Cooling Discuss all of the aspects of cooling that you can think of! Radiators, transmissions, electric fans, etc.

Bottom breather

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2014, 11:37 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DirtySpleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.43 Torsen 10 bolt
Bottom breather

I know that our cars are, for the most part, bottom breathers when it comes to cooling. I feel this is detrimental to its low-speed cooling abilities, and am curious as to whether it is possible/efficient to somehow convert to a front breathing system. The lower air dam seems like it would only work at higher speeds, and wouldnt flow air in an efficient angle to cool the rad. Just brainstorming, Thanks!
Old 02-12-2014, 12:18 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Bottom breather

The air dam also does not work at a dead stop. That's why your fan or fans must be configured IMO differently than the "insane" stock setting/settings.

If your fan/fans are still at a stock setting with a stock thermostat then that's where I would be brainstorming to reach your goal. Configuring the primary fan to a lower "on" setting (190*)with a (180* thermostat) and having the secondary fan as your back up would be considered a efficient front breather.(at least mine is)

My basically stock engine is using a new stock type radiator and that is working fine for me.
A thicker 2 row version could be necessary.

Side note = My IROC-Z has two large holes in the front of the car supplying air to the radiator but the fans must be set correctly to take advantage of that..

Some other makes/model cars have primarily solid fronts and do rely on the air dam/opening much more and desperately need the fans/etc set correctly.

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 02-12-2014 at 12:44 AM.
Old 02-12-2014, 12:43 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DirtySpleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.43 Torsen 10 bolt
Re: Bottom breather

Im actually using the stock large single fan wired to a toggle switch so i control when it runs. Its a pretty good system minus the fact that i really need a new radiator lmao! Im sure dual fans would be even better.
Old 02-12-2014, 02:16 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Bottom breather

In stock form, the dual electric fan cars don't actually use the fans at speeds over 45mph (IIRC). There are a few threads of people changing things to improve cooling efficiency. What interests me most is tilting the radiator to face downward and having a hole in the hood to extract heat from the rad. I eventually want to play around with it, and I think I'm going to attempt removing the center part of the grill and bumper and going with an aftermarket LED light bar to use as fog lights.
Old 02-12-2014, 10:19 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Bottom breather

That 45 mile per hour is IMO laughable. What makes someone think that a puller fan is not needed to PULL that air "through" the radiator.
GM technician’s I guess.

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 02-12-2014 at 10:53 PM.
Old 02-12-2014, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Bottom breather

It works quite well surprisingly. With my LB9 and all aluminum 3row rad I would never see 190+ on a 50* day.
Old 02-12-2014, 10:38 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
Ron U.S.M.C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern, CA
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Bottom breather

DirtySpleen ,or any one.
A very simple way to make your fan come on at any temperature you want is to take the ground wire of the fan that is connected to the switch in the head off and ground it to the car. Then cut the ground wire in the middle somewhere and install a simple temperature sensitive adjustable fan controller. One side of the cut wire goes to one side of the controller and the wire on the other side also connects to the controller. Other than pushing a probe into the radiator THATS IT. The probe installs in the radiator to tell the switch when to come on off. Telling it when to come on is totally up to you. You control it by adjusting the **** on the controller .It turns the fan on and off so you don't need that switch. It can be done using a $20.00 controller.

Anyone that wants to do that with a single fan can do it.


There is also a slightly different independent circuit that can be used with high amp fans and also uses a $20.00 controler

Heres the conroler used in both =http://www.autozone.com/autozone/par...67187_69565_0_

Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; 02-13-2014 at 12:54 AM.
Old 02-12-2014, 10:45 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DirtySpleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.43 Torsen 10 bolt
Re: Bottom breather

Dakota would you recommend a 2 or 3 row? I know that 3 has more surface area to cool, but the 2 row flows air easier for lower speeds. Hmmmm.
Old 02-12-2014, 11:39 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Bottom breather

For a stock engine a skinny 2 row is fine, if it's modified I'd say either a wide 2 row or a 3 row rad. If you buy a quality all aluminum rad, I wouldn't be worried too much about how much it flows, because ultimately you'll be limited by how much your fan pulls. Plus, a quality rad will flow plenty.
Old 03-14-2014, 12:09 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
guitarman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: 42086
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 firebird formula
Engine: 305 to 350 transplant
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: standard
Re: Bottom breather

I have one of those adjustable thermostats with the 180* engine thermostats and it works great. It has a range of 160 to 220 with a thermocouple you insert into the radiator fins. I ran the ground wire to it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
3rd gen money
Electronics
6
10-11-2019 09:57 PM
MrPackstin
Interior Parts for Sale
11
10-25-2017 08:09 PM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
10-06-2015 11:56 AM
Badass355ciz28
Power Adders
4
09-28-2015 08:31 PM



Quick Reply: Bottom breather



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.