it looks like to me that something might have fallen on it but then again it could have also have gotten run over but an unloaded tractor trailer maybe a flat bed but either way i doubt those are original tires. and as for title idk
Old 03-22-2014, 09:56 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by JC1992rsconvert
ive seen some decent wrecks growing up in a tow business nut i have to admit this is new. it looks like to me that something might have fallen on it but then again it could have also have gotten run over but an unloaded tractor trailer maybe a flat bed but either way i doubt those are original tires. and as for title idk
What makes you say that about the tires?
Old 03-22-2014, 10:37 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Joe Tag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Old 03-22-2014, 11:06 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Joe Tag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by Van Nuys born
Weird looking damage.... Does a t top fold up that bad if it just rolls over ? I'm thinking it went off a cliff or something ?
My brother in-law slid sideways into a stump, flipped a T-top and landed flat on the roof 15 years ago. Very similar damage minus the door jamb. A pillars are weak and raked back, not designed to hold any weight. Wife rolled a hardtop about 20years ago. Roof gave about 4" in the center. I took a high lift jack and got it straight enough to put a windshield back in and drove that old SC for another year before I traded it off. God, I hope my daughter inherited my driving genes.
Old 03-22-2014, 11:47 PM
  #16  
Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Eric-86sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 90 formula, 89 formula 350 vert
Engine: 305, 355
Transmission: T5, t56
Axle/Gears: 3:45 9 bolt, 8.8 3:73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Ill look at it from an obtimist perspective. The car was wrecked over 20 years ago, if it was not wrecked it would probably have been beat to death and eventually scrapped. By the wreck happening, many hard to find original parts were preserved.
Old 03-23-2014, 12:35 AM
  #17  
Junior Member

 
cs80camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philly
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

My body shop guy who flips cars from insurance auctions told me how sometimes in the 90ies Harrisburg (live in PA) would goof up and send clean titles back. None of the ones I bought from him tho lol.
Old 03-23-2014, 12:46 AM
  #18  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
FryeDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85z28(sold),91 rs, 15'Mazda3GT
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 (ZZ4)
Transmission: 700r4 rebuilt with kits+ vette serv
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Oh yeah, it needs some work alright. lol glws
Old 03-23-2014, 03:18 AM
  #19  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
((Mike))'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Murrieta California
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1969 RS Z28 X33 Norwood built
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: T10 4 speed
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

At least its red. I hate red.
Old 03-23-2014, 10:21 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

What do we think? Save it or strip it?

I mean, it would need every steel body panel, other than maybe the driver's door replaced. The A-pillars would require some excellent craftsmanship, new glass, roof etc. Fifteen to twenty grand? More?

On the other hand, the amount of mint, near new parts this car could generate would be staggering. Every piece, component and fastener would command top dollar.
Old 03-23-2014, 10:29 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Joe Tag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I think it'll buff right out. But seriously, 10k miles or not, I wouldn't want it. I wouldn't in good conscience be able to sell it to someone either. Looks like some great parts though.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:09 AM
  #22  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Parts car.... but too much money. If ? it did roll over... how long did it stay running ? not good.
You'd need to put it up on a lift and really check it out and that's probably not going to happen. It needs to be wholesale priced.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:10 AM
  #23  
Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Eric-86sc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 90 formula, 89 formula 350 vert
Engine: 305, 355
Transmission: T5, t56
Axle/Gears: 3:45 9 bolt, 8.8 3:73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I would use the car to turn a $1000 roller into something special. Anything can be fixed with the right amount of money but the car would probably never be 100% when fixed. Not to mention the huge hit a future seller would take when trying to resell.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:40 AM
  #24  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
IROCgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SC
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z | '99 SS
Engine: LB9 | LS1
Transmission: 700R4 | T56
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

This entertains me.... "I bought back from State Farm and the MO title is clean & clear"

Yeahh.., No.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:43 AM
  #25  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by Eric-86sc
I would use the car to turn a $1000 roller into something special. Anything can be fixed with the right amount of money but the car would probably never be 100% when fixed. Not to mention the huge hit a future seller would take when trying to resell.

Yup. This is the parts car you buy, if you are trying to do a proper restoration on a tired IROC-Z.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:45 AM
  #26  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by chazman
What do we think? Save it or strip it?
I'm all about saving third gens when possible or reasonable. However, IMHO given the damage and the fact that there's not much unique or rare about this car (other than the low mileage) I say strip it and use the parts on another car that is not totaled.
Old 03-23-2014, 12:02 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by FormerL69
I'm all about saving third gens when possible or reasonable. However, IMHO given the damage and the fact that there's not much unique or rare about this car (other than the low mileage) I say strip it and use the parts on another car that is not totaled.

Yeah, I agree. But in order to impact the 3rd gen universe, ALL of those parts need to be used on ONE restoration.
Old 03-28-2014, 08:22 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
JC1992rsconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: alabama
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 camaro rs convertible
Engine: 3.1 liter v6
Transmission: automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi trac
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by chazman
What makes you say that about the tires?
i say that about the tires because if something would have fallen on top of it it would have blown them out but either way wit hit sitting in storage for so long they probably dry rotted on bottom and when you go to put air in them they would blow out that way they look like they have been sitting for awhile but like i said i doubt those are the original tires the rims might be if it didint roll over
Old 03-28-2014, 08:22 PM
  #29  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
ev305tpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MA
Posts: 732
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 92 & 91 Z28 1LEs, 87 IROC-Z, 90 ZR1
Engine: L98, LT5
Transmission: 700R4, 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.42, 3.73, 3.27
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

The problem is that you couldn't fix it and have a legit all-original 10k mile car, it'll always be "fixed", and I dont think that body is something that can be fixed and corrected... Assuming things like the steering wheel, wheels/tires, motor and trans etc are all still 10k mile fresh, it would make a good parts car. But as mentioned above, if the car did roll over, the motor would definitely be questionable, as oil didn't get where it needed to be for some period of time... My guess though is that it slid under a trailer Buford T Justice style...

It's a shame, looked like a very pretty car prior to the accident. It's a $3500-$4000 car to the right person as a parts car. There are some very nice similar non-wrecked cars in the mid-high teens with similar miles, turn-key ready to go right now.
Old 03-29-2014, 12:27 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Has anybody contacted the owner about the cause of the accident ?
Old 03-29-2014, 04:39 PM
  #31  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Duane's 91 Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yreka, in the State of Jefferson
Posts: 846
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 red Z/28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I just checked Craigslist and the ad has been flagged for removal.
Old 03-29-2014, 10:35 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

What a difference 20 years makes... if this was a firstgen in the same condition/mileage, it would be on its way to Barrett-Jackson to pull down $50k+ and the new owner would do a full restoration despite the extreme difficulty, cost, and over-saturation of firstgen Camaros at local shows.

But this is a thirdgen, so instead it's the perfect parts car. I would love to get some spares off of that thing. Tail lights, front turn signals, interior bits, undercarriage, etc. The motor would be great to swap in to a V6 or TBI V8 RS.

And my guess is that a tree fell on it.
Old 03-30-2014, 06:19 AM
  #33  
Member
 
jrhaus76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z28
Engine: L98 - 350 TPI
Transmission: MD8 - 700R4
Axle/Gears: GH3/G80 - 2.77 POSI
Best guess yet. Tree.

I like your over saturation comment. I agree. I have always been a first gen fan but as of late, I'm pretty much over them. Now, I have been working on a guy at work to sell me his driver condition 67 327 4 speed coupe but I really feel I'll never search for a 1st gen to buy. I'm really growing to appreciate early 2nd gens. And of course an undeniable love for my IROC. . Goes without saying tho!

Last edited by jrhaus76; 03-30-2014 at 06:22 AM.
Old 03-30-2014, 01:55 PM
  #34  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

The affordability of 3rd gens is way cool IMO..... like was mentioned, if this 10k mi car was a first gen or any number of other cars it would have been gone long ago and for probably alot more money.

That's one experience I've had quite a bit of with weekend cars ( 911's and Hot Rods ) that cost 3 or 4 times more of your hard earned money.

I have just as much fun in my Iroc that didn't cost anywhere near as much.... in fact maybe more fun because of that fact... and it's way more drivable than the other cars I've owned.

I also like that younger people can afford them.... take them to the Drags and fix them up and stuff. Nothing like the energy they bring.
Old 03-30-2014, 02:58 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I'm pretty much done with 1st gens as well. Unless it's a mint rare model, like Z/28 or something, I don't even bother looking at them anymore - I just walk right by them.. I mean, how many chromed out, red '69s can one person stand to see.

The affordability of 3rd gens is a double edged sword. I mean that's why I have three of them, I guess. But when you compare their value to say, 2nd gen Trans Ams, they are still pretty low. Try to buy a nice 1979 W72, T/A 6.6, 4 speed for less than $20K, And they go up from there pretty quickly. I mean, even the common '79, 6.6 Liter, (Olds 403), which you could barely give away 10 years ago, are now in the $10-$20K range for a nice one. It's common for enthusiasts to spend $30-$50K restoring one of these properly, nowadays.

I drove this car on the Mecum auction block last year, anyone see me on TV?








This was a no expense spared, superbly restored, very rare, 1978, Y82, T/A 6.6, 4 speed with a 150,000 miles on it. Guess what it sold for?


Just guess.........




$68,000. Yup, that's correct.


On the one hand, that's great. On the other, how much fun can you have with an old car worth that much? Actually, I did have fun driving that '78 around for 45 minutes. But of course, it wasn't my car.

Last edited by chazman; 03-30-2014 at 03:26 PM.
Old 04-01-2014, 12:11 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 2,984
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Charlie thats the car I read that article on, I'm sure of it.... Amazing what it sold for...

The other note I'll add is that this squished red IROC really needs to find the right home. I think of some of the parts I have that I've tried to sell. A car like that can be very difficult to part out or sell, because the vast majority of people just aren't doing 100pt restorations on thirdgens yet. The car is a gold mine no doubt, and could be a good investment possibly to sit on for parts, but right now the market is pretty small for what that car has to offer. would be an awesome car to rehab another rare IROC, maybe a player's car or something..
Old 04-02-2014, 12:42 PM
  #37  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,379
Received 170 Likes on 124 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

People aren't doing the high end restorations on the 3rd gens yet, because a restoration costs money and there are too many cheap people that won't pay the price to restore the car. With that, who will make quality restoration parts if they know that very few will buy the parts? I find it odd that NPD has Fox body Mustang parts available, but not 3rd gen parts. When asked why that was, I was told it's because the Mustang owners are willing to pay to fix and restore their cars!!!!
Old 04-02-2014, 01:13 PM
  #38  
Member

 
FinallyGotMyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 142
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 5.0 L TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
People aren't doing the high end restorations on the 3rd gens yet, because a restoration costs money and there are too many cheap people that won't pay the price to restore the car. With that, who will make quality restoration parts if they know that very few will buy the parts? I find it odd that NPD has Fox body Mustang parts available, but not 3rd gen parts. When asked why that was, I was told it's because the Mustang owners are willing to pay to fix and restore their cars!!!!
Ouch. Does that mean that they are misinformed and that there *are* third gen owners willing to pay, or, based on his experience, too many third gen owners really aren't interested in restoring their cars in the "right" way?
Old 04-02-2014, 01:37 PM
  #39  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,379
Received 170 Likes on 124 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

From what I understand talking with marketing folks at these places, I was told that they frequent the most popular message boards looking for a target audience. TGO is the largest 3rd gen community on the web. NPD stated that there was a large demand for a certain Mustang part, somebody made it, and it sold very well. Another part was needed, somebody had it made and it sold very well. Manufacturers look for these trends before opening up multiple product lines.

Ask Hawks how many parts they paid to have created and how the sales of those parts have been. I looked at having the original molded hood pads recreated, but only a few people responded that they would pay the cost. Many people on this board have said they wanted a TGO tshirt. Years ago, I had some shirts made up by a quality screen printer and I struggled to sell 150 shirts. Okfoz put many hours into designing a new shirt based on the complaints heard about the ones I created. If he sold 200, it would be a surprise. Four of them, I bought!!!! This is on a forum of 100k registered members! Too many members are not willing to spend their money to buy the correct parts for their car. If they can throw 4th gen parts at it, that's better than fixing it correctly.
Old 04-02-2014, 10:31 PM
  #40  
Member

 
GCrites80s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 364
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: TPI 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

As somebody who has just recently gotten involved with Fox through ChumpCar, it's unbelievable how many outlets there are for parts, how cheap they can be and the amount of support available for those things. Just a couple months ago I was able to pick up an all-Fox magazine at the supermarket. Granted, almost every story was about turbo 5.0s which doesn't do a ChumpCar team any good but could you imagine an all-thirdgen magazine sitting at your local Kroger, Safeway or Ralph's? Mustang people spend. And frankly, their cars need more stuff than thirdgens anyway. The suspension is marginal and they've got roll center problems. The engines take all these bolt-ons, whereas with thirdgen boltons besides exhaust and runners don't do much until you have a cam. The stock brakes really suck. The wheels and tires are small and many people do 5-lug conversions. The lenses get messed up. Nevertheless, all this Ford being more expensive stuff isn't true with Fox when you compare part to part.

I'm not trashing Fox; we work hard so that we will be able to race one. There's simply more profit potential with them for an aftermarket manufacturer due to the slightly older design as compared to a thirdgen. And there's more Mustang guys out there (fact) and they are also arguably more passionate overall than thirdgenners. I've known enough Mustang guys over the years to know. Thirdgenners are into music, booze, pot, R/C cars, dirt bikes, NASCAR, whatever. Meanwhile, Mustang guys think about Mustangs 24/7.

Last edited by GCrites80s; 04-02-2014 at 10:43 PM.
Old 04-03-2014, 12:30 PM
  #41  
Member

 
FinallyGotMyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 142
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 5.0 L TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
From what I understand talking with marketing folks at these places, I was told that they frequent the most popular message boards looking for a target audience. TGO is the largest 3rd gen community on the web. NPD stated that there was a large demand for a certain Mustang part, somebody made it, and it sold very well. Another part was needed, somebody had it made and it sold very well. Manufacturers look for these trends before opening up multiple product lines.

Ask Hawks how many parts they paid to have created and how the sales of those parts have been. I looked at having the original molded hood pads recreated, but only a few people responded that they would pay the cost. Many people on this board have said they wanted a TGO tshirt. Years ago, I had some shirts made up by a quality screen printer and I struggled to sell 150 shirts. Okfoz put many hours into designing a new shirt based on the complaints heard about the ones I created. If he sold 200, it would be a surprise. Four of them, I bought!!!! This is on a forum of 100k registered members! Too many members are not willing to spend their money to buy the correct parts for their car. If they can throw 4th gen parts at it, that's better than fixing it correctly.
Do you think it's because there are still so many used parts out there? I just wonder if that might be part of the problem, that there are enough quality used parts out there that new reproduction stuff isn't needed yet. As for myself, I am in a tight spot financially, as I have three kids and all the $ responsibilities that go with them, that I can't afford at this juncture to pay an exorbitant amount of money for something. At this point, good, used parts are better for my wallet. It's not that I don't want to spend more, I just can't, always. I don't know how we fix this problem, that we can't get good, quality replacement parts made for our third gens.
Old 04-03-2014, 12:33 PM
  #42  
Member

 
FinallyGotMyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 142
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 5.0 L TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Thirdgenners are into music, booze, pot, R/C cars, dirt bikes, NASCAR, whatever. Meanwhile, Mustang guys think about Mustangs 24/7.
With the exception of music, I'm not into any of the rest of that stuff. I think about my Camaro almost all the time, lol. Wonder if there's any way to change that perception you mentioned in the quote above...
Old 04-03-2014, 03:21 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

As cheap as it's claimed that 3rd genners are, a portion of us will pay TOP DOLLAR for exact - and I do mean exact reproduction parts. How long have we been asking for a correct molded hood insulation? I'm in for two. The LS Conteur re- upholstery kits don't even have bolster fabric which is even remotely close to the factory stuff. I'm not dropping $700 bucks on something incorrect. Nope! How about those Goodyear Gatorbacks? I'd be in for 1 or 2 sets if they cost no more than the Mustang version.

When I need new parts, I will first try to to go with original OEM GM parts, even if they cost more. If not available I will go with EXACT reproduction parts. If not either of those, I'll go with the best used parts I can find.

Yes, I agree, as a community, we cheap out sometimes. But not all of the venders are going out of their way to provide truly correct parts. Personally, I won't pay top dollar for what I consider to be no more than a 50% - 75% correct part. Don't bother, because I don't even want them.

You want me to pay top dollar? That part better damned we'll be indistinguishable from the factory piece in every way - not some "close enough" knock off.

Last edited by chazman; 04-03-2014 at 10:04 PM.
Old 04-03-2014, 10:33 PM
  #44  
Member

 
GCrites80s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 364
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: TPI 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by FinallyGotMyZ
Do you think it's because there are still so many used parts out there? I just wonder if that might be part of the problem, that there are enough quality used parts out there that new reproduction stuff isn't needed yet. As for myself, I am in a tight spot financially, as I have three kids and all the $ responsibilities that go with them, that I can't afford at this juncture to pay an exorbitant amount of money for something. At this point, good, used parts are better for my wallet. It's not that I don't want to spend more, I just can't, always. I don't know how we fix this problem, that we can't get good, quality replacement parts made for our third gens.
The other thing with Foxes is that the parts interchangeability is much lower than a 3rd gen, so yes that's a big factor. There's a lot of parts on the 79-86s that might fit the later cars but are wrong. Same way with trying to put 4cyl parts on a 5.0. So while a V6 3rd gen might have different springs sways and brakes than an IROC or WS6, not everything is different like comparing a '81 4cyl Fox with a '91 GT. Also tons of 4cyl Mustangs turn up at the yards as compared to late 5.0s. And the 5.0s that do come in get cleaned out fast. Foxes get saved more than ours do because people can pick up the phone and have a bunch of nice, new cheap parts fast.

AND, they've been buying parts consistently since the '90s. Whereas a lot of people ran their 3rd gens into the ground during those days. Fixing up 3rd gens has only been big for a few years. And a lot of times when people built 3rd gens in the '80s and '90s people just put standard Chevy parts, as in stuff that could work on a '55 or a Chevelle or a Nova while the Fox guys were buying specific Fox parts.

Last edited by GCrites80s; 04-03-2014 at 11:04 PM. Reason: added more
Old 04-03-2014, 10:41 PM
  #45  
Member

 
GCrites80s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 364
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: TPI 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by FinallyGotMyZ
With the exception of music, I'm not into any of the rest of that stuff. I think about my Camaro almost all the time, lol. Wonder if there's any way to change that perception you mentioned in the quote above...
For example, I compare the Facebook posts of my F-body friends with the Mustang friends. Sure both post family pix and such, but the F-body guys will put up all kinds of car and bike stuff "Check out this nuts 1100hp Mercedes" "Watch this guy hit 250 on his bike" "This Sprint Car crash from Knoxville is nasty" Meanwhile the Mustang guys post pix of Mustangs only.
Old 04-04-2014, 07:44 AM
  #46  
Member

 
FinallyGotMyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 142
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 5.0 L TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by chazman
As cheap as it's claimed that 3rd genners are, a portion of us will pay TOP DOLLAR for exact - and I do mean exact reproduction parts. How long have we been asking for a correct molded hood insulation? I'm in for two. The LS Conteur re- upholstery kits don't even have bolster fabric which is even remotely close to the factory stuff. I'm not dropping $700 bucks on something incorrect. Nope! How about those Goodyear Gatorbacks? I'd be in for 1 or 2 sets if they cost no more than the Mustang version.

When I need new parts, I will first try to to go with original OEM GM parts, even if they cost more. If not available I will go with EXACT reproduction parts. If not either of those, I'll go with the best used parts I can find.

Yes, I agree, as a community, we cheap out sometimes. But not all of the venders are going out of their way to provide truly correct parts. Personally, I won't pay top dollar for what I consider to be no more than a 50% - 75% correct part. Don't bother, because I don't even want them.

You want me to pay top dollar? That part better damned we'll be indistinguishable from the factory piece in every way - not some "close enough" knock off.
You've hit on something here. I know I said I was in a tight spot budget-wise at this time, but you are right - I would maybe pony up a little more dough if the replacement part was identical to what it is replacing. I remember another thread elsewhere on here, where the original poster is unhappy with his IROC-Z badges for his gfx because they look chintzy. If the repro stuff were to mimic almost exactly the stuff it is replacing, you might see more spending. The latter half of this thread has been an interesting discussion, especially for someone like me whose goal is to get the Z I have back to stock as much as possible.
Old 04-04-2014, 08:04 AM
  #47  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by chazman
As cheap as it's claimed that 3rd genners are, a portion of us will pay TOP DOLLAR for exact - and I do mean exact reproduction parts. How long have we been asking for a correct molded hood insulation? I'm in for two. The LS Conteur re- upholstery kits don't even have bolster fabric which is even remotely close to the factory stuff. I'm not dropping $700 bucks on something incorrect. Nope! How about those Goodyear Gatorbacks? I'd be in for 1 or 2 sets if they cost no more than the Mustang version.

When I need new parts, I will first try to to go with original OEM GM parts, even if they cost more. If not available I will go with EXACT reproduction parts. If not either of those, I'll go with the best used parts I can find.

Yes, I agree, as a community, we cheap out sometimes. But not all of the venders are going out of their way to provide truly correct parts. Personally, I won't pay top dollar for what I consider to be no more than a 50% - 75% correct part. Don't bother, because I don't even want them.

You want me to pay top dollar? That part better damned we'll be indistinguishable from the factory piece in every way - not some "close enough" knock off.
Have to agree with you Charlie. I went crazy trying to restore my 82 and ran into a lot of incorrect crap that I would not put on a DD. I had to have many of my parts made to satisfy my requirements. Even graphics made by a major company that advertises here are all wrong.
I have some of Hawks repros on my car as well as PWD and I have to say that those guys did a great job on the pieces they made. Not cheap, but worth the price of admission.
Old 04-04-2014, 09:55 AM
  #48  
Supreme Member

 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by chazman
As cheap as it's claimed that 3rd genners are, a portion of us will pay TOP DOLLAR for exact - and I do mean exact reproduction parts. How long have we been asking for a correct molded hood insulation? I'm in for two. The LS Conteur re- upholstery kits don't even have bolster fabric which is even remotely close to the factory stuff. I'm not dropping $700 bucks on something incorrect. Nope! How about those Goodyear Gatorbacks? I'd be in for 1 or 2 sets if they cost no more than the Mustang version.

When I need new parts, I will first try to to go with original OEM GM parts, even if they cost more. If not available I will go with EXACT reproduction parts. If not either of those, I'll go with the best used parts I can find.

Yes, I agree, as a community, we cheap out sometimes. But not all of the venders are going out of their way to provide truly correct parts. Personally, I won't pay top dollar for what I consider to be no more than a 50% - 75% correct part. Don't bother, because I don't even want them.

You want me to pay top dollar? That part better damned we'll be indistinguishable from the factory piece in every way - not some "close enough" knock off.
I'm in the same boat. If those repro Gatorbacks come out, I'll pay for them. If I needed a new dashpad, I'd thoroughly inspect the Hawks repro one and if it wasn't up to par, I'd try to find an original piece.

However, if I had the money to restore the car in the original post, I still wouldn't bother unless I enjoyed projects more than the endstate. That car will take serious cash and time; getting the B pillar and roof perfect as well as straightening any frame damage or twist will take time, money, and serious expertise. And let's not forget repainting; chances are it will need a total redo unless you can find and pay somebody good enough to blend new paint with the original red. My guess is it would take somewhere in the vicinity of $25 to $50k to restore it right.

If I was looking for a low mile, original IROC, I'd sooner take some of that cash and go choose from some of the pristine survivors out there on the various classified sites. Or, I'd make people like Chazman, Scottmoyer, etc., some generous offers.
Old 04-04-2014, 02:29 PM
  #49  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,379
Received 170 Likes on 124 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

I'm waiting for my offer!!! You did say generous offer, right?
Old 04-04-2014, 04:01 PM
  #50  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.

Originally Posted by KMK454
I'm in the same boat. If those repro Gatorbacks come out, I'll pay for them. If I needed a new dashpad, I'd thoroughly inspect the Hawks repro one and if it wasn't up to par, I'd try to find an original piece.

However, if I had the money to restore the car in the original post, I still wouldn't bother unless I enjoyed projects more than the endstate. That car will take serious cash and time; getting the B pillar and roof perfect as well as straightening any frame damage or twist will take time, money, and serious expertise. And let's not forget repainting; chances are it will need a total redo unless you can find and pay somebody good enough to blend new paint with the original red. My guess is it would take somewhere in the vicinity of $25 to $50k to restore it right.

If I was looking for a low mile, original IROC, I'd sooner take some of that cash and go choose from some of the pristine survivors out there on the various classified sites. Or, I'd make people like Chazman, Scottmoyer, etc., some generous offers.
There are still enough extremely low miles, mint, 3rd gens around, that you can still buy one for much less than it would cost to restore one to that level. And actually, I'd have to say that such condition 3rd gens outnumber their contemporaries, (Mustang, Corvettes, etc.) by a substantial margin.


Quick Reply: 1987, 10K mile, IROC-Z. $6k, needs work.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.