LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Hello 3rd Geners!
As a new member of the board..and as I'm beginning my research, I thought I'd start my community conversation with this question. I plan on buying a 1987 IROC-Z (my HS Grad Present) to relive my youth!
In my search for the right vehicle and in my planning stages, I've been reading about people who have built 383 Strokers and are using the TPI system for air/fuel delivery to maintain OEM look. Would love to hear your thoughts from experience on why or why not over the LS swap.
My goal is a daily driver with track ability...so YES..Independent Rear, Frame Kits and brakes are coming too!!
As a new member of the board..and as I'm beginning my research, I thought I'd start my community conversation with this question. I plan on buying a 1987 IROC-Z (my HS Grad Present) to relive my youth!
In my search for the right vehicle and in my planning stages, I've been reading about people who have built 383 Strokers and are using the TPI system for air/fuel delivery to maintain OEM look. Would love to hear your thoughts from experience on why or why not over the LS swap.
My goal is a daily driver with track ability...so YES..Independent Rear, Frame Kits and brakes are coming too!!
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
It might help us if you told us what your budget is because the rear IRS kit from Heidts is over $5K.
If it's a daily driver an LS transplant would allow you to keep up with the newer cars while still allowing for good enough manners to daily drive. But again, that depends on your budget and abilities.
If it's a daily driver an LS transplant would allow you to keep up with the newer cars while still allowing for good enough manners to daily drive. But again, that depends on your budget and abilities.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Valid points, but my modification and fabrication skills are pretty extensive, so the rear end and/or bolt in kits aren't my fear. Its really more about the engine question I'm most interested in hearing about. Chevy sells a 383 Stroker for about $6K and generates about 450 HP with a carb...so my thought is adding a reprogrammed TPI setup to serve as air/fuel mgmt system may likely produce even more. I'm a big fan of stroker motors because of their low end power and fast reving top end HP. Plus if i'm right, the TPI setup and stroker should bolt right in including harnesses. Hopefully, someone else has thought about this and either tried or been witness to an attempt.
Last edited by Patzfan4eva; 09-29-2019 at 09:13 PM.
#4
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
TPI intake will strangle a 383. You can get good results if you are willing to use a carb style intake. If you really want a longitudinal intake then use something other than TPI.
A basic LS3 with a cam is hard to beat for balance of drivability and power.
A basic LS3 with a cam is hard to beat for balance of drivability and power.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 09-29-2019 at 10:44 PM.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
In your experience the TPI system will choke to 383 even if I use oversize runners and port the Plenum or am I just hanging onto a dream of having a stock looking L98 for no reason?!?
Last edited by Patzfan4eva; 09-30-2019 at 10:11 AM.
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
I see you're in CA too, so good luck with a smog-legal LS1 swap, if you're worried about that.
Yes any sort of long-runner TPI will choke off a stroker engine. If you're keeping TPI you need shorter runners.
My site at www.facebook.com/socaltpi/ will show you pics of what I've done with a set of SLP runners to go from 319 RWHP at 4800 RPMs and 418 RWTQ, to 377 RWHP at 5800 RPMs and 390 RWTQ.
Yes any sort of long-runner TPI will choke off a stroker engine. If you're keeping TPI you need shorter runners.
My site at www.facebook.com/socaltpi/ will show you pics of what I've done with a set of SLP runners to go from 319 RWHP at 4800 RPMs and 418 RWTQ, to 377 RWHP at 5800 RPMs and 390 RWTQ.
Last edited by Kevin91Z; 09-29-2019 at 11:44 PM.
#7
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
That's right in the neighborhood of this magazine article.
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...tpi-induction/
It's defintely going to be fun and plenty quick on the street where traction and speed is limited. But at the track it's going to fall behind at the top of 2nd gear when it runs out of breath compared to other engines. It doesn't have to be that way. It just is because it's got a TPI intake.
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...tpi-induction/
It's defintely going to be fun and plenty quick on the street where traction and speed is limited. But at the track it's going to fall behind at the top of 2nd gear when it runs out of breath compared to other engines. It doesn't have to be that way. It just is because it's got a TPI intake.
Last edited by QwkTrip; 09-30-2019 at 12:20 AM.
Trending Topics
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,031
Received 419 Likes
on
300 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Hello 3rd Geners!
As a new member of the board..and as I'm beginning my research, I thought I'd start my community conversation with this question. I plan on buying a 1987 IROC-Z (my HS Grad Present) to relive my youth!
In my search for the right vehicle and in my planning stages, I've been reading about people who have built 383 Strokers and are using the TPI system for air/fuel delivery to maintain OEM look. Would love to hear your thoughts from experience on why or why not over the LS swap.
My goal is a daily driver with track ability...so YES..Independent Rear, Frame Kits and brakes are coming too!!
As a new member of the board..and as I'm beginning my research, I thought I'd start my community conversation with this question. I plan on buying a 1987 IROC-Z (my HS Grad Present) to relive my youth!
In my search for the right vehicle and in my planning stages, I've been reading about people who have built 383 Strokers and are using the TPI system for air/fuel delivery to maintain OEM look. Would love to hear your thoughts from experience on why or why not over the LS swap.
My goal is a daily driver with track ability...so YES..Independent Rear, Frame Kits and brakes are coming too!!
If, OTOH, you want plenty of power for not a huge amount of $$$, go the LS route, either a crate engine or one from the junkyard with a cam swap.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Are these numbers typical build numbers? I'd like to keep the engine bay looking original but not have a dog!
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Well...in my infinite wisdom...I thought by changing the block and programming I can at the very least keep it looking stock with 425-450 HP under the hood. The LS swap is intriguing, but I fear I'll be unhappy with the look! My goal is as close to original looking as possible with a fun trackable and daily driver ability.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
That's right in the neighborhood of this magazine article.
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...tpi-induction/
It's defintely going to be fun and plenty quick on the street where traction and speed is limited. But at the track it's going to fall behind at the top of 2nd gear when it runs out of breath compared to other engines. It doesn't have to be that way. It just is because it's got a TPI intake.
http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...tpi-induction/
It's defintely going to be fun and plenty quick on the street where traction and speed is limited. But at the track it's going to fall behind at the top of 2nd gear when it runs out of breath compared to other engines. It doesn't have to be that way. It just is because it's got a TPI intake.
If you must keep the stock-look runners then TPIS is the only way to go as far as I know.
This a great stock look setup:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/engi...th-intake.html
But again, reach out Dyno Don 714 630-1502, he knows high flow TPI like noone else I've met.
Last edited by Tootie Pang; 09-30-2019 at 10:46 AM.
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,031
Received 419 Likes
on
300 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Well...in my infinite wisdom...I thought by changing the block and programming I can at the very least keep it looking stock with 425-450 HP under the hood. The LS swap is intriguing, but I fear I'll be unhappy with the look! My goal is as close to original looking as possible with a fun trackable and daily driver ability.
If you're planning major mods to the rear end (IRS) as well as big brakes (and the necessity of replacing the stock wheels with larger-diameter pieces) anyway, why not just go the full route and drop in a modern engine and trans as well?
JMO, but if the car you obtain is original and in good shape, I suggest you keep it that way. If you want to build a track car, or a street machine, maybe find a beater or a roller and modify it to your liking?
Whatever route you decide to take, good luck.
Last edited by ironwill; 09-30-2019 at 10:42 AM.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Just use an aftermarket TPI port it or use a superram those are legal
So its not a high rpm monster so what. Cam it for torque it will still haul azz and be traffic friendly.
No need to bother with an LS1 swap for this
So its not a high rpm monster so what. Cam it for torque it will still haul azz and be traffic friendly.
No need to bother with an LS1 swap for this
#16
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes
on
1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Stop using logic on me...I'm building a 3rd Gen!
But really....Good advice and will have to decide on budget and ultimate project demands first. The words here all make sense and being out of the engine for sometime I've let the tech pass me by... The IRS is for increased handling after lowered and the wow factor as well. I definitely want the car to look stock but surprise a few on the road. When I said track, I merely meant a vehicle that wasn't the slouch it was in the 80's...
But really....Good advice and will have to decide on budget and ultimate project demands first. The words here all make sense and being out of the engine for sometime I've let the tech pass me by... The IRS is for increased handling after lowered and the wow factor as well. I definitely want the car to look stock but surprise a few on the road. When I said track, I merely meant a vehicle that wasn't the slouch it was in the 80's...
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
What the california guys have done with tpi is special. Follow 1989GTAtransam’s long tube runner intake builds. Also kevin91z above. You can have tpi look and rpm power but its not cheap not easy and all custom work. Welded bases, custom large tube runners. It certainly would be noticeable difference over stock tpi stuff
the FIRST tpi stuff is what i would consider if you want tpi. It will support more power and slightly more rpm than typical big tube aftermarket stuff you see
the FIRST tpi stuff is what i would consider if you want tpi. It will support more power and slightly more rpm than typical big tube aftermarket stuff you see
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes
on
24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: LS versus TPI Stroker Swap
Too bad that FIRST doesnt have an EO#.
Have done some superram projects that made impressive #s and passed smog out here no problem. They were with C4s same thing really.
If hes not worried what a dyno says he can do a TPi build that will sit in traffic all day and make tire smoke when he wants. Still looks stock too. Guess the upside is he can use a cast crank and not worry about it spinning fast enough to hurt itself lol.
Friend got some Dougs LT1 shorties (EO#) and they got past the smog guy as his was an 89. Key thing was no bling under the hood. He had a bit of a rumpity cam 230/236 and it baaarely passed. He switched to a Crower 221/230 and was a lot happier with it.
edit..forgot about the erod, those are nice and legal but youre gonna spend some coin on it!
Have done some superram projects that made impressive #s and passed smog out here no problem. They were with C4s same thing really.
If hes not worried what a dyno says he can do a TPi build that will sit in traffic all day and make tire smoke when he wants. Still looks stock too. Guess the upside is he can use a cast crank and not worry about it spinning fast enough to hurt itself lol.
Friend got some Dougs LT1 shorties (EO#) and they got past the smog guy as his was an 89. Key thing was no bling under the hood. He had a bit of a rumpity cam 230/236 and it baaarely passed. He switched to a Crower 221/230 and was a lot happier with it.
edit..forgot about the erod, those are nice and legal but youre gonna spend some coin on it!
Last edited by cuisinartvette; 09-30-2019 at 04:41 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post