Opinions on this look
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Opinions on this look
I ran into some clearance problems putting the torq thrusts back on the Camaro after installing the Vette brakes so I'm trying them out on the Pontiac. Thinking about keeping them on this car and getting another wheel for the Camaro.
Stock
American Racing Torq Thrust II's
Here's how they look on the other car
Stock
American Racing Torq Thrust II's
Here's how they look on the other car
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,668
Received 546 Likes
on
376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Opinions on this look
I used to love 'em. Now I think that they're played out.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
Haha well I'm not getting rid of the rims cuz I still love them, just trying to decide which car to keep them on.
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: Opinions on this look
The Camaro's stance looks good with those wheels but chrome TTII's look awesome with a black car. If you plan on lowering the Formula an inch or two it would look killer; otherwise I'd run them on the Camaro, they make the Formula look like it sits kinda high whereas the stock wheels don't quite so much.
#6
#7
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Culpeper, Va
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 5.7 IROC Dark Red/Blk 92Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R
Re: Opinions on this look
The Camaro's stance looks good with those wheels but chrome TTII's look awesome with a black car. If you plan on lowering the Formula an inch or two it would look killer; otherwise I'd run them on the Camaro, they make the Formula look like it sits kinda high whereas the stock wheels don't quite so much.
Trending Topics
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
I want to lower the car. What kind of effect will that have on how it handles though?
#11
Supreme Member
Re: Opinions on this look
Stock wheels on the formula look like they just need to be left on it.
#12
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firbird formula 350
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Nine Bolt
Re: Opinions on this look
I like the stock Formula wheels better. But ether way, it's a good looking Firebird!
#13
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1985 Z28 & 1997 Z28 SS SLP
Engine: Sbc 305 TPI & LT1
Transmission: 700r4 and A4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt Posi 323 & Posi 323
Re: Opinions on this look
Look better on the camaro, what size TT11s U have, my 15 X 8s were rubbing on bumps on my 84 Z28 so I put them back on my 78 TA, I think my tires were too tall as I had real meaty tires, but my 16 X 8 IROCs fit perfect, thanks
#14
COTM Editor
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: WINDSOR, CO
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
12 Posts
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
Re: Opinions on this look
I agree 100%!
I think that when toned down and made to look more like Vintage Wheel Works V40, or V45 they can have a cool old school road racer look. I would sand/bead blast the centers and brush the lips then clear coat in matte clear with flat caps. That would totally set them apart from every other old man rocking TT2's, and make the subtle enough to run on either car.
I would lower the Formula anyway, no matter where the wheels go. Nice cars man.
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Downriver, MI
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4:10
Re: Opinions on this look
TT2's are nice wheels.. a bit overdone IMO, but they're a classic! Just get the stance right and they'll look great.
#20
COTM Editor (Retired)
Re: Opinions on this look
Youre going to be hard pressed to find another wheel that looks "more right" on a Formula than the factory wheels. The TTs look wrong on the Formula. sits too high too - as in looks like somebody changed the wheels simply for the sake of changing the wheels, with no thought or sense regarding the overall look of the car.
I think those TTs look pretty good on the Camaro, but terrible on the Formula. also, i go in for chrome on white before chrome on black.
TTs are a bit played out, but who cares? with a Third gen, your sort of limited anyway - especially on a Firebird.
again, imho, NOTHING looks better on a formula than the stock wheels. i just wish someone would make a one-off in 17".
I think those TTs look pretty good on the Camaro, but terrible on the Formula. also, i go in for chrome on white before chrome on black.
TTs are a bit played out, but who cares? with a Third gen, your sort of limited anyway - especially on a Firebird.
again, imho, NOTHING looks better on a formula than the stock wheels. i just wish someone would make a one-off in 17".
#21
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Opinions on this look
I grew up with Torque thrusts ... Cragars..... so i'm partial.
I like how you can see the rotors and the spokes have nice depth.
I like how you can see the rotors and the spokes have nice depth.
#22
Senior Member
Re: Opinions on this look
They look better on the camaro.
#23
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Piscataway, N.J.
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula 350, 2002 Grand Prix G
Engine: 350 with SLP & Edlebrock mods
Transmission: 4-speed automatic-700 R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt with 3:73
Re: Opinions on this look
You will also need an adjustable Panhard bar to compensate for the lowered rear end. The biggest problem you will run into is the clearance distance between the cat convertor and the ground which is about 3 1/2". If you drop it down (for looks) you will only have less than 2 1/2" which makes EVERY SPEED BUMP a scrap+plus dips in the road+driveways and so forth. Put on a good set of Alston Sub Frame Connectors and smile for the next week because of the awesome way the car feels (no more squeaks or rattles) and it rides like Cadillac sedan over bumps in the road.
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
You will also need an adjustable Panhard bar to compensate for the lowered rear end. The biggest problem you will run into is the clearance distance between the cat convertor and the ground which is about 3 1/2". If you drop it down (for looks) you will only have less than 2 1/2" which makes EVERY SPEED BUMP a scrap+plus dips in the road+driveways and so forth. Put on a good set of Alston Sub Frame Connectors and smile for the next week because of the awesome way the car feels (no more squeaks or rattles) and it rides like Cadillac sedan over bumps in the road.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
LiquidBlue
Wheels and Tires
32
12-10-2019 04:06 PM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-05-2015 06:23 PM