Pics of my dyno run
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
Pics of my dyno run
i had an oppurtunity to get on a dyno for free, so i put my car on it for sh*ts and giggles... heres some pics
i had a picture of me in the car, but i look really stupid in it so im not posting it
i made 205 wheel horsepower and 269 wheel torque. i attached the dyno graph. i also did the 1/4 mile simulation and ran a 13.9. Its pretty accurate from what i heard from other people who put their car through the 1/4 simulation. mods are in sig...mildly modded 305TPI
here is a link to the graph
i had a picture of me in the car, but i look really stupid in it so im not posting it
i made 205 wheel horsepower and 269 wheel torque. i attached the dyno graph. i also did the 1/4 mile simulation and ran a 13.9. Its pretty accurate from what i heard from other people who put their car through the 1/4 simulation. mods are in sig...mildly modded 305TPI
here is a link to the graph
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Osceola Indiana
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Re: Pics of my dyno run
thats some pretty impressive numbers for a mildly modded 305 now the 13.9 thats seems a little to fast, but maybe
#4
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYTHIRDGEN
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI
Re: Pics of my dyno run
not bad at all, who says 305's are slow??thats impressive rwhp for just exhaust and gears. great looking z too.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Amsterdam , NY
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
Re: Pics of my dyno run
that does seem a little fast to me , i ran a best of 15.25 with my ta , i cant remember if i had 4.10s then , i dont think i did . I think you could do a 14.4 -14.2
#6
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYTHIRDGEN
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROC-Z / '91 Z28 / '91 GTA
Engine: LT4 Hot Cam 305 / L98 355 / MR 383
Transmission: 5-spd / 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:45 / 3:23 / 3:23
Re: Pics of my dyno run
decent numbers for a fairly stock car.. any plans to make more power?
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
Re: Pics of my dyno run
im not taking the 1/4 mile simulation time too seriously guys, i might take it to the track sometime this summer and get a real number. As far as making more power, i might cam it this summer. i know its a 305, but i cant justify a new motor (350 or bigger) when i dont plan on keeping the car for more than a year or so. i can cam it myself at work for under 500 bucks.
#11
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
#12
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYTHIRDGEN
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI
Re: Pics of my dyno run
well if u do sell it (i suggest holding on to it for colective value) make sure u find a good home, that is a really nice car.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '88 IROC-Z / '91 Z28 / '91 GTA
Engine: LT4 Hot Cam 305 / L98 355 / MR 383
Transmission: 5-spd / 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:45 / 3:23 / 3:23
Re: Pics of my dyno run
if your going to hold out for a vette, go C5 or newer IMO
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: Pics of my dyno run
I would also, as those are coming wayy down in prices.
C4 vs 3rd Gen Camaros...i dont know its not worth the switch in my opinion.
I do love vettes, all the gens, but the difference in power isant there, difference in handling isant there, difference in price IS there, difference in styling IS there but im handing that to the 91-92 z28 over a C4.
Ive driven some C4s, they squeak and rattle just as much as third gens and are just as bouncy so the comfort and ride doesnt really favor there way too much.
But to say "i own a vette" is a lot cooler.
I would and will own a vette someday along with my camaro though .
Back to the thread though, that is an impressive dyno run for an almost stock 305TPI car.
C4 vs 3rd Gen Camaros...i dont know its not worth the switch in my opinion.
I do love vettes, all the gens, but the difference in power isant there, difference in handling isant there, difference in price IS there, difference in styling IS there but im handing that to the 91-92 z28 over a C4.
Ive driven some C4s, they squeak and rattle just as much as third gens and are just as bouncy so the comfort and ride doesnt really favor there way too much.
But to say "i own a vette" is a lot cooler.
I would and will own a vette someday along with my camaro though .
Back to the thread though, that is an impressive dyno run for an almost stock 305TPI car.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: St Catharines, ON
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Pics of my dyno run
Nice pics and numbers! Keep the Z though, so much more personality than a C4 imo
#19
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Re: Pics of my dyno run
I would also, as those are coming wayy down in prices.
C4 vs 3rd Gen Camaros...i dont know its not worth the switch in my opinion.
I do love vettes, all the gens, but the difference in power isant there, difference in handling isant there, difference in price IS there, difference in styling IS there but im handing that to the 91-92 z28 over a C4.
Ive driven some C4s, they squeak and rattle just as much as third gens and are just as bouncy so the comfort and ride doesnt really favor there way too much.
But to say "i own a vette" is a lot cooler.
I would and will own a vette someday along with my camaro though .
Back to the thread though, that is an impressive dyno run for an almost stock 305TPI car.
C4 vs 3rd Gen Camaros...i dont know its not worth the switch in my opinion.
I do love vettes, all the gens, but the difference in power isant there, difference in handling isant there, difference in price IS there, difference in styling IS there but im handing that to the 91-92 z28 over a C4.
Ive driven some C4s, they squeak and rattle just as much as third gens and are just as bouncy so the comfort and ride doesnt really favor there way too much.
But to say "i own a vette" is a lot cooler.
I would and will own a vette someday along with my camaro though .
Back to the thread though, that is an impressive dyno run for an almost stock 305TPI car.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Pics of my dyno run
Nice pictures Dan, looks good up on the dyno. I've heard if you switch back to the stock TPI dual filters you can see more horsepower than the cone filter like what you have.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Osceola Indiana
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
#23
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z/28
Engine: 6.3 L98
Transmission: TH350 4500 STALL
Axle/Gears: 3.73s
Re: Pics of my dyno run
Looks good..good numbers..But take that cone filter off the TB and put the stock hose back to the stock dual TPI AIR intake.If you have the baffles out it flows pretty well.Alot better than that cone w/o the hot air from the motor. Lost .2 tenths with one of those turds when my car had stock L98 in it.Just a heads up for ya
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: Pics of my dyno run
Id imagine when the car is cold they would do a better job, but once its hot in the engine bay theyd prolly hurt performance more then a dual snorkle type. Ive been wanting to get one to test out at the track.
#25
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z/28
Engine: 6.3 L98
Transmission: TH350 4500 STALL
Axle/Gears: 3.73s
Re: Pics of my dyno run
lol Dont waste your money bud.My car went 11.0s with the stock dual snorkel with the Miniram intake last year.It flows better than most think.That cone would only do decent in one of these cases with the hood open drawing outside air.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: Pics of my dyno run
Hey ... post the pic with you in the car! It's always good to put a face with a vehicle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
12-02-2016 06:33 PM