Finally doing the nuclear option
#1
Finally doing the nuclear option
I've had issues with my ignition system, mostly revolving around the ICM, since 2015, documented on here, the longest stretch typically being about a year between failures. I've done it all in terms of diagnostics and parts replacement, testing, etc.
The only thing I haven't done is rip the whole distributor out and replace it all at once, i.e. the nuclear option (in my opinion). I've seen several others with similar issues to mine who have done this and never posted again, which leads me to assume their car stopped eating ICM's.
I thought I had a good fix recently with my heat sink added under the distributor plate, but alas, it has failed again (at about a year, again).
I have tested everything and found no obvious issues, ran all the wiring, etc. etc. etc. I'm going to check the alternator for voltage spikes, again, but don't expect to find anything. I have a new dizzy on order, with a lifetime warranty, just gonna pop it in, check the timing, and see if whatever issue was eating ICM's before will go away.
My thinking is that there just has to be something, probably small, unnoticeable, issue with the current distributor that is causing failures over time. Literally every part has been replaced at one time or another.
At least with the warranty if I have a failure I can get my money back, haha.
Starting this new thread since I know there are folks out there who are also in the same situation (or will be). If you don't see me posting back it's because all went well.
The only thing I haven't done is rip the whole distributor out and replace it all at once, i.e. the nuclear option (in my opinion). I've seen several others with similar issues to mine who have done this and never posted again, which leads me to assume their car stopped eating ICM's.
I thought I had a good fix recently with my heat sink added under the distributor plate, but alas, it has failed again (at about a year, again).
I have tested everything and found no obvious issues, ran all the wiring, etc. etc. etc. I'm going to check the alternator for voltage spikes, again, but don't expect to find anything. I have a new dizzy on order, with a lifetime warranty, just gonna pop it in, check the timing, and see if whatever issue was eating ICM's before will go away.
My thinking is that there just has to be something, probably small, unnoticeable, issue with the current distributor that is causing failures over time. Literally every part has been replaced at one time or another.
At least with the warranty if I have a failure I can get my money back, haha.
Starting this new thread since I know there are folks out there who are also in the same situation (or will be). If you don't see me posting back it's because all went well.
The following users liked this post:
OrangeBird (09-01-2023)
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
Hi RedLeader289, I just replaced yet another ICM myself, and TBH my "nuclear option" plan would be to relocate the ICM out of the distributor and into it own mounting area, with a CPU heatsink and fan scavenged from an old PC. If I ever do get around to it I'll be sure to create a thread with lots of pics
The following 2 users liked this post by OrangeBird:
NoEmissions84TA (09-01-2023), RedLeader289 (09-01-2023)
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
What a sad state of the quality of these Parts TODAY.
The original ICM would have never Over-Heated so easily.
CPU Cooler Thermal Transfer Paste is also Ideal to use.
Mount a Modern CPU to a Massive CPU Cooler without it, and the CPU will Over-Heat!
The original ICM would have never Over-Heated so easily.
CPU Cooler Thermal Transfer Paste is also Ideal to use.
Mount a Modern CPU to a Massive CPU Cooler without it, and the CPU will Over-Heat!
Last edited by vorteciroc; 09-05-2023 at 06:55 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by vorteciroc:
RedLeader289 (09-05-2023), TTOP350 (09-05-2023)
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
While I'd guess they are not manufacturing them, does anyone have any experience with the Davis Unified Ignition (DUI) modules?
https://performancedistributors.com/...d-distributor/
https://performancedistributors.com/...d-distributor/
#7
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
Delcos are failing? That is surprising.
Any rate, I've been running Pertronix for a while now and no issues. Large cap HEI. I also use thermal compound under it, similar to what vorteciroc showed a few posts earlier.
Any rate, I've been running Pertronix for a while now and no issues. Large cap HEI. I also use thermal compound under it, similar to what vorteciroc showed a few posts earlier.
Trending Topics
#9
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
The following users liked this post:
RedLeader289 (09-06-2023)
#10
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
One thing I also did was to add a small braided ground strap to the housing and tie it back to my main ground point at the back of the cylinder head. I don't really trust the distributor clamp to provide a solid ground for the housing, which then goes back through the manifold, bolts with sealer on them, etc...
#11
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
On the bottom of the distributor housing, I drilled a small hole in a spot that won't interfere with any internal components. Then used a self tapping screw to attach the ground strap with a ring lug.
It was a small generic braided strap I got from the local auto parts store. Then ran that strap to a ground stud on the back of the cylinder head where all my other grounds are co-located.
It was a small generic braided strap I got from the local auto parts store. Then ran that strap to a ground stud on the back of the cylinder head where all my other grounds are co-located.
The following 2 users liked this post by ULTM8Z:
NoEmissions84TA (09-08-2023), RedLeader289 (09-06-2023)
The following 2 users liked this post by RedLeader289:
DynoDave43 (09-09-2023), NoEmissions84TA (09-08-2023)
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Meriden, CT 06450
Posts: 4,034
Received 514 Likes
on
430 Posts
Car: 84 TA orig. 305 LG4 "H" E4ME
Engine: 334 SBC - stroked 305 M4ME Q-Jet
Transmission: upgraded 700R4 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 4.10 Posi w Lakewood TA Bars
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
What brand did you go with?
The following users liked this post:
Scott's 83' Z (09-08-2023)
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
I didn't think there were any good Brands for the ICMs/ HEI Modules...
I gave up on them years ago, but if you guys found something reliable, please post it.
Thanks!
Many years ago when I started my Business, I only offered component rebuilding (Distributors, Carbs, TBI Units, Fuel-Pumps, Oil-Pumps, Alternators, Starter-Motors, Etc)...
I used to offer the Pertronix Module for Points Distributor rebuilds.
Half of them would just die without warning 12-Months later... Others lasted for years and years.
I gave up on them years ago, but if you guys found something reliable, please post it.
Thanks!
Many years ago when I started my Business, I only offered component rebuilding (Distributors, Carbs, TBI Units, Fuel-Pumps, Oil-Pumps, Alternators, Starter-Motors, Etc)...
I used to offer the Pertronix Module for Points Distributor rebuilds.
Half of them would just die without warning 12-Months later... Others lasted for years and years.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
I wish you luck there!
I was just recently looking at an ICM for Large Cap HEI (4-PIN) from MSD...
I actually like some of the Design aspects (Particularly Grounding).
It's probably also a piece of junk... but I'd be interested in trying one based on design alone.
#18
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
All of this makes me edgy when contemplating getting a programmable distributor so as to lose the weights, springs and vacuum can features I presently have.
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
#19
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
All of this makes me edgy when contemplating getting a programmable distributor so as to lose the weights, springs and vacuum can features I presently have.
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
#20
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
While (I'll assume) you might have to get into the springs to make the curve correct for what GM asked for, I found one of the limitations of the HEI was the lack of being able to reduce the amount of centrifugal advance that's available.
It doesn't appear to apply to your application (which is great to have a drop-in distributor ready to go), but for me, all of the advance is front loaded (18-20° initial) and the centrifugal adds another 14° or so for the total. IIRC, an HEI has better than 19° baked in and no reasonable means to reduce that. Reasonable meaning not having to weld up the advance slot and work from there.
Once you're satisfied with the ICM surviving, would you post your results rather than the negative response approach? It keeps the flow of information intact with the problem, probable solution and results all tied together.
Good luck.
#21
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
Fair enough.
While (I'll assume) you might have to get into the springs to make the curve correct for what GM asked for, I found one of the limitations of the HEI was the lack of being able to reduce the amount of centrifugal advance that's available.
It doesn't appear to apply to your application (which is great to have a drop-in distributor ready to go), but for me, all of the advance is front loaded (18-20° initial) and the centrifugal adds another 14° or so for the total. IIRC, an HEI has better than 19° baked in and no reasonable means to reduce that. Reasonable meaning not having to weld up the advance slot and work from there.
Once you're satisfied with the ICM surviving, would you post your results rather than the negative response approach? It keeps the flow of information intact with the problem, probable solution and results all tied together.
Good luck.
While (I'll assume) you might have to get into the springs to make the curve correct for what GM asked for, I found one of the limitations of the HEI was the lack of being able to reduce the amount of centrifugal advance that's available.
It doesn't appear to apply to your application (which is great to have a drop-in distributor ready to go), but for me, all of the advance is front loaded (18-20° initial) and the centrifugal adds another 14° or so for the total. IIRC, an HEI has better than 19° baked in and no reasonable means to reduce that. Reasonable meaning not having to weld up the advance slot and work from there.
Once you're satisfied with the ICM surviving, would you post your results rather than the negative response approach? It keeps the flow of information intact with the problem, probable solution and results all tied together.
Good luck.
No stumble on acceleration, idling where I set it, starts right up and idles happily (hot or cold).
As far as my timing curve, etc, that’s a bit out of my range of understanding, just being frank. I know it has an adjustable advance canister but I didn’t even mess with it.
The following users liked this post:
skinny z (09-10-2023)
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
All of this makes me edgy when contemplating getting a programmable distributor so as to lose the weights, springs and vacuum can features I presently have.
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
I've an old and ancient MSD small cap distributor and a 6AL box. It all works very well but is tedious beyond belief to tune.
No HEI for me though but that's just a personal preference.
What do you do for a timing curve?
Coil Dwell is the only aspect that you have no control over.
#23
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
It was different when I had this at my disposal.
But I don't any more. Now I have to lean over the fender...
As for the HEI, the lack of a limiting bushing is problematic. More tedium to make it custom.
The following 2 users liked this post by skinny z:
NoEmissions84TA (09-10-2023), RedLeader289 (09-10-2023)
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Meriden, CT 06450
Posts: 4,034
Received 514 Likes
on
430 Posts
Car: 84 TA orig. 305 LG4 "H" E4ME
Engine: 334 SBC - stroked 305 M4ME Q-Jet
Transmission: upgraded 700R4 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 4.10 Posi w Lakewood TA Bars
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
skinny z - your distributor is set up the same as mine is - as in NO ICM at all.
The magnetic pickup triggers the MSD box directly.
The magnetic pickup triggers the MSD box directly.
#25
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
It does add some complexity as it's not exactly a stand alone HEI.
That said, I know too that the CD box isn't necessary given what's available otherwise however as our OP has witnessed first hand, it can be incredibly frustrating working through this kind of stuff even without the added complexity.
That my combination of parts has done yeoman service for the more than two decades is what keeps it in the game.
The following users liked this post:
NoEmissions84TA (09-10-2023)
#26
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
Yes sir. That would be the case.
It does add some complexity as it's not exactly a stand alone HEI.
That said, I know too that the CD box isn't necessary given what's available otherwise however as our OP has witnessed first hand, it can be incredibly frustrating working through this kind of stuff even without the added complexity.
That my combination of parts has done yeoman service for the more than two decades is what keeps it in the game.
It does add some complexity as it's not exactly a stand alone HEI.
That said, I know too that the CD box isn't necessary given what's available otherwise however as our OP has witnessed first hand, it can be incredibly frustrating working through this kind of stuff even without the added complexity.
That my combination of parts has done yeoman service for the more than two decades is what keeps it in the game.
What kind of set up are you running?
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Meriden, CT 06450
Posts: 4,034
Received 514 Likes
on
430 Posts
Car: 84 TA orig. 305 LG4 "H" E4ME
Engine: 334 SBC - stroked 305 M4ME Q-Jet
Transmission: upgraded 700R4 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 4.10 Posi w Lakewood TA Bars
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
We are talking about an old-school 20+ year old MSD (non digital) box wired directly to the distributor's magnetic pickup coil via the green and purple wires from the MSD box.
Edit: it looks like you can also do this using the MSD digital box. Failure rate of those boxes ???
Download this manual: MSD IGNITION Wiring Diagrams and Tech Notes | PDF | Distributor | Ignition System (scribd.com)
Edit: it looks like you can also do this using the MSD digital box. Failure rate of those boxes ???
Download this manual: MSD IGNITION Wiring Diagrams and Tech Notes | PDF | Distributor | Ignition System (scribd.com)
Last edited by NoEmissions84TA; 09-10-2023 at 06:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
RedLeader289 (09-10-2023)
#28
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
I've an MSD 8461 distributor which has been obsolete for years. It has no module and relies on the ignition box to do that job.
It's been replaced with the 8361. Same functionality though. It too requires an ignition box.
https://www.holley.com/products/igni...let/parts/8361
The ignition box is an MSD 6AL. Wired together they function like an HEI or other conventional electronic ignition. Just with no ICM.
My CD box is also old and has been superseded with the Digital 6AL.
https://www.holley.com/products/igni...eet/parts/6425
I bought a cheapo HEI as a substitute but it doesn't have one particular tuning feature I'm looking for. That being an adjustable mechanical advance limit.
As far as HEI's go, I've read and heard plenty of success stories as stand alone units. Then again, plenty of stories such as your own that have people pulling out their hair.
For the same reason as the ICMs burning up regularly is the same reason I'm hesitant to move to a fully programmable electronic distributor. MSD and the Progressive offerings all have a printed circuit board under the cap. That's a really tough environment for electronics to survive. There are also many stories about the MSD unit giving up after minimal service. There goes 500 bucks! Poof. Literally.
Here's one programmable distributor that's caught my interest. But I think there's a risk involved.
https://progressionignition.com/
It's been replaced with the 8361. Same functionality though. It too requires an ignition box.
https://www.holley.com/products/igni...let/parts/8361
The ignition box is an MSD 6AL. Wired together they function like an HEI or other conventional electronic ignition. Just with no ICM.
My CD box is also old and has been superseded with the Digital 6AL.
https://www.holley.com/products/igni...eet/parts/6425
I bought a cheapo HEI as a substitute but it doesn't have one particular tuning feature I'm looking for. That being an adjustable mechanical advance limit.
As far as HEI's go, I've read and heard plenty of success stories as stand alone units. Then again, plenty of stories such as your own that have people pulling out their hair.
For the same reason as the ICMs burning up regularly is the same reason I'm hesitant to move to a fully programmable electronic distributor. MSD and the Progressive offerings all have a printed circuit board under the cap. That's a really tough environment for electronics to survive. There are also many stories about the MSD unit giving up after minimal service. There goes 500 bucks! Poof. Literally.
Here's one programmable distributor that's caught my interest. But I think there's a risk involved.
https://progressionignition.com/
The following users liked this post:
RedLeader289 (09-10-2023)
#29
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
.
#30
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
We are talking about an old-school 20+ year old MSD (non digital) box wired directly to the distributor's magnetic pickup coil via the green and purple wires from the MSD box.
Edit: it looks like you can also do this using the MSD digital box. Failure rate of those boxes ???
Edit: it looks like you can also do this using the MSD digital box. Failure rate of those boxes ???
That said, it's been as tough as nails. I heard the same isn't the case for more recently manufactured units. The again, what the hell is these days.
I better not have have jinxed myself with this praise for my old junk. I need it to work! Soon too.
The following users liked this post:
RedLeader289 (09-10-2023)
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Meriden, CT 06450
Posts: 4,034
Received 514 Likes
on
430 Posts
Car: 84 TA orig. 305 LG4 "H" E4ME
Engine: 334 SBC - stroked 305 M4ME Q-Jet
Transmission: upgraded 700R4 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 4.10 Posi w Lakewood TA Bars
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
I better not have have jinxed myself with this praise for my old junk. I need it to work! Soon too.
Welcome to my world.
The Progressive distributor sounds great "on paper", but I would be hesitant to use it unless the ignition coil was located outside of the distributor cap. Just my .
Welcome to my world.
The Progressive distributor sounds great "on paper", but I would be hesitant to use it unless the ignition coil was located outside of the distributor cap. Just my .
Last edited by NoEmissions84TA; 09-10-2023 at 06:50 PM.
The following users liked this post:
RedLeader289 (09-10-2023)
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
And wondering as to what Tuning struggles were involved?
I personally find the MSD "Pro-Billet" Distributor very easy to work with the Mech. Advance, and very much LOVE the Limiting Bushing.
As far as the 6AL... it is just going to "Act" as the Set of Points and determine the Coil Dwell Timing and Multiple Ignition Strikes at lower Engine speeds.
It's the same thing as a HEI Module or ICM, but with a Rev-Limiter and Multi-Spark Discharge.
Coil Saturation is maximized for a given Engine Speed.
But doing so for one Cylinder is quite the task...
Unfortunately this Coil needs to deal with the speeds and demands of all 8 Cylinders.
That One Coil has to do a TON of very FAST work for all 8 Cylinders.
Comparing it to the easy job that a Coil on an LSx Engine would have...
IS A MASSIVE JOKE!
#33
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
Bluetooth connectivity only. No laptop interface possible.
And WHO are Progressive and will they be around in 10 years time when I need help?
#34
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
The tuning is simple enough albeit tedious.
The mechanical curve wasn't too bad. I know where I'm going with that. It was the amount of effort I had to put in to dial in my vacuum advance. Lots and lots of back and forth with cause and effect and then further effect. More adjustments. But, I can say that sucker ran like it had EFI was it was all said and done.
Last edited by skinny z; 09-11-2023 at 02:52 PM.
The following users liked this post:
NoEmissions84TA (09-11-2023)
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
The only struggle Mr V is that leaning over the fender gets pretty old after a while.
The tuning is simple enough albeit tedious.
The mechanical curve wasn't too bad. I know where I'm going with that. It was the amount of effort I had to put in to dial in my vacuum advance. Lots and lots of back and forth with cause and effect and then further effect. More adjustments. But, I can say that sucker ran like it had EFI was it was all said and done.
The tuning is simple enough albeit tedious.
The mechanical curve wasn't too bad. I know where I'm going with that. It was the amount of effort I had to put in to dial in my vacuum advance. Lots and lots of back and forth with cause and effect and then further effect. More adjustments. But, I can say that sucker ran like it had EFI was it was all said and done.
So I feel for ya!
Not enjoyable at all.
#36
Supreme Member
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
My hobby shouldn't be the same!
Next up, crawling around on my back on a sheet of cardboard while I button up the bottom side of the old Camaro.
That is after I'm done leaning over the fenders doing the topside!
Thanks for listening....
Last edited by skinny z; 09-11-2023 at 05:50 PM.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Posts: 2,763
Received 739 Likes
on
565 Posts
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Finally doing the nuclear option
I don't envy you having to handle Industrial Electrical work.
I used to get sent in to deal with some of the 3-Phase 480 Volt Equipment in the Lab/ Factory at GM.
Yeah... No thanks. Very happy to be avoiding those electrical issues now.
I used to get sent in to deal with some of the 3-Phase 480 Volt Equipment in the Lab/ Factory at GM.
Yeah... No thanks. Very happy to be avoiding those electrical issues now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post