When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've read the recommendation here several times that when the factory starter dies (or even before then), that an easy/cheap/effective upgrade is to the later style L31 or LT1 starter.
I had the joy of taking a day off work today to change the starter on my L31 powered Express van. The starter has a hefty heat shield on it (good).
As you can see, the proximity of the exhaust manifold to the solenoid makes this shield pretty essential.
Are the clearances similar in an F-body? I can't imagine that they are not. Does the F-body use a similar shield? Or is there no room for one?
I've never used the shield, so I can't comment on the fitment but can say that without it, I've never had a starter issue. Heat soak related or otherwise.
I'm using Hedman LT headers and not manifolds though.
I should qualify that by saying that I did have alignment issues. It was necessary to use a shim to keep the starter gear from crushing the flywheel.
The heat soak issue with stock 3rd gens is usually only present after swapping in headers. I think the recommendations to swap in one of those starters regardless is largely due to simply being a smaller size. Personal experience: bought an 89 IROC with headers already on and a severe case of no start once warm, LT1 starter fixed.
I upgraded to an LT1 starter due to a no start after heat soak issue running SLP headers. It fixed the issue. I can now remove and install the starter without first removing the header now, and it weighs signifigantly less than the stock starter.
Other than it being a tighter reach for the wiring, I wouldn't hesitate to swap.
08-14-2018, 10:27 PM
