Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
#1
Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
After a lot of going back and forth I've decided to rebuild the stock suspension on my 1988 IROC after I get some money saved up.
I've already installed Hotchkis subframe connectors, lower control arms, panhard rod, and a BMR torque arm. Other than those changes my suspension is all stock.
I'm going to get some stock replacement springs (probably from Moog) and Bilstein shocks & struts. I'm also going to rebuild the steering system as well - probably with some more parts from Moog. Then I'll install poly bushings all the way around.
My question is about the sway bars - what diameter came stock on IROC's. I've read in different magazine articles (from when thirdgens were new) that the diameters changed for different years.
Was there a standard set of sway bars that was used for a car with the LB9 or L98? Or was sway bar diameter a computer selected parameter (like the factory springs were selected) based on the options that a particular car had.
I've already installed Hotchkis subframe connectors, lower control arms, panhard rod, and a BMR torque arm. Other than those changes my suspension is all stock.
I'm going to get some stock replacement springs (probably from Moog) and Bilstein shocks & struts. I'm also going to rebuild the steering system as well - probably with some more parts from Moog. Then I'll install poly bushings all the way around.
My question is about the sway bars - what diameter came stock on IROC's. I've read in different magazine articles (from when thirdgens were new) that the diameters changed for different years.
Was there a standard set of sway bars that was used for a car with the LB9 or L98? Or was sway bar diameter a computer selected parameter (like the factory springs were selected) based on the options that a particular car had.
#2
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
I Think from 85-?? the front was 34, and rear 22. and ?? - 92 36 & 24 IIRC Some 1LE's got 23 rear sway bar to correct an under-steer in the Players Challenge.
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
#3
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Thanks for the reply. Thats what I thought - the WS6 Firebirds got the biggest factory sway bars 36mm in the front and 24mm in the rear.
I Think from 85-?? the front was 34, and rear 22. and ?? - 92 36 & 24 IIRC Some 1LE's got 23 rear sway bar to correct an under-steer in the Players Challenge.
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
#5
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
I Think from 85-?? the front was 34, and rear 22. and ?? - 92 36 & 24 IIRC Some 1LE's got 23 rear sway bar to correct an under-steer in the Players Challenge.
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
Honestly I do not remember if it was 88 or 89 when it changed... I do recall that the WS6 cars got the 36/24 starting in 86, HOWEVER the Iroc got the "Wonderbar" and the Firebird didn't...
#6
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Maybe it was 24... My bad.. I would have to go through the parts catalogs again...
#7
Moderator
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
1982, 9 (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1983, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1984, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 30mm/12mm
Z28 - 32mm/21mm
In 1985, (f/r)
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1983, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1984, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 30mm/12mm
Z28 - 32mm/21mm
In 1985, (f/r)
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
Last edited by scottmoyer; 10-26-2012 at 12:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
rs1990 (10-09-2022)
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
My records show that in 1985, (f/r)
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 (fixed) - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 (fixed) - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
Last edited by scottmoyer; 10-26-2012 at 12:08 PM.
#9
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Thanks for the information Scott. That really helps me out a lot. At least now I know what should be under my car when I go under and start measuring for some new poly sway bar bushings.
Is there a reason the later 1990-1992 IROC's & Z28's got bigger sway bars than cars made earlier from 1982-1989?
Did the later thirdgens have softer spring rates than the earlier cars so GM made up the difference by installing bigger sway bars on these cars?
Is there a reason the later 1990-1992 IROC's & Z28's got bigger sway bars than cars made earlier from 1982-1989?
Did the later thirdgens have softer spring rates than the earlier cars so GM made up the difference by installing bigger sway bars on these cars?
1982, 9 (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1983, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1984, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 30mm/12mm
Z28 - 32mm/21mm
In 1985, (f/r)
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1983, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 29mm/12mm
Z28 - 31mm/21mm
1984, (f/r)
Base - 27mm/12mm
F41 - 30mm/12mm
Z28 - 32mm/21mm
In 1985, (f/r)
All cars except Z28 - 27mm/18mm
F41 cars - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 32mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1986 cars got: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Berlinetta - 27mm/none
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
IROC-Z - 32mm/24mm
The 1987: (f/r)
All Coupes - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1988: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
1989: (f/r)
Sport Coupe - 30mm/18mm
Z28 - 34mm/23mm
In 1990, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
Base IROC-Z - 34mm/21mm
16" rim IROC-Z - 36mm/24mm
In 1991, (f/r)
RS - 30mm/18mm
RS with 16" rims - 34mm/21mm
Base Z28 - hollow 34mm/21mm
Z28 - solid 36mm/23mm
The MVMA report for 1992 does not list anything for stabilizer bar. I would assume that 1991 and 1992 would be the same.
Last edited by yaj15; 10-26-2012 at 01:00 PM.
#11
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
http://www.iroc-zpostforum.com/NewsIROC350.htm
This link is to an old magazine article for a 1987 IROC with the L98. Says this car has a front sway bar diameter of 34mm and poly endlinks.
I thought that thirdgens didn't come stock with any kind of poly materials.
Also says that for 1987 the rear sway bar was reduced from 24mm to 23mm due to the addition of a poly bushings used on the rear sway bar.
The the rear sway bar diameter was reduced because the stiffer rear poly bushings on the sway bar made the car oversteer slightly during quick manuvering situations.
This link is to an old magazine article for a 1987 IROC with the L98. Says this car has a front sway bar diameter of 34mm and poly endlinks.
I thought that thirdgens didn't come stock with any kind of poly materials.
Also says that for 1987 the rear sway bar was reduced from 24mm to 23mm due to the addition of a poly bushings used on the rear sway bar.
The the rear sway bar diameter was reduced because the stiffer rear poly bushings on the sway bar made the car oversteer slightly during quick manuvering situations.
The following users liked this post:
Erik Cole (02-23-2021)
#12
Supreme Member
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
My 1990 had blue stabilizer link bushings from the factory. I'm assuming that blue is not regular rubber. Squirrels chewed them completely to bits, must have been good since they didn't touch anything else on the car.
#13
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
https://www.thirdgen.org/1985_IROCZ_..._November_1984
This is a link to a 1985 IROC with the LB9.
Says the rear sway bar diameter is 24mm and that was 1mm larger than the non-IROC option Z28 rear sway bar.
This is a link to a 1985 IROC with the LB9.
Says the rear sway bar diameter is 24mm and that was 1mm larger than the non-IROC option Z28 rear sway bar.
#15
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
32mm / 21mm Many times The Firebird got the upgraded suspension before the Camaro.. The WS6 for example, IIRC starting in 1986 (maybe 1985) the sway bars were 36mm & 24mm for WS6 equipped cars, and it was not until 1990 that the IROC got the 36/24
#18
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
The thinner the sidewall of the tire means that the suspension has to actually work more to do the same trip, obviously a taller tire would mean that the tire absorbs more of the energy from a non-perfect road. To change the tire, and not the suspension would only give you partial benefits to the larger tire, likewise to make the sway bars larger without changing the size of the wheels, would also be less beneficial than doing both.
Another thing to consider is larger sway bars with smaller wheel diameter may not have the desired results that someone would expect. Like mentioned previously the tire absorbs a lot of the road, if you put too large of a sway bar with too small of a wheel, the loads put on the tire may not be appropriate or good for the tire.
The Larger 16" wheels also had the added benefit of having a larger patch of tire that came in contact with the road. Ideally if a 245-50R16 tire would have 60,000 square mm of contact with the road, then a 215 wide tire would only have about 45,000 sq.mm in comparison. Without trying to figure out the exact math, the the lateral friction the tire would be able to withstand before sliding would have increased by about 1.3x. I suspect that it is something that has diminishing returns, A 12" wide tire will definitely be able to take more lateral g's than a 6" wide tire, but I am not convinced that with everything else being equal that the difference would be double. Of course I might be wrong and it might be more than double. Then you have to worry about wet surfaces vs dry surfaces and a myriad of other things to consider...
IIRC magazine articles of the day claimed a lateral .9g to .93g with the 3rd generation F-body. Which is still impressive when comparing numbers with some of the cars of today.
Last edited by okfoz; 03-28-2013 at 08:33 AM.
#19
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Thanks for the info. Even today I still surprise people that yes a thirdgen factory high performance model (Z28, IROC, Formula, Trans-Am etc.) with stock 16 inch wheels and good z-rated tires is able to pull a little over 0.9'gs. This is without all the magnetic shocks and wider tires that more modern performance cars have.
GM really did their homework when they designed 3rd gens with respect to handling and road holding. I've had my car for over 10 years and I really love how stable my car is. You really have to try to do something stupid to get the car in an unflappable situation. It can be done easy enough if your foolish but, these cars are very stable to start with.
GM really did their homework when they designed 3rd gens with respect to handling and road holding. I've had my car for over 10 years and I really love how stable my car is. You really have to try to do something stupid to get the car in an unflappable situation. It can be done easy enough if your foolish but, these cars are very stable to start with.
That was true, and for the most part you can point to when they increased the size of the wheels, the size of the bars did increase. I think it was less because of one caused the other as much as when you increase the size of the wheels, to get the benefit of having those larger wheels you need to change other suspension components in order for the larger wheels to actually matter more.
The thinner the sidewall of the tire means that the suspension has to actually work more to do the same trip, obviously a taller tire would mean that the tire absorbs more of the energy from a non-perfect road. To change the tire, and not the suspension would only give you partial benefits to the larger tire, likewise to make the sway bars larger without changing the size of the wheels, would also be less beneficial than doing both.
Another thing to consider is larger sway bars with smaller wheel diameter may not have the desired results that someone would expect. Like mentioned previously the tire absorbs a lot of the road, if you put too large of a sway bar with too small of a wheel, the loads put on the tire may not be appropriate or good for the tire.
The Larger 16" wheels also had the added benefit of having a larger patch of tire that came in contact with the road. Ideally if a 245-50R16 tire would have 60,000 square mm of contact with the road, then a 215 wide tire would only have about 45,000 sq.mm in comparison. Without trying to figure out the exact math, the the lateral friction the tire would be able to withstand before sliding would have increased by about 1.3x. I suspect that it is something that has diminishing returns, A 12" wide tire will definitely be able to take more lateral g's than a 6" wide tire, but I am not convinced that with everything else being equal that the difference would be double. Of course I might be wrong and it might be more than double. Then you have to worry about wet surfaces vs dry surfaces and a myriad of other things to consider...
IIRC magazine articles of the day claimed a lateral .9g to .93g with the 3rd generation F-body. Which is still impressive when comparing numbers with some of the cars of today.
The thinner the sidewall of the tire means that the suspension has to actually work more to do the same trip, obviously a taller tire would mean that the tire absorbs more of the energy from a non-perfect road. To change the tire, and not the suspension would only give you partial benefits to the larger tire, likewise to make the sway bars larger without changing the size of the wheels, would also be less beneficial than doing both.
Another thing to consider is larger sway bars with smaller wheel diameter may not have the desired results that someone would expect. Like mentioned previously the tire absorbs a lot of the road, if you put too large of a sway bar with too small of a wheel, the loads put on the tire may not be appropriate or good for the tire.
The Larger 16" wheels also had the added benefit of having a larger patch of tire that came in contact with the road. Ideally if a 245-50R16 tire would have 60,000 square mm of contact with the road, then a 215 wide tire would only have about 45,000 sq.mm in comparison. Without trying to figure out the exact math, the the lateral friction the tire would be able to withstand before sliding would have increased by about 1.3x. I suspect that it is something that has diminishing returns, A 12" wide tire will definitely be able to take more lateral g's than a 6" wide tire, but I am not convinced that with everything else being equal that the difference would be double. Of course I might be wrong and it might be more than double. Then you have to worry about wet surfaces vs dry surfaces and a myriad of other things to consider...
IIRC magazine articles of the day claimed a lateral .9g to .93g with the 3rd generation F-body. Which is still impressive when comparing numbers with some of the cars of today.
#21
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
The 36mm was hollow, the 24mm not sure... I know that they were hollow more for weight savings than anything. The majority of the torsion is placed on the outside of the sway bar, it has to do with leavers, the center of a twisted rod has close to zero torque, the outside has to move further for every degree of twist, therefore it has to resist more... (I never weighed one) but if you could make a 32mm solid sway bar weigh the same as a 36mm sway bar by making it hollow, the hollow 36mm sway bar would give better performance than a solid 34mm sway bar.
Again this is one of those things that would have to be tested to get real world numbers. I could speculate all day long, but the truth is you need to know what kind of steel it is, how much carbon, iron & other elements. Then you have to know the flexibility of that material, and then you cannot assume that a 36mm tube is not necessarily the same material as the 34mm solid. And you still need to know the thickness of the tube to calculate loads and tensile strengths in order to calculate which is better.
Therefore, to really get the truth about which is stiffer, get one of each in good condition, and put 100# of torque on it and see the deflection, the one that bends the least is the stiffer.
If I also remember right the sway bars are soft steel, they were not made from spring steel, or hardened steel.
John
Again this is one of those things that would have to be tested to get real world numbers. I could speculate all day long, but the truth is you need to know what kind of steel it is, how much carbon, iron & other elements. Then you have to know the flexibility of that material, and then you cannot assume that a 36mm tube is not necessarily the same material as the 34mm solid. And you still need to know the thickness of the tube to calculate loads and tensile strengths in order to calculate which is better.
Therefore, to really get the truth about which is stiffer, get one of each in good condition, and put 100# of torque on it and see the deflection, the one that bends the least is the stiffer.
If I also remember right the sway bars are soft steel, they were not made from spring steel, or hardened steel.
John
Last edited by okfoz; 03-28-2013 at 01:56 PM.
#22
Supreme Member
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Here's a roll-up of sizes, but some of the info in this seems to conflict with info posted earlier:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/faq-...-sway-bar.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/faq-...-sway-bar.html
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: check under the car
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: White 25th Anniversary RS
Engine: lt1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 4:10
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Thanks for the info. Even today I still surprise people that yes a thirdgen factory high performance model (Z28, IROC, Formula, Trans-Am etc.) with stock 16 inch wheels and good z-rated tires is able to pull a little over 0.9'gs. This is without all the magnetic shocks and wider tires that more modern performance cars have.
GM really did their homework when they designed 3rd gens with respect to handling and road holding. I've had my car for over 10 years and I really love how stable my car is. You really have to try to do something stupid to get the car in an unflappable situation. It can be done easy enough if your foolish but, these cars are very stable to start with.
GM really did their homework when they designed 3rd gens with respect to handling and road holding. I've had my car for over 10 years and I really love how stable my car is. You really have to try to do something stupid to get the car in an unflappable situation. It can be done easy enough if your foolish but, these cars are very stable to start with.
Also. anyone know who sells the 36mm bushing kits? the part store guys can only get 34mm
#29
Supreme Member
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Just put the calipers to my stock 91 B4C (non-1LE):
36mm front
23mm rear
What's odd is the front sway goes from perfectly round to slightly oval on both sides before going back to 36mm right into the bushings. This results in a 37-38mm reading for a brief portion of the bar. This is consistent on both sides of the bar so I can only imagine this is how they were stamped out.
36mm front
23mm rear
What's odd is the front sway goes from perfectly round to slightly oval on both sides before going back to 36mm right into the bushings. This results in a 37-38mm reading for a brief portion of the bar. This is consistent on both sides of the bar so I can only imagine this is how they were stamped out.
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 01 LS1, Xer-281-hr, 1.75 ProMagnums
Transmission: 4L60E, Stg2, SuperServos, 3200 stl?
Axle/Gears: 10blt, Torsen, 4.10, T/A Gurdle
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
I've got a set of the Spohn chrome moly ones and I just picked up a 36mm hollow and 24mm solid bar from an 89 iroc. Strangely enough the all original tpi iroc had these bars, a WonderBar and a 9bolt dif w/ 2.77 but no 1le brakes or alum driveshaft.
Anyways I'm not quite sure which set to sell and keep. The car is still being put together so I can't test them and the Spohns are brand new so better to sell before I install them. The car in an 88 hardtop with a ls1/auto all adjustable spohn going in...
But the real reason I wanted to post is that I had an 82 FB v6/auto with full interior option load but it had no sway bar in the rear at all. Holes were there with slugs in them for the brackets but not tapped. Installed a bar real easy.
Seeing the original list maybe having no bar was fairly uncommon, maybe not... I think the front was a fair size thou 28mm?
Anyways I'm not quite sure which set to sell and keep. The car is still being put together so I can't test them and the Spohns are brand new so better to sell before I install them. The car in an 88 hardtop with a ls1/auto all adjustable spohn going in...
But the real reason I wanted to post is that I had an 82 FB v6/auto with full interior option load but it had no sway bar in the rear at all. Holes were there with slugs in them for the brackets but not tapped. Installed a bar real easy.
Seeing the original list maybe having no bar was fairly uncommon, maybe not... I think the front was a fair size thou 28mm?
#31
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
But the real reason I wanted to post is that I had an 82 FB v6/auto with full interior option load but it had no sway bar in the rear at all. Holes were there with slugs in them for the brackets but not tapped. Installed a bar real easy.
Seeing the original list maybe having no bar was fairly uncommon, maybe not... I think the front was a fair size thou 28mm?
Seeing the original list maybe having no bar was fairly uncommon, maybe not... I think the front was a fair size thou 28mm?
Edit to add - IROC's came with different size bars during their 6-year run. I have seen '85's with solid 34 fronts, while later ones had hollow bars. Most of the rears I have seen on earlier IROC's are 23mm
Last edited by two-if-by-sea; 05-18-2013 at 08:29 AM. Reason: add info
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
the WS6 Firebirds got the biggest factory sway bars 36mm in the front and 24mm in the rear.
85 Trans Am got a 25mm rear sway,.... That's the largest rear sway ever offered on a ThirdGen. That car also got a 34mm Solid front bar too. Pretty sure that 85 was the only year that a front 34 solid and 25mm rear sway were offered.
I've never heard of an IROC with a 32mm front bar.
i measured it and confirmed what the gm dealer said its 31.5mm / 1-1/4
Edit:
Here is a picture of a 12mm rear bar that I pulled from an '83 Firebird SE
Last edited by John in RI; 05-22-2013 at 12:18 AM. Reason: edit :
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
it measured 1-1/4 / 31.5 and the vintage dealer book confirmed
I see that you re-posted without bothering to actually check. So; I'll do you a favor and show you what the "vintage" ( 82-87 ) GM part number book REALLY says:
No Sway Bar ( Front OR Rear) was ever offered in 1/2mm increments. Regardless of your lack of acceptance to the fact that you are wrong,....... Your stock bar is/was a 32mm.
#35
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
I see that you re-posted without bothering to actually check. So; I'll do you a favor and show you what the "vintage" ( 82-87 ) GM part number book REALLY says:
No Sway Bar ( Front OR Rear) was ever offered in 1/2mm increments. Regardless of your lack of acceptance to the fact that you are wrong,....... Your stock bar is/was a 32mm.
1-1/4 is in inches /standard. That was the measurement
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Berlinetta:
27mm in front
No rear sway bar
I see you just bought aftermarket "1-1/4 front and 13/16 rear energy suspension bushings" for your car last month,..... Those would be the aftermarket suppliers measurements - not factory spec.
http://www.earlythirdgen.com/forums/...php?f=3&t=1348
Some random internet post (& and the GM Parts book ) still not enough for Ya';.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac...rd_generation)
I could post countless other web pages documenting other 83 Daytona owners detailing thier sway bar sizes, but you get the idea. I really don't understand why you would ever thing I was trying to steer you wrong here Chris; What-ever dude. Just don't be surprised when other people call you out on this......
27mm in front
No rear sway bar
I see you just bought aftermarket "1-1/4 front and 13/16 rear energy suspension bushings" for your car last month,..... Those would be the aftermarket suppliers measurements - not factory spec.
'82-early 84 WS6 suspension sway bars are 32mm front/21mm rear. At some point in '84 the rear bar was upped to 23mm.
Some random internet post (& and the GM Parts book ) still not enough for Ya';.....
The WS6 performance package option, available on the S/E and Trans Am, included 4-wheel disc brakes, P215/65R15 Goodyear Eagle GT radials with 15-inch cast aluminum wheels, stiffer springs, thicker 32 mm front & 21 mm rear sway bars,......................Trans Am. WS6 from 1987 thru 1992 included 36 mm front sway bars, 24 mm rear sway bars,
I could post countless other web pages documenting other 83 Daytona owners detailing thier sway bar sizes, but you get the idea. I really don't understand why you would ever thing I was trying to steer you wrong here Chris; What-ever dude. Just don't be surprised when other people call you out on this......
#38
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
1) We need to calm down, this is not life and death.
Here are the sway bar sizes as per the IPC 1992
FIREBIRD
BASE (FE1)
Front
82-84 27mm
85 30mm
86 (2.5L) 30mm
MID (F41)
30MM
82-84 30mm (Trans Am & S/E)
85 32mm
86-92 34mm
WS6, WS7, WY6, WY5 (FE2)
82-84 32mm
84 Special - 34mm (I assume anniversary Ed)
85 34mm
86-92 36mm
Rear:
BASE (FE1)
82-84 NONE
85-92 18mm
Mid (F41)
82-83 12mm
84 18mm
85-92 21mm
WS6, WS7, WY6, WY5 (FE2)
82-83 2.8L, 2.8-1 - 18mm
82-83 305G,H,S - 21mm
84 21mm
84 Special - 24mm (I assume anniversary Ed)
85-92 24mm
Here are the sway bar sizes as per the IPC 1992
FIREBIRD
BASE (FE1)
Front
82-84 27mm
85 30mm
86 (2.5L) 30mm
MID (F41)
30MM
82-84 30mm (Trans Am & S/E)
85 32mm
86-92 34mm
WS6, WS7, WY6, WY5 (FE2)
82-84 32mm
84 Special - 34mm (I assume anniversary Ed)
85 34mm
86-92 36mm
Rear:
BASE (FE1)
82-84 NONE
85-92 18mm
Mid (F41)
82-83 12mm
84 18mm
85-92 21mm
WS6, WS7, WY6, WY5 (FE2)
82-83 2.8L, 2.8-1 - 18mm
82-83 305G,H,S - 21mm
84 21mm
84 Special - 24mm (I assume anniversary Ed)
85-92 24mm
#39
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
We take our sway bar sizes seriously!
Seriously, there is one missing from the list. John in RI mentioned earlier the 25mm rear, found on (some?) 85TA (and maybe some 84's). I found one today. First one I have seen, so I snagged it. From an '85 TA, WS6 (16" rims, 4 wheel disk, etc) that interestingly enough, had an LG4. Odd combo. Was a fairly late build, April '85 on the door sticker. Shots:
Seriously, there is one missing from the list. John in RI mentioned earlier the 25mm rear, found on (some?) 85TA (and maybe some 84's). I found one today. First one I have seen, so I snagged it. From an '85 TA, WS6 (16" rims, 4 wheel disk, etc) that interestingly enough, had an LG4. Odd combo. Was a fairly late build, April '85 on the door sticker. Shots:
#41
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
All I can go on is what the IPC shows...
There are 2 explanations to your findings.
1) There was a 25mm rear sway bar, but there was no replacement part, and it was replaced with a 24mm.
2) it is an aftermarket bar.
Oddly enough, the WS6 & WY6 was called a "Performance Package" and the WS7 & WY5 was a handling package... In theory, you could get WS6 with a V6 on an S/E, as it is specified with having a special rear sway bar in 82-83 the 12mm..
John
There are 2 explanations to your findings.
1) There was a 25mm rear sway bar, but there was no replacement part, and it was replaced with a 24mm.
2) it is an aftermarket bar.
Oddly enough, the WS6 & WY6 was called a "Performance Package" and the WS7 & WY5 was a handling package... In theory, you could get WS6 with a V6 on an S/E, as it is specified with having a special rear sway bar in 82-83 the 12mm..
John
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Just trying to clear up some of the invalid information that gets posted here - it's a real bitch sorting thru posts when you need answers and keep finding the same "wrong" data mentioned over and over again.
NICE SCORE !
I got my 25mm rear sway from an 85 TA,....... It's ready and waiting to get restored so I can install it in 'Mean Green'. I also re-checked and the front sway from that 85 Trans AM & it IS a 34mm SOLID bar. This make/model/year was the only car I've ever found this combination in, however; I've read others stating that the set-up was also used in the 85 IROC too. I have never owned an 85 IROC & not been able to confirm this; my parts book doesn't show a 25mm from 82-87 for Camaro.
I found one today. First one I have seen, so I snagged it. From an '85 TA, WS6
I got my 25mm rear sway from an 85 TA,....... It's ready and waiting to get restored so I can install it in 'Mean Green'. I also re-checked and the front sway from that 85 Trans AM & it IS a 34mm SOLID bar. This make/model/year was the only car I've ever found this combination in, however; I've read others stating that the set-up was also used in the 85 IROC too. I have never owned an 85 IROC & not been able to confirm this; my parts book doesn't show a 25mm from 82-87 for Camaro.
#45
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Although there was a 25mm sway bar, there is no part number for it in my IPC... I would be interested in seeing an older parts catalog from 1985 or 1986... Mine is from 1992, and I know that some things have been deleted, for example the part number for the Aluminum Firebird Hood is missing, there is a reference to (Steel) that is still present, but the Aluminum part number is gone.
John
John
#46
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 164 Likes
on
119 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Also For your enjoyment, I found the 1992 Camaro IPC pages as well... Unfortunately they are on Microfiche, so I have to take a digital picture of them, thus why they are inverted colors.
#47
Supreme Member
iTrader: (167)
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Here's the info from my "82-87 -'F' Parts" book. ( shows a Camaro on the cover )
As you've found with your later version of the parts number books,..... there's no part number for a 25mm bar in this book either. The sway bar information it not continued to the next page, it ends at the bottom of the page shown.
I also find it odd that there's no 23mm rear sway listed. I can't even count the number of 87 and earlier Z28's I've owned with a 23mm rear bar on the back.
As you've found with your later version of the parts number books,..... there's no part number for a 25mm bar in this book either. The sway bar information it not continued to the next page, it ends at the bottom of the page shown.
I also find it odd that there's no 23mm rear sway listed. I can't even count the number of 87 and earlier Z28's I've owned with a 23mm rear bar on the back.
#48
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Laredo, TX
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC-Z/1987 IROC-Z/1988 IROC-Z
Engine: Four 305 TPI LB9's
Transmission: Two 700R4's/One WC T-5
Axle/Gears: Posi's 3:42/2:73/3:55/2:73
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Hello everyone, if this helps any my 1985 IROC originally came with a 32mm (1 1/4") solid front with polyurethane bushings and the rare 25mm (1") rear sway bar. The car is an early production and has a rough cast iron thermostat housing instead of the later smooth steel housing used on later TPI engines. It also has the fog lamp switch in the lower part of the dash instead of being right under the head lamp switch. My other 1987 IROC has the 34/23mm combination, and my brothers old 1989 IROC had the 36mm hollow front and 24mm solid rear sway bar. One time I also came across a 1985 TRANS-AM WS6 in a salvage yard, with a solid 36mm front sway bar lying in front of the car.
#49
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Laredo, TX
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 IROC-Z/1987 IROC-Z/1988 IROC-Z
Engine: Four 305 TPI LB9's
Transmission: Two 700R4's/One WC T-5
Axle/Gears: Posi's 3:42/2:73/3:55/2:73
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Oh, and just one more thing if this helps with any, my 1985 IROC was equipped with the front BZW springs and rear NNN springs which I still have in storage.
#50
Re: Stock sway bar diameter sizes on IROC's
Thats good info. I've read that GM changed the rear sway bar size to make the rear end easier to control and hard driving situations. Is it also true that the 1985 IROC's had a tire rub problem in the rear under hard cornering.